.webp?h=10 "Harambe (No Eyes) - GRRRAAHHHH!! UGH UGH UGH!! OOOH OOOH OOOOH! HOOO HOOO! RAAAAHHHRR!! UGH! OOOOOOOHHHHHH!! GRAAAHHH!! RRRRRAAAAHHH! OOOOH! GRRRR!!")
When will the wholesome sexual healthcare subs be restored? Or was this intentional? Qualifications for an overturn are either:
an explicit statement from admin saying it was a bug/oversight and will be/is being corrected, OR
any of the following subs being unbanned (selected at random from a post I saw): /r/rule34, /r/overwatchporn (or /r/overwatch_porn idk), /r/legalteens
No this is permanent (wins if still nothing in 3 days OR an official statement indicating permanence) - 18 bets
Within 1 hour - 2 bets - WINNER!
1-3 hours - 11 bets
3-8 hours - 21 bets
8-24 hours - 8 bets
24-48 hours - 3 bets
48-72 hours - 1 bets
All times are relative to the timestamp of this thread.
Note: as a reminder I do not read threads or comments so this understanding of the situation is based entirely on titles and thumbnails, if it is in error then the situation itself is wrong, not me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It doesn't really matter, whichever I choose everyone will yell about carp rigging bets so I don't see any reason to put much thought into it
Mind not the rdramacel, his words are like so much wind—loud, mindless, harmless, and then gone.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
BIPOC WHAT HAPPENED?!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!metashit carp is fully admitting the bets will be rigged again
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I have already conferred and made the correct bet
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"Carp makes good betting threads" @realKongDick's BUTT!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
A good betting thread for this would've just been:
Is this permanent?
Who cares about the hour windows like neighbor why make it a bet on the hour-by-hour updates instead of the event itself?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You can't close a betting thread with "is this permanent" because then Reddit could always walk it back at some point you FUCKING MORON. People can also maximize winnings (and losses) with more options. The key to a good bet is providing a variety of choices with roughly similar probabilities in a vacuum so bettors can feel smart and use their brains figuring it out. YWNBAJ (and I envy you)
!commenters look at this clown
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I've never ran a betting thread so yea, I'll be humble and concede that maybe you're right.
I'm just saying that from my perspectuve it's more fun to have a low-stakes bet with higher chance of winning vs a high-stakes bet where you have to snipe a low probability. Whereas in a yes-no bet you could use more of your judgment regarding general knowledge of reddit's actions, having to guess it by the hour comes down more to luck than anything. You know what I mean?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Actually screw all this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this is how you do it
@BIGBILLYKONGDONG !commenters !bets:
Would you rather have a betting thread with:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What if I think both of you are r-slurred, but in a good way?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Your roll (1-20): 7 "why dont we... get together and talk about this more!"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Talk about a loaded question. Who's not going to choose the first option?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
10 is too many.
2 is good, it's fun like you said
3-5 is pretty good too
Putting the
in
spookieturkeymerrynew yeardonkeyJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Ok
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Someone did not win his bet.
Smells like a skill issue to me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Maybe you should just git gud at betting
(I goombled away over half my winnings in the first 20 minutes)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I actually won that bet bigly I'm not sure what you're all on about
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
If there are more posts about dramatards seething about the bans getting reversed, then reversing bans wins. If there are more posts about dramatards gloating about redditors seething, ban enthusiasts win.
Measure it purely internally
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context