[I have to make this edit because I overestimated you tards. ENGLISH MOTHERLOVERS. Do you speak it? This post is not about foreign aid in general, whether USAID is corrupt (probably is 
), etc. It is about chuds' attitude to the specific institution USAID over time.]
Above is the google searches for "usaid" over the last 5 years, so it goes all the way back to Trump's first term.
Here's the last month. Notice it has nothing to do with Trump's inauguration. It just suddenly fires up one day when the NPCs got their firmware update.
I've seen chuds all over this place acting like they always knew USAID is corrupt and this has been common knowledge throughout society for a long time.
Here's a good example from @finbarfin: USAID, one of the more infamous money laundering arms of our sprawling government
Infamous? Like Charles Manson? Benedict Arnold? Idi Amin? That Borgia chick who poisoned people? I've never in my life heard someone describe a person as "infamous" because they just became hated by a fraction of the population in the last week.
But Redactor, we've always hated USAID! We've been railing against their corruption for so long.
This site's users are neurodivergent, highly political, mostly right-wing so surely it has come up. Well, let's look at the data. (I know that's what the DOGE boys would do.) It was mentioned in 58 posts, of which 7 are from more than a month ago. It was mentioned in 134 comments, 13 from more than a month ago. Most of these just mention it in passing. Quite a few are negative, but not in the way our current chud program says. Most of these are attacking the politicians who ordered USAID to do something, third world people for stealing, or pointing out the actually true fact that it's largely a corporate welfare program for farmers. I'm not finding anything about corruption in the agency itself.
Did anyone post any evidence that they actually gave a shit about the internal workings of USAID back then? There was one person. Just one person. Can you guess who it was? I'll give you some time to think this over.
It was me! Little old Redactor. Not only did I care, I cared enough to read the entire fricking section of Project 2025 about it.
And what was my opinion of it? It must be some woke soy libtard response. I probably cried on the shoulders of another guy in my polycule. You know me, the left-wing extremist.
I skimmed through Intelligence and USAID. It actually wasn't too scary. Most of it was just boilerplate "we should do things more efficiently" bullshit that could just as easily come from the Democrats. Their only new ideas were funneling aid money to missionaries in Africa and using aid to hurt Iran somehow.
Why did I choose those two sections? Why not health care, education, finance, other more important stuff? Because this was what I felt I was most qualified to evaluate.
I am the only one of you r-slurs who actually knew anything about your issue du jour before now. I even knew what was supposed to be Daddy's game plan for it. You can't deny it. I am the King of Chuds. It's time for you to crown me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Anything that gives any tax dollars to libtards is corruption r-slur. They were censoring the Internet. Flooding the country with Haitians. Instigating revolution in Ukraine. Funding campaigns of pro-crime Soros prosecutors. They're basically the Jews of the 21st century.
Again they were taking my money and using it to start wars, promote replacement migration and violent crime,
ing kids, hosting "kill whitey" seminars, and silencing anyone who talked about this.
!project2025 I may have heard about them last week but I hate them so much
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I really cant tell if redactor is trolling or having a gen x or redditor moment and labeling anyone with concerns as "chuds". rdrama's most "center-left"/"centrist" redditors keep falling into the
behavior when it comes to the political establishment being exposed as a corrupt clique that think they're better than you by virtue of being born in their socioeconomic class. Sometimes I wonder if some people on here are in that class and are projecting. 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He's bragging that he knew about USAID first. That comment I quoted was making fun of chuds for not knowing it was corrupt before now. But I wanted to chud post. So I quoted out of context and responded to it. I liked my chud post so much that I pinned it. !friendsofredactor0 discuss
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He could've written an article about it like Tracing Woodgrains does.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And I could have done it with 50% as many words.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm bragging that I already knew in detail the chud position on a major event for chuds 7 months ago. If you really care so much about this r-slurred shit, how is it that I was the only person who knew anything about it until this week? It really really indicates that chuds are not serious about their positions on these issues and just spout whatever Daddy's latest firmware update told them to.
Sorry dipshit, this is not a post about American foreign policy since Point Four. If you'd like to talk about that, maybe make your own thread in /h/erstory. It's been a keen interest of mine since I was a kid.
Sorry dipshit, you're preaching to the converted. I'm from a one-party blue state. I have way more reason to hate them than you ever will. You can't even fricking begin to imagine.
Sorry dipshit, but have you ever worked for the government? I'm astounded that in a week this is the worst Musk could come up with. Either USAID is running a wayyyy tighter ship than the rest of the government or Musk is extremely turbotarded to not be able to find more. I mean, frick, I personally know of a really huge government corruption scandal that involves way over $100 million and nobody gives a shit because that's such a small amount of money and there's no
s involved.
Please comment if you have anything to say that isn't already answered by those 3 statements. Don't make me get out the Bardfinn apology form.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That is the serious position. That's !project2025 and it's winning!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Gimme a minute, I'm trying to deal with real life and a lot of replies at the same time. OMG it's so hectic!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
As a fellow member of !genx, I may be able to offer some insight into
@Redactor0 et al.'s current predicament. It all stems from being a moderate white guy from the !pnw. For most of his adult life, the Democratic Party genuinely gave a shit about him, at least insofar as politicians can give a shit about anyone. It wasn't just lip service; he was their kind of guy. He didn't have to depend on his interests and the Democrats' interests aligning because his interests were the Democrats' interests. A pretty nice situation, all things considered. 
Unfortunately for him, that's been slowly but surely changing, for both a longer time and to a greater extent than he knew. His interests are no longer the Democrats' interests, and every remotely positive thing they say about or offer of help they make to people like him is nothing but lip service. He's started to realize that over the past year or so, but he doesn't know how to handle it, and it's driving him a little bit insane.
The reason I know all this is that I'm a radical black guy from !dixie. I've always been aware the Democratic Party doesn't give a shit about me and everything they say is lip service at best. So I'm on the outside looking in, watching white boys lose their minds trying to wrap their heads around something I've known all my life. Don't trust politicians or the government to give you shit. If you want something from them, you've gotta make not giving it to you the indisputably more painful option.
Trump, ridiculous as he is, seems to instinctively understand that. Which is impressive, given his background and upbringing. It's also why even though most of the nonsense he's doing right now isn't going to accomplish much in the long term, I actually expect him to get the things he's really after, the stuff at the top of his list. Not because he's some brilliant mastermind playing 12-dimensional uckers, but because he's able and willing to make his opposition hurt if he doesn't get what he wants. The sooner guys like Redactor accept that and move on, the sooner they'll be able to finish their psychotic break.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!nonchuds daily reminder to amplify the voices of black bodies
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!friendsofredactor0 This guy pretty well gets me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't think this is as true as they want to think. I think that they had a false idea of the political parties given to them from the legacy news outlets back then and they didn't have social media that democratized a lot of journ*lism.
This is considered a low IQ, racist southerner opinion to them which prevents them from ever coming to that conclusion.
Their retirement funds are at risk if they support reforming or removing the current establishment.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It was my understanding that Gen X is more right-wing than Boomers and Soylennials, no? Gen Z would be repeating this pattern.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What redactor behavior are you linking to this disconnect?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sneeding over sandshit like any of it actually matters is definitely when he, specifically, is at his most unhinged, and posts like this one certainly aren't making him seem more connected to reality. But I put "et al." in there for a reason. Like
@Kiwibee said, this is hardly a unique thing among moderate liberals at the moment. 
Of course, it's not as though !schizos such as myself are in any position to judge the sanity of others. For instance, I genuinely believe JFK was inadvertently shot by one of his own guards who had drawn his weapon in an effort to fire back at Oswald. Intellectually, I know it's probably not true, but I still believe it. Same goes for most of the untrue things I believe. The contradiction is surprisingly easy to reconcile if you just don't think about it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Wtf would I be sneeding about? They actually formed a cabinet in Lebanon today.
As I've said quite a few times, the reason I developed an interest in precisely because it has nothing to do with me so I can be unbiased.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
the admins of this site literally put their thumbs on the scale to stop it from being too chuddy. The anti-chud drives are funny but this site would be far more right-wing if the admins were more hands off. A good 1/3 of the users are twinky Indians/Asians who start wailing if you're too critical of globalisation. It's not exactly Voat.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The chud drama posted here isn't very entertaining, though. It's so difficult to find any that's truly amusing since they don't have any real institutions and gay catboy Nick Fuentes is basically irrelevant. It's the same boring, performative stuff from marble statue twitter accounts. It'd be like posting democrat party obsessed old women tweets/facebook posts on rdrama.
There just isn't as much chud drama of quality that's funny and the posters here don't put in the effort. Scored and kotakuinaction are such low quality sources given they had their internal drama already and its been the same whining for a decade now.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I've said like 5 times just in this thread that I "have concerns". The problem is just that you're r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
? That's not corruption that's politics you don't agree with
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The state buying sympathetic press is arguably pretty corrupt, especially for leftists who leave out not chance to stress just how important a free press is for democracy. They've used tax money to found campaigning for democrats.
They've also funded censorship laws in europe, which would in turn incentivize social media to be more censorious globally (as that is cheaper) in some cases, which would hurt the free speech of american rightoids too.
Funding BBC allows them to launder sympathetic facts through a reputable brand to shape the narrative and control wikipedia.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Weren't all the press expenditures subscriptions, including to Bloomberg terminals and similar services like Politico Pro?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Potato Potato
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Fortunately I know enough of the English (Massive Cute twink) language to parse this. You're saying you can't bear to live in the same society as "libtards" (70% of the population). Maybe you should move to Russia? They could give you a Chud Autonomous Oblast in Siberia.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If they're 70% of the population then Trump wouldn't be president
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Trump didn't win because he was loved. He won because most voters (like me) refused to vote for either candidate. I didn't do that to give Trump a "mandate" to do whatever he wants.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
this but unironically
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context