Unable to load image

Are tankies more based than the other commies?

Title

3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This implies any kind of commie is based at all. !anticommunists

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Some chuds unironically believe that tankies are "socialists, but racist and therefore based" because Stalin was a drunk uncle type of racist and because the Soviets brutally suppressed dissent.

Not only are online tankies among the soyest bunch of commies, but even heyday USSR tankies propped anti colonialist guerrilas and promoted infiltration within civil rights groups in the US to get assets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_you_are_lynching_Negroes

!anticommunists not to mention literally living on pods, widespread abortion, rampant alcoholism, suppression of the individual.

So based, so much red-pilledness.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd coalition with a Nazbol over a 'socially liberal fiscal conservative' but the former doesn't exist in any appreciable number

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you were forced to live on a 30sq meters pod and be forced to queue to get butter and potty paper I bet you would absolutely miss the globohomo !neolibs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's all fun and games until the @Chuddo-Yudo'tards realize that fascism is essentially communism.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

God hates neoliberals

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Says the guy whose country was run into the ground by woke socialists.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

God hates neoliberals

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you gonna apply for asylum in the US under Trump's refugee plan for Boers? You might miss exotic big game hunting, but weve got sizeable populations of feral boars to cull here.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

probably

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Technically, yes. I world say they're "less stupid" rather than "more based" though. Because:

1. All commies are still stupid.

2. They don't have time for identity politics.

3. They're honest (or dumb) enough to acknowledge that bringing in their ideal society is going to kill a lot of people.

:!#marseydarkcomrade:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They don't have time for identity politics.

Why do people believe that? The Soviet Union pushed for ID politics as psyops or to show their support for anticolonial movements, they had more abortions that any country at the time, they sent a completely unqualified woman to space just because they could claim "first woman in space" title for proto-wokie points. Communism was never socially conservative and was always an "internationalist" movement.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Communism was never socially conservative

You don't seem to be familiar with communism and homosexuality. !gay !anticommunists

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lenin legalized homosexuality and many of the og Bolsheviks were into it.

Just because Stalin and most of Russians were against buttsex doesn't mean highly ideological commies were against it.

But yes, homos fare 100 times better under liberal democracies than under some oppressive dictatorship

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lenin legalized homosexuality

No, he really didn't. That's a popular Reddit exaggeration by commies. What happened is that they declared all czarist law overturned, which happened to include the laws against homosexuality. But it's quite debatable whether the legalization was intentional, what parts of the USSR had the changes, and it wasn't long before Soviets (under Stalin) banned it again in the late 1920s and early '30s. Even in the honeymoon of 1917-early '20s, the situation for homos was still awful both de facto culturally and even under treatment by police and courts with alternative charges like "mental illness."

So, it was never functionally legalized, and the legalization that briefly occurred was questionable in intent and efficacy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Interesting :#marseynotes:

I guess it was just a consensus that gayness was an unnatural sexual deviancy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As with all controversies, there's also a case that the changes by Lenin and his friends were intentional -- but I don't think there's a case that they ever cared to invest real effort/political capital into making the legalization very real.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What, this?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

only based commie is a dead commie

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They are the muslims of communism except way more soy and prone to suicidal ideation

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I like them the most I guess.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Commies are opposite of based and tankies are the most destructive bunch

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tankies are more realistic as they have actually built substantial countries historically.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseychiitan:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.