Unable to load image
Reported by:
  • 2DBussy : "founded over the last 50 years"

[๐Ÿค“๐Ÿค“๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜] Home Depot is more valuable than all major EU companies founded over the last 50 years.

https://old.reddit.com/r/ProfessorFinance/comments/1ix45rz/home_depot_is_more_valuable_than_all_major_eu/

								

								

Most Based Comments

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Our regulatory "regime" protects us from a couple of billionaires taking over our economy and our politics like has happened in the US. It's a great long term investment. (37)

Hilarious you think Europe isn't controlled by a handful of oligarchs. (-19)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Well, then the question stands: why doesn't the market value their equity as highly? (3)

Because, they're not innovative. You're never gonna see brand new anything out of them. They will use US ideas, manufacture and plan them well, but at the end of the day it all relies on the states. (-6)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

That doesn't sound right. Who or what is this source? (10)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

A different mod approved the comment, so I'm letting it stand, but it's still a very poor argument. "America only got its economy because it's uniquely morally evil and deserves to lose it" is a very bad take because it's way too easy to find all the other economies ill-gotten gains, and that's if we can even agree on what is the "right" or "wrong" way to build your economy. The slavery stuff is easy, but there's 500 other things we all do that have to be sorted in an moral absolutist framework. Is oil always bad, or is it ok when Americas enemies like Russia and China produce and consume it? Which angel in Heaven is weighing out the most moral tax policy, the most righteous worker protections, the balancing of profit and loss? Morals can be a part of economics, but nations don't operate on the Ten Commandments, and it's not a video game where rules are hard wired. Nations and corporations aren't human. (1)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”˜

[removed] (0)

The person you replied to was literally referring to the post. The post is about Home Depot's value vs European countries. Now you're saying Home Depot is not innovative. But it's bigger than Europe because Europe is not innovative. Get your shit together before trying to be condescending, it's embarrassing. (1)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”˜

What a ridiculous, brain dead bullshit. Numbers are hard, yea? (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/hughcifer-106103

Score: ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Number of comments: 4

Average angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Maximum angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Minimum angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining! :marseyminer:

:marppy: autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. :marseycapitalistmanlet: Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion :marseyjamming:

134
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Our regulatory "regime" protects us from a couple of billionaires taking over our economy and our politics like has happened in the US. It's a great long term investment. (37)

"I'd rather eat dirt and rocks than tolerate the existence of a billionaire" - average Redditor

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Was it Norway where all the billionaires left when they tried to tax them more lol.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, they tried to tax unrealized gains, which forced them to leave the country to avoid having to liquidate all their assets.

Which is what leftoids in the US want to do as well btw

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Muh no billionaires would exist in an ethical system cope.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A bunch of rednecks voting for a guy supported by 1 rich guy is an oligarchy actually :soysmug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Autocracy is when the candidate I dislike brainwashes a bunch of sheeple into winning a popular vote.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.