:marseyhappening: Cartels are retaliating for being labeled terrorists by using an IED to kill someone

https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1894473557788258617

Born too late to get deployed in a desert

Born too early to get deployed in a desert

Born just in time to get deployed in a desert

:#marseyfsjal: I look forward to the Mexican president pissing herself about how El Donaldo is too mean to the poor in need Cartels.

131
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>"This shocking act of violence highlights the growing threat posed by cartel activity along our southern border."

>"Highlights"

>What an odd choice of word as a way to describe a guy getting blown up by the cartel

>Also odd that highlights just so happens to be an AI buzzword. As is crucial, alarming, utmost importance, remain vigilant, and backbone, which are all mentioned in the text.

>:marseyhmm:

>Throw it into gptzero's AI content checker, which is fairly permissive with finding AI generated text.

>If there's just a handful of human written sentences in an otherwise AI written piece of text, it would float around 40 to 60% probability written by AI.

>Surely it's just coincidence.

>"We are highly confident this text was ai generated. 100% Probability AI generated. We've compared this text to other AI-generated documents. It's similar to the data we've compared it to."

>:marseythonk:

On the one hand, AI content checkers can be off, and GPTZero is middle of the pack compared to others like Originality in getting more accurate answers. I also didn't see it mentioned in the Twitter thread. Maybe I'm just being neurodivergent and getting a bad result, someone can check me on that.

On the other, getting a 100% from GPTzero in current year means you have to be shipping that shit straight from ChatGPT, and it would be really funny if a major Texan official decided to ask ChatGPT to make his response to this incident and just shipped the first draft.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

[X] (formerly [?]) highlights [talking point]

Has been a journoid staple for decades :marseygigaretard: .

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Except the overuse of that as a buzzword for journos is exactly why it's an AI buzzword since it has such a high prevalence in training data. Alongside that this is a statement issued by the state of Texas with the Comissioner's name attached. The standards of writing and style are different than what's expected by a Buzzfeed employee.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

look im gunna have 2 ask u 2 keep ur giant dumps in the potty not in my replys 😷😷😷

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is the future! Ain't it grand?

trans lives matter

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To make it even better, some of the advice given or lack thereof is reading like absolute nonsense when considering it's the Agriculture commissioner giving safety tips to farmers and ranchers:

  • Avoid dirt roads and remote areas: Impractical given that it's cattle ranching, and ranchers are going to be the people who will need to use these roads most often.

  • Avoid cartel controlled regions: How would ranchers identify these regions without more specific information?

  • Limit travel to daylight hours: Agricultural work typically requires work in the early morning and evening.

  • Stay on main roads: I'm going to go out on a limb and say Texas' ranches are like any other ranch in any part of the US that has a lot of ag, which is that many of them are only accessible by secondary roads.

  • Report suspicious activity to law enforcement: how? To which law enforcement agency? Just local police? The sheriff? Send a tip to the Feds? It's incredibly vague on who to report to and how when considering this is cartel activity we're talking about. And there's no mechanism provided to do so. There's actually no mention at all of any specific resources.

  • Basically says LRGV is important and then essentially advises to avoid it. Which is fricking enormous. Also it implies that their so called backbone of Texan agriculture should just be abandoned.

  • Stay vigilant: but gives no specific threat indicators to watch out for, so that's fricking meaningless.

  • Refrain from touching unfamiliar objects: Yeah, that makes sense for a military context for dealing with IEDs. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that's pretty impractical for farmers and ranchers who on a daily basis need to handle a variety of objects, cowtools, and miscellaneous materials.

  • I guess Visitors to Mexico and people who operate near the border are addressed in the same statement regarding the same threat. As though those are groups with the same needs.

  • The statement describes an IED attack. Then gives advice on how to avoid random encounters. Perfect advice for an IED, which tend to be sophisticated and planned actions.

Now I'm not a Texan or a rancher. I might be making some redditor observations and talking out of my butt or out of my depth. I probably am at a few points. But some of this seems pretty suspect and strange considering it's by the guy who oversees agriculture in the entire darn state of Texas, where agriculture is a multi-billion dollar industry. The person, who above all else, should understand daily life realities of farmers and how to give practical, specific guidance.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16844996389783444.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

T... Try to keep yourself safe

H... how will you keep yourself safe

I... It is the solution to all your troubles

N... No point in staying alive

K... Keep yourself safe NOW

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.