Unable to load image

[🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓] Why do Americans not seem to care about school shootings?

https://old.reddit.com/r/AskUS/comments/1jo44jp/why_do_americans_not_seem_to_care_about_school/

								

								

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Ahh yeah the shootings only happen in 1 country so that must be the meds that are used world wide. Just say that you don't care and be honest about it. As long as it's not your kids getting shot you couldn't care less. (25)

It seems like an impossible challenge for leftists to understand how to argue.Convincing others that your position is superior is a lot easier when you're not telling them they are horrible people.A large campaign in your local community and a couple of safe companies had a positive impact where I live, but I'll try telling other FUDs they just want to kill children.Bold strategy, seems to be playing out great. (-13)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Most of us care. But a loud regressive well funded minority of buttholes pump propaganda about guns and freedom. (44)

The second amendment is propaganda? (-14)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Because some people care about guns more than children's lives. (110)

Everyone cares when kids lose their lives. I have 2 young kids and I have several guns and I hunt. If you think people don't care then you have been captured by propaganda. At this point making guns illegal is not realistic in this country. People don't support outlawing guns because it won't fix the problem. Older guys I know would go to school with hunting rifles in their truck back window. No one got shot. There is a big movement to do more research on school shooters and SSRIs but then again if we do that it would cause a stigma on pharmaceuticals and some people would lose a lot of money. So the counter argument would be why do Americans love their prescriptions more than kids lives? (-15)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

I'll give you some lee way since you put "Seem to" but as most questions on here, the question comes loaded by design. How come past America older teens actually purchased guns out of catalogs and were allowed to bring them to school and store them until the end of the day and there was not 1 school shooting, yet now in more modern times guns are banned from schools, and there's more school shootings. Anybody going to look into that or no? Got to ask why and what factors contribute to such a shift. Idk why everyone pretends it's the guns or perhaps they believe it is incorrectly but has done zero historical research on America and guns. We have more guns in USA than people, YET this issue of school shootings is new, and it's still not as high as you would think it is for a country with more guns than people. We have 365 Million plus population, and more guns than that. Also, Canada is not America, the formulation of a country and it's foundational laws and rights matter. Canada did ... (0)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

I'm going to get shit on for this, because Reddit is full of Leftoids and Leftoids love gun control. America has always had guns, but it didn't always have a mass shooting problem. At one point in time, schools had shooting ranges, and kids would bring guns to school so they could go hunting after school. At some point in our nation's history, something happened to our people. I don't know what it is, but, for some reason, Leftoids seem pathologically adverse to looking into what changed.In as little words as possible, what I believe to have happened is a mix of quotes from Jordan Peterson and ShortFatOtaku.It's revenge against God for the crime of being. Someone has to pay for my misery, and God is out of reach. Seems like the further away from homesteading we got, and the better our conditions got, the more unhappy with existence we became. Bitter. Angry. Resentful. That guy has more than me. His wife is prettier. He has nicer things. A bigger house. A better life. I de... (1)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Because some people care about guns more than children's lives. (110)

So sick of reading this misguided take. Time and time again, people such as yourself imagine a world "if only people cared about kids more by removing constitutional rights, we'd be safe!" and "Shouldn't one kids life be worth that effort?"OK. Shouldn't kids lives be worth physical security? The immediate response to that is "OMG why have schools be like prisons! We cannot have that!" What happened to "Isn't it worth one kids life?"We have physical security in all areas of society. Corporate offices, banks, government buildings, airports, sports arenas, concert venues, bars, etc. So you're totally cool with having controlled ingress/egress and scanners for contraband there, but not at schools? Explain why kids lives are less important, I'll wait.Now onto the gun debate. Let's assume we all agreed if we had zero guns there wouldn't be school shootings (similar to "you can't drown in the backyard if there are no pools" argument). OK there's probably 400,000,000 firearms in this countr... (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/jayp196

Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🐮(+1🐮)

Number of comments: 11

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining! :marseyminer:

:marppy: autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. :marseycapitalistmanlet: Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion :marseyjamming:

46
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

its the same reason why "people dont care about kids dhing in car accidents". About as many children die in car accidents every year. Driving a car is not a fundamental right or even a right in any regard, so it would be very easy to create mpre refulations/legislation on it. If they passed a law that all children under age 16 lets say have to wear a helmet in the car it wpuld save at least hundreds if not tjousands of children's lives. They dont do that tho bc such lehislation would be burdensome and unpopular and the politic8ans who forxed that on people wpuldnt get reelected. Why does no one virtue signal about rhe children by going after the "evil auto manifacturers" killing thousands of cjildren every hear with their products?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because killing things isn't the purpose of a car

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That doesnt counter anything I just said. The purpose of lawn darts wasnt to kill peple butt that didnt stop regulators from banning them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Comparing school shootings to car accidents is a genuinely r-slurred comparison. Even lawn darts is fricking dumb. Cars serve an important practical non-violent purpose for society but sometimes things happen with them to cause harm. Guns exist for the purpose of shooting things. Lawn darts are a purely leisure item whose usefulness didn't outweigh the danger they caused.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Guns being prevalent in America is the only reason the cops here don't go full boot-on-face mode like in Eastern Europe and Australia.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not even being anti-gun. I just think it's r-slurred to compare car accidents to shootings

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

guns serve an important practical violent purpose for society but sometimes things happen with them (this is "a car drove into a crowd" language :marseydisgust:)

sometimes people kill each other

guns exist for the purpose of shooting things,

however shooting things is no less practical or important a purpose than getting from A to B :marseyindignant:

the usefulness IS the danger they cause

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lawn darts are a purely leisure item whose usefulness didn't outweigh the danger they caused.

and they still got banned, unlike guns :hmm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Im comparing preventable deaths to even more preventable deaths. You cant regulate or ban guns nearly as easy as you could regulate cars. If saving lives were a concern they could pullout more regulations on cars to save lives butt theh dont bc it would be impractical/unpopular. Youre argument seems to come down to some type of philosphy pertaining to the intent of rhe killing, like a child who dies in a car accident is somehow more moral than a kid killed by a gun, butt at the end of the day a death is a death and legally its much easier to save lives by regulating cars than by regulating guns bc their is no constitutional protection or right to drive a car. Any politician more concerned with regulating/banning guns than refulating cars to make them safer is clearly a powerhungry hippocryt

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

maybe not the one YOU built

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It is when I'm behind the wheel!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And the vast majority of civilian-owned guns are not being bought by someone who wants to maximize their body count. Apart from a few gangbangers and psychos people own guns in the hope that they won't have to actually shoot anyone.

You could just as easily say that the "purpose" of nuclear weapons is to kill people, but none of the countries with nuclear weapons actually built them hoping to use them someday.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.