Most Based Comments
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘
Ahh yeah the shootings only happen in 1 country so that must be the meds that are used world wide. Just say that you don't care and be honest about it. As long as it's not your kids getting shot you couldn't care less. (25)
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘
Most of us care. But a loud regressive well funded minority of buttholes pump propaganda about guns and freedom. (44)
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘
Because some people care about guns more than children's lives. (110)
Angriest Comments
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Because some people care about guns more than children's lives. (110)
Biggest Lolcow: /u/jayp196
Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🐮(+1🐮)
Number of comments: 11
Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!
autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents.
Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
its the same reason why "people dont care about kids dhing in car accidents". About as many children die in car accidents every year. Driving a car is not a fundamental right or even a right in any regard, so it would be very easy to create mpre refulations/legislation on it. If they passed a law that all children under age 16 lets say have to wear a helmet in the car it wpuld save at least hundreds if not tjousands of children's lives. They dont do that tho bc such lehislation would be burdensome and unpopular and the politic8ans who forxed that on people wpuldnt get reelected. Why does no one virtue signal about rhe children by going after the "evil auto manifacturers" killing thousands of cjildren every hear with their products?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because killing things isn't the purpose of a car
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That doesnt counter anything I just said. The purpose of lawn darts wasnt to kill peple butt that didnt stop regulators from banning them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Comparing school shootings to car accidents is a genuinely r-slurred comparison. Even lawn darts is fricking dumb. Cars serve an important practical non-violent purpose for society but sometimes things happen with them to cause harm. Guns exist for the purpose of shooting things. Lawn darts are a purely leisure item whose usefulness didn't outweigh the danger they caused.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Guns being prevalent in America is the only reason the cops here don't go full boot-on-face mode like in Eastern Europe and Australia.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not even being anti-gun. I just think it's r-slurred to compare car accidents to shootings
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
guns serve an important practical violent purpose for society but sometimes
)
things happen with them(this is "a car drove into a crowd" languagesometimes people kill each other
guns exist for the purpose of shooting things,
however shooting things is no less practical or important a purpose than getting from A to B
the usefulness IS the danger they cause
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
and they still got banned, unlike guns
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Im comparing preventable deaths to even more preventable deaths. You cant regulate or ban guns nearly as easy as you could regulate cars. If saving lives were a concern they could pullout more regulations on cars to save lives butt theh dont bc it would be impractical/unpopular. Youre argument seems to come down to some type of philosphy pertaining to the intent of rhe killing, like a child who dies in a car accident is somehow more moral than a kid killed by a gun, butt at the end of the day a death is a death and legally its much easier to save lives by regulating cars than by regulating guns bc their is no constitutional protection or right to drive a car. Any politician more concerned with regulating/banning guns than refulating cars to make them safer is clearly a powerhungry hippocryt
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
maybe not the one YOU built
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It is when I'm behind the wheel!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
And the vast majority of civilian-owned guns are not being bought by someone who wants to maximize their body count. Apart from a few gangbangers and psychos people own guns in the hope that they won't have to actually shoot anyone.
You could just as easily say that the "purpose" of nuclear weapons is to kill people, but none of the countries with nuclear weapons actually built them hoping to use them someday.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context