It's day three of me literally just posting wholesome bible verses to /r/Christianity, and the """Christians""" are tired of this tomfoolery

Papist agents have been dispatched to your location.

If the baby survived, the mother has to keep it.

But that's not true now. Ignoring abortions entirely, if a woman gets pregnant, carries the pregnancy to term, and gives birth to a healthy child, they're still allowed to just dump them at a safe harbor location and sever all ties.

What's the argument here though?

I understand your pain. Redditors are too stupid to clarify what they're arguing about, so let's try:

tard1: You know the vast majority of abortions aren't for what one could call a 'baby', but a collection of cells too small to see. No thoughts, no awareness, no senses.

Translation: The definition of a baby involves more than just a thoughtless, unaware, senseless collection of cells. [Implied: there has to be something else to fully constitute a "baby."]

tard2: Very, very, very few people advocate for late term abortions [appeal to majority: most do not support late-term abortions]]

tard2: If a woman aborts a fetus that's of an age where it might be viable, something went extremely wrong and the woman is giving up a baby she really wanted

Translation: I partially agree; however, the viability of the fetus and [somehow] the intense desire of the woman wanting the baby are relevant.

That's it. No, I'm not going to look at the thread for additional context. It's an issue of semantics, mainly revolving around "personhood status." No philosopher has figured that out, so the abortion debate will rage on.

My solution is to provide abortions by way of medically-induced deliveries. If the baby survived, the mother has to keep it. If the baby dies, the abortion was a success. This approach solves all the complexity and should make everyone happy.

The "flip a coin" method is nice, but few will appreciate its ineffectiveness. Yeah, the rights of both parties matter, but again you're begging the question by assuming that the unborn baby is a person with said rights. You want to avoid that semantics issue, but ya can't. No one really can.

I'd just settle for <12-20 weeks = abortion zone.