Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Where the heck do you people work that this shit comes up all the time? Learn to factory, cute twinks.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is (part of) why she got fired.

![](/images/16571100102825463.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyclown3:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

An inquiry found that Miss Forstater had brought the organisation into disrepute

this is some muzzie sharia law level shit lol, "she bought disrepute to the family! stone her!"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literal blasphemy shit.

It's not enough to accept that other people believe something, you have to believe it too.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wokeness is a religion - a very intolerant religion that believes in firing and shaming anybody who doesn't hold the same beliefs.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Clearly humans as a group have a need for some sort of codified shared behavioural system, and that need manifested as traditional organised religion.

When muh atheists came along and were too enlightened for traditional organised religions, they didn't get rid of the underlying need, and stuff like wokism and trumpism and other wingcuckeries have swelled up to full the vacuum.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, I find this theory very compelling also.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Your comment is ignorant and offensive. Traditional organized religions are not the only way to meet the need for a codified shared behavioral system. Atheists are just as capable of developing and adhering to such a system without resorting to religion. And the rise of wokism, trumpism, and other wingcuckeries is not due to the lack of traditional organized religions, but to the fact that those who espouse these ideologies are ignorant bigots who are more interested in promoting their own agendas than in actually making the world a better place for all.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

One of the biggest atheist YouTubers back in the day is literally an antisjw incel. So, you're wrong. Also Dawkins another prominent atheist back in the day, hates the woke shitters. They've both been targeted by the wokes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Fighting against and fighting for wokeness are two sides of the same coin.

Only grillpillers are truly free of the shackles of nu-religion

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

YOU'RE WRONG BECAUSE TWO EXAMPLES

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He is wrong because what he said was r-slurred

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To be fair, i'm not happy sharing a pronoun with the terrifying combination of soy and p-do going on in that picture.

'They' is clearly the most appropriate pronoun. Unless 'it' is on the table.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Unless 'it' is on the table

Be the change you wish to see in the world.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That thing is definitely not a male. She deserved the fine if she thought otherwise :marseynails:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.