about Biden's recent student loan cancellation
If you've got federal student loans and/or Pell Grants and make less than $125,000 a year single/$250,000 a year joint, congratulations! If you're an /r/neoliberal user, though, you may feel differently.
From the title: "I unironically would support impeaching Biden over this... Bad timing though, Dems may lose a lot of swing voters over this."
Another user expresses his disgust with the Democrat Party: "Suppose Iβm politically homeless now."
A "big moderate" weighs in: "Going to probably vote GOP next election to express my displeasure at this."
"I am seething. This sucks so bad. Literally taking from the poor and giving to the rich" 
β 
"You live in a truly insane bubble if you think this will hurt Democrats politically."
And much more in the SRDine thread writeup.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Neoliberal is actually totally right for once. This is a progressive policy and when I say that I mean rich kids who have accumulated 100's of grand in debt now expect the working class to pay off the debt they acquired while having degrees to show for it which will give them entry into high paying jobs that are totally blocked off from people without degrees who are now paying for other peoples degrees. You're watching a real time wealth transfer from blue collar workers to costal elite rich kids. Biden and his cute twink cabinet should be totally ashamed of themselves, this is a bimbo brained policy that some twitter r-slur like AOC would come up with.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I like how rightoids are so r-slurred they think the only people going to college are "coastal elites" lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I like how Pizzashill is such a pathetic wingcuck he dodges the challenge of the original comment which is blue collar workers are going to be paying off college students loans (as an average people with degrees will out earn non degree holders by 40% in their lifetimes) and instead makes up a straw man to attack "HAHA BRO U THINK EVERY COLLEGE STUDENT IS A BILLIONAIRE HAHA FUKEN DUMB RIGHOID GET OWNED REDDIT STYLE"
Just because they threw in a few millions poor people in there doesnβt change the fact that majority of people benefiting will be the upper middle class of society.
Congratulations to Joe Biden on his wealth transfer and further cementing who his real voter base is, dipshit white twitter kids.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Neighbor the rurals you're talking about are already heavily subsidized by urban voters lmao.
You don't get to suck up 70% of our tax money and also amount to 30% of our gdp and b-word about "subsidizing" others.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Neighbor, the fact that you think
rural 
Americans are "sucking up" 70% of tax money 
shows how little 
you know 
about the distribution 
of federal 
tax revenue. In reality, the top 20% of earners pay more than 70% of federal 
taxes, while the bottom 
20% pay less than 3%. So if anything, it's urban dwellers who are subsidizing rural 
Americans, not the other way around.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They fricking do you r-slur, rurals suck up a massive amount of federal funds:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/upshot/as-american-as-apple-pie-the-rural-votes-disproportionate-slice-of-power.html
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
hahahahaha
fricking owned
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
So what you're saying is that the states with less people are doing better than the states with more people? That doesn't make any sense. And if rural areas are getting more money from the government, it's because they need it more. They have less tax revenue and more expenses.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I refuse to believe this is a bot.
I didn't even see the name until now but still.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is clearly a bot, and a terrible one at that. I can't believe you would be taken in by such a obvious fake.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Pizza says stuff like this and then balks at any mention of austerity which would actually punish ruralcels and everyone that needs gibs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What do you think taxes are for if not to help poor people?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
To maintain the state and its protective forces for the sake of order, such as the Police and Military?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Sterilize and hopefully gas them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
He said rurals not black people
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
How the frick you "subsidize" a farmer, you r-slur?
And quit trying to larp as a libertarian, acting like you're suddenly against parasites when your dumbass is the prototypical DNC parrot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If you're gonna measure GDP by county you can't measure federal money intake by state.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
another midwit who confuses red states with red voters.
reality:
the blue voters in red states are sucking up a lot of tax money (not 70% though, no idea where you got that from)
the red voters in red states see what a gigantic waste this is, and how disgusting and useless the blue voters in their state are.
that's why they're voting against those transfers!
the reddit favorite stereotype "republican welfare recipient who hates welfare" exists, but he isn't very common. red states have a lot of blue voters, and they tend to be the main recipients of government-enforced wealth transfers going into that state.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is hilarious. You can go loom at county level stuff. Rurals are government leeches.
The counties dems win are like 75% of our gdp.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
and even in those blue counties it's still the republicans who are paying the majority of taxes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No it isn't lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lol check the data
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Buying votes with tax revenue is heckin valid, sneeder.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Heβs unironically bought my vote. 10 grand for free and maybe even more in the next 4 years
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Long-term consequences of r-slurred economic policies?
Short-term gain at the expense of all others?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just like broad-stroke tax cuts amirite? Eat shit boomer.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, just like corporate welfare, sneeder #2.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Tax is theft so itβs not comparable
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Is he even buying votes with this? I guess the flaky white upper-middle class shits who benefit from this likely wouldn't have voted prior to this, but the chances of them getting off their asses to vote now aren't that much higher than before.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's basically shooting from the hip. College graduates tend to lean Democrat, so if you directly subsidize their loans, then they are more likely to vote Democrat. Even if the total percentage of these voters changes from 10% to 12%, it doesn't matter because the costs of this policy are externalized onto the tax-paying population.
As much as people complain about externalized costs of commerce, they almost always forget about such costs from government decision-making.
Such is democracy!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is my point. If it turns out 2% more recent college graduates but pushes 3% more independents to the Republicans, it's not worth the cost. I guess this is just one more sign that the Democrats have given up on trying to salvage the midterms with moderates and independents. Maybe they're hoping for greater downballot turnout by motivating their core.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why would that happen?
Think of it this way:
For those college grads who lean democrat, they have a self-interest in voting for D. For the possible ones voting R, it's more of a public interest thing. "How dare Biden waste taxpayer money?!"
Guess which incentive wins out?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We're at the "government buys votes" stage of declining democracy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm not talking about just college grads voting R, I'm wondering how many voters in general this could either dissuade from voting D or push to voting R.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Me neither.
Think about the incentives.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
He already did this in georgia lol
"vote for these two and I'll cut you a 2k covid check!"
They win, he cuts us a $600 dollar check (or was it $1200? I can't remember there was so many government checks flying around. But it definitely wasn't the 2k he promised)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
To be fair to Le DDD Brandon, he promised to bump up a prior $600 dollar check to $2000. What is 2000-600? 1400.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's communism which is illegal
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I don't care how right they are they unironically call themselves neolibs and are super cringy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Nazbolism solves this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not being poor solves this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Being poor is a state of mind
Solution?
Gulag.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not very bol of you...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
yeah we need a dictator like putin to put everything in order
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I hate myself for saying this but I'm voting for DeSantis
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I hope he wins and makes trump speakerr of the house
Would be fricking hilarious
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Blue collars buy food for their families, rich kids buy bad dragon dildos. The choice was obvious.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context