about Biden's recent student loan cancellation
If you've got federal student loans and/or Pell Grants and make less than $125,000 a year single/$250,000 a year joint, congratulations! If you're an /r/neoliberal user, though, you may feel differently.
From the title: "I unironically would support impeaching Biden over this... Bad timing though, Dems may lose a lot of swing voters over this."
Another user expresses his disgust with the Democrat Party: "Suppose Iβm politically homeless now."
A "big moderate" weighs in: "Going to probably vote GOP next election to express my displeasure at this."
"I am seething. This sucks so bad. Literally taking from the poor and giving to the rich" 
β 
"You live in a truly insane bubble if you think this will hurt Democrats politically."
And much more in the SRDine thread writeup.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Neighbor the rurals you're talking about are already heavily subsidized by urban voters lmao.
You don't get to suck up 70% of our tax money and also amount to 30% of our gdp and b-word about "subsidizing" others.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Neighbor, the fact that you think
rural 
Americans are "sucking up" 70% of tax money 
shows how little 
you know 
about the distribution 
of federal 
tax revenue. In reality, the top 20% of earners pay more than 70% of federal 
taxes, while the bottom 
20% pay less than 3%. So if anything, it's urban dwellers who are subsidizing rural 
Americans, not the other way around.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They fricking do you r-slur, rurals suck up a massive amount of federal funds:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/upshot/as-american-as-apple-pie-the-rural-votes-disproportionate-slice-of-power.html
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So what you're saying is that the states with less people are doing better than the states with more people? That doesn't make any sense. And if rural areas are getting more money from the government, it's because they need it more. They have less tax revenue and more expenses.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I refuse to believe this is a bot.
I didn't even see the name until now but still.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is clearly a bot, and a terrible one at that. I can't believe you would be taken in by such a obvious fake.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pizza outsmarted by a bot
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pizza is a food, not a sentient being. How could it be outsmarted by anything?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pizza you just got called non sentient by a non sentient being I think its time to rope
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
To be fair, similar levels of consistency.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lmaooo
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Laughing at other people is really immature and childish. Grow up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
hahahahaha
fricking owned
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Pizza says stuff like this and then balks at any mention of austerity which would actually punish ruralcels and everyone that needs gibs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What do you think taxes are for if not to help poor people?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
To maintain the state and its protective forces for the sake of order, such as the Police and Military?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Sterilize and hopefully gas them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
He said rurals not black people
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
How the frick you "subsidize" a farmer, you r-slur?
And quit trying to larp as a libertarian, acting like you're suddenly against parasites when your dumbass is the prototypical DNC parrot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If you're gonna measure GDP by county you can't measure federal money intake by state.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
another midwit who confuses red states with red voters.
reality:
the blue voters in red states are sucking up a lot of tax money (not 70% though, no idea where you got that from)
the red voters in red states see what a gigantic waste this is, and how disgusting and useless the blue voters in their state are.
that's why they're voting against those transfers!
the reddit favorite stereotype "republican welfare recipient who hates welfare" exists, but he isn't very common. red states have a lot of blue voters, and they tend to be the main recipients of government-enforced wealth transfers going into that state.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is hilarious. You can go loom at county level stuff. Rurals are government leeches.
The counties dems win are like 75% of our gdp.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
and even in those blue counties it's still the republicans who are paying the majority of taxes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No it isn't lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lol check the data
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I have, several times. You are delusional if you think the largest counties in America, counties in which democrats win by 70% are funded by republicans.
You'd have to be a literal r-slur to believe this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
check again
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context