- 213
- 232
Bottom text lmao.
AMA
- BananaSundae : Wait, I thought this was a drama site. Why are there a bunch of cute twinks serious posting itt?
- 180
- 106
For many, many years, I've recorded that my girls outperform the boys by a wide margin. In my case, the measured difference between them is so large that I cannot help but think something is wrong with our boys, particularly after I also account for their general behavior.
If I test 100 children and score work blindly, with names removed, the top 90% will be girls, and it has been so for a couple decades.
Sounds like you teach grade school.
Boys largely struggle to follow simple directions. Working memory is poor. Executive functioning is minimal. They are impulsive to the core, constantly distracted, and unable to perform at grade level. Compared to girls, the boys leave me feeling as if I where working with infants and toddlers. Most students we have in our special education programs and those with IEPs are boys. In every class I've had, most of the boys strike me as being mentally handicapped. Yes, there are outliers. There are always outliers amongst both genders.
lmao These literal children would rather play than listen to me, are they retarded?
I don't know if boys ever catch up,
Considering !fellas outperform !biofoids almost across the board I'd say they do more than catch up
but I do not suspect that to be the case, given the deltas I record every day. I'm familiar with the old anecdotes of boys maturing slower and being a couple years behind the emotional development of girls, but this appears to be something more ominous.
No, boys are just tuff enough that they don't falter the moment you crack the whip.
its called the patriarchy. Boys are not held to the same social standards as girls.
Then why are boys the most likely to be punished?
The patriarchy, which leaves boys behind?
The sentiment is that low achieving boys will achieve higher than high achieving women because of patriarchal standards.
These boys DON'T have to try hard because the system is meant for them to succeed.
Are you literally retarded? They don't try because they don't care. They're children who'd rather be playing amongst themselves.
Except that's not an explanation for what's happening here. Boys aren't doing worse in high school because they "have an understanding" that they will succeed later on. They're just...failing.
They aren't just failing in K-12, either. The success of boys in a continual downtrend at college as well.
It's bizarre to me that someone would look at a kid who is going to drop out of high school and say "Well, the patriarchy!" like it's a point worth making in that context.
It's because teachers are made up solely of unicels who had it pounded into their head that patriarchy
was the great satan that caused all sin in the world.
Teachers are mostly women. Parents who actually parent are mostly women. Males are taught to not respect or listen to women. It's not difficult stuff to grasp.
That doesn't track at all. Somehow the majority of authority in a boys life is female and he's taught not to respect them? No, hr learns not to respect them. Seeing teachers fail basic physical tasks, bow down to empty authority and go on childish power trips teaches him not to respect women.
- BananaSundae : >brave browser
- of_blood_and_salt : who
- ULTRA-NIGMATIC-MEGA-HOMO : Brave is good
- DickButtKiss : Im horny i want some dramatard kitty any ladies let a fat neighbor hit?
- 174
- 77
- 153
- 221
Cute pictures of her new velvet hippo Hickory:
Some of the typical comments:
Hickory is going to need lots of tennis balls!! I love him so much. Completely adorable! 🧡💙
⠀
He's beautiful I love him 🥰❤️ congratulations!
⠀
Honey still seems displeased.
Displeased? She looks like she's completely disassociated. Unable to comprehend the horror of the situation.
Only 3 hours later, disaster strikes!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
He's NOT a bad boy he's so sweet he only chewed on my dog's head a little bit
GOOD idea, there's too many toddlers in the world anyway
I can't be the only one who finds the juxtaposition funny between the sparkly hearts and the advice on how to stop your dogs eating each other
Bonus Post
- 152
- 148
Copy pasting the first part of this so lazy girlies don't have to experience the stress of !clinklickers
As the sheen on dating apps dulls, more Americans are reporting bad experiences on them. Frustrated by bots, subscription costs and high effort-to-reward ratios, Gen Z is fleeing the apps in hope of real-life meet-cutes. Earlier this year, “Bustle” declared that dating apps are in their “flop era.”
Not all of the apps are taking this backlash without a fight. On Tuesday, after months of internal shake-ups and stock market woes, Bumble took a shot at winning back hearts and minds with a redesign, which includes a break with the app's requirement that women make the first move.
A new feature, which the company has called “Opening Moves,” allows women to place on their profiles a question, like “What is your dream vacation?,” to which men who match can respond. (In nonbinary and same-gender matches, both sides can include these prompts.)
The shift is a major one for Bumble. Until now, a man who matched with a woman on the app had to wait for her to message him. If she did not initiate a conversation, the match would expire after 24 hours.
Whitney Wolfe Herd founded Bumble in 2014 because of her own personal experiences. She said that the idea was to give women more control. “I had a series of bad relationships, and I felt I was controlled by a man,” she added, “whether it was: Don't wear this or, You can't hang out with this person or, You need to be home at this time.”
But over the years, Bumble received feedback from women who found that making the first move was “a lot of work” or “a burden,” and Ms. Wolfe Herd began thinking about how to release the pressure. Opening Moves, she said, is a result of that process, a way to let women maintain control while not feeling the stress of initiating all of the conversations.
But not copying the whole thing because The Gray Lady be a notoriously litigious b-word.
- Grue : /h/slackernews
- 134
- 142
Didn't see any drama threads about this. Governor Newsom signed a bill that would raise utility bills for Californians based on income.
Under $28,000 income — $24 per month
$28,000 to $69,000 income — $34 per month
$69,000 to $180,000 income –$73 per month
Over $180,000 income — $128 per month
This is on top of current utility rates.
Commiefornia Redditors in the thread explain they're happy to pay the increases while others are screaming for the heads of PG&E execs (and a few for the legislators who actually passed this lol)
Solar users are irate that they are also going to be charged regardless
Bay Area malding
https://old.reddit.com/r/bayarea/comments/1algswt/the_pge_sucks_megathread/?sort=controversial
- 110
- 137
A fricking Message To Voyeurs of the fricking Naked Run
Don't post videos of the fricking naked run on TikTok, Instagram, Twitter, social medias. This is fricking unconsensual and unkind.
Instead of watching, join and run. Unless you're actually studying… then I suppose you don't have much of an option here. The fricking intention of the fricking naked run is not fricking oggle, but to bond with your peers and decompress.
Nudity is not fricking inherently sexual. Don't sexualize people without their consent.
Note to the fricking runners, you may want to consider covering your face or wearing lingerie/undies if you are fricking concerned about privacy or getting filmed. Unfortunately, some people just don't respect common sense, politeness and/or boundaries.
Be safe, and good luck on finals, motherlover!
🫶🏃♀️
- 108
- 77
Reddit and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race pic.twitter.com/NTj2E8tVjP
— Sic 👔 (@soyencedenier) April 28, 2024
everything is reddit
- 99
- 104
- TotalDonkeyEnjoyer : xhe's right
- 96
- 29
it scares me that people like you can vote. based on the fact that you so confidently espouse materially false information, i say we should require a 36 on the ACT or similar standardized test in order to vote. it would filter the lot of you out, and i would rest easy knowing that the opinion of cretins doesn't matter.
- 96
- 132
Beautytok is all up in the shit right now and it's actually kind of funny so ima tell you all about it!
A few months ago a new makeup brand called Youthforia caught some flak from black beauty creators because their foundation shade range was basically non-existent for black people, and that's not allowed unless you're a Korean or Japanese brand (for obvious reasons). The owner of the brand (who is asian but is American and Youthforia is an American brand) actually came out and tried to defend their shade range by UNIRONICALLY saying it was a SOCIAL EXPERIMENT and was met with even more criticism because we all aren't fricking BLIND and that's STUPID. AND all of the shades on the box were NOT the shades that you get in the bottle so darker shades were actually even lighter than advertised which only made people more upset.
SO to appease the masses Youthforia expanded their shade range and introduced like 5 new shades for darker skintoned people and now everyone wants to burn down their HQ.
IT'S FRICKING SHOE POLISH BLACK. This shade is a literal asian-on-black hate crime and everyone is soooooper mad because it's LITERALLY black face paint. The shade is being compared to minstrel makeup and now Youthforia is sooper raycist.
Like you know if Time fricking magazine orders a rush job article about your debacle you done fricked up good.
Anyhoo tiktok is all abuzz with their pitchforks and you can pick pretty much any video about it and watch jaqqoffs slaughter each other in the comments with whataboutism and "muh cousin's neighbor is black like a tire and would love this!"
It's great.