STEPPED.com

16
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I meant the British dominion over India up to 1947.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah ik it was nothing great but acceptable rule. :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is Gandhi overrated or was he the saint and wise sweet old man portrayed in the west?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hate that cute twink like you wouldn't believe.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1736125583X0ebwdxO98xw4w.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>if the muzzies kill us we win

Well, that's quite a hot take. Did he check on how the Zoroastrians are doing?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17361278783iDMUoKqCFBx-g.webp

This was after Muslim League government bussed in Muslims from East Pakistan, ordered police(whose officers it had made predominantly Muslim in the years leading up to it) into barracks and unleashed mobs on Hindu civilians with the intent to cleanse them out of the entire city so as to stake Pakistan's claim to it. Thankfully our people had prepared to and after a day's slaughter we turned the tables, to extent the govt had to declare a curfew because it was the muzzies who were getting rekt by the fourth day. The Muslim leader who organised all that still has a street named after him in the same city. Gandhi was telling basically one of the largest organisers of this resistance to surrender arms unilaterally.

Words cannot describe how much I loathe that libertarian homo. Without him we'd have maybe had a population exchange and peace. That utter cute twink. If I could kill one person in early 20th century it'd be gayndhi.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

how'd you guys end up with socialism and the reservation system? that seems like the real problem.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

All poor democratic countries are socialist because the poor are only real electorate.

Reservation similarly was ultimately bowing to demographics. To carry an election you need 40-45% vote share in a multi party system. forward castes were 15%, Muslims 10% and scheduled castes and scheduled tribes made up another 25%. These were demographics INC primarily pandered to, FCs huffing nationalism cope while others were bought(in case of Muslims by sops and acceptance of Muslim personal law, for the other two by sops and reservation). The middle were largely excluded from this alliance. They eventually mobilized and forced through another set of reservations and so now 75% of the country enjoys it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

hmm, so basically you guys needed a mao followed by a deng and you'd be on a better path today. taiwan and south korea also didn't become democratic until the late 90s, makes you think.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

these are :marseymayo: questions I ask my uber driver

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At least it unified the country. Imagine a world in which the 100+ various princedoms post-Mughal Empire all were autonomous countries today. The subcontinent would make every single international organization useless, because they all function on the principal of one country one vote. Sort of like how all the random Caribbean island countries ruin CONCACAF for Mexico, Canada, and the US, but on a global scale.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>International organization

>Not useless

:marseysmughips:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.