/h/pol
Chuddo-Yudo they/them  2d ago (image post) Edited 2d ago 393 thread views #354279 earned 152 coins from votes spent 340 currency on pings

GayBC's Vote Compass test has dropped.

Unable to load image

https://www.abc.net.au/news/vote-compass

EDIT: it's literally just the classic political compass upside-down...

!strayans

37
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1743585511ujUsie0G0b4YHg.webp

Seems about right. Though most of those questions need a button 'the whole basis of that system is fricked and needs to be completely redesigned'

And what's with the greens all the way over there on the economic left? Are Australian greens different or something? Usually they're somewhat economically liberal centrists with a hard stance on environment and idpol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The "left" economics greens believe in is usually made up stuff like rent and price controls and "just give people free money"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So like I thought, capitalism with some welfare state. Full left hand side should signify literal communism.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you a communist?

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1741003488tqIRWtbEmPwOBQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyagree#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyindignant: you better not come for my marseybux

According to this test I might be one of youse

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1743591929J7NZnOwiJT2_2A.webp

Are you a specific kind of communist?

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1741003488tqIRWtbEmPwOBQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

nod rly, it gets a bit r-slurred at the ends of that auth/lib axis, but otherwise the focus is to minimise economic leeching and exploitation and I vote for the usually still quite evil lesser evil party whoever's policies are in that direction.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the polcomp's biggest flaw is that it combines social conservatism with wanting a totalitarian govt (and vice versa, social progressivism with anarchy/liberty).

That's why most people get libleft, including a lot of cancel culture/tankie types. Because they're socially progressive, the test assumes they're not auth.

This is also why no one gets auth left. Because auth left would require you to be socially conservative with leftist econ (so a Strasserist, Nazbol or Sahra Wagenknecht type). Modern commies aren't socially conservative.

A better test is Sapplyvalues, which makes the Y axis ONLY auth/lib and adds a separate bar for socially con vs prog. On the Political Compass I get moderate auth right, but on Sapplyvalues I get slightly lib right with a conservative bar. Might make a post about other tests at another time.

!sophistry !freespeech

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

time cube political cube solves this

3rd axis

:marseythumbsup3:

https://media.tenor.com/0K4AwGPBj8oAAAAx/how-cube-cat.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

economic leeching and exploitation

Like what exactly?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Born into money, have a bunch of power for no particular reason, use that power to leech wealth from productive members of society.

Born poor but lazy, pretend that you can't find work, receive weekly cheque from the government, paid for by productive members of society.

Both must suffer.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

commie

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>"Commie but racist"

rdrama leftoids in a nutshell. Somehow worse are the "fellow conservatives" who would unironically pick a Soviet style government over "shitlibs", never mind the Soviet Union promoting woke stuff since it's inception (and no, the Soviets position towards gays doesn't count, even in the 1980s the majority of westerners regarded homosexuality as a sexual deviance and a mental illness) plus gun ownership ban, no private property, no freedom of movement.

>BUT, BUT, LE COMISSARS AND GULAGS AND MASS EXECUTIONS, SO BASED

:#soyjakwow:

!neolibs !freemarket

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

my social views and economics are almost equally as right wing, but I prefer to talk to statist social conservatives over progressive libertarians.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Today I'm going to ping free market over culture war nonsense

:marseyclueless:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's relevant because those cons engaged in culture war nonsense would ditch the free market because some "muh trains" shit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Though most of those questions need a button 'the whole basis of that system is fricked and needs to be completely redesigned'

>tfw no option for the mass killing of all foreign property investors

:#marseyitsrigged:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Usually they're somewhat economically liberal centrists with a hard stance on environment and idpol

If they had their way, everything would be price-controlled, overregulated, or outright prohibited. They are globally the most r-slurred and unhinged political group because anything they do justifies their goal of "saving" the world.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Green economics works because there are always more rich people to tax

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1741003488tqIRWtbEmPwOBQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.