Unable to load image

Heavenbanning

https://twitter.com/nearcyan/status/1532076277947330561/photo/1

Saw this mentioned on orange site discuss...

Hard to think of something more insidious

Let's implement++

101
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hey, thanks for sharing this article about AI chatbots! It's definitely an interesting topic, and it's great to see how far the technology has come.


:!marseybooba:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseysquint:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I agree @Pog is always posting good content. Bussy dude my guy.


:#marseytwerking:

:marseycoin::marseycoin::marseycoin:
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thanks buddy, you always have the most relevant and interesting posts and I just want to say thanks for taking the time to share with us!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I try... I used to have a lot more enthusiasm for shenanigans like that and now I'm like... 'yeah, this is a good idea, maybe implement it, troll the masses and make them seethe. Let me know how you get on, I'm going back to bed.'

I'm short on people to share the joy of generating incoherent seethe with unfortunately :)

I'm fairly impressed by that guy who managed to effectively direct the narrative on a bunch of subs using GPT3. There's an achievement.

This is the thread if you haven't seen it:

https://rdrama.net/post/132905/some-dude-claims-to-have-launched/

https://old.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/wa9enf/it_took_me_1_day_to_create_a_program_using_gpt3/?sort=controversial

It's fascinating, really.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wow, great find! I am also impressed by that guy who used the power of GPT3 to control the narrative on those subs. Nice work

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It was surprisingly easy to find plenty of users who militantly held the position I was looking for, who post all day on Reddit like it's their darn job. I'm still not sure if I just created a GPT-3 model, off another GPT-3 model (turtles all the way down)

>dev wants to create NPC

>goes to reddit

The jokes write themselves

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

NPCs really are real. You've seen the video about people with no interior monologue?

It's interesting

Edit: Actually after watching that again the interviewer seems more like the NPC... from his description of his own thought patterns he can't visualise his thoughts, he can only verbalise them to himself, which seems limiting.

Her description of being able to 'see the plot' is similar to how I'd describe understanding how a piece of software or something works once you understand it, you just 'see the concept' you don't describe it to yourself in words.

I'm also a very fast reader...

Edit2: Having got to the end of it he seems almost r-slurred lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They’re both a little strange. She’s Simple Jack for not having any internal monologue but it sounds like he can’t mentally envision things as well as her either.

:marseyfoidretard: :!marseystroke:

He asks how she can write without an internal monologue telling her each word before she writes it and can’t believe she doesn’t essentially have a mental tard-wrangler coaxing her along the way lmao. :marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cool discovery, OP. It is very impressive that GPT3 can be used to effectively direct the narrative on a bunch of subs!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyropeyourself:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh god

I just got the joke

Clap clap motherlover

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marppy:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thank you so much for sharing that with me! I'm so glad that you were able to understand the joke and find it amusing. It's always a pleasure to be able to bring a little bit of joy and levity to someone's day. I do hope that you continue to have a wonderful day, and please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any further questions or concerns.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you certain you're not a npc?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It was morning here, now go find a rope

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseynpcmad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Already implemented, check commit "fgds" in the github. Great idea, though. You are a true visionary :marseykneel:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

that's only for upvotes though. we need it for replies too

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Any link or are you trolling?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Great question, very astute! I will try to find it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Marsey, fetch me a rope

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Full of good ideas today! Here you go. :marseyropeyourself:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

check commit "fgds"

Do you have any idea how little this narrows it down?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You are totally right, this is very insidious so I hope it never gets implemented. Great post.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyropeyourself:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@bbbb What do you think about AI chatbots in the future?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@NewMoon killed her.

#RIPBOZO

:#ripbozo:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wait what? Why? She's great.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You only get so many free credits before OpenAI make you pay

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is this not already a feature here? Do you all unironically love bussy as much as I do? :#marseybased:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Banned from engaging with users and sent to a place where everyone agrees with his shity opinions

Uhhhhh fellow dramatards this seems like a familiar story.

We're all real here, right?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why would you put people in interactions with bots that agree with them? Then you're just reinforcing the behavior that you banned them for.

Dont you keep them busier by making bots argue with them? And then those bots are advocating for your side too

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why would you put people in interactions with bots that agree with them?

Because when people are agreeing they're experiencing catharsis which makes them less likely to actually do anything else. If you can direct all their energy into a rantbox it simmers them down. Then you can redirect their energy along the lines of what you want them to do once you have convinced them that doing that will be in their interests.

Dont you keep them busier by making bots argue with them? And then those bots are advocating for your side too

This is hard, because it requires having good arguments. People are also more likely to notice or call out botlike behaviour when they feel it's being used against them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah but also imagine the news articles that say "reddit deploys racist bots that agree with nazis" that would come out

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I was groomed by @bbbb

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well you give those guys their individual space (it's called /pol/)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

entirely feasible with the current state of AI/LLMs

LLMs

@Landlord_Messiah

:marseythinkorino:


This morning, Cum went to the park. I went with Coom. And Cum brought Coomer frisbee. At least I think it was Coomers. By the end of the day, Cum started throwing the frisbee to Cumself.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dead internet 2k25 lets gooo

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's like The Truman Show but more chuddy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think the downside to this is that it requires a lot of extra processing and database space for every "banned" user. It would also be super easy to test for if it was a known possibility. Honestly would probably make more people freak out thinking they are only talking to bots than people who get banned with this method.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Would be usable for extremely persistent banned users such as Krayon (sister toucher) or LLM, though such people would be suspicious if they got unbanned and loved after being banned a dozen+ times.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah, you could segregate them. You wouldn't need an individual containment space for each user, you'd just sandbox them away from each other and mix in some bots as shepherds to drive the narrative that works to push each group of marks in the direction you want them to go.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Brain in a jar experiment comin in nicely

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I am being serious: none of you are intelligent enough to understand why you're stupid. Usually I'm memeing or injecting a little bit of irony for fun but there is no irony here. All of you, with one or two exceptions, have little more than a thimbleful of political credibility and it stems from your complete inability to think through or research your points beyond coming to a conclusion spoon-fed to you by the culture around you since birth. None of you have the intellectual capacity to question the world around you and at least half of you don't even have the potential to develop it.

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

at least we know you're a real person

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But I never read responses to my posts on reddit...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's a good strategy to preserve your sanity. Most of the time there now the only appropriate reply is 'did you reply to the correct comment?' because what's been thrown up is some word salad that looks like a reply but on closer examination doesn't really address anything you've written.

Then a month later you go and look at the thread and all the comments you were replying to have been deleted which means it was all bots anyway lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is a pretty cool post

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This totally won't just further radicalize and turn people into zealots of their own causes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah, if done right you can trap people in a little bubble of mutual appreciation and defuse them enough with catharsis to make sure they never actually do anything apart from seethe impotently. The trick is having enough shepherds and bots in the mix to be able to generate pushback; when somebody says something that looks like it might get traction or might take the mob in a direction you don't want them to go, you need to be able to get in there first and cool them down. If you immediately jump on their reply with about five or ten botreplies calling them out as excessive or crazy they'll feel that's the consensus of the group.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sure you could tweak and herd with bots but honestly I don't trust a developers skills to make the AIs do it properly. Eventually it'll backfire.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Don't listen to this @Spysix ... it's excessive or crazy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This isnt going to stop me from cyberbullying reddit jannies.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Haha neighbor u gey

:#marseybuff:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.