None

https://old.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/1czauff/us_to_resume_trumpera_tariffs_on_graphics_cards/

https://old.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/1cyzdqx/us_to_resume_trumpera_tariffs_on_graphics_cards/

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1cz50eq/us_to_resume_trumpera_tariffs_on_graphics_cards/

https://old.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/1cz44tm/us_to_resume_trumpera_tariffs_on_graphics_cards/ :marseyjanny:

https://old.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/1cz45by/us_to_resume_trumpera_tariffs_on_graphics_cards/ :marseyjanny:


US to Resume Trump-Era Tariffs on Graphics Cards Assembled in China

The tariffs add a 25% duty on graphics cards, motherboards, and desktop PC cases.

PC builders, beware: The Biden administration is preparing to resume tariffs on graphics cards and motherboards assembled in China.

Over the past year, the US Trade Representative (USTR) has delayed restoring the Trump-era tariffs, which added a 25% duty on affected Chinese goods. The goal was to gather feedback from the industry and consider modifications as trade associations lobbied the White House to end the tariffs, citing the costs.

But on Wednesday, the USTR issued a notice, saying it had recommended to the White House that the “tariffs on covered products be maintained.” On Thursday, a spokesperson for USTR then told PCMag: “We are maintaining tariffs on products currently subject to the action, including the two tariffs you've inquired about.”

Those tariffs use the codes 8473.30.1180 and 8473.30.5100 and cover graphics cards, motherboards, and desktop PC cases. Other components previously covered under the Trump-era tariffs include trackpad units valued at over $100 and power supply units that output more than 500 watts.

The Consumer Technology Association had pushed the White House to end the tariffs, but CTA VP of International Affairs Ed Brzytwa tells PCMag, "They're not getting rid of anything. There are only tariff increases."

So far, the USTR hasn't officially issued a federal notice to continue the Trump-era tariffs or said what date they'll resume. But the White House already announced it's preparing to increase tariffs on select Chinese manufactured goods, including semiconductors, lithium-ion EV batteries, and electric vehicles, in some cases to as high as 100%

Brzytwa adds that the US is signaling it'll continue protectionist trade policies against China, but at the cost of rising consumer prices. “It seems like there's a competition between the Republican Party and Democratic Party on who can be tougher on China, and who can be more protectionist,” he said.

The tariffs are designed to punish China for unfair trade policies and alleged intellectual property theft. But in late 2021, several tech companies—including Nvidia, HP, and Zotac—urged the US to exclude their products from Trump-era tariffs, citing the lack of electronics manufacturing outside of China.

“Efforts to create new capacity in countries that presently do not manufacture such products (such as the US and Vietnam) were unsuccessful and were severely hampered by the fallout from COVID-19,” Nvidia said at the time.

Meanwhile, Zotac told the USTR: "China remains...the major manufacturing base of video graphics cards and personal computers in the industry. The major reason is due to the upstream supply chain remaining mostly in China."


!g*mers prepare yo bussies.

None

Redittors (hard r) discuss it here

None
26
I want to physically strangle the AI Sparkles ✨

No, I do not need an AI-generated summary of the page

None
None
58
Copilot these nuts in your mouth???
None

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17164853494425623.webp

And in typical AI style, she only has four fingers on her right hand

None

They should hire more black women. They did invent the telescope.

None
13
:marsey2pac:
None
None
None
43
Streaming has officially RETVRNED to cable :marcusrcaconnected: :marseyrcaconnected:

Comcast is now offering streaming services with ads as a monthly package just like how they used to bundle cable packages. :marseyxd:

None

Reminder this will only get worse because you cant install Mint from a usb stick :marseypenguin:

!codecels Disscuss

None
None
None

Orange site: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40417828

Reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/hardware/duplicates/1cwlp9n/microsoft_announces_an_armpowered_surface_laptop/

Some benchmarks here, doesn't look bad but nothing ground breaking either

https://signal65.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/NewSurfaceLaptop2024_Signal65LabInsights.pdf

With how long the Snapdragon Elite took to roll out, I'm expecting nothing but disappointment in the real world

None

here's the tweet where :marseydrama: all he says is "her", referencing the movie :marseymidsommardani: "Her" where :marseydrama: Scarlett Johansson does the voice :marseyhearnoevil: for an AI that th main character :marseycrystalmaiden: falls on love with. The fact that he tweeted this just a couple :marseycupid: days before :marseyskellington: the reveal of Sky, and the fact that the voice :marseyhearnoevil: is basically just Scarlett's voice, means some easy cash for Clon Jost's wife

None
None
None
Reported by:
41
Mood

@J love sucking peepee

None

Any body of academic thought whose paradigmatic communication medium is video rather than text is prima facie suspect. Might you please link a written statement of the salient position(s) of any one of these gentlemen?

-

I think it's pretty elitist to judge the quality of a content via whether it's in a book/journal or not. In fact, the recent wave of scientific fraud discovery shows that one can hide data manipulation pretty effectively in an academic journal. I'd much rather scientists spend their time making eli5 videos. :marseyclueless:

-

Just curious, why do you write like that? Reminds when I was 11 and wanted to sound smarter on the internet.

-

My reply is an attempt to address the original comment with precision. To diagram its intended meaning:

alternative theories of consciousness

"Any body of academic thought" [I accede the scientific legitimacy of the domain of discourse, rather than dismissing it.]

know where to go to find well-argued positions on the topic.

"whose paradigmatic communication medium" [This is the beginning of my challenge to the Original Commenter, by granting the information provided authoritative status, which they perhaps cannot fully defend.]

On YouTube you can find plenty of discussions

"is video rather than text"

it's particularly important to explore these discussions as dispassionately as possible if you regard materialism as the only theory of mind that has any scientific credibility or validity.

"is prima facie suspect" [The Original Commenter has asserted that discourse and engagement are important, yet provided only time consuming, low signal-to-noise sources of information.]

As Christopher Hitchens reminds us in his legendary oration on John Stuart Mill and free speech [2]

"Might you please link a written statement of the salient position(s) of any one of these gentlemen?" [The only written citations are 1) generic and 2) ancillary to the core topic. I invite the Original Commenter to further his argument more substantively, without demanding exhaustive citations.]

-

OK, let me rewrite it:

Any body of academic thought whose paradigmatic communication medium is video rather than text is prima facie suspect. Might you please link a written statement of the salient position(s) of any one of these gentlemen?

Academic content is usually in text, not video. Do you have links to written work from them?

Shorter and the exact same meaning. Also doesn't sound like you've been perusing your thesaurus all day.

-

No, the second approach's meaning is more obtuse. What does "usually" mean? Are there acceptable alternatives? If content is in an alternative mode of communication, is it acceptable?

These vagaries permitted in your revision are clear and inherent in the original commenter's motion. Therefore, I submit your adjudication of "shorter and the exact same meaning" is woefully superficial in it's drive for simplicity, to the point there is no thought left that is clear in the original garden. Further, exact and technical communication is what separates Hacker News commenting from the hordes of subreddits that thrive on imprecise babble.

-

At minimum, this does not capture that I _am_ challenging the Original Commenter ("prima facie suspect") to more rigorously defend his position, but doing so respectfully. "One salient" written source is a carefully chosen framing: the OC cannot meet it by replying with support peripheral or meta to the main argument, but neither can he dismiss my request as burdensome, demanding multiple links.

The proposed revision suffers from its terseness, losing both nuance and completeness.

-

Communication is about being understood. Not about crafting the perfect sentence. Even if you craft the perfect sentence, that will be the perfect sentence _for you_, and it might be completely lost on many people, some perhaps even more intelligent than you.

The subtext of "Academic content is usually in text, not video" is "I don't trust this because it's in video, not text". Now if you say that is not clear, sure, but the subtext of your comment is "I opened a thesaurus and tried to seem smart", which is why this conversation derailed here. You can't ignore the subtext to craft a mathematically perfect sentence..

-

Communication is about being understood.

The subtext of "Academic content is usually in text, not video" is "I don't trust this because it's in video, not text". Now if you say that is not clear, sure

Indeed, relying on the implicit when the explicit is sufficient [0] does a disservice to one's readers, in whose ability and charity to comprehend my surface text, without presuming confounding subtextual meaning, I have every confidence.

[0] It is not always; some things can only be gestured at, not grasped.

-

I hope some day you realize how cringe your comments are.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17161541169444141.webp

There's more in there... !clinklickers but I got sick of trying to copy the formatting right because the HNewses also love their >

None

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17161341494466894.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17161341497244613.webp

:marsey4chan:

https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/100546675

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.