Context: Dr. Charlotte Proudman is a gigafeminist known for her hot takes, including:
A message to pregnant women — please give the baby your surname.
The only person of colour in the royal family isn't present because Meghan Markle was bullied out.
Harry Potter is a little patriarch that resorts to magic & violence to rule.
Today, she has launched a campaign to change the law so that moids have to prove a foid consented when defending an accusation of r*pe. In her own words:
Proudman (who I have personally diagnosed as having Narcissistic Personality Disorder) decided to make herself the face of the campaign, producing this wonderful poster:
The slogan itself has become a point of contention:
https://x.com/BiFelicia319/status/1765044078897471864
https://x.com/jessothomson/status/1765080110141722910
https://x.com/Daisy_J_S/status/1765096615352959472
https://x.com/LizMaryWard/status/1765065360271888644
https://x.com/beesley_cathy/status/1765059359447330969
https://x.com/jessothomson/status/1765080110141722910
Selected comments:
This is obviously r-slurred, but naturally there are some male feminists arguing against their own self-interest 
Why do you think this switches the burden of proof to the accused?
Because that's literally what she said it does? 
I'm 30, there are only a handful of times the woman actually said ‘let's have s*x'
Which 'basic human behaviour' are you referring to, coercing women into s*x?
That Redditor should be arrested for not getting the consent forms signed!
I feel that these sorts of things are proposed in bad faith to make feminists look ridiculous.
Feminists would never say something completely r-slurred unless they were plants.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hello Dahncer_the_reindeer, or should I say r*pedeer? 8 letters, fitting huh. If this life were perfect you'd have known nothing but milk and cookies since you left your birthers c*nt. However, it's not- that's where I come in.
You have no say anymore, no freedom, no volition- I am Santa. You now worship my Christmas tree. You can call me Nicholas. A saint? No, but I come with more conviction.
Dahncer_the_reindeer you are my r*pe sleigh-ve now. And that's your greatest achievement- all you've ever amounted to, tugging and pulling my sleigh as we break the space time continuum together you complete fricking slut. I'll find you.
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/1b7bpvc/im_asking_for_it_calls_for_law_to_require_clear/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
The only person of colour in the royal family isn't present because Meghan Markle was bullied out.:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
It would put the onus on defendants to show how she consented, if she wanted to have s*x, if she was asked if she wanted to have s*x, what steps did she take to make sure that she was wanting to have s*x and was enthusiastic about it.:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Why do you think this switches the burden of proof to the accused?:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
The criminalisation of basic human behaviour continues.:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
I'm 30, there are only a handful of times the woman actually said ‘let's have s*x':
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
I feel that these sorts of things are proposed in bad faith to make feminists look ridiculous.:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context