"Actually, women were the hunters" AKA Bongs discuss why their moids arent having kids

Context: The BBC put out an article acknowledging that men on the bottom rung don't get kitty. Naturally, foids are out in force to pretend the reason for this isn't obvious.

It's not evolution at all, historically women were the hunter/ gatherers. Gender roles are a social construct and that's very clear to most people nowadays

Don't believe your lying eyes! The fact that every primitive culture from the Amazon, to Africa, to Australia, displays the same divergence in gender roles doesn't mean anything. Not only are women the hunters, they're also better at it, sweaty

Generally woman lean left, as they're beneficiaries from the system. Men lean more right - generally they're net contributors to the system. I suspect if the proportion of women contributing increased, then more would move fiscally to the right. And more men benefitting would cause them to move fiscally (but probably not socially) to the left.

what does this mean?

It means foids are a net drain to the government purse. They use more public services, and receive more in government benefits, than they pay in tax.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2375926

This top 10% myth is nonsense. By what metrics do people decide which men fall into the 'top 10%'? Has anyone actually asked women what they're looking for in a partner. I promise you it's not cars and money!

Never ask a foid (or a moid, to be fair) what they're looking for in a partner. Look at who they choose when given the option - revealed preferences über alles.

https://gwern.net/doc/psychology/okcupid/thebigliespeopletellinonlinedating.html

!incels