An expose on @FrozenChosen ft. Sirpingsalot (Effortpost in comments)

Fellow dramatards, I come to you with a story of janny collusion, of egirls gone wild and of a Rizzler cut down in his prime. This post and podcast will call into question everything you thought you knew about rdrama, it's storied history and it's expansive lore.

What I posit to you today, the humble drama peasant, is that our sacred community is being manipulated and weaponized by a late 30's e-girl to do her evil, satanic bidding and destroy the lives of the men she once lusted after.

Let's start with the facts: We all bore witness to the SPAL/Frozen sexting logs that Frozen herself leaked. Many humble drama peasants were left wondering why she would leak such a thing? The truth is that I messaged her and let her know we would be discussing her, and that she was invited on to defend herself. She declined, and in an effort to jump out in front of the drama, she leaked the debaucherous DMs of her own accord.

Let us look a little deeper at these, as it establishes a pattern of behavior that she has weaponized against multiple scrotes that she has left in her wake.

Here is a DM from Sirpingsalot's first banning, when accusations of libertarianism were lobbed at him. When SPAL was a potential love interest, this was her position:

@FrozenChosen was so bricked up, had such fire in her loins for our hero, had such strong convictions that he was an innocent man framed, that she ignored the wishes of her fellow broom wielders and provided him with instructions on how to get back onto our esteemed platform. Surely this act of rebellion and insubordination would warrant her demopping? Not when you're highly simped after post wall e-girl Frozen!

Of course, she flipped on him when it became convenient and public sentiment had rallied against our hero. A man unjustly banned for simply accusing @carpathianfriendly of being a libertarian with no evidence. Here, contrary to her previous stance, she accuses him of being a libertarian.

Our holy hero does not waver at this snakening of epic proportions. He remains steadfast in his convictions and asks why she has flip flopped, why she maintained a public and private position like Hillary Chinton. Her answer is important, as it establishes a sickening pattern of behavior.

"I wasn't flirting, I was attention seeking". A massive cope with an unearned gif as to establish some sort of "own" that never occured.

So why bring up this drama? It's good and dead, we've all already had our laughs and exchanged banter about it. What exactly am I getting at here?

She has used her goodwill to bury yet another love interest and smear his good name before

Let's talk about Mello. He's been banned for ages now, an evil man, a schizophrenic stalker who was a threat to not only @FrozenChosen's safety but to the community at large. At least, that's what they would have you believe.

A user once reached out to me and said Mello would be a good interview. I was informed that he was a schizophrenic who stalked and harassed Frozen. I didn't have much interest, but I figured I would shoot @FrozenChosen a DM and see if there was anything to work with. The response set off a whole lot of red flags that something was amiss.

Why would a supposed "stalking victim" become so irate as to threaten a journ*list with legal action for simply asking about her story? Why would somebody who allegedly fears for their life threaten legal action towards somebody who could interview their stalker, potentially giving them ammo for future legal proceedings and proving she has a valid concern for her safety?

This simply doesn't add up!

Unconcerned with her belligerent and toothless threats, I persisted. I talked to Mello on twitter, asking him some questions and preparing for his interview. What struck me as odd is that he only agreed to do the show if he didn't have to talk about Frozen, choosing instead to b-word about Aevann and Carp. Odd, isn't it? For a supposed "stalker" to not take up an opportunity to continue their alleged harassment? Would a real "stalker" simply let their "victim" go that easily? Again, things are not adding up.

I'd love to post these chatlogs to prove this, but I cannot. They are lost to the sands of time because Mello DFE'd after receiving this from Frozen:

She sent me a copy of this restraining order (leaving his full legal name in, which I redacted) shortly after she was made aware of my upcoming Mello interview, boasting and celebrating over her kill. Why is it that he has supposedly been stalking her for years, making her feel unsafe the whole time, yet an emergency restraining order is only filed once she becomes aware that I am willing to give him the voice that the jannies had swept away from him?

Once again, it's not adding up.

I mentioned earlier that she has established a pattern of behavior - entrapping scrotes with her feminine wiles, and then proceeding to destroy them once they've outlived her usefulness. Frozen would have you believe that she is an innocent victim, that she had no hand in his interest in her, that she wanted to be left alone.

Interesting! So once again, she claims she was "attention seeking" and goaded the poor guy into communication. Supposedly, she's been stalked by a deranged schizo, fallen trap to the whims of a billionaire diaper furry, yet she still persists in talking to rdrama men for sexual thrills? Is this what we are to believe?

Look to the skies, the truth is out there

This is what I am forced to believe, the conclusion that I've logically produced - @FrozenChosen has a pattern of behavior wherein she uses her put on "friendly" demeanor and feminine charm to ensnare innocent men who's only crime was being bricked up. Should she decide that her attention seeking is over, she'll cry to jannies and users alike of their evils, claiming to be an innocent victim of dangerous, criminal men. She's even gone so far as to threaten me with lawfare and actually use the courts to cut down a former love interest.

This is a janny on our website, abusing her mop and her poweruser clout to get her rocks off by causing actual, real life harm to users. Doxxing isn't allowed (she doxxed Mello to me by the way), even mentioning where it happened to her is bannable, but using legal action against users you've supplied personal info to is kosher? Is this what we are to believe? Why is Frozen untouchable? Why are her crimes to be swept under the rug and unanswered?

If you enjoyed this post, listen to the episode. I had some pretty good jokes this time ngl