salt and rocks
https://x.com/Hezbolsonaro/status/1838698521068999103
Why is the US backing an Israeli attack on Lebanon? There's a materialist answer for this. To get at Lebanon's limestone resources. pic.twitter.com/ZqIIPBj5DR
— Liam π΅πΈ (@Hezbolsonaro) September 24, 2024
yeah we need to get that stuff that's literally fricking everywhere. The ground is made of it.
can't forget about salt, a strategic resource because it's 176 AD.
this tweet was particularly amusing. Investigative journ*list over here discovers that a huge mining conglomerate gave an entire $3,000 to Democrats
three thousand entire dollars? It's all a giant top hat WASP conspiracy to divest the innocent brown world of its extremely common resources 
Frequently asked questions:
Q: This is bait
A: Don't care, upmarseys to the left
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The fricking entirety of my state
alone 
is fricking 
limestone lmao
!engineering civilcels imagine the fricking cost estimates if we had to import stone
from Lebanon lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's it I'm investing in concrete and cement producers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You should invest in nuclear powered boats. They are probably going to become the norm very soon provided nanny states don't cuck out because of chernobyl or whatever. There are already nuclear powered aircraft carriers and nuclear powered ice breakers, it's just a matter of time until a technology gets deployed that makes it possible for transatlantic vessels to also be the same. Only problem is that there needs to be a technology created that makes it fool proof so that in the case of an emergency, the rods stay inside a casing and therefor not get lost, so as not to fill the depths of the oceans with fuel rods.
@nuclearshill thoughts?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Based idea. Small nuclear reactors are the way
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
As long as they are required to look as good as NS Savannah.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The reason they didn't catch on already is that it's way too expensive to build them, and they could only be maintained in a handful of ports, which was far outweighed the operating costs being lower. What has changed in that department?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
climate change policy of EU and eventually US
https://theconversation.com/global-shipping-is-under-pressure-to-stop-its-heavy-fuel-oil-use-fast-thats-not-simple-but-changes-are-coming-204271
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Regulations load and need to keep experts aboard will kill it tbh. There's thousands of cargo vessels, the whole trade is known for being involved in stuff like smuggling there's no need to give them potentially dangerous tech.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Party rock!
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Or haiti. even haitians aren't as stupid as these palestinian lives matter tards
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
idk neighbor haitians are pretty horrifying
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context