(16k likes) 7 YEAR OLD VIRGINIA CLASS NUCLEAR SUB FORCED TO TURN BACK AFTER NORWEGIANS REFUSE TO FUEL IT :marseyflagukraine:

https://x.com/allenanalysis/status/1895919362705600849

do NOT look up what a nuclear sub is especially not a virginia class nuclear sub just accept this very real thing that very really happened and europe is back on top baby


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17334134537326243.webp

127
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lol I read they supplied 5 million gallons last year. which is a drop in the bucket.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How big of a bucket?

Part of America's ability to dominate global military action has come as a result of the ability to continually pour ever-greater quantities of fossil fuels into military vehicles, aircraft, and weapons manufacturing. Without fossil fuels, America's global military operations would crumble. A typical U.S. tank battalion of 348 tanks consumes 2.3 million liters of fuel per day, while an aircraft carrier battle division uses 1.6 million liters, and an F-16 fighter jet uses as much fuel in an hour as a typical vehicle would consume throughout a two-year period (Karbuz, 2007). Because of this massive amount of fuel consumption, U.S. Department of Defense data shows that the American military is a larger consumer of fossil fuels than the entire country of Nigeria, which has a population of upwards of 191 million residents https://fossilfuel.com/the-u-s-military-consumes-more-fossil-fuels-than-entire-countries/

So over the course of a year they supplied a weekend worth of fuel. America will never recover from this.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

that's a climate propaganda website

if 348 m1 abrahams tanks covered as much as 100 kilometers in a day it would still only be 0.13 million gallons

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Isn't 100kms in a day at low end for a tank tho? Unless held up I'd expect consistent speeds of 20-30km/hr at least even on rough terrain?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

depends how it's used. if you have to move tanks that fa most armies use tank transporters. in an engagement or patrolling baghdad it would probably be less, because combined arms maneuvers only move as much as their slowest part

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.