https://x.com/michaeljknowles/status/1899111503992676633
Wow, he got completely wrecked. How does a guy show up to debate 20 people without understanding even the basis premises of his own purported beliefs? https://t.co/EvtwySlhFt
— Michael Knowles (@michaeljknowles) March 10, 2025
Embarassing, he doesnt even know what utilitarianism is 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lol more of the "objective morality is only possible through god and religion nonsense". Then he confuses consenting adults being a nessesary condition with it being a sufficient condition. Then pulling out the democracy alone cant be trusted because of mob rule. Then homos are bad because they cant have kids. This is your brain on religious fundamentalism. Sincerely arguing for a theocracy. !gaytheists get a load of this guy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The fundamentalist r-slur would have no answer if the same argument was directed toward him. What if tomorrow, God decided that the immoral was moral and vice versa?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Most apologists squirm if you ask them if god commanding you to shoot up a school is moral, but william laine craig is one of the few that will go, heck yes i would
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well yeah. If God personally told you to do something then that thing is morally right by definition.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Would you kill a baby if god told you to?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
reason #320 why not to have a theocracy: they'll kill babies if they think god told them to do it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Theocracies don't work because people abuse Gods word for their own ends. It would only work if Christ himself came back to rule it. And then on top of that you have schizos who believe God commanded them to do something that he didn't.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
how can you tell the difference between something he actually commanded and something he didnt?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wats the sufficient condition then? Not spreading aids?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So true queen, if you dont spread aids, you can do whatever you want
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Nowhere am I agreeing with the religious fundamentalist perspective.
I'm pointing out that he owned Seder's bussy like a trick picked up on the side of the road.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context