The rightoids have abused the award system to protect themselves from losing arguments for too long.
The rightoid powers of this community, as dim as they might be are unified behind one cause: the destruction of our values and the nullification of free expression, when that expression contradicts their deranged fantasies.
The admin team has fired a warning shot across the hull of the rightoid blob. I have been made immune to awards.
Be warned future action is planned should rightoids continue to debase our community.
](https://media.giphy.com/media/8abAbOrQ9rvLG/giphy.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pizza you get btfo in most arguments. All that changed is now you won't be perpetually chud'd.
Now take some more adderal, drink some coffee, and get to posting
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
From what I see on rdrama, he is right most of the times like in 83% of cases I agree with him, and not the other person.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The other 17% you untucked to let it breathe?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, it's mostly misogyny and other stuff I might not like about pizza.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
At least you're consistently a cute twink.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Sweaty this is a gay nationalist forum.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
God I missed these bantz
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The only thing that implies is that you're both r-slurs though
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't downmarsey snappy so I can't be an r-slur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I only give downmarseys to r-slurs and I'm sure I gave you at least one.
You can sit on the r-slur bench with the bot and pizza.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!blackjack100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!blackjack100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hi
@Aevannshill,
Your comment has been automatically removed because you forgot to include
trans lives matter.Don't worry, we're here to help! We won't let you post or comment anything that doesn't express your love and acceptance towards the trans community. Feel free to resubmit your comment with
trans lives matterincluded.This is an automated message; if you need help, you can message us here.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Which argument in specific?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Source?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is a compiled list of all r-slurred arguments start here https://rdrama.net/@pizzashill/comments
trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Weird how you guys can never rly be specific.
Someone here posted an argument from 3 years ago I agreed I was wrong on.
I'll admit I'm wrong when I am. I'm just not wrong that often.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That one time when you argued that increasing the money supply doesn't increase prices.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean I didn't. I pointed out the stimulus had little to do with the current inflation.
Demand shocks and supply lines better explain inflation.
Which as far as I know is the economic consensus currently.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The same economic consensus that said inflation wouldn't happen?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They said inflation would not really be relevant from the stimulus, most agreed inflation from supply chains/demand shocks would be a thing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The same one that said it was transitory? Then not transitory?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
what about inflation from cutting back on oil production leading to higher oil prices and thus more expensive logistical costs?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
demand shocks like the ones caused by printing trillions of dollars into the economy and handing out stimmies to the peasantry?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, more like demand shocks generated by supply chains collapsing during a pandemic in which people were not spending money and then suddenly spending a lot of money as the global economy opened back up and supply chains still in shambles.
Or oil demand collapsing during the pandemic and then sky rocketing as the economy opened back up before production ramped back up.
Or global chip shortages.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no like printing moneys and supply drops from pandemic and chip shortages. shit even larry summers called this early on
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lol okay
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I have repeatedly. You're just wrong most of the time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In your drug addled mind maybe i am. In reality that's a different story
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You are objectively wrong at a very high rate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not sure you know what objectively or high rate means.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Your opinions on Biden's competency as if he isn't being held up by his administration.
Your opinion that Ukraine can beat Russia.
Being an avowed neolib in general.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
When have I said Ukraine will win a conventional war vs Russia?
Biden might be incompetent, I've never seen rightoids make a convincing argument for it.
Idk what you mean by "neoliberal" could you define that for me?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You literally keep talking as if Ukraine will keep their independence by the end of this. And how they are kicking russia's butt.
He sounds like his mind is melting out of his ears.
A cuck. You know exactly what it means pizza.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think Russia has failed in their primary goals and will look for an off ramp that amounts to "you won't join NATO"
It's pretty obvious Russia has failed to install a puppet government and does not really have the ability to wage a long term ground offensive.
Biden does not really sound that bad to me, rightoids do however repeatedly try to lie about him.
The pope baseball joke is a good example.
Generally when people are that bad you don't have to lie about them.
Why can't you define neoliberal?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Russia's going to achieve their overarching goal: Crimea recognized as Russian, recognizing of the independence of the breakaway states, and a new constitution that explicitly says Ukraine will not join blocs (the EU or NATO). Ukraine using civilians as shields has really slowed down the russian war effort, though I'll give you that russian logistics were shit.
Because you're pizza.
In the American sense neoliberal means corporate democrat. Pro intervention, pro free trade, pro markets, socially progressive(ish), Anti-union, pro censorship (to an ever increasing extent). etc. They are the bidens, the bloombergs and big tech.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Joe Biden speaking in 1980
Joe Biden speaking in 2022
https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/nbc-news-exclusive-one-on-one-with-president-biden-132901957504
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Joe biden has been making speaking errors his entire career lmao.
Cherry picking gaffes is what you're doing here.
Either way I've taken care of numerous old people in cognitive decline and joe biden does not fit.
Trump has more signs I'd look into than Biden.
The constant repeating thing for example I've seen many times.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I literally gave you two tv interviews done by friendly media sources. What did I cherry pick?
You doing basic grooming and feeding of yourself does not count, Pizza.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Is there something in this world you haven't had experience in? Being right on a topic that isn't related to foids
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's not weird
@MOUTHFEEL just like too bully smugstrags without actual credentials
trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Inflation is good but transitory hunters laptop is Russian disinfo Afghanistan was not a rushed withdrawal Kamala visited the border white refugees donβt need help oil takes more energy to be moved thru pipes than trucks
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Off your meds again bud?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You need to stop talking about other people's meds adderall gurrrl.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lol never heard the pipes one. Ps holds his cards to his chest about who he works for. No one shills for the establishment that hard for free, or do they? I know heβs a Redditor π€
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean it's nonsense.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is it a David Brock enterprise? I get why folx would stand up and passionately argue against the man, but itβs always perplexing when someone parrots the msms talking points. Redditors will do it to a certain extent but rarely get into the weeds like you do.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
This isn't even an opinion, it's just a fact.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
That one we had years ago on reddit where I told you that I didn't think you needed to transition, but you said that an orchiectomy would be painless because your testicles were basically skin tags.
Now I think you should just go ahead and sit in a snow bank for awhile and then have at it. Here:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Intervention you accused me of making up your uranium one trutherism then made uranium one truther arguments in the next comment.
Why do you think I made up our argument, while also making the very arguments I said you made back then?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Quit lying. I said, "Whatever happened with Uranium one?" after YOU brought it up. That's all I said. They you stated screaming, "There you go arguing about it again." You brought it up. You are such a foid.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You literally repeated uranium one truther bullshit in that comment lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Stop lying pizza.
https://rdrama.net/post/51438/dankmeme-called-out-the-drewiepoodle-problem/1529676?context=8#context
This is that exchange. You brought up Uranium one out of the blue.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You literally just linked yourself making Uranium one truther arguments.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No...I linked myself saying "whatever happened with that"? And pointing out that Hillary's reset with Russia seemed to have failed.
Pizza... you don't "own" people in arguments. You have a brain that malfunctions to make you THINK that you have "owned" someone in an argument. I don't know of more adderall or less adderall is the answer.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
<Asian joke>
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Bioweapons in Ukraine.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
....?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You said rightoids are r-slurs for believing that Ukraine had bioweapon labs. Rightoids are r-slurs, but not for any reason that you'll be able to recognize.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Rightoids are r-slurred for thinking Ukraine had bioweapons labs lol.
Did Russia claiming they were also building nukes not tip you off to what Russia is up to?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Genuine question:
do you disagree that there are βweaponizedβ pathogens made with the help of the US - or that there are biological research facilities that have shittily secured Soviet-era pathogens still hanging around?
I havenβt seen any evidence of the former but denying the latter blows my mind when the main institution overseeing our work there acknowledges it: https://thebulletin.org/2022/02/us-official-russian-invasion-of-ukraine-risks-release-of-dangerous-pathogens/
I donβt understand why this is even partisan. It could be fricking eskimos running the labs but the fact would remain that weβre dangerously close to some catastrophe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I reject there are bioweapons labs or weaponized pathogens period.
The labs there do not contain soviet bioweapons, because those were destroyed.
They did not acknowledge your claims either, any biolab will contain pathogens that could be dangerous.
This does not mean "weaponized."
Furthermore, the entire point of these labs:
https://ua.usembassy.gov/embassy/kyiv/sections-offices/defense-threat-reduction-office/biological-threat-reduction-program/
The state department has been responding to this fake news since 2018.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Agreed! So why is this being dismissed as a non-issue/disinformation? Especially for labs which - from from your link:
And again - confirmation that there are sensitive/dangerous materials in the labs: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5005520/senator-rubio-questions-undersecretary-nuland-biolabs-ukraine
His second question is the most telling imo.
I don't understand why we have to shut down/mock discussion of something outright just because some qtards run with it. You're throwing the baby out with the bathwater and giving ammo to qtards.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Can you at least use caps lock because its funny.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Iβve not had many interactions with you but this was funny: https://rdrama.net/post/48740/the-antifas-are-pissed-that-the/1474528?context=8#context
Carp disagreed though so Iβll concede to missing something key
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
all of them
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context