Trace posts about his LoTT hoax to the /r/TheMotte. The users don't react the way he thought they would.

[Deleted by author.]
119
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://old.reddit.com/r/TheMotte/comments/pitqan/culture_war_roundup_for_the_week_of_september_06/hcder7m/?context=999

Here's a bunch of the same people cheering him on for an article about their political adversaries being similarly fooled

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they're not gonna read this, if you have something to say to them post it there :marseywoah:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Even if they did read it, they're incapable of comprehending any information communicated in fewer than 10 paragraphs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You’d be surprised, I’ve noticed increasingly heavy cross-pollination over the past few months

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, the amount of hypocritical butthurt and double standards when it comes to treating rightoid wingcucks with "charity" while straight up seetheposting against leftoid wingcucks on /r/themotte is why I barely read the culture war roundup anymore. I cannot understand why so many people are going into conniptions over a fricking non-journaloid twitter user getting pranked. It clearly isn't about protecting the reputation of trains from undeserved hatred and it isn't about principles (from a former community member). It's just righteous huffing and puffing over someone on their side getting tricked.

This is what happens when you cultivate a culture where humor is literally banned.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@TracingWoodgrains post was pretty straggy though. Individuals in general should not be taking credit or associating themselves with gay ops like that. When Al Qaeda bombs an embassy, the bombers name isn't the important part.

![](/images/16513673980543017.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What about the 25 million jews, though?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To be fair there really isn't a better place to get the right wing takes and there are often good discussion. Where else are you going to go? Breitbart?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe it’s nostalgia but there used to be a lot less wingcucks when it was on /r/slatestarcodex. There was also more variety of topics than :marseytrain:s and twitter journos

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yeah, the lefties balanced it out. but now /r/ssc is useless for anything but links because it's otherwise a slightly more willing to argue SRD(at the expense of :marseylongpost2:), it's nearly declined to /r/xkcd levels. And that was probably the sweet spot if for no other reason that the blog comments were so shit to use.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reading /r/slatestarcodex now is like visiting a lobotomized friend. Smh posters there are basic as frick now. Where did all these lame new posters come from?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Probably NYT readers from the dox that think they're open minded but just brought their normie beliefs. But really when the people who post in the motte left to the motte who was left? People who claim to value to challenging your beliefs but are too fragile to handle even careful disagreement.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Have you figured out rationalism is r-slurred or

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I haven't

Pls explain

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pure Rationalism is r-slurred as humans aren't rational. Just be an ubermensch instead of a bugman

With Socrates, Greek taste suddenly changed in favour of dialectics: what really happened here? Above all, a noble taste was defeated; with dialectics, the rabble rises to the top. Before Socrates, dialectical manners were rejected in good society: they were seen as bad manners, they humiliated people. The young were warned against them. People were generally distrustful of reasons being displayed like this. Honourable things, like honourable people, do not go around with their reasons in their hand. It is indecent to show all five fingers. Nothing with real value needs to be proved first. Wherever authority is still part of the social fabric, wherever people give commands rather than reasons, the dialectician is a type of clown: he is laughed at and not taken seriously. - Socrates was the clown who made himself be taken seriously: what really happened here? - Freddy Nacho

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

humans aren't rational.

This is the actually purpose of the community, the point isn't that you are rational, it is that you should aim to be more rational. Christians don't aim to be christ.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I like how you're saying this as if rdrama isn't basically the same.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Mottecels are just fragile rightoids hiding behind :marseylongpost:

RDrama unironically has more intelligent and balanced political discussions nowadays in spite of our general r-sluration :marseysmugretard: :marseyspecial:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To be fair I think a lot of rdrama aligned mottezans lost our accounts in the orange cat raid of /r/place so it was imbalanced.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.