Let me tell you this-- /r/Drama was one of the most malevolent, cruel, coldhearted online communities you'll ever find, and even as a supporter of free speech it appalls me that Reddit allowed such a vile, festering hub of bigotry and sadism to exist. You think [slur]town was bad? That subreddit, if you pick up on the dog-whistles (and many don't even bother with that-- say want you want about Stormfront, at least it bans "n[slur]"), will reveal itself to you as Reddit's number one hub for the web's most hardened Nazis, Klansmen, Fascists, and G*mergaters. You'll notice on the sidebar that it encouraged members to be as dramatic as possible. That's intentional. They encouraged arguments in the comments section. That's intentional. You know the Three Minute Hate (it's from this underrated book 1985, give it a read, it's scary how much it parallels our society)? It's like that, they wanted to stoke the flames of reactionary rage so they could continue to dogpile every progressive and minority who enters the subreddit, normalizing these evil feelings. They brigaded from subreddit to subreddit, having an entire cabal of mods spanning hundreds of communities, gaslighting lived experiences of the oppressed and unashamedly bolstering Reddit's homegrown white supremacy movement. They've kink-shamed hundreds of people too, some even... to death. I fear that /r/drama may have produced an entire army of Dylann Roofs and Elliot Rogers, and I highly suggest that nobody dares visit that horrible subreddit, lest you potentially fall victim to its corruptive aura

"Chevron has proved to be fundamentally misguided."

"Experience has also shown that Chevron is unworkable." pic.twitter.com/ubc297hivO

— Rob Romano (@2Aupdates) June 28, 2024

The Chevron doctrine stems from the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984). It established a legal test for determining when courts should defer to a federal agency's interpretation of a statute that it administers. The doctrine involves a two-step process:

Step One: The court asks whether the statute's language is clear and unambiguous regarding the issue at hand. If it is, the court must follow the statute's plain meaning.

Step Two: If the statute is ambiguous, the court then considers whether the agency's interpretation is "reasonable" or "permissible." If the agency's interpretation meets this standard, the court defers to the agency's expertise.

This doctrine recognizes the expertise and policy-making prerogatives of administrative agencies and allows them to fill in the details of broad legislative frameworks.

TLDR: fed agencies can't make up rules

A week ago I was going to hook up with a guy and my period suddenly starts like two hours before he's arriving. I panic and stick two of those triangle makeup sponges inside of me. Well, as I was rushing and panicking, I actually inserted 3, not 2. But I forgot... so when he left, I removed 2 sponges and thought everything was fine.

3-4 days go by and my period is over, but brown liquid is dripping out of my vagina all day long. Not discharge, super watery brown liquid. It smells so bad. Nope, not fishy. It smells like feces. Yep. Straight up. Pretty sure that sponge had both sperm and period blood in it. I'M SORRY. I've never smelled anything so bad.

On day 7, I finally went to the pharmacy and got vaginal gel, thinking I was suffering from bacterial vaginosis. I squirt a lottt of it up there and pray it'll fix this. A couple hours later I have to go number 2, and when I push... I feel something coming out of my vagina. I thought "Oh heck no. There's no way" and there it is, the last sponge I'd forgotten was there. It's not hard like a tampon, it's super soft so I never felt it.

I'm so disgusted with myself. I've had this sponge inside of me for A WEEK. With sperm in it. Should I do something even though it's gone now? Should I see a gyno??? I'm so embarrassed and feel so dirty.

Op is sexworker. This is whore you are bangiin raw.

!biofoids

!foidmoment

!coomers

wunderschön

People are, of course, 100% on board with this and not being dramatic at all

https://old.reddit.com/r/CapitalismVSocialism/comments/1do62wt/all_the_denver_basic_income_project_is_a_failure/

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/64f507a995b636019ef8853a/t/6671a15eec7a812dee108e7c/1718722914185/FINAL_DBIP+Year+One+Quantitative+Research+Report.pdf

They organized the recipients in the following groups, "Eligible applicants were randomly assigned to one of three payment groups: A) $1,000 a month for 12 months, for a total of $12,000 in a year; B) $6,500 upon enrollment and $500 a month for the subsequent 11 months, for a total of $12,000 in a year, C) $50 a month for 12 months, for a total of $600 in a year."

This is odd, why don't they have a control group that received $0 per month? Could it be that they knew most of these people would find housing of their own volition regardless of the payment provided, and that by excluding an actual control group, they don't have to compare against the null results???

Maybe by providing $50/month to people that would find housing anyway, they could claim that participants showed these incredible improvements (ignoring the fact that the payments are not the reason why)?!?!? No, that would be disingenuous! Leftists wouldn't do such a thing!!!

Actually, that's exactly what's going on here. If you look at Figure 16 on page 27, it turns out that the $1000/mo payment is statistically no more likely to reduce the probability of a participant being unhoused as compared to the $50/mo payment. Does anyone actually believe that $50/mo is enough to solve homelessness? No, that's silly.

Leftists want to believe that UBI will work SO BADLY that they take taxpayer money, funnel it to a group of homeless people they know do not need it (they deliberately chose participants without disabilities and illness), construct a purposely deceptive "study" based on this scientifically unsound process, and then plaster the "promising results" all over the internet, using leftist propaganda accounts on X to trick people.

!peakpoors

I know, I know. The BBC is not a reliable source, cope.

I have no idea why they are doing this but former commie leader and American hater Evo Morales has denounced it so it must be a good thing. Hopefully it leads to a lot of helicopter rides for leftist scum.

Cute twinks of reddit clutch pearls

https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1dp8h9v/bolivia_presidential_palace_stormed_in_apparent/

Most stable South American shithole

/r/Bolivia for those who speak lettuce picker

https://old.reddit.com/r/BOLIVIA/comments/1dp75m6/que_esta_pasando/

@pizzashill

rdramaai: https://websim.ai/c/nvI7TPAouK3gD8UtN

rdramaai with sexting mode : https://websim.ai/c/z9No9rqNrdCFathpL

Not sure exactly what's going on, but a bunch of the early power users are insane creeps I think? The baddies include people called anonsee and kairi as well as pedos and zoophiles if anyone wants to try find the goss.

examples of spicy stuff:

• https://aegis.blue/Notice+of+Labeler+Termination

• https://bsky.app/profile/bitdizzy.bsky.social/post/3kvmg42btrs27

• https://bsky.app/profile/himboblacksmith.bsky.social/post/3kvmbq2eedc2i

• 

P.S. I object to bard-posting on principle, but penny remains an active user