cheer

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1d77r0e/sandy_hook_families_ask_bankruptcy_judge_to/?sort=controversial

Alex Jones is crying about it

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/alex-jones-breaks-down-in-tears-says-authorities-threatened-to-shut-down-his-studio-i-was-duped-by-someone-101717304074181.html

!g*mers

Anyway, countdown to the kid seeing this tweet since they get a tablet shoved in their hands before they can even walk these days.

(plus Armored Skeptic on suicide watch lol)

I thought they would start shooting satellites since that would made India super power

Karma for rigging

https://twitter.com/Babygravy9/status/1796930912485015615

this guy might have yellow fever and similar r-slurred rightoid views about le westoidfoid, or mb they're in love and aren't terminally online losers, or mb they're not even dating. Who knows, but it's not stopping wignats from pooping themselves

>the west has heckin fallen bc someone had s-x

supermodel steps in to point out his negative canthal tilt, 3/10

>omg he's so dreamy I'm str8 btw

chiobu steps in to defend his sister, only for capy to slap him around

in my opinion, I think she could do better !femcels disguss

https://twitter.com/kyivpride/status/1797600024987406336

Official Kiev pride account gives link to registration of pride event (atm I am writing this it had 260 views)

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

His wife suggested the cover-up story behind the "grab the kitty tape", that was revealed in the testimony at the trial. (101)

Ask any/every man (non gay) if they've ever grabbed a kitty, lol. (-59)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

They were indoctrinated into a cult mindset (10)

Which party votes in lockstep and turns on anyone that dares go against the dialectic? It certainly not Republicans. (-23)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

Dems have now normalized the kangaroo court. Careful, that knife cuts both ways. (-24)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

There is a big difference between "Did Trump do what it was said he did" and "should this be a felony prosecution".My own issues with the trial:Paying people money to keep information quiet is normally a major expense for every campaign, right on par with paying people money to dig information up. If that constitutes "illegally influencing an election" than literally every campaign down to that for the Hazzard County Animal Control Officer is doing the same thing, but only Trump gets prosecuted. Do you think the Hillary Clinton campaign listed the expenses for the Pee Dossier as "we paid this money to get false information to embarrass Trump"?The payments to Stormy Daniels are perfectly legal in and of themselves. You are allowed to pay off your mistress so that she doesn't tell her story.The DOJ and Bragg's own predecessor knew all about the payments and declined to prosecute. The FEC knew about them and declined to even bring a civil suit (which has a much lower burden of proo... (0)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Except. . .that has nothing to do with the charges. The charges are all related to financial fraud. Him having the affair and paying hush money isn't illegal. Altering business records to hide the payments, however, is. (65)

Sort of. The falsifying business records is a misdemeanor, but doing so with intent of another crime elevates it to a felony. Prosecutors didn't have to prove what the underlying crime was, just that there was intent.    The other crime (one of 3 floated by prosecutors) was that this was done because it would be bad for Trump in the election. Essentially, he falsified business records so that the American public would not find out that he cheated on his wife with a porn star, and that he paid her for her silence.    If the defense had convinced the jury that the reason Trump did it was to protect his family - that this had nothing to do with the election - he could've been found not guilty. However, there were several bits of testimony that showed Trump's concern was the election.   Then, prosecution would've had to tie the fraud to a different crime (they mentioned tax fraud and another crime I don't remember as possible underlying crimes).  (3)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

But isn't it still a crime just not a felony? Falsiying business records is still illegal, just a misdemeanor if not done in furtherance of other crimes. (1)

Correct, the crime that was charged was a misdemeanor, so the statute of limitations had run. The “in furtherance of another crime” part is what would have made it a felony, but the DOJ had previously investigated the other crime that was alleged and declined to prosecute (which means that legally speaking, he didn't commit “another crime” whether or not he did the thing that was alleged). The other crime wasn't a state crime, it was a federal crime, so the state doesn't have the ability to prosecute for it. You can't simply allege a crime that - if committed - would ratchet the charge up to a felony, which is one of the eleventy billion reasons this will be overturned on appeal, at some level. If you could do this, it gives prosecutors absolute free rein to enhance any charge for which an enhancement exists, by simply alleging the crime that would enhance the charge was committed. If you're innocent until proven guilty, you're innocent until proven guilty in a court that actually h... (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/Spector567

Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🐮(+0🐮)

Number of comments: 20

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion