butt also theyre gonna ban all porn and queer people!

Oh, don't worry, the eventual goal is to ban all porn. It's even spelled out in the Republican Mein Kampf, Project 2025.

That's a lie They're going to ban queer people, and claim that that's banning porn Actual porn they'll leave alone.

They will not. Yes, they also have an anti-gay agenda, but the Christian Taliban, which now dominates the Republican party and holds the Supreme Court, absolutely wants to re-criminalize porn And I quote from P2025's website itself Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership calls for the criminalization of pornography production, distribution, and consumption. Pornography has no claim to First Amendment protection and its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime.

Britney Spears appears frantic as she posts bizarre new Instagram video spinning around in circles, weeks after she declared she identifies as a ‘5 year old.’ pic.twitter.com/MLSVRl9hg0

— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) December 20, 2024

Other post

https://rdrama.net/h/toomanyxchromosomes/post/326941/former-witch-warns-parents-about-the

I've felt (I don't know...guilty?) about the imbalance in male and female sexuality pretty much since I became sexually active but especially since I (25F) got with my current boyfriend (26M) a few years back A typical session for us will result in me cumming probably about 10 times, sometimes more sometimes less depending on the circumstances and what we're doing. Whereas for my BF its always the same, just one orgasm. Sometimes we'll wait for about 20 mins or so and he can go again but he's outright told me before that the 2nd orgasm for him so soon after the first is not really enjoyable and he only really does it for my benefit and after two he's totally done for the day. So essentially I have more orgasms on a bad day than he has on a good day and when I put it that way I genuinely get upset on his behalf.

And this is without mentioning the issue of holding back orgasms during s*x which I don't feel this sub has touched upon enough from what I've seen. I simply cant imagine having to hold back an orgasm, it completely defeats the whole point of s*x in my mind, having to hold back would just make the whole experience more stressful than enjoyable as far as I can tell. Without meaning to sound like I'm bragging I'm really relieved I'm not a man because I know that if I was I'd absolutely suck at s*x because I c*m so quickly and I'd end up leaving my partners disappointed. This discrepancy in being able to just let go and enjoy s*x really doesn't sit well with me, I've been with men who suffered from premature ejaculation and against my better judgement I did find it frustrating when they came too quickly. But whereas for men there is seemingly no worse crime in the bedroom than cumming too soon for women its the complete inverse where there is no greater virtue than girls that c*m really quickly. They are admired by both genders as ideal sexual partners!!! How is this fair?!?!?

I suppose what I'm getting at is that I HATE this discrepancy in orgasms, I feel like some kind of selfish pleasure whore but I cant help it!!! I really wish my BF could experience what I feel and I really do give him all the blowjobs and most of the kinky stuff that he asks for to try an even the scales but I still feel guilty. Its not just guilt though its a weird cocktail of emotions, I don't like to use this word but I do think there is some degree of pity in there and I have to admit there's also a huge sense of relief that I'm a girl but in all honesty that just makes me feel even more guilty, like I'm being dismissive of the issue due to an accident of birth.

I raised all these points (or something similar) on another forum that I was a member of a few years back and the response I got from both men and women basically amounted to "Why do you care? Its not your problem, just enjoy yourself" the response from other women especially was almost hostile!!! Pointing out that I'm not just lucky for being a girl but also lucky amongst women as well many of whom don't have partners that can bring them to orgasm or who even struggle to climax by themselves. I suppose all that's true but it didn't really make me feel any better about it all :(

Anyway reading all that back I imagine some of you probably think I'm being dramatic or looking for problems where there are none but seriously for the last few years this has really ate at me on occasions. I'm not looking for a solution as such, I suppose there isn't one really, I just thought some of you might be interested in my perspective

Anywho thanks for reading :)

You let him do what?? pic.twitter.com/T7wa3cUqhh

— Naomi (@TheNaomiWolf) December 18, 2024

!foidmoment

!foidmoment

Just read the replies

I was thinking he deserves windshield wiper fluid and motor oil

He'd probably love it and then immediately start lecturing me on how I didn't chose the best brand and to just ask him next time.

*50 replies of seething*

sneed about it

https://old.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/1hfzlfg/women_carry_71_of_mental_load_says_new_research/

71% + 45% = 115%

Found an extract from her manifesto that's currently locked, apparently she was a radical feminist (who was a fan of RFH), and not exactly proficient in the English language. https://t.co/S8tshBGbY5 pic.twitter.com/t9xWXfXdia

— пiтго (@PETR0GRAD) December 16, 2024

I predict that starting next month, pregnant teenagers in red states will be removed from their homes by the state and placed in either foster care or group homes until their babies are born, then the babies will be removed from the mothers and adopted out with the assistance of religion-based adoption agencies. Because Handmaid's Tale was based in reality... and some in our country read it as an instruction manual, not a cautionary tale.

Note: the Magdalene Laundries weren't "group homes" or foster care, they were abusive workhouses and nothing like them ever existed in the USA even when we were a thousand times more christian than we'll ever be again. but this is /r/twoxchromosomes so we won't let facts get in the way of some good hysteria.

I think one thing you'll see is WHITE families with trans or queer girls will have those children taken away because their parents are being irresponsible by not forcing them into the closet, and these kids will be in a Magdalene Laundry type situation and more or less forcibly married off to Young Republican Incels who are in good standing with the national party. R*ped and impregnated, then forced to marry the man. Getting that white birth rate up is real important.

Deut 22:29 allows male feminists to buy their victims for 50 shekels.

Handmaid's Tale is historic and history repeats itself when we don't take heed.

When people unironically believe this nonsense, I assume this is less TwoXChromosomes and more TwoXtraChromosomes.

Why do you believe this couldn't happen?

Come on now, there's no basis for this in reality. Without even diving into the legal hurdles or the legal and social ramifications, this sort of thing doesn't just start happening the instant someone takes office. People vastly overestimate the power of the oval office and underestimate the rest of the government's ability to sit around arguing and not get things done. People who actually believe this stuff haven't taken one moment to think logically. This is 100% terminally-online emotional thinking.

Oh, you're an "I'm a logical thinker" troll. All of this stuff, and worse, has happened in history. Some people may be over-estimating the speed with which things can happen, but "government is inefficient" is not a compelling argument for why it can't happen at all.

kinda proof that posts get astroturfed to the front page? and maybe the competency crisis + changing political atmosphere caused backlash?

Bobby Joe Long as an American serial killer and male feminist.

Long was born with an extra X chromosome.

This condition results in excessive estrogen production.

She's 40.

I wouldn't date a transphobe personally. If you're being quite generous with your partner, you could talk to him about why he feels so insecure about you having s*x with trans folks.

Does he feel similarly about you hooking up with other men? Is this some weird way of trying to have a "one peepee policy" without calling it that?

I don't really want to meet other men! I just want to meet queer women, and trans women and men. I think he doesn't get it because, in his mind, he thinks about their biological s*x. I find it so wrong, and it's really hard because I've been in a long-term relationship with him, but I've grown so much as a person and in understanding my queerness. I find it so unfair that he thinks this way about my beautiful trans people.

Trans men are men, dude. That's kind of the whole point.

dood

!foidmoment

!rfrickluigi_jannies free bait material

I want to act on my primal instincts and have s*x the way men have s*x but I literally cannot subject that to myself without feeling traumatized after.

Like I know it's a MUTUAL action where both parties consent and enjoy the pleasure but at the same time I'd feel like the loser?

I get the sense there's a power imbalance I feel like I can't immerse myself to my primal desires without feeling like I'm losing something.

The strangest thing is I AM NOT RELIGIOUS NOR DO I THINK OTHER WOMEN WHO ENJOY S*X W/O FEELINGS ATTACHED ARE WRONG FOR IT. I just cannot relax and mimic their ways. I DONT KNOW WHY.

HELP ME. I want my insides rearranged so bad but it's so unrealistic to wait until I'm in another relationship for that.