Moids ☕

There's data suggesting people actually had more s*x in the past despite society being harsher on promiscuity. People have more s*x in relationships than they do stringing together hookups, simply due to ease and availability. (At least straggots)

Even if increased sexual promiscuity from women leads to more s*x overall, you're assuming that s*x is evenly distributed. Without the limiting factor of people pairing off and taking each other out of the available pool, one male is able to monopolize multiple females, leaving a large number of excess males. This is why societies throughout history have had to strictly enforce monogamy and/or find ways to cull excess males to maintain stability.

The cope loop goes like this:

The whores would sleep with him if the incel was prepared to degrade himself in that way but he isn't, so the whores are left to the chads while the incel waits for the innocent virgin woman to meet and fall in love with.

This, however, never happens because all the good women also get gobbled up by chads and turned into whores.

After seeing what those goblins actually look like and reading their written thoughts, I actually believe that they are so physically, mentally, emotionally, and interpersonally hideous that they will never get s*x or be loved.

And it's for the better of the human gene pool.

If s*x is only allowed in long-term relationships, the 1:1 gender ratio means everyone is paired off. Casual s*x lets multiple women frick the same hot guy on different nights (or the same night if he's ), vs one of them marrying him and the others having to settle for uggos.

Patriarchies take this logic and go even further, e.g. not allowing women to get jobs, forcing them to marry even if the available guys are repulsive. Or making them male property so they don't get a choice. It all comes down to the fact no women would voluntarily choose to frick these walking genetic failures, so they fall back on social coercion.

(tbh whore has never really meant "has a lot of s*x": fricking your husband twice a day = fine, fricking one stranger a month = whore)

You're forgetting about the Chad paradigm

I think that their cope is that women are only whores for

I imagine the constant rage/depression they feel stops clear thoughts from forming.

Why are people seriousposting here?

They're not actually mad about the lack of s*x or romance. Most incels are just passive, low T guys who are deeply concerned over over their social status and how their lack of s*x affects that i.e. Elliot Rodgers. Fricking some uggo or paying for s*x does nothing for their status so they don't accept it as "real." Same with betabuxxing since even if they manage to go steady with some Stacy it doesn't count because other men fricked her without trying as hard which lowers his status relative to theirs (it doesn't matter if it's true or not the idea is that it could be true if she's fricked other guys). The incel ideal is the same as the PUA, where the goal is statusmaxxing by fricking as many attractive women as possible even if it brings them little pleasure or happiness. Even though they're doing this for the approval of some audience, the audience doesn't even have to really exist, it's done to impress the uncool highschooler in their heads.