Moids β˜•

89
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That part always confused me about inkwells. How do they hold the very clearly contradictory opinions of "WHORES, AAAARGH!" and "it's impossible to get s*x" at the same time? Basic logic would imply that if foids "spread their legs" less - s*x would be even harder to get, no?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They're not actually mad about the lack of s*x or romance. Most incels are just passive, low T guys who are deeply concerned over over their social status and how their lack of s*x affects that i.e. Elliot Rodgers. Fricking some uggo or paying for s*x does nothing for their status so they don't accept it as "real." Same with betabuxxing since even if they manage to go steady with some Stacy it doesn't count because other men fricked her without trying as hard which lowers his status relative to theirs (it doesn't matter if it's true or not the idea is that it could be true if she's fricked other guys). The incel ideal is the same as the PUA, where the goal is statusmaxxing by fricking as many attractive women as possible even if it brings them little pleasure or happiness. Even though they're doing this for the approval of some audience, the audience doesn't even have to really exist, it's done to impress the uncool highschooler in their heads.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The cope loop goes like this:

The whores would sleep with him if the incel was prepared to degrade himself in that way but he isn't, so the whores are left to the chads while the incel waits for the innocent virgin woman to meet and fall in love with.

This, however, never happens because all the good women also get gobbled up by chads and turned into whores.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There's data suggesting people actually had more s*x in the past despite society being harsher on promiscuity. People have more s*x in relationships than they do stringing together hookups, simply due to ease and availability. (At least straggots)

Even if increased sexual promiscuity from women leads to more s*x overall, you're assuming that s*x is evenly distributed. Without the limiting factor of people pairing off and taking each other out of the available pool, one male is able to monopolize multiple females, leaving a large number of excess males. This is why societies throughout history have had to strictly enforce monogamy and/or find ways to cull excess males to maintain stability.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

and/or find ways to cull excess males to maintain stability.

We need another world war.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

or just gender-selective abortions.

but historically it's always men who benefit from a higher ratio of women to men, so it's amusing hearing feminist fantasize about aborting boys.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Send all ugly, single 30 year olds of both genders to the front lines

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is some 60 iq reasoning and just a total waste of effort. Send the all to be experimented on with half baked ugliness remedies. If it pays off they will be good looking and rejoin society. If it doesn't just keep slamming risky surgeries and medicine into them until they perish. This also pushes science forward benefiting the full citizens. :marscientist:


:#marseytwerking:

:marseycoin::marseycoin::marseycoin:
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd like the threat of imminent death from deployment to force the uggos into desperately funding these experimental surgeries themselves, tbh. Why should this be the taxpayers' burden?

:marseycapitalistmanlet:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who said this would be taxpayer funded? Big pharma just needs its shackles removed.


:#marseytwerking:

:marseycoin::marseycoin::marseycoin:
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

![](/images/16625678301871347.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Look at that one fricker breaking lockdown.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseynerd:

No wonder you don't get laid

and/or find ways to cull excess males to maintain stability

Actually pretty based though

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>No wonder you don't get laid

If I just wanted my peepee sucked, I'd go on Grindr

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseylaugh::#marseysmug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

After seeing what those goblins actually look like and reading their written thoughts, I actually believe that they are so physically, mentally, emotionally, and interpersonally hideous that they will never get s*x or be loved.

And it's for the better of the human gene pool.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That’s just survival of the fittest. R-slurred lions don’t get laid either.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If s*x is only allowed in long-term relationships, the 1:1 gender ratio means everyone is paired off. Casual s*x lets multiple women frick the same hot guy on different nights (or the same night if he's :gigachad:), vs one of them marrying him and the others having to settle for uggos.

Patriarchies take this logic and go even further, e.g. not allowing women to get jobs, forcing them to marry even if the available guys are repulsive. Or making them male property so they don't get a choice. It all comes down to the fact no women would voluntarily choose to frick these walking genetic failures, so they fall back on social coercion.

(tbh whore has never really meant "has a lot of s*x": fricking your husband twice a day = fine, fricking one stranger a month = whore)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're forgetting about the Chad :marseyschizochadthankscapylove: paradigm

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because it's kind of irrelevant here. At a lesser supply, the highest s*x earners would get even higher percentage of the total :marseyxd: leaving even less scraps for the rest :marseynerd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

According to the Book :marseyreading: of Inkwell, every foid :marseypennyboo: without fail flocks to Chad. Chad :marseycapychad3: then :marseytransflag: breaks their heart :marseychiobulove: and sacred virginity seal, :marseyotter: and then :marseytransflag: they dye their hair :marseyavril2: and turn :marseyhillary: into scrotephobes who would never :marseyitsover: touch :marseygrass: a ricemaxxer or currycel :marseypajeet: or short :marseymanlet: king.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think that their cope is that women are only whores for :chad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I imagine the constant rage/depression they feel stops clear thoughts from forming.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why are people seriousposting here?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

idk, entertainment? We've always had some amount of seriousposting on /r/drama / rdrama.net....

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wait did I somehow get lost and end up on that unfunny rDrama sister site with seriousposting rightoids?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Or is this bizzaroworld where rdrama is unfunny?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can you print me some ban awards to combat :marseygladiator: the mayo :marseycracka: fascist :marsey1984: menace

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We're currently supposed to be on a printing diet, lol :marseypoor:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyobey::marseycapygigabrain::marseyobey:

Literally 1984 :marseyfreezepeach:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.