None

Having no family doctor I'd love to sign up for something like this.

Is there anyway to save on taxes or otherwise to offset the cost?

Most downvoted comment lol.

$450 for nurse practitioners? The scam has begun from the start.

No diss on nurse practitioners, I find mine to be extremely competent, and tbh I haven't seen my doctor even once since I signed up to my family practicr - but then again, this is paid for by my taxes.

If I'm coughing up 450 bucks, I'll want a doctor at my beck and call 24/7 and prioritised referrals.

!r-slurs come get ur boy

Is there a way to report this? I though this wasn't allowable

Nope entirely legal u fricking narc.

How is this legal!!?? Why isn't the Ministry of Health not shutting these down and throwing the book at these people.

More and more it feels like laws are just not being enforced anymore.

R E T A R D E D

"me no likey! illegal! no rule of law!"

As a physician that has had to fix several mistakes by nurse practitioners in the last month, this is not going to end well

lmao jokes on you I'd never be able to get in to see a real MD anyway. There's a reason I've not been in 6 years and counting

None
None

:#marseyyikestyping:

None
None
None

Gunn, who works as a human resources assistant and is currently on maternity leave, has been living with her ex-partner for 10 months as she scours rental ads multiple times a day. She said she needs to get out, but she's starting to feel hopeless.

"I've been looking for so long and I just feel like landlords and big corporations, they get to just cherry-pick because they have so many applications and they just pick the one that makes the most income," she said. "I have a good job ... I pay all my bills. And now I could be homeless."

Golly almost like being a single mom is a bad choice.

She's working with a housing support worker, but they haven't been able to find her a rental either.

Gunn said if she can't find a safe and affordable place to rent soon, she may have to give up primary custody of her children to their fathers, who have stable living situations.

:#marseyxd: Fathers.

But it may be for the best. Maybe you should've consider this before being a hoe

Alexis Dingwell is also searching for housing for herself and her two-year-old son. She currently rents a room in a house with 10 people.

She said she has applied to hundreds of rentals that are close to her $1,500 budget but she is always denied. In one instance, she was told it's because she has a young child.

Sue. They literally said the quite part outloud. Drag the r-slur to the HRC and milk them like a paypig. A black guy got 10K a few years ago because he was singled out and made to prepay for his meal.

"I think it's ridiculous, honestly, 'cause where else are we supposed to live if we can't live in your building," Dingwell said. "It's an apartment building, it's for people to live, it's for people to be safe. And you're telling me I can't live there because I have a kid? It just doesn't make sense."

Makes perfect sense. No one wants to deal with children, especially those of a single mother

None
12
Affordable housing is here, leafbros!

jk suck it poorstrags :marseyfinger:

Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland toured a new building on Monday offering micro-apartments starting at $1,600 per month that she said was illustrative of the homes that her government is getting built for “low and middle income Canadians.”

None
None
None

So APPARENTLY you can get money if youre a native who was forced to go to day school which as a racist colonizer you would think is literally just school.

BUT apparently no. Day schools, chud, were JUST as bad as residential schools, maybe worse because they had to cram 24 hours of oppression into just 8.

The government paid out like 6 BILLION dollars to the heya hoyas in an effort to put the matter to rest but they want to reopen the settlement because they spent all their money on smokes and lottery tickets already or smth.

Basically this means they will be able to keep the settlements open in perpetuity all the while launching new ones, on top of the other ever increasing funding they ask for.

None
None
None
26

None

https://old.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/1b92j6v/senseless_violence_everything_we_know_right_now/?sort=controversial

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17098522420917177.webp

Life's funny like that

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17098522422513804.webp

Canadians can't resist talking about americans within every Reddit thread

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17098522425138104.webp

we had years of pro violence Tamils blocking highways, kid coming from a civil war, Sri on Sri violence here is uh...not surprising

None
None

OTTAWA - Electricity Canada is sounding the alarm over a proposed tax change it warns could see some private utilities saddled with millions in additional income taxes.

He says the problem arises from an adjustment to the Income Tax Act[...]It would bring Canada in line with the United States, the United Kingdom and Ireland on tax rules for companies that operate across more than one country.

But Powell says those countries exempted private utilities that are publicly regulated because they are often required to carry higher debt loads in order to keep rates lower. The new rule would lower the tax exemptions for those debt loads, meaning income tax bills would go up.

Who could have seen this coming?? Yes of course the power utilities will just absorb a giant % cut in profits

None
20
Safe Supply is morally bankrupt :marseyindignant:

A few weeks ago there was a thread in my local sub which I wrote off as schizo rambling. Someone was claiming a chain of foster homes was providing kids in care with weed every day, in an effort to make them docile and easier to manage. Lots of scepticism and basically OP was told to contact both CFS and the CBC. The thread of course is long gone.

Weeks go by and CBC runs a front page article

Province cuts ties with Winnipeg foster home operator after teens given marijuana daily

In which all of OPs claims were vindicated. If you needed any more proof that enabling junkies and letting them wallow in addiction is immoral, this is probably it.

Staff were told by upper management it was better to have workers at the home provide cannabis than risk residents going elsewhere and doing harder drugs, such as methamphetamine and opioids.

"It's easier to just keep [them] placated and happy than to have to deal with the paperwork, police and hospitals," the former employee said.

She said an underage teen who had never smoked marijuana in her life started smoking it daily after she moved into a Spirit Rising House home.

The foster homes were run by some guy who believes in enabling junkies and was giving kids a gram of weed a day. That's over an ounce a month for a kid. Absolutely insane amounts of weed for teens. If you had any doubts this is proof harm reduction proponents lack a moral compass.

None
14
:redlight: the rim doesn't roll THIS IS NOT A DRILL i repeat THE RIM DOESN'T ROLL :redlight:

:marseyitsover:

!leafs it should be ILLEGAL to advertise ROLL UP THE RIM if the rim doesn't roll. The North has fallen. :chudturbospergout1:

Remember what they stole from you.

None

Remember if you die before retirement your family gets literally nothing. If you die after retirement your spouse gets half. Terrible risk compared to a private option.

LOL please tell me more about this "great asset", an asset so great that I could theoretically contribute to it for 40 years but, if I end up dropping dead at age 65.1, would end up getting essentially zero (excluding the pitiful 'survivor's pension')

If you drop dead at 65.1 you also get essentially zero of any of your other retirement assets, since you're dead

What an r-slur reddit tier comment.

If it's such a great investment why does it need to be mandatory?

So it can function as a ponzi scheme if need be

Because not everyone has the sense or willpower to save for the years they cannot work. In a country with a social safety net, you and I would otherwise be paying for those people's retirement. I'd prefer they fund it themselves.

A lot of anti-socialism folks tend to hate on the CPP but the alternative is even more socialist.

I don't know a single person who relies on their CPP who doesn't also need some other form of welfare.

So they should just say that. Why lie about it being a good "asset." It's not even an asset, it's a liability for workers and it pays out only if you live long.

And that's assuming the government still wants to pay you out by the time you retire. There's no guarantee they don't just scrap the program and take the money for something else.

All good points.

It's absolutely an asset. Yes, it has uncertain returns. Many assets do.

It's an "asset" you can't barrow against, can't withdraw from until the gov says so, can't be passed on to your next and kin and disappears entirely if you die.

This is kinda how I see it as well.

Personally, I fricking hate the CPP. I'd get far better returns investing that money myself. With that being said, I understand its existence, because I also understand how truly idiotic some people are with money.

Just look at how many elderly people right now rely/relied solely on CPP to fund their retirement, it's a joke. If there was no CPP, then sure, some would have saved that money… but lots would be fricked and be a huge bane on our social services if there was no system in place.

Then stop being a cuck and do what 95% of all !leafs do and commit tax fraud.

How is this an asset. I can't borrow against it. I can't sell it. I can't pass it on to my children. It is not included in my net worth.

/u/Long_Ad_2764 asking the real questions!

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.