Unable to load image

Calls for law to require 'clear yes' to s*x : unitedkingdom

https://old.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/1b7bpvc/im_asking_for_it_calls_for_law_to_require_clear/

								

								

Context: Dr. Charlotte Proudman is a gigafeminist known for her hot takes, including:

Today, she has launched a campaign to change the law so that moids have to prove a foid consented when defending an accusation of r*pe. In her own words:

It would put the onus on defendants to show how she consented, if she wanted to have s*x, if she was asked if she wanted to have s*x, what steps did she take to make sure that she was wanting to have s*x and was enthusiastic about it.

Proudman (who I have personally diagnosed as having Narcissistic Personality Disorder) decided to make herself the face of the campaign, producing this wonderful poster:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1709671829612153.webp

The slogan itself has become a point of contention:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096721270529974.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096721271223457.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096721271945784.webp

https://x.com/BiFelicia319/status/1765044078897471864

https://x.com/jessothomson/status/1765080110141722910

https://x.com/Daisy_J_S/status/1765096615352959472

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1709672280848292.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096722809274642.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096722810108292.webp

https://x.com/LizMaryWard/status/1765065360271888644

https://x.com/beesley_cathy/status/1765059359447330969

https://x.com/jessothomson/status/1765080110141722910

Selected comments:

This is obviously r-slurred, but naturally there are some male feminists arguing against their own self-interest :malefeminist:

Why do you think this switches the burden of proof to the accused?

Because that's literally what she said it does? :marseyshrug:


The criminalisation of basic human behaviour continues.

I'm 30, there are only a handful of times the woman actually said ‘let's have s*x'

Which 'basic human behaviour' are you referring to, coercing women into s*x?

:marseysnoo: That Redditor should be arrested for not getting the consent forms signed!


I feel that these sorts of things are proposed in bad faith to make feminists look ridiculous.

:marseygigaretard: Feminists would never say something completely r-slurred unless they were plants.

109
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Getting consent papers is bad enough but imagine how much of a mess everything will be once bureaucracy gets involved :marseysmug2:

You'll need your s*x permission signed three times with a blue pen on A4 paper, date entered correctly, and your names written clearly otherwise it won't be accepted in court. Oh and it must also be stamped by some official the next day after both of you will give an additional declaration of consent :marseycop:

It's what bongs deserve, I hope this will become a law :marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oi did you the loicense for the s*x license

:#marseybongtalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

everything will be once bureaucracy gets involved

Bureaucracy should be involved. Its called marriage, and its an institution.

I want to be able to participate in making life without any risks or any consequences and without any input from others

Who you procreate with, should be determined in part by society and community. When we stopped allowing social pressures to effect procreation, we created broken homes and r-slur copulation, destroying our society's gene pool.

Like it or not, when community had input on this sort of issue we had >90% two parent households and a much healthier population. Mentally ill idiots can only think with their cute twink wieners. Reminds me of the r-slurred cute twinks who jerk off or practice sodomy. Your spilling your seed for no other reason than because you are too r-slurred to not give into your pleasure. You are making yourself less than human, like an animal, incapable of self control.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I would rather get shit on by my upstairs neighbor on the balcony of "my" 75th floor, 200 sq ft, Walmart-owned apartment than live a week of my life with input from puritans.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No one will force you to live by puritan rule, we'll just peacefully protest you with a powerful witch trial.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're right! Having to get a consent declaration and the signed approval of all your neighbours before fricking a girl is even better :marseyagreefast:

No bong will ever pass his genes again :marseybonggenocide:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well the problem is that they don't want the community or family involved in this decision making, they want the exact r-slurred cute twinks you complained about to be in charge of this. That's who the bureaucracy is.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tldr?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i pretended my car was out of gas on a busy intersection and a guy started helping push it and i hit the gas making him fall flat on his face like a bum.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

idk

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.