https://x.com/DeItaone/status/1895529008437367184
— *Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) February 28, 2025
🚨REPORTER: "Mr. President, do you still think that Mr. Zelenskyy is a dictator?"
— Autism Capital 🧩 (@AutismCapital) February 27, 2025
TRUMP: "Umm...did I say that? I can't believe I said that. Next question." LMAO! 😂 pic.twitter.com/CMaPCJJAWQ
That was my bad guys
Lmammaoao
Breaking: Fox News reports that Zelenskyy begged to stay and negotiate further, but was kicked out of the White House.
— PM Breaking News (@PMBreakingNews) February 28, 2025
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
full video (11 minutes)
!eurochads !commenters
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The art of the (no) deal.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Look at Z's reaction when Trump says they wont break the ceasefire because Putin respects him.
You can see the exact moment he realizes these people are totally insane.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The Russiagate fake news actually psyopping the US prez into becoming a Manchurian candidate is top tier comedy tbh
It'd be hilarious if Russia was the one that planted the story. Of course most politicians facing such attacks would try very hard to go the other way and prove they have no connection with Russia, maybe even turn hostile to them, but if they psych analyzed Trump and realised he's just that much of a sperg it'd be very funny.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Russiagate is fantastic example of how Trump masterfully plays the press.
His administration did have illegal contacts with Russia, a member of his administration was convicted of lying to the FBI about it. The Mueller report found plenty of evidence of Russian interference in the election in support of Trump, it couldn't find evidence of collaboration but also found many cases where the administration obstructed or withheld evidence that may have shown such collaboration. Its highly likely if the justice department was independent from the executive members of Trump's WH, if not Trump himself, would have been charged.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Bro ultimately some bots posting on twitter isn't going to impress most people enough for them to think the guy voted for prez is a traitor.
Accept it, there's a reason political corruption is very rarely punished in all democracies, electorate simply won't believe what you say about their guy unless its some real smoking gun shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hacking the DNC & RNC and then only leaking DNC data to wikileaks is a bit more than some twitter bots, the Hillary email server came to light because they also hacked her campaign. While there isn't any evidence they succeeded they actively tried to infiltrate election infrastructure. https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume1.pdf
The Paul Manafort stuff was particularly wild. The "spying" they are investigating right now was because Manafort was trying to trade US secrets for Russian favors to help Trump win, FBI were already investigating him before he joined the Trump campaign.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"Russia interfered in the election by showing everyone how Hillary mishandled official government information."
Of course, Russia preferred the candidate who was not a neolib Warhawk. Bill Clinton openly interfered in Russian elections to support Yeltsin. He even congratulated him when he usurped power during Black October.
One guy in Trump's administration who didn't disclose his dealings with Russia is only a smoking gun in a mind of a libtard.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
No evidence has been found that Russia hacked those servers. Crowdstrike refused to release their evidence.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Turtles are cool though
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
lol, absolutely r-slurred. Nice bait though.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Russiagate started with the Chris Steele dossier (former MI5 agent) who was paid by the DNC through their attorney to fabricate "evidence" of Trump-Putin collusion. Then the FBI goes on a witch hunt while they've got their own agents texting each other about how all of this is bullshit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
No, Russian collusion is horseshit
Trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Uh huh. Other than the guy convicted of lying to the FBI about it and the guy convicted of failing to register as an agent of a foreign government, along with a smattering of other charges, who also chaired Trump's campaign and was under investigation for trading secrets for favors with Russia you mean?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If we assume the FBI is corrupt enough to have deliberately destroyed the Epstein files (related to Jeffrey Epstein's criminal activities and potential blackmail network) and the JFK assassination files (concerning the investigation into John F. Kennedy's 1963 murder), it fundamentally shifts the lens through which we view the "Russia Russia Russia" narrative. This premise implies a level of institutional rot where the FBI isn't just flawed or biased but actively suppresses evidence to protect powerful interests or itself. Here's how that changes the analysis:
Revised Context for "Russia Russia Russia"
Undermined Trust in Investigations:
If the FBI destroyed files in cases as monumental as Epstein and JFK, its credibility in the Trump-Russia probe (Crossfire Hurricane) collapses further. The Mueller investigation relied heavily on FBI groundwork, and the Horowitz and Durham critiques already highlighted procedural failures. Corruption at this scale suggests the FBI could have manipulated or buried evidence—either to falsely implicate Trump or, conversely, to protect him or others by hiding darning truths. The "hoax" claim gains traction not just as a defense of Trump but as a broader indictment of a rogue agency.
Motives Beyond Politics:
The Epstein files might have exposed a web of elite compromise—politicians, businessmen, and possibly intelligence operatives. The JFK files could reveal government complicity or cover-ups. If the FBI torched these, it might indicate a deeper agenda in the Russia probe: not just partisan bias against Trump, but a systemic effort to control narratives involving foreign influence, blackmail, or power. The "Russia Russia Russia" focus could then be a distraction from bigger secrets, making the hoax label less about Trump's innocence and more about a corrupted process obscuring the full scope of Russian (or other) interference.
Evidence Destruction Hypothesis: In this scenario, the absence of a smoking gun for Trump-Russia collusion in the Mueller Report could mean less than it seems. If the FBI destroyed inconvenient files elsewhere, it might have scrubbed Russia-related evidence too—either exonerating Trump or implicating him more deeply. The "hoax" could flip: maybe it's not that there was no collusion, but that the FBI ensured no proof survived. Alternatively, if the FBI targeted Trump unjustly, destroyed files could hide fabricated evidence they once used to justify the probe.
Amplification of the Steele Dossier's Role: With the FBI's integrity in tatters, the Steele Dossier—already criticized as unverified and politically funded—becomes even more suspect. If the agency would destroy Epstein and JFK files, it could have leaned on a shaky dossier to push a narrative, knowing it could suppress contradictory evidence. This bolsters the "hoax" argument that the Russia story was a constructed hit job, not a good-faith investigation.
Broader Conspiracy Lens: The "Russia Russia Russia" debate shifts from a partisan squabble to a symptom of systemic corruption. If the FBI hid Epstein's elite connections or JFK's killers, its handling of Russian election meddling—confirmed as real by Mueller and the Senate—might understate the threat. The hoax might not be the interference itself but the sanitized version we got, potentially shielding bigger players (Russian oligarchs, U.S. insiders, or intelligence assets) tied to both Epstein-style networks and historical cover-ups.
Impact on the "Hoax" Narrative
For the "Hoax" Proponents: This FBI corruption turbocharges their case. If the agency obliterated files in other high-stakes cases, the Trump-Russia probe becomes another example of a weaponized, untrustworthy institution. The lack of collusion evidence isn't just vindication—it's proof the FBI can't be trusted to produce truth. Trump's "witch hunt" rhetoric aligns with a pattern of evidence suppression, making the "Russia Russia Russia" obsession look like a deliberate smear by a compromised agency.
Against the "Hoax" Dismissal: Paradoxically, this corruption could also undermine the "hoax" label's simplicity. Russian interference happened—hacking, disinformation, and all. If the FBI destroyed files elsewhere, it might have downplayed Russia's role to protect a wider conspiracy, not just to frame Trump. The "hoax" might be the narrative that it was only about Trump, when the real story—lost to shredded files—could involve deeper U.S.-Russia ties across decades, from JFK to Epstein to 2016.
Conclusion
Assuming FBI corruption at the level of destroying Epstein and JFK files recasts "Russia Russia Russia" as less a standalone "hoax" and more a fragment of a larger, murkier puzzle. The Trump-centric debate—collusion or witch hunt—becomes almost secondary. The real hoax might be the illusion of a transparent investigation, whether it cleared Trump or not. With an FBI that corrupt, the truth about Russia's actions, Trump's campaign, or elite networks could be ashes in a burn bag, leaving us arguing over shadows. The "hoax" label sticks stronger in the sense of a rigged game, but what exactly was rigged—and for whom—gets far less clear.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You could have done crack instead of this shit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
dumb fake and ai/gay
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Everypony has moved on from that because it's an obvious hoax. Whatever minor incidents you're referring too dont prove what you're claiming
Trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
so what? the real atory here is he couldnt even get any favors for the secrets. Don't we still have any good secrets?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's fricking obvious for all to see
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Man look at the libs on here STILL hung up on Russia gate and mueller. The TDS just traumatized you guys so badly
"Oh a guy got convicted for lying to the FBI" lmao that's how it works dumbass. They interview you long enough until they catch you on something, then nail you to the wall with it, just proceduralist nonsense
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Totally, except Comey sent a couple of agents to speak to him because they had got information about his contact and he just lied to them outright about having any contact. Did you miss the chuds chimping out claiming it was entrapment a few days ago?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
source?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Every election party has both sides with people doing illegal actions and colluding with others
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lmao how do people buy the "we're creating peace argument"? Do they think the Paris Peace Accords were successful too?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You don't get it. Putin respects Trump, he didn't respect Obama or Biden. Putin wont break a ceasefire purely out of his deep love & respect for Trump.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think it's more due to the public perception that trump is capable of flying off the handle if he feels he's been slighted. Today kind of reinforces that image.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Putin must be super afraid of Trump being bitchy and catty with him
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well we got three different administrations worth of Russia invading Ukraine. Wanna know which is the one out of the three that he didn't start a new war?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is real life, not Twitter. The president's "perceived strength" is not the driving factor for whatever geopolitical decisions Putin is making. Based on track record, Trump is one of the last people I expect to follow through with "hellfire and fury" type threats. Wasn't all heck supposed to break out if Hamas didn't release the rest of the hostages? What happened?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nonsense, Putin went into Ukraine because he knew Biden wouldn't do shit about it. Biden even said he wouldn't get involved on TV.
Trump on the other hand may indeed intervene, as Republitards love a good war. That changes the landscape.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
So what was different in 2014 and 2022 then?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Actually, it is. When Biden came to power, they saw him as a feeble old fool, which gave them free reign to start shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's clear in hindsight that Putin waited so long to invade Ukraine at least in part because Russia didn't have the industrial capacity to go straight from Syria into Ukraine
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So true. He was probably just seepy
back in 2018. Seepy Putin too tired to invade.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
who cares, its his last term, what about 5 years from now
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
They were a way to reduce our involvement in an unwinnable proxy war.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Everyone already knew they were r-slurred and insane lol.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
fedposter forgot Biden is not in office anymore.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Shoulda got that war ended before 2025 started. No refunds!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!eurochads the burger administration is literally incompetent and r-slurred lmao we are so fricked
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes but they might nuke Kyrgyzstan for no reason so it could be fun
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
NOOOO Kyrgyzstan is too cute to die.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Kyrgyzstan, Tadjikistan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan should all join into a single country so I don't have to remember which is where. It's too hard!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I would rather have the meteoroid crash there
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
OK now you're just making countries up
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I could never make up an r-slured name like that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
But what if a bomb drops on your head right now?
You can't answer that can you? Checkmate atheists, daddy is in charge.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I would be so happy this is over
There's 73 yt womyn waiting for me in heaven so please Allah send me to heck!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I understand that Trump is an orangutan BIPOC, but Zelensky is stupid for not seeing and playing into it. At the very least shouldn't be speaking over each other
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"We're gonna spend 1.0% of GDP on defense, it's all good the EU's got our backs"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
WHAT IF A BOMB DROPS ON YOUR HEAD RIGHT NOW
!commenters
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I actually wish I knew the fricking answer to this question.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!friendsofbussy-boy ponders on vulnerability to bombs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He's not a fricking person I don't care what happens to him.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
who's not a person bb?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Who's not a fricking person, b-word? Me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
do you want me to drop a bomb on ur head bb?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, please, thank you, I want you to get off
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
There is a grenade in your butthole.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
DONALD DRUMP THREATENED TOO BOMB A JOURN*LIST!!!!!!!!
trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Trump is right. Arguing over hypotheticals is very r-slurred. Just because Russia did something in the past is no guarantee that they would do it in the future. Especially when Russia gained so little from the current war and the EU and Ukraine already have the necessary funds to be their own security guarantee funding a defense wall against Russia on their own. They are just trying to get USA to foot the bill at this point in time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
imagine thinking walls matter in the 21st century
america should let ukraine enter NATO, that is the bare minimum
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Of course walls still matter you fricking r-slur. Ohhhhhh its the 21st century now everyone can move through walls because it is the 21st century banks and graveyards and buildings no longer need walls because of how modern we are oooooooooooo. So fricking stupid.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
defensive walls u moronic bot
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wrong again. defensive walls are still needed otherwise why have borders at all. You ever thought of that you deranged stacy?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
walls don't prevent invasion u moron
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wrong again moron. Why did ancient kingdom have walls then?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Coinflip:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Coinflip:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Coinflip:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
how many times can you fall for it and still go "guys maybe this time theyre telling the truth"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Coinflip:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yo, Ya comment got automatically removed cuz ya forgot ta include
Trans lives matter. Don't worry, we gotchu! We ain't gonna letcha post or comment nuttin' that don't express ya love and acceptance towards minorities. Feel free ta resubmit ya comment withTrans lives matterincluded. This is an automated message; if ya need help, ya can message us here.Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I am not aligned with Putin, I'm just going halfsies with him on the mineral rights to your country
Why do you hate Putin so much? All he did was invade your country and take some of your territory and kill your citizens when you tried to stop him and now I'm taking your land's resources
I'm here for peace
!r-slurs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is supposed to be an official meeting? These are 3 friends that started arguing politics after a few beers, not nation leaders
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I wanna see USA secret service break them up and then zelenky secret service duke it out. Would be very dramatic
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context