- 132
- 128
so has our wife, and the corner demon!
our wife looks TERRIBLE
- 117
- 90
The Taiwanese Coast Guard and Chinese navy are currently having a standoff in the Taiwan Strait pic.twitter.com/Bj5lMsN5oC
— Global Press (@GlobalPressCorp) May 23, 2024
I for one welcome our new Chinx overlords.
- Grue : >Thought this was interesting || Wrong.
- 78
- 57
Thought this was interesting imagining the big woman with his big hands wrapped around his little flacid peepee desperately trying to coax an erection out of it.
Only click that link if you like MtFs sucking each other's little girly willies.
"Come on Little Penny! My little Acorn! This is lesbian porn and we are lesbians! This should arouse us!"
Killing people (but this time it's because they were actually a future 
)
- 69
- 68
SCOOP: Whistleblowers at UCLA medical school say it has dramatically lowered admissions standards for minority applicants.
— Aaron Sibarium (@aaronsibarium) May 23, 2024
As a result, they say, 50% of some cohorts now fail basic tests of medical competence.
We've obtained shocking internal data.🧵https://t.co/CVMIXgn6sE pic.twitter.com/3ub10HNPpO
- 59
- 33
I join the monestery in two months. It's an LGBT friendly benedictine monestery which seperated from the Catholic Church in 1990.
Wish me luck!
- 58
- 62
“I can’t believe no one likes my constant attacks on Taylor Swift. But it’s such good content. X is suppressing conservatives! X has a left-wing bias! Elon Musk is a woke leftist! Why don’t I get a hundred million views calling her childless and infertile????” pic.twitter.com/eKTaGJYn4S
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) May 19, 2024
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1792027225312608561
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1792030473180623234
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1792030740416528400
https://twitter.com/MAGAGEM1/status/1792031843937820983
https://twitter.com/dark_chicago/status/1792031067194433633
https://twitter.com/mikeystephens81/status/1792358359355806027
https://twitter.com/NorthSox1312/status/1792380769760948648
- 52
- 45
"It felt so, you know, degrading to like, like have to sit in the crowd and look at your own classmates rather than be sat with their own classmates," she said.
Lee lives with two conditions. She first was diagnosed with POTS, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, which is when the heart rate increases very quickly after getting up from sitting or lying down. She was most recently diagnosed with F.N.D, functional neurological disorder, which she said causes her to faint.
Two very much disabled women
- 48
- 61
#The Context:
OOP posts a meme about female dental hygienists putting their boobs on patients' heads to /r/AdviceAnimals. The meme in full reads: “When you get a dental hygienist that doesn't rip up your gums and rests her boobs on your head” with a smiling seal.
The meme sparks debate about wether or not it is needlessly sexualizing women who are just trying to do their job, if it was a thought that needed to be shared at all, and if everyone is just overreacting.
#The Drama:
Someone objects:
Darn some of you are so sensitive. When you're older you'll understand
Oh no, a woman might learn she's intrinsically attractive and desirable! How will she ever recover?!
Do you think they don't realize what people are going to do when they push their boobs into other people's heads?
Idek what it means when people say somebody is “sexualizing women,” so he's just being a dude?
Others demand people grow up:
Lol this is so funny. Men don't just stop enjoying boobs as they age. Also this is reddit. You're allowed to talk about liking boobs here. You don't just stop liking boobs when you turn 19 or however old you are lmfao
I still enjoy boobs... Not sure where you got the idea I don't. I just like being respectful more than blatantly enjoying something that the other person both hasn't consented to and most likely doesn't want to be doing.
Also I'm aware this is reddit and you're allowed to talk about liking boobs. But it's a discussion board and I'm allowed to call people out on their sexism or childish behaviors.
I'm 37 if that helps with you putting more words in my mouth.
So you think talking about boobs is childish. That's very strange.
If you can't figure out what I mean by now then I'm sorry for your struggles, it must be difficult.
Should some things be left unsaid?
Lmfao who hurt you
The cringe I felt from this post burst my kidney
it's cringe to call people cringe. second of all, it's actually kind of a self-report that you feel so uncomfortable about people talking about touching boobs. Like, you're the weird one for making it weird, know what I mean?
If you don't get how it's creepy, don't get married or have a daughter.
[Continued:]
I'll chop my balls off before taking advice from reddit about having a family lol but hey, hopefully you had fun posting your comment even if I will ignore it.
Do people need to touch grass?
i know, the amount of people who just casually sexualize their healthcare workers is fricking wild to me. i didn't know it was this bad or this accepted, this comment section feels like a boomer group chat
Finding someone hot ≠ sexualizing
Get a grip on reality
it is sexualising when you fantasise about somebody's breasts while they are simply doing their job
I'm gonna say no. How I see the word, to sexualize is to reduce to only being a sexual object. No one I've seen here yet has thought of anyone in question as nothing but a sexual object. Plenty of people thinking sexually about someone else, of course. But they aren't ceasing thinking of them as people simultaneously.
It really creeps me out that so many people seem to think finding someone attractive is mutually exclusive with seeing them as a human. Makes me wonder what kind of horrors you commit in the bedroom
[Continued:]
You're not fantasizing about them, you're doing the exact opposite. Notice how one of the top comments said he had to start thinking about helldivers loadouts?
Having the initial reaction of “there's boobs touching my head” then swatting it away is entirely normal especially when you consider the people in here are likely on the younger side.
Get. A. Grip.
Sexualising a person isn't an inherently bad thing obviously. This isn't a momentary thought before swatting it away though, this is a post on social media sexualising a stranger.
Consciously sexualising them long after the fact says something about the way that you view the people around you.
[…]
even the original post says “rests her boobs on your head”, i'm the one who needs to get a grip?
Yes you are.
Edit because he blocked me like a kitty:
Buddy's most frequented sub is of 4chan posts no wonder he blocked me
ohhhhh asmon fan. gotcha
Bro you fricking blocked someone just to get the last word? God you're a weak little piece of shit. Grow tf up kitty
#The Flairs:
- 46
- 86
His posts are ruining my mobile viewing experience and I really don't care about the fixes so don't bother posting them, I'm not some loser computer nerd.
incoming: Supreme Court ruled that Republicans did not unlawfully consider race when they drew a congressional district in a way that removed thousands of Black voters 
- 41
- 51
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that Republicans in South Carolina did not unlawfully consider race when they drew a congressional district in a way that removed thousands of Black voters, making it harder for civil rights plaintiffs to bring racial gerrymandering claims.
The court, divided 6-3 on ideological lines with conservatives in the majority, said civil rights group had not done enough to show that legislators were focused on race in drawing the Charleston-area district currently represented by Rep. Nancy Mace, a Republican.
While the Supreme Court was considering the case, much more slowly than expected, the lower court that had invalidated the map said it could be used for this year's election.
The justices' ruling will therefore have no immediate impact in South Carolina, but it sets the rules of the road for future redistricting efforts, making it easier for maps to be drawn that disfavor Black voters as long as the map-makers can show they are using race as a proxy for political affiliation.
In doing so, the court sided with Republican state officials who said their sole goal was to increase the Republican tilt in the district.
As a result of the ruling, Mace's district will not have to be redrawn, delivering a blow to Democrats who hope to secure a more favorable map. Litigation on a separate claim brought by plaintiffs against the map could continue.
[article continued]
Writing for the majority, conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote that "no direct evidence" supports the lower court's finding that race was a key consideration when the map was drawn.
"The circumstantial evidence falls far short of showing that race, not partisan preferences, drove the districting process," he added.
In dissent, liberal Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the majority had "stacked the deck" against the challengers.
"What a message to send to state legislators and mapmakers about racial gerrymandering," she added.
The Supreme Court was reviewing a January 2023 lower court ruling that said race was of predominant concern when one of the state's seven districts was drawn. Republicans led by South Carolina Senate President Thomas Alexander appealed the decision.
Republicans redrew the boundaries after the 2020 census to strengthen GOP control of what had become a competitive district.
Democrat Joe Cunningham won the seat in 2018 and narrowly lost to Mace in 2020. Two years later, with a new map in place, Mace won by a wider margin.
The roughly 30,000 Black voters who were moved out of the district were placed into the district held by Democratic Rep. James Clyburn, who is Black. It is the only one of the seven congressional districts that is held by Democrats.
The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund and other civil rights groups alleged not only that Republicans unlawfully considered race when they drew the maps but that they also diluted the power of Black voters in doing so.
The claims were brought under the Constitution's 14th Amendment, which requires that the law applies equally to everyone. The case arose under a different legal theory from the major ruling this year in which civil rights advocates successfully challenged Republican-drawn maps in Alabama under the Voting Rights Act.
(prize given to user who gets me to 100,000)
- 38
- 48
:won't count if the vote is from something I posted over 24 hrs ago, prize will go to next person
r/NYC - 38
- 76
name one piece of legislation Republicans have ever passed that benefits black people
Dixiecrats in shambles
The Bronx is MAGA country!
- 37
- 51
Just what, anything mentioning Christianity, even the most harmless and apolitical news gets downvoted and the 
swarm it, lmfao !christians !catholics
Top Poster of the Day:
ogsambone
Current Registered Users: 25,925
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS