In case anyone thinks it's fake: https://www.gazeta.ru/army/news/2025/02/06/25021682.shtml

English article about this: https://en.defence-ua.com/analysis/a_russian_official_explained_appearance_of_donkey_forces_on_frontline_and_referenced_kamikaze_dogs-13458.html

Was on hinge (mistake #1) talking to a guy who was a massive Ariana Grande stan (mistake #2). He mentioned her and how much he loved her music, and I mentioned something about liking her music (lie) but I'm worried about how she looks right now. Immediately this man went off about (exact words) how "problematic" it is for me, "as a man", to "gossip about women's bodies". I'm not trying to gossip, I'm genuinely concerned. She's bone. It's horrifying to see, especially in the face of younger girls/gay men [lets be real] who may end up thinking there isn't a thing wrong with being that skinny, and any comment of genuine concern is "gossip". Even worse, this didn't seem like the opinion of some one off arianapilled r-slur, but a pretty popular opinion online to just ...not mention how she looks in any context. I'm genuinely worried. She looks incredibly sick.

https://old.reddit.com/r/redscarepod/comments/1itnjqz/ariana_grande_looks_like_absolute_shit_and/

gather round - this all started weeks ago, bored at work on a conference call I came up with a plan - a plan to troll ted simp, though as it progressed i would actually start to feel bad, I would never reveal any of this as I actually felt bad about the things I said to her, but after the events of tonight she's opted for war, to smear me, to delude herself into thinking I'd ever actually be interested in her. Well dramafriends, the liquor flows through me, let me reveal what actually happened here, so after she ends up killing herself from being taken advantage of by yet another predator, you can know I have clean hands.

This all started with me telling her she probbaly isn't even crazy (WHO WOULD EVER BELIEVE ME SAYING THAT?)

after this I added her on groomercord, and I have a pass from the owner of this website himself to post groomercord images.

now let's move on.

i can post more of this bs if you want - but as you can see, I made it clear I had no interest in ever sleeping with her.

now let's see what I was dming OTHER people at the exact same time to showcase my A) intents of trolling her at first, B) my ethics intervening after.

Thank you for letting them dip out quietly. wtf.

He should've fired them. Unless their felons with active warrants these guys would never bother them.

I don't think Americans are aware of what their food is going to cost without cheap exploitable labor.

About the same tbh.

These squads always look the same. Pudgy white guys who aren't well put together. They don't know what they're doing most of the time..

What? There's 2 fatties in there and they look like they know what they're doing. Believe it or not plainclothes units don't want to look like cops.

I mean, look at them as a unit. They look goofy. I understand multi agency cooperation but let's be real. They don't look serious. They look like the boys about to hit the airsoft range. One is excited about his buddy's gun for some reason, when they really should all be familiar enough with their shit that it's no big deal. Probably some new toy bought with tax money though. There's no uniform in sight. Just a bunch of tacticool gear in whatever ensemble you want apparently. Also we're gonna gather out here in this parking lot and goof off till 0600 then it's gravy time.

I can see the SWAT jacket on one.

Me? Well you see. I was checking my mail like I usually do when I received a letter. "Dear Ricky" was on the lid with hearts and decor on the front along with a "Happy Valentines day". I was ecstatic of course because I thought I knew who the sender was. For you see within the last few weeks another one of my eGFs has managed to dox me. I had flown her out to me twice in two months, and I was very cautious. It takes me a while to trust and even though I could feel the love starting to form I just did not trust her fully yet so I didn't want her to know my address or full name.

Unfortunately while I was sleeping she looked through my wallet, found ID my name and then my linkedin and then me. So far things are still good between us even though she will joke about how casually she can ruin my life sometimes. I don't know. I feel like there is something wrong with the way I've been perceiving danger over these last few years and I think it gets worse every day. What is danger really? What is that feeling? Why do we listen to it?

But anyways back to the topic at hand. I have been having a rough couple of months with the only bright light being my eGFs. All of the neurotypical women I meet on the apps only want me for my body and the ones who are looking for love don't want to be with someone like me who enjoys trolling on the internet. You may think I'm joking but I'm not, because my troll side is a big part of me. And unfortunately society forces me to hide it. You can't just tell people about your trolling habits and expect good treatment in return.

This has lead to me feeling isolated. Doubly so because I just recently moved out of my families home to be across the country just based on an impulse decision. I spent my entire Christmas with Greg Doucette and I was on research chemicals so I still have random flashbacks to that period that will probably be occuring for the next 5-10 years. One eye is always seeing the future while the other is always seeing the past. It's actually so annoying because the visual snow from my last incident was just starting to recede. But yeah I have just been stressed out. I am still training to try and get it all out but it feels like my body fails before my mind lately.

I'm off topic again, so back to the letter. I received this letter and thought it was from my egirl who had just doxxed me. Maybe she came to surprise me? But no. This is what I received.

Now I don't want to seem ungrateful. I truly do not. I love my parents for thinking about me, however this just was not what I needed right now. And the blow was dealt in a way that is hard to deal with.

Because when I feel pain I would just rather feel it all at once, and when I'm experiencing it I don't want to react to it in anyway. I have mastered the ability to just accept it and let it take its course. The exception to this is if I am distracted by others. People always poke and prod in moments like this, and it is the worst thing you can do to someone like me. They are dragging it out. Today would have been over already if that letter was not sent. I'm not afraid to say this almost ruined my entire day.

Almost.

I found the way out. The way out is through love. To love so deeply that every other emotion feels like an illusion in comparison. You have to want them to kill you. A love so strong that you start thinking behaviors you previously classified as batshit insane are actually rational thoughts tied in facts and logic. And really the only way to truly feel a love like this is to let go entirely.

I don't why things are that way, but it is. You need to be thinking about loss constantly. You need to see your loved ones die one million times in your head so that you can let them go. Because I promise you until you do that you won't truly know loss. You will always be hoping, arguing with yourself, trying to find a way out. But when you look far enough ahead you'll realize that was a r-slurs game. You're just running on a treadmill in denial that eventually you're going to run out of gas. The suffering of the gazelle will always outweigh the pleasure of the lion.

But while you cannot change the outcome. You can accept it. And through true acceptance you can end it.

I'm not talking about ending it through a cowardly method such as "enlightenment:". That is only temporary, and you are leaving the cycle to continue it's cruel and twisted game while you escape into the merciful oblivion. My solution will be permanent.

I am going to kill Samsara. The entire cycle. I will save every last one of us. I don't care how long it takes me. I don't care if I have to spend one million years crawling through a tunnel of discarded rusty kitchen knives. I don't care if I have to roll a boulder up a 50 trillion mile 30 degree incline. I am the only one with the will to do this, and I doubt anyone else will even try.

My friends, I will save you all. I promise.

!friendsofspiderman

@Spiderman

I need to talk to you. We have to do this together. You are the only one who can help me.

Wikipedia's "talk" page on the Gulf of Mexico/America/Cuba/Florida has been in an uproar the past few weeks because of 's EO to change its name. Some highlights:

If the international groups such as the United Nations group of experts on geographical names (meeting in April), the International Maritime Organisation and the International Hydrographic Organization opt-in to recognising the U.S. owned portion of the gulf as the Gulf of America, then I agree that we should concede to the name. Somejeff (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

To both sides of this "question", this entire discussion is moot, since the moment Donald Trump leaves office the next President of the United States will immediately reverse the name-change order. The Gulf of Mexico will remain The Gulf of Mexico so long as modern human society endures. Looneybunny (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

We should call it the Gulf of the Olmecs since they were there first

Google just announced there changing it on their maps Bamaboi445 (talk) 23:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Google is not Wikipedia. Accuratelibrarian (talk) 02:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

You had no problem with President Obama changing the name from Mount McKinley to Denali it's over if that's what president Trump wants that's what he gets you can still go on to Google maps and this nonsense on here Wikipedia and I still got to hear the same bullshit if it's good for the goose it's good for the gander it changes and it needs to be changed now today not yesterday because you don't like trump it don't matter I voted for Obama I voted for that change I didn't like that Mount McKinley got changed him out Denali but because I voted for it happened it going to happen fight it love it leave it it does not matter it's changing and we're not going to stop until it does 65.102.184.179 (talk) 10:07, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

In case editors don't realize, usage of this name has already begun: "an area of low pressure moving across the Gulf of America, interacting with Arctic air, will bring widespread impactful winter weather to North Florida, etc." StAnselm (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

That "source" is from the POLICTICAL OFFICE of a well-known extremist right-wing supporter of Donald Trump. It is not a reliable, nor independent source, and therefore should be discounted Looneybunny (talk) 22:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

I don't see why a mention would be a problem considering the fact that American schools (and media) will soon be teaching it as the Gulf of America. Jstewart2007 (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Also, the moment Donald Trump leaves office the next President of the United States, (who will, considering recent events, most assuredly be a Democrat), will reverse the order, and the "Gulf of America" will vanish as quickly as it appeared, just another example of exactly why Donald Trump was the worst pick for President in American history. Looneybunny (talk) 22:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

This Looneybunny person has posted similar comments on multiple reply chains even if it is questionably relevant

Seriously, how long are the admins going to drag their feet on an official government change? Regardless of whether people like it or not the Government of the U.S. as well as major state and private institutions will refer to it as the Gulf of America going forward unless the change is reversed. The title of the article doesn't have to change but the intro to the page should at the very least include "also known as the Gulf of America in the United States" and there should be a new page on the dispute itself like the pages for the disputes around names of the Persian Gulf and Sea of Japan respectively, instead of relegating it to two clearly tacked paragraphs at the end of the etymology section. No one else outside of the Koreas calls the Sea of Japan the "East Sea" but the article intro still recognizes the dispute's existence, why isn't this any different? Syracuse58 (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Because it's Drumpf silliness and not something that has to be indulged here. Among all the other reasons given. Acalamari 02:54, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

I think we're going to be stuck fielding whatabouts from the people who erroneously believe that the United States should be allowed to rewrite reality like O'Brien from 1984 for a very long time if we don't start aggressively clerking this page. An RfC generally has a shelf-life of minimum six months. Can we please have a moratorium on discussions of American nicknames for the Gulf of Mexico for the next six months so that we have the clarity of consensus necessary to clerk these repetitive arguments promptly? Simonm223 (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

The nonsense is from those fighting so hard to pretend like the American government doesn't have the authority to name things. It's hilarious to see how quickly Wikipedians tripped over themselves to change Mount McKinley to Denali, and how hard they're ignoring the same arguments to change it back, same with this page. Ortizesp (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Funnily enough, although both the Gulf of Mexico and Denali name change were part of the same EO, Denali's wikipedia page intro has already been changed to include the tagline "Denali, federally designated as Mount McKinley"

Oppose, see the example of Clingmans Dome, which was changed by Wikipedia the very same day Biden changed it. Funnily, all these scruples about COMMONNAME and all those "voices of concern" were nowhere to be seen. XavierItzm (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

This is a comment for the RFC that isn't open right now. Comparing a relatively obscure mountain in Tennessee to an internationally important body of water isn't doing this argument any favors, politically motivated or otherwise. Departure– (talk) 01:57, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

We should rename the Atlantic Ocean to the American Ocean so that people stop worrying about the gulf name change since then it wouldn't be as big of a deal.

Strong Support It is important to address the elephant in the room here: There is a strong liberal bias on Wikipedia. By comparison, the Obama administration changed the name of Mount McKinley to Denali in 2015, and the Wikipedia editors were almost tripping over themselves trying to make the name change from Mount McKinley to Denali. I understand that the Gulf of Mexico is a different case in that the Gulf of Mexico is not entirely within the borders of the United States, as Denali/Mount McKinley is, but I think that at the very least the president's executive order must warrant changing the title to: "Gulf of Mexico, officially the Gulf of America in the United States." To me, any opposition to simply noting that it is officially called the Gulf of America in the U.S. is bald-faced activism protesting the name change more than it is actually rooted in reason, evidence, and consistency across articles. U.S. Federal Agencies will henceforth be referring to it as the Gulf of America. If someone sees the name Gulf of America on a U.S. Federal map and enters it into Wikipedia, they'll need to scroll down to the middle of the page and read a paragraph buried in the article containing irrelevant information such as a comedian Stephen Colbert's comments on the name to try to make sense of why they're seeing Gulf of America on a map. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia designed to transmit information; activism and bias should be discouraged. (For evidence of such activism and bias, just look at the opposing comments above describing this as a "stunt"; yet no one ever described Obama's name change from McKinley to Denali as a "stunt." Such opposing positions are not rooted in reason, only bias and activism.) Ambrosiaster (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

This really is the essence of false balance. "We shouldn't call something Trump does a stunt, unless we can also describe something unrelated that Obama did as a stunt." (We can unpack the facts if you like, but this isn't the Denali page; it's the Gulf of Mexico page.) Things can be qualitatively different from each other. Describing different things with different terms isn't bias, it's analysis. And sometimes the analysis can quite validly (if informally) be 'yeah, that's a stunt'. Biden claiming to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment was also a stunt. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

NB: The above user is currently blocked from editing in the main space, as a sanction for having edit warred on the Gulf of Mexico article. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Correct. And the editors who were warring to include comments from comedian Stephen Colbert and to revert the changes with even more frequency than me were not temporarily blocked from editing. Further evidence of bias and activism. Thanks for pointing that out. Ambrosiaster (talk) 19:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

That's an interesting linguistic tic you've got there, always pairing "bias and activism". GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Still waiting on that analysis you alluded to in your prior post. Ambrosiaster (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Nope. I mentioned that it's possible, which it is. I'm not here to perform for you; your own biases are showing. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:37, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Figured that would be your response. Ambrosiaster (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Support in a way its very similar to Deadnaming if the federal government wants it to be Gulf of America then that is what it should be called. Did we have this type of vote when Ellen Page changed her bame to Elliot? I know its not a human but it still applies here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fruitloop11 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

You mean his name'. And no it's not, because Eliot Page is the leading authority on what his own name is - it's within his power to choose it, and he did. He is, in fact, the individual affected. Neither the President of the USA, nor the US government generally, are the Gulf of Mexico, nor do they own or control it. It's international waters, and it is beyond the power of any arm of the US government to change its name unilaterally - even in common usage within the USA, never mind globally. GenevieveDEon (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

You are so terrified, I can tell your hands start shaking every time you type. The fact is it WILL be changed you need to stop harassing all support voters. Imagine if someone was allowed to harass you while you voted Harris, which you 100% did. Even another user has warned you to stop Fruitloop11 (talk) 15:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from personal attacks. You are wrong about my voting, for a reason that should be apparent upon reflection. GenevieveDEon (talk) 16:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm literally about to report you for harassment. the admins will see user:Wildfireupdateman giving you a warning and the harassment you made against User:Ambrosiaster user:AnotherWeatherEditor and many others. and no, I will not call Ellen Page Elliot Page until you stop bothering people. Fruitloop11 (talk) 16:19, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

You are welcome to try. GenevieveDEon (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia Jannies hid this one in spoilered text simply titled "Enough."

Thank you. This user's engagement certainly veers more on mud-slinging than it does on civil discourse in my opinion as well: (1) She told me I have a linguistic tic and (2) She tried to undermine my position by claiming that I had a very temporary ban for an edit war. She is free to reason through it, but she is mostly engaging in name-calling and attempting to shame the support voters. Ambrosiaster (talk) 16:37, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

I knew before I posted she was going to reply to me, so I was on the defense. I think anyone will see this person isn't using the discussion board the way it is intended. It's all about bullying someone who doesn't have the views as you. Fruitloop11 (talk) 16:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

This strikes me as in line with Facebook's actions of lightening censorship and Twitter's actions of existing past 2022 of trying to be in line with the new Trump government because if I'm not mistaken they're facing a pretty serious federal anti-trust lawsuit. What shows up in Google maps does not necessarily reflect what is in common usage. Departure– (talk) 01:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

You do understand that this is merely a question of entering in the lead ", officially Gulf of America in the United States," not to change the title wholesale. As pointed out earlier, the moment that the Obama admin changed the name Mt McKinley to Denali, liberal Wikipedia editors changed it forthwith and added the hashtag #ThanksObama! Common usage was moot at that time because everyone knows that the common used term was Mount McKinley, not Denali. But now all of a sudden common usage returns to the forefront. Ambrosiaster (talk) 04:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

In sum, stop treating common usage as a dispositive factor. It was not dispositive for Mount McKinley, and in that case, the entire article name was changed—a much more drastic measure than is being proposed here. Ambrosiaster (talk) 04:20, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:No personal attacks: "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Better read up the policy. Also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Gotitbro (talk) 04:58, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

I hope that is not directed at me. Defining someone who posted #ThanksObama in the edit line of the Denali article as a liberal is a personal attack? Read the link I shared above: While redirecting the Mt McKinley article to Denali, an editor inserted the political line into the edit #ThanksObama. That to me is far less neutral and inappropriate than me defining such an individual as a liberal. Certainly a conservative didn't write #ThanksObama. No one was attacked personally here. Ambrosiaster (talk) 06:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Is Ambrosiaster Wikipedia's biggest ?

Bonus: The Denali Wikipedia talk page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Denali

Opppose (changing the name back to McKinley on the website) per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CRYSTAL. This move request is premature and entirely based on a political maneuver that likely is not going to affect the common nomenclature of the mountain. Its status among governmental figures is not relevant to the article's name. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 15:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

In the above discussions, it's been made clear that both are common names. If "McKinley" is the name that the government and Associated Press are going to use, it should be given precedence as the title. Derpytoucan (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Are the majority of reliable sources going to follow the federal government and the Associated Press? Is every publication that adopts the AP stylebook going to discard Denali completely? It's too soon to tell, and we shouldn't react on the spur of the moment. XOR'easter (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

How many times is the goalpost of "well not ALL RS call it McKinley" going to be moved over the next four years? There's already a precedent that's been set when the article was renamed in 2015. If McKinley is a common name, and its the name that the federal government and Associated Press are going to be using, it should be the article's title. I'm fine with waiting until the Secretary of the Interior has actually made the name change official, and perhaps seeing how other RS call the mountain when reporting on that event, but implying that we need to wait any longer to rename the article is absurd, especially given the aforementioned instant renaming in 2015.Derpytoucan (talk) 21:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Stop WP:BLUDGEONing the discussion. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 23:53, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

I don't see this as bludgeoning. @Derpytoucan makes a good point. anikom15 (talk) 03:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Repeatedly replying to multiple commenters is textbook BLUDGEON. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 13:22, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Talk about projection because that's exactly what you're doing. Esotericmadman (talk) 13:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Bonus bonus: The edit page for the Gulf of Mexico webpage:

106 edits in the last 24 hours alone

I've always believed that Wikipedia is a goldmine for drama and petty squabbles between self-centered know-it-alls, but I usually can't care to look into it because I find the layout of their website atrocious.

!ifuckinglovescience what is the scientific consensus?

The complex super-detailed tattoos by Yusuf Kurtkaya

[📹 yusufkurtkaya]pic.twitter.com/ggO3FYAlNN

— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) February 21, 2025

Am i allowed to make a psot consisting of every user alts. They wont have the @ symbol so no mass pings, no pings at all in fact. Repsot has leaked mine. Drowned has leaked mine. Fishy has said its ok to do.ive contacted @ a and they havent responded and they usually menas just go with it..

Take a look at me now..

British police issue second mugshot of convicted ISIS terrorist after she complained about her previous mugshot showing her face.

Farishta Jami, 36, demanded police retake her photo wearing a niqab.

Her lawyer claimed showing her face caused her “considerable distress.”… pic.twitter.com/m6GVa6e4TS

— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) February 15, 2025

This is so relaxing. I feel so at peace right now. Like all is right in the world. I am where I belong.

This is my purpose. I was always meant to be an unauthorized janny who plays by his own rules. One who has his own moral code that he built from the ground up. I am going to moderate the world someday.

Where did all of my friends go?

pic.twitter.com/wnBeTgfEGc

— Reddit Lies (@reddit_lies) February 14, 2025

https://rdrama.net/post/342798/homocracy-awards-prestigious-series-of-fell

participants:

Pakistan: host, ranked 3, volatile af, bet if you r-slurred

New Zealand: ranked 4, bet if you like underdogs

Bangladesh: ranked 9, bet if you are a degenerate

India: ranked 1, fixture riggers, playing in Gulf (not of america), bet if you like bullies

Afghanistan: ranked 8, new upcoming fellas, bet if you hate women

South Africa: ranked 6, big booty bavuma, bet if you like elon musk

England: ranked 7, bet if you want to lose money

Australia: ranked 2, current world champions, bet if you are a c*nt

GOOD ADVICE

https://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/champions-trophy/winner

BAD ADVICE

redditors predictions

https://old.reddit.com/r/Cricket/comments/1iqwh6b/rcricket_champions_trophy_predictions_thread/

Delta Flight 4819 (Operating as EDV4819) crashed on landing today at Toronto Pearson International Airport.

The Canadair CRJ-900 inverted and caught fire at some point after reaching the runway. pic.twitter.com/mJxuNqO2HQ

— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) February 17, 2025

Can't wait until this is blamed on Trump. Canada really is the 51st state.

Brock is so cute! Triana is the sleepiest babe!

!animalposters !cats

gross wtf - 113 votes

infrequently - 7 votes

frequently - 7 votes

!pantspoopers !fartneighbors !incels !schizomaxxxers !whitetrash !tunnelsnakes

🚨#BREAKING: The Truth

The past few days have been an unrelenting nightmare, marked by an overwhelming barrage of stress, frustration, and exhaustion that has taken a significant toll on my part. A severe and unjust breach of my personal life has occurred, and private… pic.twitter.com/bUa1OGxcnA

— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) February 19, 2025

"Furthermore, let me state this as clearly as possible as I have no interest in minors. Period." https://t.co/p3frIhg4uw pic.twitter.com/ydimrHv8ce

— MavLostHisIQ (@MavLostHisIQ) February 19, 2025

Respectfully, if you’re a proud gay man, why did you pretend to have a wife? https://t.co/Cv4uokZGI2 pic.twitter.com/bEKdDMepbm

— TheDoog (@doogle990) February 19, 2025

Who had this on their 2025 bingo card? https://t.co/CoONU1LOEE pic.twitter.com/J84ptCNbGq

— Garbage Human (@GarbageHuman24) February 19, 2025

So... turns out this degenerate is into pup play...

... dude... you can get off this dimension!

🫤 https://t.co/fOLLZe6u2m pic.twitter.com/B8MwnrnGQI

— Joshua Ek (@JoshuaEkOnX) February 19, 2025

Rawsalerts is ALSO into nappies and shit like that!

In an advanced and respectful society, you'd be put down like the sick dog you identify as!

What a degenerate!

🫤 pic.twitter.com/ArrEtlydqu

— Joshua Ek (@JoshuaEkOnX) February 19, 2025

"Imporntant" bro gooning as he wrote this whole statement https://t.co/ng4L3A6GUt

— Cynic (@FreeRoamMode) February 19, 2025

Now THATS how you conservatism in 2025. Uwu

"Xbox Series X|S sold an estimated 2.7 million units in the US market during 2024, marking its worst full-year performance in Xbox history. The numbers in Europe are staggeringly worse, with an estimated 290,000 units sold over the year. When you add the two up, you get just under 3 million in total units sold, which paints a very worrying picture for Microsoft's hardware gaming division.

These numbers are both down from 2023 (which was also a tough year), when Xbox sold 3.8 million units in the US and 550,000 units in Europe, for a combined 4.35 million. This is a nearly 10% drop year over year in units sold, leading Microsoft to report a Microsoft reported a 42% drop in Xbox hardware revenue for the quarter ending in June 2024 in recent months."

Meanwhile PS5 had its best quarter ever last holiday season with record breaking console sales and software sales, selling 9.5 million units from october 2024 to december 2024. PS5 has sold 4 million units in november 2024 meaning they sold more units in a single month than Xbox did during the whole year.

Many people haven't noticed this, but Xbox has completely stopped marketing their consoles since last year. No holiday sales, bundles, discount...

Xbox was also out of stock multiple times in different countries, like due to low supply.

They are clearly moving on.

!accelerationists !g*mers

SNOYARYANS WON

JESUS CHRISTINE WESTON CHANDLER SONICHU WON

HEXBOXCHUDS LOST

TOTAL SNOY-NINTENDO-SONICHU NIPPONESE CONSOLEGOD VICTORY

!animalposters !coomers