None

Most Based Comments

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

I think you're delusional if you think Nickole Atkinson overstepped any boundary. If she hadn't been persistent, if she hadn't kept hounded CW or didn't call the police it would have been a completely different outcome. Neighbor Nate on the other hand was aiming for his 15 minutes of fame. (13)

I am just wondering how NA had Chris Watts' phone number. Who has their friends' husband's number unless they're having an affair? Unless Marlboro Grandma gave the number to NA to pressure him to get home. (-7)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

I know right?!? I don't know much about her, but she was the bestest friend in that situation you could have. She was like a darn bloodhound mixed with a Rottweiler! If my partner killed me, went off to workโ€ฆ I don't think anyone would notice for a spell. Especially if he gave some excuse like I wanted some time away as they were have some issues or something. People would just think I was busy or something.Her? She just mobbed up and wouldn't let ANYONE tell her ANYTHING. She was going to figure out what the issue was and where her friend would be. Most of us would defer to a friends husband at first because obviously they know better than us about events. Not her! She was calling up everyone, talking with receptions staff at the doctors, even getting into her phone! Chris didn't even have a full morning to enjoy his new life, free of his family obligations. He didn't even get to go to the Lazy Dog for a date with the mistress. Certainly no romantic trip or anything like that! That... (26)

I'm going to have to disagree with you on this. It absolutely none of nas business (or Cassies for that matter) where sw and the girls were, none. Cw should have told her that and to get off his property when they were blowing up his phone. (-2)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Nickole "Scoob" Atkinson exhibited behavior akin to a stalker when she couldn't find her "friend" SW. I thought she was absolutely rude, acting like the house was her own. Normal people would have called the other owner (Chris) and expressed concern, but Nickole had such weird entitlement-- like the world is coming to an end because SW and daughters are missing and she must gain access! Honestly, SW absolutely used Nickole. SW solely benefited from that relationship. Nickole ran errands and mowed their darn lawn, while SW sat back on her lazy butt (blaming her 'health challenges' of course!) SW didn't deserve a friend like NA, and sadly, NA couldn't see that her "friendship" was strictly one-sided. (3)

I mean she's probably used to talking to SW all day and knew she wasn't feeling well and had a doctor's appointment that morning and wanted to see how it went. And CW had a different story about where SW was to everyone. It was also very out of the ordinary for SW and the girls to just be gone. (1)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”˜

Na wasn't her friend, she was more of a caregiver. She was probably more afraid of losing her job. (1)

How are you even thinking like this? I'm serious. I am dead serious.Even if what you're saying was trueโ€ฆ.How can you logically not piece together that a caregiver going the extra mile (even if motivated in part by fear of losing her job) is STILL not even CLOSE to pissing n' moaning about someone's โ€œrightโ€ to get involved? That you judging her for that (which isn't proven true), and yet, not judging CW for WHY he wouldn't want people on his property is truly delusional thinking? One is way worse than the others. In your thinking a woman was motivated by fear of losing his job, is worse than CWโ€˜a motivation for not wanting people on his property (not wanting to go to jail because killed his pregnant wife and two small children) Why is this even an issue for you? How would you know anything? You're way of thinking is deeply flawed and lacks depth. You completely ignore the truth, which is those with a moral compass are going to do whatever they can to help someone they suspect is in g... (1)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Nickole "Scoob" Atkinson exhibited behavior akin to a stalker when she couldn't find her "friend" SW. I thought she was absolutely rude, acting like the house was her own. Normal people would have called the other owner (Chris) and expressed concern, but Nickole had such weird entitlement-- like the world is coming to an end because SW and daughters are missing and she must gain access! Honestly, SW absolutely used Nickole. SW solely benefited from that relationship. Nickole ran errands and mowed their darn lawn, while SW sat back on her lazy butt (blaming her 'health challenges' of course!) SW didn't deserve a friend like NA, and sadly, NA couldn't see that her "friendship" was strictly one-sided. (3)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

The defunct WOT called Nickole Atkinson the Quasimodo for the Thrive huns. That was not a jab at her physical appearance. It was how she was treated with doing their dirty work, especially for Shanann, such as picking up the gift the Watts mailed for Cece and taking it back to the post office to return it, and being unaware that she was overstepping society's objective boundaries or willing to cross them to appease the mean girls she was trying to impress.Nickole was following instructions from other huns because she was the local one in Denver who could do what they said, like driving over to SW's house to look for her. I think all of the huns were worried that SW had harmed herself because she'd been a basket case all weekend - refusing to eat, getting low blood sugar from not eating, getting a headache from low blood sugar, etc. SW was stressed to be sure but based on her flair for drama and medical attention, I suspect she was exaggerating for attention. Likewise, the huns ... (29)

Cassie dogged NA until she finally went to Saratoga trail. Nate lied to cops saying he has heard sw and cw viciously arguing (5)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/sfr8

Score: ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Number of comments: 5

Average angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Maximum angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Minimum angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining! :marseyminer:

:marppy: autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. :marseycapitalistmanlet: Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion :marseyjamming:

None
3
Istanbul peace talk we are so back
None
3
Holding Frame

None
3
2024: Ukrainian bullies Ukrainian for saying Slava Ukraine

None
4
My weekend plans :marseyopossum:

None
None
4
You are African

@kaamrev

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17147423800586677.webp

None
None
5
:gigachadqueen:
None
5
Paczki Recipe

!kurwa

None
5
Autists please explain this to me why are there 2k commenys yst talking about melting wax??
None
None
5
honkai star rail is everywhere

@TouchFluffyTails discus

None
5
How is your relationship with your parents?

Personally, non existent.

None
6
Cat

Cat

None
None
6
:marseyclown3:
None

What is America doing today to break out of such a doomed trajectory and into a more sustainable one?โ€ฉThe answer, sadly, is nothing, or rather, worse than nothing. On climate, for example, the most immediate need is to end the burning of fossil fuels as soon as possible โ€” something not even being considered by Washington policymakers in a country that hit record oil production and record natural gas exports in 2023. โ€ฉEven a quarter-century from now, wind and solar energy sources together are forecast to account for only about one-third of U.S. electricity generation, with 56% still being supplied by gas, coal, and nuclear power.โ€ฉThe message is clear: curtailing ecological breakdown while improving humanity's quality of life requires banishing the material extravagance of the world's richest people, especially the growing crew of global billionaires. That would, however, have to be part of a much broader effort to rid affluent societies of the systemic overextraction and overproduction that threaten to be our global undoing.โ€ฉCivilization itself is in danger of collapse. Growth โ€” whether expressed as more dollars accumulated, more tons of material stuff produced, more carbon burned, or more wastes emitted โ€” is coming to an end. โ€ฉThe only question is: Will it happen as a collapse of society, or could the reversal of material growth be undertaken rationally?

None
6
:marseyhomofascist: :marseyhomosupremacist:
None
None
6
What was His Problem?
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.