Massive NATO L

I never dropped u I just couldn’t handle the video of you fingering your asshole. I had a visceral disgust response that perturbed me. As a heterosexual woman, male asshole freaks me out. But I’m willing to look past it and make up.

— SHAWTY (@bronzeageshawty) April 25, 2024

>A housing advocacy group is slamming Denver's new Asylum Seekers Program as “insufficient” and “a slap in the face,” even staging a protest to voice their disapproval — as the city spends tens of millions of dollars on migrant aid and slashes its emergency services budget to stave off insolvency in the wake of the influx.

>The program will provide six months of free housing, food assistance, workforce training and more to the approximately 1,000 migrants currently in the city's shelter system as they await authorization to work, which due to federal asylum seeker law can take up to 180 days.

>Until now, migrants were allowed to stay in shelters between two and six weeks, but the new rules dictate that migrants arriving in the city after April 10 must vacate after 24-72 hours, after which they will be “provided a short-term stay at a congregate site along with assistance securing onward travel to another destination.”

>Advocacy group Housekeys Action Network Denver (HAND) decried the changes, telling local ABC affiliate KMGH-TV that the shift would overwhelm groups working to help migrants.

Migrant rentoid expresses his grievances

>Migrant Willy Bastidas said the policy would only exacerbate the homelessness crisis families are facing.

and makes his demands

>“The mayor doesn't represent us … He needs to listen to us and work with us to a better solution.”

https://old.reddit.com/r/TransRacial/comments/1c9xkhe/i_made_a_graph_explaining_transracialism_thoughts/?sort=controversial

How many points scrotelings? I'm at 12.

Well have you considered: how else will the state university's head football coach be the highest paid state employee?

DAE le handegg bad?!

---

The way they bucket this, science/math majors learn the most followed by humanities/social science majors, followed by engineering majors. But then health, communications, education/social work, and business students learn basically nothing.

PRIORS CONFIRMED

This is healthcare hero and TikTok nurse erasure!

---

The average student spends 3 hours on studies? And that INCLUDES classes?

At UChicago, you were supposed to take 3-4 classes a quarter and a typical class was supposed to take 10 hours of work per week so you'd have 30-40 hours of work in total. A hard class could be 20 hrs/wk.

More colleges should be like UChicago.

I worked very hard for my degree in PoliSci TYVM! Do you want fries with that?

---

One of my favorite Professors mentioned once, "D's get degrees, but they don't get you jobs."

I have people at the school I went to who achieved a Bachelor's Degree in 2.5 Years, another became a Producer/Writer at CNN in D.C. + Successful Side-Business, a bunch became Anchors at Regional News Outlets.

And then there's some people who have gone absolutely nowhere in their lives.

I don't know if it has always been like this, but that is insane variance from people coming out of the same program at a smaller University.

>One of my favorite Professors mentioned once, "D's get degrees, but they don't get you jobs."

Lol, lmao even 🤣👍

🤣 he just read the teleprompter 🤣

"Four more years? Pause?"

pic.twitter.com/2g00pkHNd3

— Clown World ™ 🤡 (@ClownWorld_) April 24, 2024

Him realising he had to keep that shit going for 4 more years

I'm still stuck alone as a pathetic alcoholic who can't walk so I have to watch TV all day. Here's my latest batch of recommendations.

Shang Chi

Surprisingly good capeshit. I guess since it has asian people in it they decided to make some actually good fighting scenes (especially the one on the bus). The story isn't terribly interesting but Awkwafina is cute. I think this is the first Marvel movie I've seen that I actually liked since X-Men back around 2000.

Battle: Los Angeles

A technologically advanced but apparently r-slurred alien race makes an infantry assault on Los Angeles. It takes itself way too seriously for the goofy subject matter so it's not fun like Independence Day.

Past Lives

A Korean girl in middle school has a crush on a boy but she emigrates. Many years later he visits her and her white husband. I was afraid this would be cuck fiction, but it's anything but. It's an examination of how we share a common fate with certain people in our lives and the different ways that can play out. The characters actually have realistic emotions and actions that I can relate to. It's probably the best movie I've seen in years, in my top 10 of all time. Sorry zoomers, but if you're under 30 you probably won't be able to fully appreciate it.

Captive State

Aliens have taken over Earth and turned it into a dystopian shithole run by a puppet regime. Critics found it confusing, probably because it's actually a very realistic depiction of how a resistance/terrorist organization works and not some stupid Hollywood fantasy. It captures what the real challenges are, like needing to secretly communicate with each other without doing anything that looks suspicious.

Golda

I just watched a few bits of this bizzare attempt to make Golda Meier look like some kind of feminist heroine. It reminded me of an interview I heard last year with an Israeli officer who had served in '73. He said Golda came to visit the front lines and was like "Aw shucks, we got surprised but how could I have known? I'm just a little old lady and I trusted the men around me." Which made him go ballistic and tell her that he'd had 50 guys in his battalion killed in the first hour and she needed to come up with a better explanation. It's really bizarre sometimes to see how different the view of the American media is about people in Israel versus the domestic view.

Guns Akimbo

Grown up Harry Potter gets guns bolted onto his hands so he's forced to run around like a character in a John Woo movie as assassins try to hunt him down for the sake of a reality tv show. Batshit insane in a good way and lots of fun.

21 Jump Street & 22 Jump Street

Cops go undercover as high school students to find out who is selling drugs there. There's not much to say except that it's a good premise for a comedy and there's actually a lot of funny jokes in it. The sequel doesn't quite measure up but is still watchable. Made by the guys who did The Lego Movie so it's not surprising that it's good for what it is.

Transporter Refueled

The opposite of the above. There's a whole genre of moves with names like Transporter, Driver, Conveyor, Freighter, Courier, Delivery Boy, etc. and I think Jason Statham is in 80% of them. This one falls flat in every way. Only watch this if you're curious about how badly you can frick up making a Transporter movie.

Shooter

Marky Mark is a sniper who gets framed for an assassination by guess who: the evil corporations and the CIA blah blah. The plot is made up of cliches that are as predictable as they are r-slurred. It's typical Hollywood shit for mouthbreathers where you're supposed to think things are plausible because they appear in Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories. Don't watch this shit, watch the first Jack Reacher movie which is similar but for people with developed frontal lobes.

Point Break

I've never watched this the whole way through but seen every part of it multiple times because it was constantly on channel 12 or 49 on Saturday afternoons in Portland in the '90s. I'm highly ambivalent. Patrick Swayze does a great job as a Gen X hippie surfer cult leader bank robber. That parkour scene in the middle is kino. But overall the premise is incredibly silly and again it takes itself too seriously. The other movie constantly played in that time slot was Remo Williams: The Adventure Begins which I maintain is far superior.

Transformers

I had one of these on the tv while I was playing with my phone and cooking and stuff. It's incredibly bad even as a children's movie. I can't even tell wtf is supposed to be going on. It's just random CGI shapes moving around. Honestly it reminds me of when I was taking zaleplon and would experience totally bizzare hallucinations before I fell asleep. It's just random pixels and sometimes there's a joke.

Overboard

Goldie Hawn is a rich stuck up b-word. She gets amnesia and Kurt Russell tells her that she's his wife in order to scam her into taking care of his kids. Critics at the time cried and shit their pants because it's "predictable". Congratulations r-slurs, I guess you would have turned up your noses at Shakespeare's comedies because everyone gets married at the end. (Except for Don Pedro. Get a wife, bro!) It's a comedy in the old sense of the word where it makes you laugh but you also don't feel dirty at the end. I also highly recommend the classic Hong Sisters romcom Couple or Trouble based on it. (These words rhyme with each other if you're Korean.)

Choice quotes from the article itself

The “feminists are man-haters” trope is getting old.

Until recently, refuting these claims has proven difficult. After all, every feminist-hating man has an anecdotal story of “that one feminist” he knows who definitively hates men. Thankfully, contemporary research has finally given us real, irrefutable evidence that feminists do not, in fact, despise men.

Feminists Won't Coddle Men's Egos

Whereas non-feminist women are likely to excuse or ignore men's bad behavior toward women, feminist women will, more often than not, call it out. They will not pull their punches to spare men's egos. They expect much from men, and will hold them accountable to the behavior they know men are capable of.

And it appears that this is where the man-hating feminist trope has its roots.

Yes, there is ample anecdotal evidence that some feminist women hate men. Following the #MeToo movement, many feminists began actively self-identifying as misandrists (man-haters) in response to the sheer volume of abusive, dangerous men who were exposed during that time. Many feminists and non-feminists alike saw their attitudes toward men evolve as they saw prominent male celebrities, political correspondents and politicians they trusted and admired be called out for their sexual misconduct and attempted cover-ups. For a lot of us, it was a time that eroded our trust in men. For some of us, that trust was never regained.

lmao

But the existence of some feminists who hate men does not prove that all feminists hate men. In fact, although feminism is a movement that seeks to center women's equality and liberation, it has also done much for the liberation of men. After all, men are harmed by patriarchy, too, and feminists seek to abolish all forms of gender-based discrimination that are propped up by patriarchy.

lol

---

Now we get into the comments

Moid does everything to please feminists but only gets shit on, continues being a feminist because it's called being a decent person chud.

I mean, to say that feminism hates men is nonsensical because feminism is a broad and diverse ideology that itself can neither hate nor love.

I've done everything that my feminist gender studies professors told me to do as a man. I am gentle, communicate my emotions, try not to be arrogant and speak over people, etc etc etc, and I am a better, more fulfilled man for it.

But... once in awhile I'd like my side to actually advocate for me, and recognize that we still live in a society that excludes men from many things. I'd like my side to recognize that sometimes WOMEN unfairly exclude and hurt men. The advice everyone gave me as a man and as a father, including the school principal and family lawyer? Get a female family member to take my kids to the doctor, because if it had been a woman doing it, this probably wouldn't have happened.

This was extremely depressing for me. Despite being the best man and father and husband I could--- and live up to the feminist ideal of what a man should be--- I was still treated like a predator and abuser by default. So who was advocating for me as a man on this issue? Who was calling this out and calling it unfair??

The only voices I hear are right wing ones, but I am not interested in being the kind of man they want me to be.

Let's be honest... if I went to a feminist sub on Reddit and brought up my woes, would people in that sub be sympathetic? Or would I promptly get banned?

Other men like you are supposed to be advocating for it. But men have been so reliant upon other people, usually women, organizing and structuring neutral gatherings and a lot of existing men's spaces being incredibly toxic means men have to start creating their own communities.

Only right wingers are dishonest and the reason why young people support palestine is because zoomers can just fact check who is more just on the internet

Something I've noticed over the decades is that conservatives tend to think that everyone knows and believes what they know and believe. Therefore, in their mind, anyone who professes to know/believe something different is just lying in order to gain an advantage over the conservative.

Which fits this situation. Since they believe feminist beliefs are wrong and trying to assert power over men, they hate feminists and assume feminists must hate them just as much (if not more). They cannot imagine a world where people just ... believe differently, everyone must be trying to pull a fast one on them.

I mean, that's what THEY do. Conservatives lie all the time about everything, so they assume everyone else does too.

I'm good

They're bad

If I do something bad, they must be doing the same thing, but even worse.

I think the reason this tends to be more prevalent on the right is that they believe in good and bad people, while the left tends to believe in good and bad actions.

Hot take. The rise of leftist thinking among the youth populations is directly correlated to how much easier it has become to actually check whether actions have good and bad consequences. Boomers cannot imagine being able to just gather data on what is and is not helpful for people and society. They favor divine command ethics and virtue ethics because these are much easier to use in low-information ecosystems.

Menslibber calls out the phd article writer for purposely misinterpreting a study

She also links to another article she wrote about the same topic, which interprets the lower benevolence result as:

Meaning, feminists are less likely to coddle, mollify, or excuse men who behave poorly.

These interpretations do not seem to have any basis in the actual study. If you read the study that she cites, the scores for benevolence are measures of benevolent sexism specifically, taken from the 1999 AMI inventory, which measures responses to statements like “Every woman needs a male partner who will cherish her” and “Men are more willing to take risks than women.” A footnote in the study explains, "Conceptually benevolence to men and hostility to men are not indices of positivity–negativity, but rather they measure stereotyped attitudes to men."

In other words, she is citing a study that found lower benevolence and then is explaining what lower benevolence means, but her explanations are baseless and not supported by the actual study. It is ironic that she is even trying to (baselessly) defend feminists' lower benevolence, because this finding actually signifies that feminists have less stereotyped attitudes towards men.

Menslibber used to be a chud but then he realized that feminists couldn't be misandrists because feminists believe in equality... just like how the DPRK is a true democracy

I used to be skeptical of feminists as well, when I was a teen. I thought many of them were just misandrists. Then I was reminded of the word "misandrist" and realized that was stupid - feminists believe in equality, misandrists "hate men."

Can someone who calls themselves a "feminist" act misandrist, or even be a misandrist? Sure. But they are different things, so that's important to know.

Menslibber volunteers for charity and notices how it somehow turned around to being about women

I volunteered for a men's charity for a while that said it was about challenging what it means to be a man, but all they really did was challenge how being a man affects women, they did talks like "here's how to talk to your friends about sexism and consent" which is very valuable, but when that's ALL hat you do I can understand why some men feel like it paints them as the problem.

Every single press snippet on their website was about the safety of women (which is incredibly important). But when your challenging masculinity charity is more only focused on demonising the behaviour of men towards women, it's like putting a plaster over a wound that needs stitches. It would be more fruitful to help them to understand themselves and express themselves in a healthy way that sends a message that these men are valued as people.

Can you understand why women and feminists main priority may be lowering the rates of sexual violence? And they do that by teaching about consent? I do not understand how you can experience a talk about consent as demonizing men

Menslibber says its only moid foid on social media

This is especially clear on social media spaces like Instagram where men LOVE complaining about women and seem to just genuinely hate women that aren't super submissive "trad-wives"

Menslibber/vaush fan explains that it doesn't make sense for men to ignore what women's expectations for dating purposes because another menslibber told them to, gets btfoed by a janny

One of the most demoralizing things I sometimes read on this subreddit is someone saying that men can't change because women still have expectations of them that fit traditional gender roles.

How true that perception of expectations are is pointless to argue because it differs from place to place and most people talk about their personal experiences anyway... but even if it was 100% true, always - so what? If it's a necessary step for the better, don't play into those expectations. Women don't want to date you because of that? Okay.

"but even if it was 100% true, always - so what? If it's a necessary step for the better, don't play into those expectations. Women don't want to date you because of that? Okay. "

I dont know man.This just feels like a bad concession .Part of appealing to a demographic means addressing issues that said demograpic actually cares about.For alot of guys,especially young guys,thats dating.How to be percieved as attactive to women around me.

Its counter productive and a bit delusional to expect men to ingore what the women they actually come across becasuse some online social tell them so. (entire comment removed)

FOH with that.

---

Finally we have the removed comments

https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/MensLib/comments/1ccxkhm/_/l194lda/#comment-info

Other men like you are supposed to be advocating for it. But men have been so reliant upon other people, usually women, organizing and structuring neutral gatherings and a lot of existing men's spaces being incredibly toxic means men have to start creating their own communities.

Men have organized movements for millenia, how could you possibly suggest that they simply are too lazy to organize? Men organize on this issue all the time on the right. So why not on the left? Because it is a hostile workplace environment, as evidenced by the very comments you made up above.

I know, because I've tried and I've experienced the phenomenon myself. I have attempted to organize, and I have been met with hostility from people that should be allies. For example: when my wife and I dealt with infertility, I was involved in numerous infertility support groups and ran my own. There were no men, and I wondered why. So I started a subgroup myself and encouraged the women to bring their husbands so that we could get things going.

In doing this, I realized I'd revealed my gender, and I was verbally abused by many of the women there. A few were right winger Bible thumper types who thought I wasn't adhering to God's plan of what a husband/father to be, but even more were self identifying feminists who said I was "invading the sacred space of women" and "just trying to get off on pregnant women." I would have perhaps started an exclusive men's group, but it would have taken years and years to get it up and running and I needed support at that moment, not in 10 years. It's hard to get a men's liberation movement going when the people who are supposed to be your allies are actively tearing you down. The attitude was generally. Their attitude was the same as yours: "You are wrong for expressing your pain when so many others are suffering more."

I had the same issue as a parent of a micro preemie. At the moment of my deepest depression and grief when I needed support, I went to pre-existing support groups. I was met with the same treatment. So I started my own blog and tried to organize. While working. While raising a kid with special needs. But yeah, I get it, I'm a man so I just have to do it all myself with no help, and if I fail, it's all on me.

Do you know how hard it is to try to create a movement from scratch in a busy life? It's like telling a woman in the 19th century to--- if she wanted to be a scientist--- simply to reinvent the entire university system and scientific literature system from scratch.

And yeah, it's nice that you can find a few people in the halls of academia who might actually be earnest advocates, but that doesn't mean much when the actual people in the real world who are supposed to be allies are tearing you down.

Your lecturing me without knowing my experiences is a bit hypocritical when you talk about being patronizing. You think you are the only man who has experienced that kind of pain with a loved one and struggled in a typically non-male space?

I appreciate and commiserate with your story and I am well aware of how hard it is for men to organize these kinds of groups. Yet feminists had to do it in much harsher conditions in the late 19th century to now. Again - those men didn't join the one you tried to create because to a lot of men, it isn't our responsibility. I don't see how your story contradicts my overview. I know a few good men are trying.

It's just the majority of men benefit from our patriarchal society or just don't care.

foid try to not make anything about themselves challenge impossible

https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/MensLib/comments/1ccxkhm/_/l18csfk/#comment-info

It's a lot easier to justify oppressing people who you can convince yourself you hate - and it's easier to hate someone who you can convince yourself hates you.

And unfortunately the whole conservative movement & mediaaphere is a giant machine for manufacturing hate. Hence why, and how, patriarchy gets reproduced.

Do you have any evidence that this is what anti-feminist men are trying to do? It's a common trope, but I only ever see it bandied around in feminist spaces.

When I myself was antifeminist, and when I talked to other antifeminists, our antifeminism was not about trying to justify oppressing women. Rather, it was about trying to stop stereotyping and prejudice towards men. So it is quite ironic that you describe antifeminism as an attempt to justify the oppression of women.

They regularly believe women's place is in the kitchen; that men are physically and mentally superior to women; that men deserve a well-mannered, subservient wife; that female promiscuity is a problem, and that reproductive health should be out of their control; that no-fault divorce shouldn't exist and marital rape is impossible; that sexual harassment and assault isn't a widespread issue;

islam is right about women

https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/MensLib/comments/1ccxkhm/_/l19b8lf/#comment-info

The real perception paradox: reading an article about men who hate feminists that makes feminist men question their stance. /s

Seriously though, there is something very wrong with the tone of the article.

The "all men are responsible for patriarchy" trope is getting old.

https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/MensLib/comments/1ccxkhm/_/l18vo21/#comment-info

Mods, are y'all going too hard on some of the comments? There was one that I wanted to respond to that's now deleted, and the person said they were once antifeminist but now they weren't. These are people who have learned that what they thought was wrong, and grew from it. Or they're explaining how they came to believe what they did believe. These things can and should absolutely be included in discourse about those who aren't feminist. Who knows what would work better to change someone than someone who has changed?

Imagine the perfect wife. Smart, hot, charming, funny, supportive etc. Now add some lovely serious mental illness. I am not having a good time.

L'epic game changers was already used and like all game changers it didn't change the game

Biden also directed his team to take this step following Russia's procurement and use of North Korean ballistic missiles against Ukraine, and Russia's attacks on civilian infrastructure in Ukraine, a US official said.

“We had warned Russia against acquiring North Korean ballistic missiles and against renewing its attacks against Ukraine's civilian infrastructure,” Dietz said. “With our readiness concerns resolved, we were able to follow through on our warning and provide this long-range capability to Ukraine.”

Did he told he won't give Ukraine tanks, cluster ammo and a lot of stuff ? I bet he will have a bonner when chunks weapons start sending khohols to Bandera

Blinken already ruched to beg China not to:

https://twitter.com/carlzha/status/1783096644378210592

worked out fantastic

But wait a minute

Last fall, the US first sent Ukraine the mid-range variant of the ATACMS missile system, which can reach about 100 miles, while the longer-range version can reach as far as 190 miles.

Russian started using Korean shit after khohols got ATACMS so it didn't mattered if Russian started or didn't using Korean shit because sooner or later he would send 190 miles missiles to Ukraine trying to save his homolegacy

So we can conclude khohols lost Avdiivka and etc when they had super duper ATACMS and

Lockheed Martin, which manufactures the ATACMS missiles, is in full-rate production and produces approximately 500 missiles per year, a spokesman for the company said in September.

Korean can build more Kiskander than that a year.

So now without Soviet stockpiles Ukraine will continue is journey in deficit

He says look how many khohols are around than screams ultra pro khohols slogans and then as you hear a lot of men voices replies and he says a whole brigade, fricking heroes

Yeah they all pro khoholsstan yet nobody wants to hold Ocheretyne or Bakhmut:

I want to take a low earth orbit space flight, just to experience microgravity for a bit and see the beauty of the world from up high.

ruqqusfield is inferior to platysfield