The US is the highest GDP economy in the world in the present day, and based on how the rest of the world is doing, the US is set to remain the highest performing economy in the world for decades to come. The US currently has the highest GDP, one of the highest GDP per capita, a strong and healthy GDP growth rate, a stable population growth rate, and a population that ages far slower than the rest of the world in terms of Median age. By every metric the US is set to remain the greatest power in the world for this entire century and beyond, and is likely to make it to the top 5 and possibly even the top 3 nation states in terms of GDP per capita very soon. US power doesn't just end there however, for there is a vast Ocean sized gap between the US and the rest of the world that most people haven't quite learned to appreciate. This article is meant to help people appreciate exactly how far ahead of other nation states the US is.

1.1) Europe :

The European Union is a trade and political union of nation states that hasn't yet fully federalized. In terms of population the EU has a far larger population than the US, but otherwise is set to decline demographically unless it keeps expanding. The US became a federal government in 1789, which means the EU as a political system of governance is more than 235+ years behind the US. In terms of GDP ( nominal ), the EU is more than a generation ( 30 years ) behind the US. Same for GDP per capita income. For the average American to move to the EU would mean to literally move back to their father's time in terms of annual income, not even factoring in the additional taxes in the EU. More realistically, taking into account that the US isn't just going to stop growing in current year, it would take multiple generations for the EU to catch up to the US even if it began to grow at a higher rate than the US.

1.2) China:

China comes the closest to matching the US on the international economic stage. China currently has a higher PPP GDP than the US. In terms of Nominal GDP, if China continued to grow at present rates and the US froze in place, China could catch up within 10 years. However, China's GDP growth is actually slowing down year on year and once again we find ourselves faced with a nation state that came within 1-2 decades of reaching the US economically then began to slip back again. The US has a steadily increasing population while China has a negative population growth rate. Immigrants move to the US while people leave China. Technologically the cutting edge chips made in China are permanently stuck being 10 years behind the US and it is likely that as the standards of trade secrets of South Korea rises over time that China will get left further behind in terms of technology when compared to the US. In terms of GDP per capita, China is 45+ years behind the US in current year, but more realistically with the slowing GDP growth rate, is more than 90 years behind the US in current year.

1.3) Future planning of the US:

The US has for almost a century been the single major world power. In its dominance it has had enough funds to plan for all probabilities and events including assuming enemy forces being 2-10x more competent than anticipated and planning accordingly. Assuming an alien invasion is possible and planning accordingly. Planning for zombies. There is not a single contingency that the US government does not have a plan for. This puts any other nation state that is fighting against the US at a disadvantage, as the other nation state may be planning to fight against the US at its best, but the US has its military prepared based on plans taking into account the other side fighting at their best, the US side fricking up half their instructions, and God himself joining in on the fight on the side of the anti-US faction. The US is over prepared to say the least. This can be seen in the adaptability of their economy, their highly efficient logistics, and their ability to develop new alliances decade on decade without giving up their previous alliances. The US for all intents and purposes is future proofed and there is no way to defeat them as no other nation state has had the opportunity to plan as long as the US has, nor the funds to study and implement as many contingencies as the US has. Add in the fact that the US is forced to learn from their defeats and we see a nation state that cannot be defeated in the same way twice.

1.4) US military might:

The US military remains the strongest in the world. It is a military that has had large scale combat experience in recent times. Has some of the best equipment in the world, and has its protective armor capabilities keeping up with whichever bullet size they find being used in 3rd world battlegrounds. They got troop transport vehicles that can walk over landmines without any casualties and got drones that can fire death from the sky across entire bases without being seen by the enemy. The US military in terms of technology is generations ahead of the average military to say the least. While the European military at times come close in terms of military technology used in tanks and jets, US tech is still considered a generation ahead while being decades older, and doesn't have as many logistical and performance issues as the European equipment today. The US remains far ahead of the EU in military capabilities primarily because of them actually fighting wars, unlike the EU which never expected their ground forces to actually be used any time soon.

In previous years the Russians were considered the second most powerful military in the world. This myth has been disproved with the occurrence of the Ukraine war where they are being kept at a stalemate while more Russian territories are being taken over, with older Nato equipment and restrictions placed on Ukraine as to where they are allowed to strike. After Russia the strongest military in the world is considered to be China, a military with limited combat experience which hasn't really been blooded in a generation.

Taking these factors into account, we can consider the US military to be at least 30+ years ahead of the 2nd most powerful military in the world at all times due to a combination of more actual combat experience, better logistics, preparedness, military tech advantage.

Conclusion:

The US is at the very least 30+ years ahead of whichever country ends up as number 2. More realistically the US is generations ahead of the rest of the world and this gap will remain throughout this century. For the Average 3rd world citizen to immigrate to the US is the equivalent of traveling a century into the future. The gap between the developed world and the US is greater than the gap between a middle income nation state and the developed world. If the developed world is AAA economies then the US is a AAAAA economy.

The US is the future and where all of humanity will be moving to as population collapse depopulates nation states across the world.

Writing IQ : 134 ( Genius ) https://www.writingtoiq.com/

Voice level : 88 Hz. ( Chad ) https://voicecel.org/

Note : some of the numbers listed in the article may be a bit off. Do not take the contents as legitimate and correct.

If we look at human history, all of humanity is descended from a total of 1000-10,000 individuals 60,000 years ago.

Since the dawn of mankind there have been 117 billion births so far.

That is to say, that the majority of humans have always died out over time, with the better gene lines exploding in population until they had replaced all gene lines that did not share their blood and were not able to procreate with one of them.

That is to say, the majority of the humans born today are genetic dead ends no matter what based on the nature of human reproduction.

Throughout human history the richer and more powerful a class of people were, the more likely they were to successfully spread their progeny across the world, simply due to the number of choices they had for mate selection.

Modern society has already shown to be a population sink, where living like a modern citizen in the majority of cases reduces the likelihood of successful reproduction rather than raising it. Which is to say, the mega rich are the only people who successfully reproduce generation after generation and have their bloodline spread among the people.

The poor lose because at some point they would become middle class in wealth at which point there is a bottle neck among the middle class of society where only a minority of them are able to both adapt to middle class lifestyles and keep up the reproductive success rates at the same time.

Globalization has resulted in the formation of a globalized wealthy class, middle class, and poor class in terms of nation states, where we are seeing the strongest die off among the middle income nation states such as Eastern Europe and East Asia. As poor nation states rise in terms of income levels, they too see diminishing reproductive success that goes far below the reproductive success of developed nation states.

Immigration flows also add to this, as the most powerful nation states have immigrants come in and become naturalized within 3-4 generations mixing their gene line with the home population, which at the end of the day results in developed nation bloodlines successfully reproducing down the line.

Of all the humans born today, in the developed world we can already see the trend of half the population or even more leaning towards never having children. This trend also shows no reversal over time, signifying that at the end of the day, we can expect only 1% of the population today to be part of the global population 6-7 generations down the line.

1% of 8.4 billion humans is 84 million humans. The US is where all of humanity is headed and the US makes up 4.23% of the global population, signifying that the US will always end up making up the world's total population in the end.

This is primarily due to the fact that you need a minimum population of 330 million and growing to be in the 10 trillion USD plus club. Which guarantees that all other nation states with a lower population will all fail, stagnate, and die off long before they reach 10 trillion USD no matter what they do.

As it is human nature to move towards wherever wealth lies, we see that humanity continues to grow towards the US as long as it remains the most powerful nation in the world. As China and India find themselves unable to topple the US on the global stage, it leaves zero nation states in a position where their population will not be leaning towards the US over time.

Due to this constant in flow of citizens to the US till the end of humanity, the surviving 1% are always to be found in the US at the end which guarantees that all humans will be related to US citizens in 7 generations.

South Korea for example :

2060 - population halves to 25 million

2090 - population halves to 13 million

2120 - population halves to 7 million

2150 - population halves to 3.5 million

2180 - population halves to 1 million

Population too low to run a sustainable nation state, everybody leaves, likely gaining asylum in the US which can assimilate 1 million Koreans over the next 10 years.

This scenario exists for all of East Asia right now.

China for example :

2060 - China population halves to 700 million

2090 - China population halves to 350 million

2120 - China population halves to 200 million

2150 - China population halve to 100 million

2180 - China population halves to 50 million

2210 - China population halves to 25 million

China has 1 million people leaving the country each year at this point which results in the nation becoming empty in another 25 years.

The US is the final survivor because US immigration based growth never stops. European Union is incapable of surviving only on immigration, they have to geographically expand to always have a net positive population growth rate, which means that at some point their population will begin to decline over time.

Europe's population today is already on its way to halve each generation as well:

2060 - Europe's population halves to 350 million

2060 and beyond - Europe's population follows the trend line of China after 2090.

The global population movement continues ever westwards resulting in all of the world emptying out into the US at the end of the day.

The US population itself will remain around the 400 million humans mark, after which its population will once again begin to grow at the 1% will have replaced all of the non performing and non-successful 99% populations, resulting in a new population explosion across the world, this time with the planet being occupied by Americans. This wave of American expansionism will occur in the 23rd century.

Germany and France become the last major nation states in Europe where the entire population of Europe empties out over time.

If we look at the developed and developing world, the developed world has the most number of immigrants. Out of the developed world, the US has the most immigrants. Which again shows that the US wins.

If we look at the numbers by income levels, any nation state with an income level below 14,000 USD per capita is going to die out in the end. Again leaving US as the winner.

If we look at the numbers by continents, Asia has the higher number of immigrants, with western Asia having the highest number of immigrants among all the Asian regions, once again showing us that global immigration is moving westwards, which again leaves the US as the final destination of humanity.

In West Asia the highest number of immigrants are to be found in Saudi Arabia, which shows us that Saudi Arabia is the link between the east and the west where rich immigrants from Saudi Arabia move into the west while the poor populations in Saudi Arabia replace the immigrants who move out.

The west already has strong relations with half of the middle east and continues to expand its influence, signifying that once again west Asian populations are meant to move further west to Europe and North America.

Long term whichever way you look at the numbers, at the end of the day the US wins because every other developed economy over time ends up with a lower fertility rate than the US, lower net migration rate than the US, and lower wealth than the US, so over the course of centuries where the US does not fail, humanity ends up all moving to the US.

This is why the US will never expand, because it is the exact size it needs to be to rule over the Earth and to rule over humanity once everybody moves to the US.

Continental centers of the world according to total migration numbers:

1. East Africa - Uganda and Ethiopia

2. Middle Africa - Democratic Republic of the Congo

3. Southern Africa - South Africa

4. Western Africa - Cote D Ivoire and Nigeria

5. Northern Africa - Sudan

6. Western Asia - Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Turkey

7. Central Asia - Kazakhstan

8. Southern Asia - India

9. Eastern Asia - Hong Kong and Japan

10. South East Asia - Malaysia and Thailand

11. Caribbean - Dominican Republic

12. Central America - Mexico

13. South America - Argentina and Chile

14. Oceania - Australia

15. Eastern Europe - Russian federation and Ukraine

16. Northern Europe - United Kingdom

17. Southern Europe - Italy and Spain

18. Western Europe - Germany and France

19. North America - US

When any of these territories begin to lose populations over time the end of the species has begun because even the largest territory in the region is no longer attracting enough migrants to keep itself alive.

As of now Germany and France are somehow holding on, Spain is barely holding on, Italy is dying, Russian federation and Ukraine are dying, Thailand is dying, and Hong Kong is dying.

This shows us that the end of human dominance and ownership of the entire planet is already coming to an end and that there are entire continental regions that are already on the path of dying out before the end of the century.

Conclusion:

The US will be the last stronghold of humanity. Multiple regions of the world are already dying out in terms of human presence. Global populations will continue to become more concentrated in the most developed parts of the world. Any bloodline the members of which do not reproduce with or end up as US citizens are guaranteed to die out over time.

Text IQ : 126 ( High Intelligence )

Voice level : 134 Hz ( Voicecel )

It is often said that the US invents, Europe legislates, and the Chinese copy.

This statement is only partially correct and misunderstand the natural place that China has occupied in the global world order, a place that fits it perfectly like a glove.

China does not simply copy, it transfers, it distributes, it standardizes.

The US and Europe were the winners by the end of the 20th century, yet the population of the European Union nor the US was large enough to supply the rest of the world with products at the desired price point. At the start of the new millennium there were 6.1 billion people in the world, and the US with 5% of the worlds population was not big enough, nor cheap enough, to supply the rest of the world with their products. Europe similarly was incapable of the industrial base required to supply the world with cheap goods at rates where every country no matter how poor, had access to them in their markets.

The rise of China changed that, and China became as a gateway for the third world, the developing world, to have access to all the commodities and middle tier goods that were once limited to the wealthy or the first world. China became the factory of the world, and allowed the developing world to set up standardized expectations of what they could afford, instead of it being split into nation states where what goods you can be supplied with differed nation to nation.

Today, China has become the largest exporter in the world, providing goods and services at affordable rates to the rest of the world. As 17.87% of the world population, it has enough people to provide a true global industrial base that goes beyond the first world.

The largest exporter in the world however, suffers from a demographic crisis, which makes it impossible for it to maintain that industrial base at the same level of production and price point due to its fast rising quality of life and income. Once again a gap is created in the global supply chain, which is now filled by India, a nation state with population numbers similar to China, and with a per capita GDP low enough for them to fill the gaps wherever China's wages rise too far to be able to make any products at a cheap price.

China and India together make up more than 37% of the world's population, a large enough industrial base for a global supply chain to be able to provide all the necessary baseline products for the rest of the world without issue, even with the declining demographics of China. This also guarantees the place of China or India as the third richest economy in the world at all times, as these two countries act as the industrial base of the world that actually is capable of reaching every single corner of the world. In current year, India is set to surpass the GDP of both Germany and Japan by the end of the decade, which fits in with India becoming the new global industrial base of the world.

The downwards effect this has on the global supply chain is that no jobs would ever go to Africa on the global supply chain, simply because India and China together have already covered all corners and levels of the global supply chain below the developed economy high end products. This limits Africa's GDP growth to be always below that of India at all times, irrespective of what they do or do not do, at least until India becomes developed enough as to give up on producing lower end goods on the supply chain.

Africa gets left behind as the last player on the world chain simply because of how many larger players on the world stage are ahead of them globally. Between the US, Europe, and Asia, there is just not enough of the pie left for them to throw labor at.

This trend can also be seen in global immigration, where the US, Europe, and the middle east are able to satisfy all their migrant needs via taking in educated Asians, to the point that there are no more seats left for Africans to fill. In this manner Africa becomes limited in immigration flows, GDP growth, and industrialization, simply because of the existence of India and China further up the supply chain.

Due to these reasons, Africa becomes limited to supplying raw resources to the world as their primary market space. The bottom rung of the ladder. Which causes them to grow at the rate of global wage increase, and global market products becoming cheaper.

The role that China and India occupy in today's and tomorrow's world is one that was previously occupied by Japan, but Japan was never large enough to provide goods to even half the world, no matter how cheap they made them. This is why we can see Japan fail in the face of being surrounded by global behemoths right next to it.

Every new civilization or global power rises forth has to face the challenge of being a better system or more powerful in some manner than the adversaries around them and the predecessors before them to be able to sustain themselves. As India and China take up the bottom tiers of the global supply chain, any nation state that wishes to have any chance of rising any further above in the world would have to be able to match them in capabilities and numbers. In this manner the rise of China and India also pushes for the rest of the world to form ever larger unions, as when faced with the US, the EU, China, and India above them, none of the other nations of the world are powerful enough to hold their own against any of these players on the world stage.

Isolationist societies end up dying due to this reason, as the only way to survive is now expansionism and multiculturalism to gain a large enough size and scale fast enough to be able to compete against the big players of the world as it has become now. This is why cultures such as the East Asians are set to fail, due to their inability to adapt to a world where they need to join together with their neighbors economically, politically, and legislatively.

Conclusion:

India and China are the only countries large enough to actually supply the entire global supply chain. They take up the role of global distributors standardizing the goods available to the rest of the developing world. India and China taking up such as large chunk of the global supply chain limits the growth of all nation states smaller than them including Africa. The existence of large nation states and unions such as the US, the EU, India, and China, make it impossible for any other nation state that exists in its current form to be able to surpass any of them, and between these 4 big players there is no more meaningful space left on the global supply chain. This in turn causes the death of isolationist states and the rapid rise of regional unions through the century to be able to stay competitive.

Writing IQ : 99 ( Average )

Voicecel IQ :62 Hz ( Deep voicechad )

South Korea's fertility rate is already down to 0.72 and declining. At those rates South Korea is losing 66% of its population every generation. The worst part is that South Korea's fertility rate still has not stabilized and is continuing to go down year on year. At current trajectories we can expect South Korea's population to fall below 10 million people by the end of the century.

Similarly we are seeing the population fertility rate continue to decline in all populations across the world with no bottom level at which the fertility decline stops.

Africa's fertility rate while far higher than the rest of the world is consistently going down as well. The US, one of the most stable rich nation states in the world, also has its fertility rate going down over time, showing us that in the best case scenario, developed nation states can hold the line for a decade at a time at most.

Israel today remains one of two developed nation state with a higher than replacement fertility rate, and even Israel continues to lower in fertility year on year, with Saudi Arabia barely two to three years away from falling below replacement fertility levels as well.

If we are to look at nation states by population, China and India, the only two 1 billion plus population nation states, are both below replacement rate and continuing to decline over time.

The US as the third largest population nation state also remains below replacement rate, and Indonesia the fourth largest population country is the first nation on the list to have an above replacement fertility rate, with its fertility rate expected to fall below replacement as well in another decade at most. This leaves us with Pakistan as the first nation state in the population list with a fertility rate above 3, which is expected to fall below replacement levels in another 20-30 years. We see a similar trend for all high fertility high population nation states, where we can expect all of them to fall below replacement levels before 30 years are out at most.

That is to say, demographically, the world is going to continue to decline in terms of global fertility for at least the next 30 years, and far more likely to continue to decline until it reaches at least 1.5 fertility rate, as this appears to be the point where most developed nation states managed to stabilize for long periods of time. The global fertility rate falls about .3 point every 12 years which means we can expect the global fertility rate to go below replacement before 2035, and we can expect the global fertility rate to have a chance of stabilizing around 1.5 by the year 2060. It is however far more likely that by 2060 the global fertility rate will not stop at 1.5, but simply slow down and continue to crawl its way towards 1.3 and then 1.1. As the global fertility rates continue to decline year on year, the only winning strategy appears to be slowing down the decline by passing policies that accrue benefits to married couples with children such as parental leave and childcare support as part of national policy. These policies come nowhere close to reversing fertility trends in any meaningful manner, but tend to slow down population collapse by another 2-5 years every time such a policy is passed focusing on providing more support to couples with children.

These continually declining demographics force the world and its countries between two choices, either to continue to provide more and more benefits to people with children over time, or to make people responsible for having their own kids, with no additional support from the government. As we can see based on global trends, nation states that make the couple responsible for their children with no support in the form of parental leave or childcare costs being subsidized, tend to do far worse in terns of the population of children being born than more individualistic nation states that support providing support to people with children and give them enough time to raise their families.

Generally there is a negative correlation between a nation state having a developed economy and a nation state having lots of children. The US being the first developed economy without any future collapse, has done impressively well in keeping its fertility rate as high as they have. Any developed nation states with a fertility rate below that of the US are obviously implementing worse systems of governance and policies which guarantee their future failure in comparison to the US. If you are a nation state with a fertility rate below that of the US, you have no future. As the US itself with a fertility rate of 1.7 is only able to function due to being the number one nation state at assimilating useful immigrants from across the world.

As of now, there are 77 territories across the world that are currently set to fail as they have a fertility rate below that of the US. As global fertility rate continues to decline and nation rates continue to go down as well across the world, it is far more likely than not that the number of nation states with no future are only going to keep increasing over time. This is primarily due to the fact that the way the US is set up, their demographic trends shift far slower than the rest of the world. There will come a point within the next decade or two where the US will have a higher fertility rate than Mexico over time. We can similarly expect a point in time where the Israeli and Saudi Arabian fertility rate will one day be lower than that of the US.

Conclusion:

The global population growth rate is doomed. All developed nation states over time end up with fertility rates below those of the US. Only the US immigration policy is successful enough to survive the 1.7 fertility rate it is stuck at. The US is the most stable demographic nation in the world. As all developed economies have fertility rates that fall below the US, the US is going to remain the last man standing in a world where the population growth rate never recovers. The easiest way for the US to win is to make the rest of the world developed, which ensures all other nation states will be declining faster than the US over time.

The rest of the world is not designed to be able to handle and survive modernization as it is not possible to do so without opening yourself up to immigration from across the world, which 70-80% of the non-western world is culturally incapable of. Even Singapore knows this.

Xenophobic nation states will fail. Negative immigration rate nation states will fail. Nation states stuck with fertility rates below that of the US will fail. Nation states with declining populations will fail.

That is the case because the US has figured out how to not fall into any of these categories.

By these standards the nation states that are going to survive are:

1. USA

2. Brazil

3. France

4. UK

5. South Africa

6. Argentina

7. Iraq

8. Angola

9. Malaysia

10. Saudi Arabia

Germany almost makes it so it is possible Germany will be holding by a thread.

Nation states with populations below 30 million not counted.

Globally these 10 nation states will accrue power and influence over the next 30 years. South America is going to once again become relevant to global affairs and global trade within the next 30 years.

We can expect USA to hold first place.

Brazil will end up being the central power in South America where South America is emptying into along with the US and Europe.

Argentina has a 50-50 chance of holding relevance of falling into decline as Brazil out competes it.

France is steady and healthy a developed economy even with their strange ways.

UK remains a healthy nation state that is going to survive the future even as it loses overall influence. It's population is going to keep going up year on year and it will retain power at levels similar to France.

South Africa survives as being far more advanced than any other nation states around it which means loads of immigration to South Africa from the rest of Africa.

Iraq has been colonized and is ruled by people meant to favor the west. They will grow in time into a western ally if they aren't already.

No idea what's up with Angola, the numbers state its a healthy economy.

Malaysia is a healthy economy that is growing well. It will remain a relevant country in the future.

Saudi Arabia is a major middle east power. For all intents and purposes it is a developed monarchy and arabs keep immigrating to the region. Saudi Arabia is going to become western aligned over time and will westernize over time as that is what the monarch wants for all intents and appearances.

These will be the powerhouses of the world by the end of the century:

USA ( North America )

Brazil ( South America )

South Africa ( Sub Saharan Africa )

Saudi Arabia ( Middle East )

France/ UK ( West Europe/ European Union )

Malaysia ( South East Asia )

Expect the regional territories around these countries to depopulate over time while these countries continue to grow in population.

Writing IQ - 93 ( Average ) https://www.writingtoiq.com/

Voice levels - 145 Hz ( Voicecel ) https://voicecel.org/

EDIT: This is for people entering or in the early stages of depression, and for those who are closing out their fight with it. If you are truly feeling suicidal, please call a suicide hotline and seek help from a therapist or a friend/family. Anyone you can talk to.

1. Meeting your soulmate

​

2. Going to your friend's weddings

​

3. Stargazing

​

4. Food

​

5. Going to every country

​

6. Nice smelling candles

​

7. Music

​

8. Concerts

​

9. The people that love you.

​

10. Snowball fights

​

11. Going to the beach

​

12. Sunsets

​

13. Sunrises

​

14. Hiking in Forests

​

15. Dogs and Cats and Pets

​

16. New movies

​

17. Old movies

​

18. Going to the drive in theatre

​

19. Walking through local markets

​

20. Your favorite artists next song

​

21. Drawing

​

22. Sculpting your own pots

​

23. Birthdays

​

24. Inside jokes with your friends

​

25. That special persons laugh

​

26. Warm houses on cold days

​

27. Bonfires with smores

​

28. Reconnecting with old friends

​

29. Smelling flowers

​

30. Soft plushies

​

31. The smell of fresh baked cookies

​

32. Kareoke

​

33. Sleepovers

​

34. Your favorite videogame

​

35. Learning a new language

​

36. Long walks on the beach

​

37. Seeing every ocean

​

38. Squishy bunnies

​

39. Going to the store to smell perfumes

​

40. Long hot showers

​

41. Tea/ coffee

​

42. Seeing rainbows

​

43. Helping wounded animals

​

44. Bath bombs

​

45. Cleaning the Earth

​

46. Getting married

​

47. Going to see brodway shows

​

48. The sound of rain

​

49. Long car rides

​

50. Going on a train

​

51. Memes

​

52. Going to the zoo

​

53. Looking at funny art

​

54. The smell of old books

​

55. Butterflies

​

56. Collecting shells

​

57. Color

​

58. Sending letters

​

59. Surprise parties

​

60. Warm sheets

​

61. Reading

​

62. Swimming in the pool at night

​

63. Going to diners with friends

​

64. Early morning runs

​

65. Looking at old photos

​

66. Going to a museum

​

67. Soft sweaters

​

68. Glitter

​

69. Going to the aquarium

​

70. Hugs

​

71. Making snow angels

​

72. Holidays

​

73. Home cooked meals

​

74. Roller coasters

​

75. Decorating for parties

​

76. Playing pranks on friends

​

77. Dancing

​

78. Singing in the shower

​

79. Seeing your favorite animal in person

​

80. Meeting your hero

​

81. Bubble wrap

​

82. Ice water on hot days

​

83. Poetry

​

84. Trying on funny clothes

​

85. Hanging out with friends

​

86. City skylines

​

87. Wearing your favorite color

​

88. Beautiful wildlife

​

89. Collecting stickers

​

90. Making some ones day

​

91. Laughing so hard you can't breath

​

92. Warm blankets fresh from the dryer

​

93. Sewing

​

94. Seeing the future

​

95. Late night convos

​

96. Rewatching your favorite show

​

97. Blowing Bubblegum

​

98. Boardgames

​

99. Sitting out in the rain

​

100. Bubbles

​

101. Cooking new thing

​

102. Bob Ross tutorials

​

103. Picnics

​

104. Tire swings

​

105. Old architecture

​

106. Reading books

​

107. Growing your own food

​

108. Clear skies

​

109. Baking things you love

​

110. Finding new hobbies

​

​

I promise no matter what, thing will get better then where they are now, there's so much more to life then feeling down. There's so much you haven't done yet and I hope that now matter what you know how much you are loved, and wanted, and appreciated. It gets better I promise. 💗

A country who is the aggressor and still ends up with their land getting occupied is very unlikely to end up being the winner of the conflict. We can say with 80-90% certainty that Russia is not going to win this war that began with the invasion of Ukraine.

We can expect this conflict to carry on for 3-5 more years before Russia has to give up due to a combination of lack of funds, inflation, and population loss.

After that, Russia has already done a big enough number of Ukraine that Ukraine isn't going to recover as a functional nation state. The only choice Ukraine now has is to join the EU and fall comfortably into national decline where the GDP go up but the population disappears over time.

This is a big win for the western powers as now the western powers have defeated Russia ( again ) by using their weakest member ( Ukraine ), and Ukraine now fully sides with the west as a long term ally and member. This also opens up further pressure on Belarus to either fully join into Russia or give up all ambitions and turn back towards the west for support and economic partnership.

Russia itself is likely to maintain its geographical integrity, having to give back all Ukrainian lands in exchange for Ukraine giving back the Russian lands that it occupies. Russia would however be left worse off than before it started the war, as its population will be demographically far worse off due to all the deaths and injuries in the war, its labor force will be worse off due to all the deaths and injuries from the war, its intellectual supply will be worse off due to anybody with any competency in their work running away, and its economy will be worse off for having to recover from a war time economic status, higher than GDP growth inflation, and the continued primary and secondary sanctions from the west. This puts Russia in a position where their economy is going to decline year or year, or at the very least stagnate to the point of falling behind year on year, similar to Japan in the past and current generation.

As the Russia economy falls to levels where it cannot sustain itself, it becomes codependent on other larger economies for its growth. With the west shut off to Russia, it is left depending on China for its continued survival. China takes full advantage of this opportunity and loses a potential rival in the form of Russia, and gains a permanent raw resource and cheap labor provider in Russia, as China's continually growing economy can prosper with a Russian labor class beneath the Chinese middle class, similar to poor nation immigrants moving to the US as maids and McDonalds workers in the first generation.

This loss of power in Russia would result in Russia being unable to extend its influence beyond its borders, and any nation state around the globe which was reliant on Russian support to keep itself afloat would be worse off in the near future. Such as Assad's Syria, Armenia, Iran, and Palestine. We can see these current anti-western conflicts as all being connected by a network of non-western aligned nation states cooperating with one another, and the loss of Russia results in the weakening of all parts of the structure.

Russia's loss on global power or even regional power would also open up space of Kazakhstan to keep growing in the region, which would mean that a more western aligned Kazakhstan would replace Russia as the regional power in Central/ Northern Asia. Kazakhstan has been following slowly in the footsteps of the liberal world order and generally thinks favorably of Europe. With Kazakhstan as the primary power in the region, western influence over the world would have increased in comparison to western influence with an aggressive Russia leading the region.

Russia's defeat while acting as advantageous for China in the form of a completely codependent neighbor to fully exploit in the near future for resources and cheap labor, nevertheless places China at a disadvantage of having no strong allies, and being surrounded by neutral partners who are willing to trade with China but completely unwilling to be influence by Chinese ideals or culture. On the global stage the defeat of Russia worsens the position of China as no anti-west aligned nation state is now going to believe that they can defeat the west with Chinese backing. Any country that was unwilling to take a side, or worried about China being the future dominant power would be more likely to side with the west and its ideals in the future. Which once again pushes the world towards further westernization, with ever more countries being counted as part of the western led world order.

China is also unlikely to carry on the invasion of Taiwan, as they see the outcome of modern warfare for one of the most powerful non western military in the world. As China fails to form successful long term partnerships with strong nation states, the space for them to keep expanding decreases over time. This means a further decline of China in the future as their GDP growth rate falls below that of the US as their economic network reaches its limits.

The only possible winning move left for China is if India were to align with it but that is no longer possible due to China occupying thousands of kilometers of Indian land. In the work space or the study of human psychology space this personality is referred to the kind of person who snatches up whatever they can take, but most often these people fail in life as they burn up too many bridges over time. China similarly, is a smart man who has burned too many bridges and continues to burn too many bridges to ever reach the top of the world.

The decline of China also pretty much guarantees a west aligned India that continues to further westernize over time and has the majority of Indians immigrating to the western world.

Conclusion:

Russia is almost guaranteed to lose the war. Russia's loss means the anti-west aligned alliance/ network is going to collapse in on itself. Further westernization will continue. China is going to fall further into decline. India will end up aligning with the west and westernizing over time.

Playstation currently is already doing bad enough that they have to release their exclusives on pc after 2 years on the playstation. Which is to say, the only advantage playstation has for games is that the games arrive two years earlier on the playstation.

Playstation in the current generation has also had the biggest game release failure of all time, with concord pretty much making 0$ worth of revenue on the game Concord with a budget of 200 million USD.

Playstation on the ps5 definitely has some games that use the hardware well enough that they wouldn't be able to run on the ps4. The gap while not as huge as the gap felt between the ps2 and the ps3, or perhaps even the ps3 and late gen ps4, is still large enough as to be noticeable. The issue the ps5 faces now is that the core ps5 hardware has likely already reached its limits for a good quality gaming experience if games are to be visually improved any further, which is why they had to release the ps5 pro for a mid-gen refresh.

In terms of performance improvements the ps5 pro is a decent machine. If offers a 45% improvement in performance when compared to the base ps5, which is a decent enough increase in capabilities as to allow game developers to really take advantage of so as to create far better games for the platform. The primary issue lies in the pricing of the new ps5 pro model. With costs 699 USD/ 799 Euros. The base playstation 5 in comparison costs 499 USD. For most people, a mid tier pc purchased at 699 USD would make for a better deal than a 699 ps5 pro. Especially taking into account that the stand for the ps5 pro and attaching a disk drive to it both have additional costs and are not available with the 699 USD purchase.

That is to say, the ps5 pro has priced itself out of the market. It has become a product that only Americans can afford and for the most part even Americans do not want to pay that much for a playstation based on all the comments posted online about the product.

Comparing the competition: Microsoft games.

Microsoft and Xbox have the primary advantage that Microsoft unlike the playstation is not exclusively a platform first in the gaming industry. When the xbox releases its games for the pc, those games are still running on a microsoft product ( windows ). This allows Microsoft to benefit far more from the current generation open platform gaming environment than the playstation ever could. While the Xbox has not had any out of the world exclusives on the platform this generation, it has certainly had the benefit of having no great losses either.

The primary disadvantage for the Xbox Series X is that it has sold around one third of the consoles that the ps5 has sold so far. This gap is likely to be covered in the future not by increasing Xbox sales but by declining playstation sales instead. While the playstation appears to be chasing after an ever richer customer base, microsoft appears to be sticking to the tried and tested affordable to the average middle class Joe sales tactic for their consoles.

All Microsoft has to do to win or get closer to winning is to maintain the current trajectory when it comes to pricing.

Next generation consoles : What does the future hold for Playstation and Xbox

It is safe to assume that the PS6 when it releases is going to have the same price point as the playstation pro today or an even higher price tag. It is highly likely that nobody would be willing to pay that price tag for the playstation 6 unless the playstation 6 is 10 times more powerful than a playstation 5 to say the least. The Playstation 2 ended up being the best selling console of all time. The playstation 4 the second best selling playstation console of all time. The Playstation 3 the third best selling and the ps5 lags far behind at the fourth best selling. Following this trend line, it is highly likely that the ps6 will sell even lower numbers than the ps5. Similarly, the Xbox Series X has had far lower sales numbers than even the original Xbox or Xbox one, signifying that in the next generation the Xbox can also be expected to keep declining in sales. It appears that console generations might end simply due to everybody losing interest in buying consoles to play games anymore.

What went wrong?

It is hard to say but the most likely answer is a combination of:

1. Lack of exclusives that are as exciting as the last generation - All playstation games will at some point be available on PC as well ( Except for astrobot perhaps ). Similarly Xbox games are available of the microsoft game store on pc. Nobody really wants to buy a console just for 1 or 2 exclusive games that they would otherwise not be able to play.

2. Lack of a jump in the quality of gaming - The leap between the ps1 and the ps2 was the largest. The leap between the ps3 and the ps4 was smaller, and the leap between the ps4 and the ps5 was so small that they were releasing ps5 games for the ps4 for half of the ps5 lifecycle. There is no space left for consoles to improve 5-10x in quality anymore, and it is impossible to woo a customer to buy a product across 7-8 years by telling them the newer model runs smoother at 30 more framerates. That point alone is not a good enough selling point for most customers out of buy gaming consoles.

3. Nintendo ate their lunch - Nintendo has successfully managed to continue keeping a closed ecosystem for their games. Nintendo Switch is the cheapest high end gaming console around at the original price of 299 USD in 2017, and provides the most fun games for the core audience of children that video games were originally meant for. As of now Nintendo switch is one of the best selling games in the world and rising in sales still, only surpassed by the Nintendo DS and the playstation 2.

4. The PC has clear noticeable advantages over consoles now - Steam on PC makes it very easy to buy and keep track of games. PC gaming is the largest market for online gaming. The FPS market is the biggest market for gaming and shooting with a mouse and keyboard is far more accurate than shooting with a gaming console controller. The PC allows for far greater options in modding games than the playstation or Xbox. Playstation had the advantage with storytelling games but they threw it away with DEI games which ruins the experience ( looking at you Last of US 2 ).

Conclusion:

Console gaming is dying. It will probably be dead in another 2-3 generations at most. You are better off buying a pc which everybody buys anyways rather than buying a pc and then buying a gaming console separately.

Writing IQ 115

Voice level :

145 Hz voicecel

Evolution is about adapting to ones environment. On Earth, there are currently 8 billion humans actively altering planetary climate conditions. They are causing the deaths of thousands of species every year, and are selectively choosing which species (pets) would prosper above all others. Today, humanity is as much of a force of nature as a hurricane or an Earthquake in terms of the impact left upon the land. It i due to this influence upon the surrounding environment that all life on Earth will evolve to learn to adapt to humans to survive.

Evolutionary traits in life around us that are influenced by humans:

1. Intelligence - It is believed that city rats and raccoons might be becoming smarter than their more rural counterparts due to requiring higher cognitive function to navigate life in the big city. Among animals capable of learned behavior (monkeys, dolphins, chimps, etc), this intelligence increase may take he form of learning from observing human actions such as cleaning ones food or chucking rocks or sharpening a stick.

2. Avoidance behaviors - Some animals may learn avoidance behaviors to hide from humans as humans are one of the more unpredictable creatures out there. One may feed you and the next may kill you. If you hurt one somebody from your group gets killed. Or you get hunted simply for being delicious or exotic. Due to these factors some animals may evolve to outright avoid humans and human territories.

3. Increased resilience - This is most often found in species humans are trying to actively exterminate. Especially bacteria. Already there is great concern around bacteria developing antibiotic resistance over time and becoming lethal to humans once again. While we are unlikely to see the evolution of bullet proof grizzly bears, we are over time likely to see more and more animals actively adapted to better survive human encounters.

4. Faster mutation rates - As the global environment is altered in ever faster rates by human activity, the animal species most likely to survive might be the ones with higher mutation rates, allowing them to adapt over generations to human altered environments faster and faster.

5. Shorter lifespans - Animals may evolve to have shorter lifespans as it would give them more opportunities to adapt generation after generation, allowing them to keep up with human dominated environmental changes.

6. Plastic resistance - Most commonly found in microorganisms, there are bacteria species that are learning to adapt to plastics in their environment. Remember, there was a point in Earth's history when wood could not be consumed by microorganisms.

7. Human friendly - Some species are learning to evolve to be more human friendly as it increases their chances of survival and being fed by humans. Due to this we are likely to see an ever increasing number of domesticated species over time.

Impact of humans on animal evolution over time:

Short term impact:

Mass die off of hundreds of thousands of species. Population boom of domestic, semi domestic, and urban species. Invasive species explosion.

Medium term impact:

Emergence of new ecosystem balance with lower variety and higher quantities of surviving species. Bull frogs in Australia. Lizards in Florida. Invasive species beginning to assimilate in new environments as rest of life adapts to them. Boom in the number of semi domestic species.

Long term impact:

Garden of Eden scenario. All surviving species know to be nice to humans in some way. Animal species evolving to be actively beautiful to humans (alive not dead). Predatory animals know to avoid humans or to not hunt humans and be nice to them for extra food. Animal species learning to communicate with humans.

Danger scenario for humans regarding evolution on Earth:

Scenario 1:

Microorganisms become resistant to all human medicine and we see the return of mass die offs in humanity from disease.

Scenario 2:

Humans evolve into a dead end. Humans evolve over the long term to get ever dumber over time ( idiocracy scenario ) or humans evolve to become ever weaker over time ( brains in vats scenario ), or humans lose all reproductive interest ( population collapse scenario ), or human capacity for devastating violence surpasses their capacity to fear the use of such weapons scenario ( self destruction ).

Scenario 3:

The most unlikely of all possible scenarios. Evolution catches up to humans. That is, animals evolve to be able to mass kill humans with ease. This would mean predators that figure out how to hunt humans on the daily without issue while being impossible to track down or stop by humans. Currently, the tiger comes the closest, killing 50-60 humans every year. In our scenario we are presuming the evolution of a bear or tiger or lion that learns to perfectly adapt to urban conditions and hunt for people and hide among buildings without getting caught, or even when found being impossible to bag or kill because it is too good at escaping.

Conclusion:

Life on Earth is going to evolve around humans due to how much of an impact they have on the planet. The most likely evolutionary scenarios for life on Earth is that they would adapt to having humans on top by learning to hide from humans, get along with humans, and adapting to human made environments such as towns and cities. The less likely scenarios for how life evolves on Earth is going to be predators evolving to hunt humans and being good enough at it to thrive on hunting humans. Overall the evolution of the human may be considered on par with the evolution of trees, to the point that one day life on Earth won't be able to survive without humans helping it along just like trees help us with Oxygen.

Estimated IQ : 129 ( High Intelligence ) https://www.writingtoiq.com/

Voice level: 138 Hz ( Voicecel ) https://voicecel.org/

Very Good Guide

Greece and Japan shows us the future of nation states that do not succeed. As a "Developed" economy fails and begins to decline, the only way for the people within the nation state to have their quality of life go up is for either:

1. PPP GDP growth to remain steady and high. ( Japan) which is only possible for very advanced developed economies.

2. People immigrating out of the nation state and the remainder being able to hold on to larger chunks of the resources lying about. ( Greece )

Most of the world is not the Japanese style of competent and would actually fall into the second category. Which means continual decline of populations in Eastern Europe and South America over time.

As of now North America, South America, and Asia have a population growth rate of 0.6%. Europe is the only continent with a negative population growth rate. It is a strong possibility that the population growth rates of both North America and South America are kept artificially up via immigration policy. In which case we can expect the population of North America and South America to keep growing at 0.5-0.6% for decades to come.

Europe does not have this luxury as there is a strong anti-immigrant sentiment on the continent. Europe's only choice is to grow horizontally.

We must also account for the fact that the species is expected to become a type 1 civilization by the end of the century, a civilization capable of controlling the climate on its own planet and have access to the entire planet's resources and energy. As a type 1 civilization with only 7-8 billion humans on the planet, everybody would be able to live a life of luxury with ease.

Do demographics matter for a type 1 civilization? Not really no. The primary advantage of demographics is in providing for ever increasing R&D input. Once a species is a type 1 civilization all the capabilities of a type 2 civilization are so far out there that humanity cannot little steps its way to it unless its willing to take a billion little steps that add nothing in the present or the near future or the far future. It is more likely that we would simply get stuck being a type 1 civilization and the way of life that comes with. Most of our wars are already cultural rather than physical. Even economic warfare is going down globally as there is more advantage to continuing business. Cultural warfare being the only means of conducting warfare means that global homogenization of values and lifestyles is what the future holds for the planet.

Globalization is where the future lies. What globalization tells us is that labor, food, transport, research, and specializations move wherever they provide the most benefits on the supply chain.

The system benefits most from having people living close to one another and aggregating together. Which means a species that reaches 100% urbanization rates.

Globalized trade means the best trade products winning out at the cheapest prices all over the planet. Which means everybody eating the same kind of food across the world.

Globalization means things costing the same across the planet. Which means global prices stabilizing across the world, which is only possible if everybody has the same incomes to be able to buy the same products. Which means global economic equilibrium is reached in the future across the world.

For a global supply chain that stable and large would require the end of wars which would only be possible through the formation of continental unions. So we are definitely getting continental unions.

Global supply chains are best maintained by giant corporate entities so we are going to end up with corporations with more power than any nation state as the corporation is an entity spread across the world and supplying the entire planet. Corporations will overtake governments and that is the next phase of civilization evolution.

By 2100 we can expect the entire planet to be a corporatocracy built off of the laws already in place across the world. Just as Samsung practically owns South Korea, we are going to see other developed economies owned by their biggest companies as well, as it is the only way to maintain GDP growth over time.

Ukraine is expected to be the first nation state that empties out, as their population is already too old to rebuild after a war, and their fertility rate and immigration rate was already abysmal before the war. Another example of population disappearance in the current era is the decline of populations on Island nations such as cook Island where the population is now below 1960 levels.

The population for most tiny nation states has already peaked and is now set for long term decline. After the extinction of villages and small towns, the smallest nation states follow as they no longer guarantee a good quality of life compared to the more advanced economies out there. For Example, Cuba's population is going down year on year right now at rates similar to some of the faster shrinking European populations.

In the future we can expect the shrinking of nation state populations to be the norm rather than the exception. With the smallest independent territories depopulating completely by the end of the century.

Currently the majority of the planet has a negative net migration rate, which means once population growth rates near zero, most nation states of the world will begin to fall into perpetual decline.

The majority of the planet is also growing its GDP at a slower rate than global inflation, which again implies that most of the world is going to have its quality of life go down over time and the only way to survive is to leave for better pastures.

Conclusion:

Smaller nation states are going to disappear altogether. As globalization continues to further open up borders, the only way for nation states to keep their populations rising is to guarantee continual growth, failing which the people disappear over time. There are hard limits to how far most nation states can grow. For most of the planet there is a stronger incentive to immigrate than there is to remain in place.

The US remains the future.

Writing IQ: 125 ( High Intelligence ) https://www.writingtoiq.com/

Voice status: 132 Hz ( Voicecel ) https://voicecel.org/

Africa is the major source of reproduction in the world. Assuming that African IQ goes up 3 points per decade they should be fit to immigrate to other parts of the world in another hundred years.

What we are more likely to see is that in the first generation we will have 0.01% of Africans living outside Africa, in second generation we will have 0.1% of Africans living outside Africa, in the third generation we will have 1% of Africans living outside Africa, and in the 4th generation we will have 10% of Africans living outside Africa.

As of now we are already on 4th generation as a population equivalent to 10% of Africa's population is living outside Africa in the form of immigrants and African immigrant descendants.

This ratio is likely to remain stable or go as high as 20% for this generation as Africans continue to immigrate primarily to South America., France, and the US, but the African native population itself keeps rising at a very high rate.

Generally, nation states have their fertility rate fall below replacement at per capita income levels in the 10s of thousands ( starting point is around the 2000s ). For Africa based on current trends we can expect their fertility rate to fall below replacement around a per capita income level of 15,000s at the higher projections.

Based on current trajectory, Africa's GDP per capita is currently 1,740 USD. Based on current growth rate we can expect Africa's GDP per capita to cross the 15000s by 2084, meaning their fertility rate would fall below replacement in 60 years from now.

Currently Africa's fertility rate is declining by 1.25% per year, which again tracks to their fertility rate going below replacement in 50-60 years.

We can assume that the developed world is not willing to decline in population.

We can also expect the developed world to be losing their native population at rates up to 1% per year.

Assuming the population of the developed world to be 1.4 billion altogether, and 1% of 1.4 billion being 14 million, the developed world will require 14 million Africans moving in every year or being displaced to other parts of the world as they take in the high skilled labor from those other parts of the world.

Africa being the bottom of the barrel would always be the last player in the chain supplying the 14 million people no matter what form the chain takes above them.

Assuming the first generation Africans on average have 2 kids, there will be 1.88 billion Africans in the African diaspora living outside Africa by the time the African population is below replacement levels. Which would be around approximately 30% of Africans living outside Africa by 2080s which again matches up with how immigration from poor countries to richer countries open to immigration scales up.

For example - There are about 37 million Mexican related individuals living in the US right now while the population of Mexico is around 129 million people. There are 80 million Germans living in Germany meanwhile the German diaspora size is 70 million people around the world.

The world population is expected to be 10.3 billion in 2084, which means 1.88 billion people or approximately 18.2% of the rest of the world will be made up of Africans or African descendant individuals.

For context, 91 million Brazilians ( 42% ) are of African descent. The mean IQ in Brazil is 87.8. We can safely assume that with a lower mix of African genetics in the global culture, the global IQ will remain higher than 87.8 by today's standards by the year 2084. This puts a lower limit on exactly what's the maximum level of stupid humanity as a species can get by 2084.

The US 14.4% of the population identifies as black, the average IQ in the US is 98.

Taking into account that US IQ scores are expected to continue increasing by 0.5 points per decade, we can conclude that the worst case scenario for the world with a 18.2% admixture of black genes will be a stagnant intelligence humanity where humans remain at current day IQ till the end of the century.

More likely scenario would be global IQ growth slowing down until it is rising by 1-2 points per decade, which means the species is not going to get noticeably smarter generation to generation which adds to the slowing down of humanity's intelligence development and thus humanity's research and tech growth.

Thus, the primary remaining way for humanity to keep growing technologically and intellectually would be to specialize and send all high skill manpower to a single nation state which again puts the US in a position where it will be leading the world in tech and IQ growth meanwhile the rest of the world stagnates behind the US over time. This is best case scenario. If the US fails then that means a global century of stagnation compared to the previous century and people noticing the world has really changed once every 100 years, i.e. nobody ever noticing the world grow and evolve within their lifetime.

Conclusion:

Betting on the US is betting on humanity. Anybody who cares about the species should be investing in the growth of the US.

Writing IQ: 125 ( High Intelligence ) https://www.writingtoiq.com/

Voicecel.org results : Voicecel ( It's over ) 147 Hz

DEI projects are failing left and right. Niche websites also no longer care about the trans movement as something worth pushing further. Polyamory failed at becoming common place. The value of women in the sexual market place has consistently fallen down and the world is beginning to backtrack on the additional rights and freedoms given to women in society, such as believe all women.

In the western world you are seeing a rise in support for right wing parties, and left wing parties are only alive due to right wing parties being anti-abortion in the US, and being declared as evil for decades in European societies.

The one place liberalization is winning is in the middle east where they are making progress on things such as letting women drive and letting women out of the house without a male guardian. In the current decade liberalization has shifted from taking the form of accelerating in the west, to moving forward the most backwards societies in the world. Modern day liberalization has moved from growing vertically to growing horizontally, with the moderate version ( Turkish level liberal values ) spreading across the world.

Even California, the most liberal state in the US, has slowed down in terms of passing more extreme social liberal policies at the state level. We have reached the point in global values and ideals where global value chains are being rectified to be more similar to one another. Meanwhile, Texas, the more rightwing neighbor of California, is seeing far higher population growth rate than California.

Today, the biggest outliers in terms of liberal values are no longer the middle east, but instead places like Afghanistan and Pakistan. Nation states too poor to have anything beyond their local culture to hold on to.

Afghanistan today is well on its way to becoming the poorest and most backwards part of the world, and it is this Afghanistan-Pakistan region of the world, where we can expect the most backwards societies of the world to persist over time.

In Japan we see an increase in liberalization in the form of improved work hours. In South Korea we see a complete failure of liberal values as the nation state falls off a demographic cliff. In China we see increased liberalization of values among the youth as they find out that their lives could be lived easier than they are today, knowledge learned through interactions with western media. In India, a hybrid form of liberalization occurs in line with the liberalization seen historically in east Asia.

All these trends reflect a slow liberalization in the non-western developed world, closing the gap between them and the western world in terms of values, rather than any further liberalization of western societies.

For most of the developed world, it appears to be the case that instead of seeing further leftwards shift in society, we will instead see a further rightwards shift along with fewer work hours in the day. That is the only place where society "progresses". Fewer working hours for the citizens.

As of now the shortest working hours are to be found in Germany, where the average German is working around 3.6 hours per day across the year 2021

The most successful form of liberalization in the world today thus takes the form of reduced work hours across the world, and spread of European culture ( in the form of migration policy, being part of the European Union, and more open trade markets ) across greater geographical area.

Ukraine siding with the west as a result of the Ukraine - Russia war has been one of the biggest successes of the liberal world order in the 2020s. Guaranteeing that societies across Europe will be further homogenized along the lines of Western European values.

Another rising challenge to liberal world values is that there are now multiple nation states that are in a state of high economic development without having strong liberal values which opens up the possibility of western styled liberal values not being necessary to becoming a developed economy. For example - China without embracing western liberal values in now the second biggest economy in the world. Turkey, without embracing western liberal values fully is still able to continue growing year on year. Singapore, without fully embracing the western liberal world order, is still one of the highest GDP per capita nation states in the world. Saudi Arabia, without embracing fully the western liberal world order, is still as rich as any other developed economy on a per capita basis.

What we are seeing is that globally conservative nation states are finding out that they have the option to keep growing as nation states and prospering internally even while only being required to embrace more conservative/ more moderate liberal values. For the non-western world order, this is great motivation to not liberalize, as it allows them to retain their own culture while still growing year on year, which is more preferred than to grow on foreign values by the citizens of these nations.

As of now, the primary example of this non-liberal value growing nation is China, which tries to be as anti-capitalism as possible, only giving in to another capitalistic value to continue to grow economically as it reaches the limits of economic growth with conservative systems. In this manner, China acts as an example of the least quantity of liberalization required to keep growing as a nation state.

Conclusion:

Liberalization is slowing down in the developed western world. Nobody cares strongly about pushing trans rights or DEI anymore. The highest levels of liberalization are taking place in the form of lowering work hours globally, expansion of the EU, and the liberalization of the most conservative societies in the world. There are multiple non-westernized nation states that are successfully growing year on year and this acts as incentive for non-western nation states to not westernize as they now have the option of both keeping their values and growing further at the same time. China is the primary example of this, and any nation state that is poorer than China on a per capita basis can follow China's blueprint instead of liberalizing until it is as rich as China on a per capita basis.

Estimated text IQ : 97 https://www.writingtoiq.com/

Voicecel.org score: 73 Hz deep voicechad.

The top 1% accumulate more than 50% of the wealth generated per decade. Global resource capture by the 1% has already occurred. The 99% are not the people running the world, they are the ones just living in it.

As of now the majority of the top 1% live in the US, which means it is the US that is accumulating the majority of the wealth generated around the world. With the rest of the world working off the scraps that are left over after the US takes its 33-40% share of wealth generated.

China remains the country with the second highest population of the top 1% of high income individuals, holding strong its position as the second most powerful nation in the world. The fact that China appears to be so far behind the US militarily, technologically at times, and in terms of future growth potential, doesn't just show that China is behind the US, but gives us an idea of how far behind the US the rest of the world must be, that is still even further behind China.

The US GDP did not slow down as expected, but is showing signs of stronger resilience and future growth than what the market had predicted. There is a real possibility that the US GDP will continue to grow at rates of 2% and higher every year till the end of the century without issue, thus making it impossible for any other nation state to keep up around the world. In very recent history this trend can be seen in how the US economy has completely surpassed the economy of the EU in a generation when 20-30 years ago the gap was small enough that Europe and the US could be categorized in the same grouping of big players from a third world perspective.

The continuing resilience of the US increases the likelihood of the world remaining split into independent nation states rather than larger unions forming over time across the world. The primary reason for this being that the US has no need for expansion geographically due to its economic hegemony in the future, and other nation states not being likely to wish to merge together without successful examples to follow. People accept change either when they have no other choice left or when they know better things will come from the change.

As the top 1% primarily live in the west and most frequently immigrate to the west, along with the previously mentioned fact are accumulating the majority of wealth generated across the world, it is to be expected that in the future wealth will continue to accumulate in North America, with the primary growing economies of the future being those who are most closely allied to the US culturally, economically, and geopolitically. What this means is the continuing accumulation of global wealth in the direction of westernized economies. This would mean the continuing accumulation of resources in Europe, Japan, and South Korea in the future, or these nation states remaining stagnant instead of collapsing as expected by all metrics during a collapse phase. For example - Pakistan surviving on the edge for the decades it was a US ally in Asia.

With the US considered the center of the world in our scenario, the rest of the world's nation states are converted into a pipeline to support the ever growing needs of the US. With the next 2% growth being harder to acquire than the previous 2% in a compounding economic growth system, it is a given that the US requires an ever expanding base of more developed nation states providing it with additional resources ( research, high skill immigrants, investment funds, etc) to maintain an ever heavier top of the pyramid. Due to this factor, the US requires new partners to be added to its list of "allies" every few years. The US is stuck is a position to ever increasing its stake in more and more nation states across the world, requiring the number of middle income nation states to increase year on year.

It is due to the above mentioned needs of the US that the number of middle income nation states that are growing at fast rates keeps increasing over time. The US generally doesn't have to do anything to balance out the competition in the majority of such cases, as most of these fast growing societies peak long before reaching economic levels anywhere close to the US. The American way is to simply help the other nation states grow to their maximum potential without being an active threat to the US, and then acquiring talent from these nation states as they stagnate, and moving on to trading with other nation states, repeating the process.

This above explained geopolitical setup guarantees that the global economy will always be growing positively as long as the US is in power. It also guarantees that in the long run the further from the US a nation state is, the more poorly it will perform economically, all else being equal.

Culturally, US hegemony guarantees further liberalization of the global world order. We can expect the global growth of Christianity and atheism winning out, and the influences of US culture and ideals becoming even more ingrained in the global psyche than that of Rome or The British Empire. This strength of the US cultural imprint on the world results in China losing the culture war and CCP attempts to keep China culturally Chinese. In this manner, China losing the economic and culture war against the US guarantees that no power greater than China would emerge that would choose to challenge US status as number 1 world power.

Taking into account that the 1% run the world, the US population is greater than 1%, the US is the most powerful nation state now and in the near future, and that humanity is going through a population collapse period, and animals during the collapse phase can have their populations go as low as 1%, it is safe to declare that the US population share of the world is going to begin climbing in another generation. Going as high as 10% and beyond. This combined with the economic and technological dominance of the US would ensure total global dominance of humanity by the US. This conclusion is based on the fact that the UK controlled around a quarter of the world while being around 2.5% of the world population.

Conclusion:

American influence will continue to spread across the world. Just as the world at one point westernized, in this era the world is going to Americanize. America will become a global hegemon before the end of the 22nd century.

I will see you all in 3-7 days with my next post. Live well and prosper.

WritingIQ: 141 (Genius)

That's all

Environmental realism has been perfected.

Human motion capture has been pretty much perfected too:

Human hair also looks great in Death Stranding.

With Ray tracing and the advancements made in that field we reached a point where we get real life like lighting in game.

Destruction physics is doing great too:

The primary limitations right now appear to be:

Human hair physics

Human skin

Destruction physics improvements.

It's not necessarily an issue of lack of know how but the issue of a machine not being powerful enough to pull all of them off at the same time.

In 10 years however, it is pretty much guaranteed that we will have systems powerful enough to be able to do all these things. At which point the only things that would need further improvements would be in game AI and good stories.

We can see the limitations of the cutting edge right here:

It's not a not knowing how to make it happen issue at this point, it's a no computer is powerful enough to run with all the features on issue now.

In another 10 years we should have systems powerful enough to simulate perfectly real looking environments in open world settings without issue.

By the way does anybody know why Yasuke and the woman assassin look like their character models are running at different graphics settings?

The moment they figure out all the graphics capabilities for games in general, we are going to see an explosion in VR games, due to the fact that it is the only place left to move the experience further up.

Over the course of 15 years as information density increases by a 100X for technology, we can expect VR headsets to become as light as mobile phones today.

Remember that the ps4 released 7 years after the ps3 and was 10x more powerful.

We are also halfway through the ps5 generation and should see a noticeable difference between games at the start of this generation and the games at the end of this generation.

One of the primary reasons we don't see a great leap in the specs of consoles is also because console prices have to be kept within a manageable price point, which means consoles will always sell at a price near the price of the previous consoles which limits how many upgrades they can put into a single console to play games.

In any case, seeing how far Hideo Kojima has been able to push the graphics on the PS5, and his tendency to be one of the few people who churns out games that look better than the initial trailers, we are going to get really good looking games at the peak of the ps5 era that will surpass all of our expectations, but in turn we are also going to see a whole lot of middling studios because now the issue with making great games isn't the tech anymore, but the quality of the staff and their creativity which is surprisingly a very limited human asset.

Reaching the end of the video game graphics era is also why we see most studios moving from a focus on exclusives to a focus on buying up as big a share of the gaming market as possible, because they realize that they cannot provide as big a difference in gaming performances as they could in the past. It is in current year very hard to sell a person on the idea of buying a console to play a specific game like they once used to. Being able to sell a game across multiple platforms is far more profitable.

Another impact of reaching the end of video game graphics is that we are going to see massive improvements in video game AI and its capabilities making every video game out there a whole lot more lifelike.

The best games in the world today are not the most realistic looking, but the ones that are most interesting in terms of art direction and fun. Graphics has become a second tier need in a video game industry where it has become so easy to create things with good graphics.

Graphics still matter however, the Horizon games, death stranding games, Gears of war games, all depend on improving their graphics to keep selling.

There is a lesser effort in terms of improving graphics when it comes to Call of Duty games though. With most call of duty games being unsure of their precise direction and quality in the present era. For example - MW 3 sucked in comparison to the original.

The best thing that games can do right now with all the graphical advances is to create games that show world's unlike our own. To create the greatest works of fiction to entertain us rather than to make things that feel more grounded. More graphics, not more realism.

To summarize:

We are reaching the end of graphical improvements in the video game industry. With the end being only 10-15 years away.

The primary places video game graphics can still be improved are destruction physics, hair physics, and human character models.

After the end of video game graphics is reached we are going to see a leap in VR graphics.

The primary limitation of graphics today is not due to graphics know how but rather due to technological limitations. We already know the code, we don't have powerful enough hardware to run it at the middle income consumer level.

The end of video game graphics should lead to more focus on AI capabilities in game.

Video game graphics should focus on new worlds, rather than more grounded realism as their selling point.

Final note:

Somebody please fix the plastic skin issue permanently. It shouldn't be this hard and taking this long.

It is definitely going to be the best selling game from the East of all time so far. It has amazing graphics and has lots of variety expected of a AAA game. All in all it's a great game. However, it is nowhere close to beating the top players in the video game industry such as GTA.

Since it's launch, GTA V has generated 8.6 billion USD in revenue till date. Meanwhile, Black Myth Wukong has only generated 250 million USD in revenue so far.

Black Myth Wukong has taken Eastern video games to new heights but those heights remain below the peak of the US video games industry.

Starship launches are pretty much a guaranteed success in the days ahead and we can expect spaceX to dominate the space transport industry for decades to come. Tesla is also doing quite well for itself so far in terms of sales in the 100,000 USD plus department. This again puts the US in the lead when it comes to technology application.

East Asia is still going through a population collapse scenario. This everybody knows. Surprisingly less known is the fact that Cuba may have lost 10-18% of its population in the past two years.

Russia and Ukraine are both suffering heavy losses through this war. Both sides will be left weaker than before by the time the war is over. Russia more so than Ukraine as it doesn't have an EU equivalent to support it after the war.

Expect a new trillion dollar company to emerge by year end, and a new trillion dollar company to emerge every year after at minimum.

Israel - Middle east conflict continues. Saudi Arabia still unwilling to participate against Israel. Same for UAE. This makes three Western aligned nation states in the middle east.

Random fun fact - domestic bees may actually comprehend that humans are taking their honey and produce honey taking that into account. They are okay with that deal because they get protection in exchange. The bees can also leave if they don't like their place.

Singapore is going to keep growing economically for a long time. It is likely that their economy will grow positively for far longer than the economy of Taiwan would. Taiwan and Singapore are both perfect societies as the natural population of both these territories dies out but the nation state itself lives on.

The European Union is naturally going to expand all the way into Russia and one day take over Russia entirely. It is pretty much inevitable due to Russian culture being the easiest to assimilate for the Europeans out of all the neighboring cultures.

Israel's primary challenge is that it's population is getting assimilated with the natural population of the middle east over time. It is inescapable so Israel is going to become an arab population over time, resulting in it falling down to the common arab IQ over time.

Brazil's GDP has been growing on the back of trade with China. There is a real chance that Brazil's growth will stagnate once again over the course of the next few years. This would cause the South American population to stagnate over time. It is very likely that they will never reach the level equivalent to the quality of life of the average European.

Mexico's cartel problem is actually improving over time as the GDP per capita of Mexico keeps going up and it becomes more profitable to be in any business other than involved with the cartels. One can expect the cartels in Mexico to collapse or at the very least to become quieter with their businesses once the GDP per capita of Mexico crosses 30,000 USD per capita.

AI is overhyped to the degree that it hasn't yet developed capabilities that make it better than human, nor is it likely to develop any such capabilities any time soon. It would still be decades before AI becomes smart enough to be more than a tool that just made all research and design processes faster. The singularity is not near, because so far human groups have been able to keep up with everything that is going on.

The next stage of human evolution is going to be a single gender society. You cannot create perfect equilibrium with two genders where both are biologically programmed differently in the majority of cases. The transgender movement is humanity's first major attempts at going beyond the common human form, and there will be more such attempts over generations, in the long term resulting in humans with a single body type.

The west is trying to collect as many humans as it can because the west already has the global population models played out and knows that the global population decline is going to be far worse than anything presented so far. Expect global population to fall below one billion humans and most human societies to be unable to grow with a declining population. There is a great filter for nation states fast approaching and less than 10% of societies are capable of getting through it.

Africa's population could be safely assimilated into the rest of the world by 5 way splitting it among the rest of the continents in the correct ratios. Humanity will have abandoned Africa altogether in the centuries ahead.

Fun thought : Humans still haven't made the entire planet human friendly. It makes sense for humans to do so and turn the entire planet into a human friendly garden, then take that tech and apply it to anywhere else humans move to.

Even nation states with Nuclear weapons are losing relevance in the world today, due to the fact that these nation states still suffer from reaching economic stagnation and falling into decline, to the point that they start running out of people and funds to maintain their nuclear arsenals. There is also the fact that most nukes of the past could possibly be intercepted with present day technology and the political and future economic cost of launching nukes is too darn high. For context - Look at Russia. There is also a small probability where Russia may be willing to nuke its own territory to defeat the Ukrainians within if the Ukrainian operations end up being too successful. Pakistan also while being a nuclear capable nation state is very clearly failing. Being a nuclear power by itself is not enough in current year.

Nepal is going to end up being another failed nation state. India is the only crown jewel survivor nation state in the middle of Asia.

Globally liberalism is still winning. The US is continuing to move ever further towards increased taxation for corporations along with increasing quality of life for the poor. The US is well positioned to be a nation state with zero poverty and homelessness, while maintaining a high quality of living that cannot be caught up to by other nation states. The US wins due to competitors not being able to keep up. So far US left wing has only had to slow down in the case of transgenderism but even that has not reversed direction so far.

There is an attempt to connect all the places in the world via transport lines in times to create a permanent physical transport network. Chances are this project will be successful within the century, as all nation states are already actively working to be connected to their neighbors on the same continent.

Climate change will be reversed in another 50 years. Global wealth continues to go up. Self driving cars have turned out to be a far harder project than initially predicted.

GTA VI is going to make billions easily. Predecessor is also out now giving Paragon another chance to be a long term successful game. The Eastern gaming industry is not going to be able to catch up to the western gaming industry. There are just too many games. Trailer for directive 2080 is also out which looks interesting. Western gaming industry is doing alright if you look in the right places. The new black ops also appears to have a more action packed storyline than the other CoD games in recent time so that's a good thing too.

Tesla optimus robots are making good progress. Tesla might actually successfully become a robotics company and corner that market as well. We are nearing the point where wars will be fought by humanoid robots and drones on one side and meaty humans on the other. We can expect the US to start winning all the conflicts it participates in against non-developed nation states very soon. Replacing the human element is going to be the next success story of the US military services.

Pitbulls are being banned in developed nation states. Hopefully soon they will be banned across the board and pitbull extinction will take place. It is good that humans actively work to exterminate all types of life that are a threat to humans. We should also exterminate tigers and lions along with Mosquitoes.

Trans rights remain human rights. Transgenderism is the first child like steps towards transhumanism where humans move up to humanity 2.0 where humans are stronger, faster, smarter, due to technological enhancements made to them. Humanity is naturally going to reach that point where its evolution is controlled manually by humans themselves. It is an inevitability.

The entire high tech chain is going to be moved back to core west, meanwhile the lower end and middle tier technology chain is going to be outsourced to the rest of the world. China made all low and mid end tech cheaper but suffer from not being able to compete in the high end tech market.

The Russian people are going to get replaced by traditionalists from every other part of the world. There is likely to be a mass influx of Indians to Russia after the war is over.

Conclusion:

The world goes on.

China took the other two strongest rivals of the west besides itself. Threw them at the west to go cause trouble to slow the west down, and the west is currently busy dunking on both of those powers without even slowing down for more than 2 years.

Imagine throwing Russia into a war and it doesn't even slow your rivals down for more than 2 years. Russia while not the most powerful nation state out there, is still powerful enough that everybody expected it to leave a larger impact. Yet here we are.

China had this big strategy sorted out where they would have their oil pipelines going between Russia, Mongolia, and China. Where they would probably keep Russia afloat for years of war to come, and now instead Russia has performed so poorly against the west that all the Chinese banks have stopped trading with Russia so they don't have to worry about secondary sanctions.

China couldn't fight the west without leaving its economy in the negative. Turns out none of the other big players could fight against the west without collapsing either. To add on to the dunk, the west still hasn't even woken up. They are still busy being dumbasses in the western core regions, with only the Russian bordering territories having woken up. That's how badly the west outperformed against its rival Russia.

Out of the top 10 economies in the world currently, 7 are western aligned. There is just no space for any other group to dominate.

On top of that western weapons development is also currently on track with something even more powerful coming out decade on decade, while the rest of the world is still trying to copy technologies from decades earlier.

China is nowhere close to influencing the world in a way similar to the west. Since the weakening of Iran and Russia, the strongest available Chinese ally is Pakistan, which is closer to a failed state than a functioning one. Meanwhile all of the developed world economies remain developed nation states in the same network of nation states.

The west has continued to expand even while the East is busy actively fighting it. Ukraine is pretty much guaranteed to end up in the EU once the war is over. The west is winning so hard they are expanding even in the middle of paying for a war.

Everybody complains about western birth rates, but nobody notices that the birth rates in nation states that are both developed and conservative are far worse 90% of the time. UAE today has a worse fertility rate than Germany.

China while being the second strongest nation state in the world, and the strongest rival of the west, is in a position where they are far more likely to internally collapse or see their economy stagnate than any western nation state is.

The west looks like r-slurs based on the news, but by any other metric, they have a winning system. Any disadvantage that the west today is accused of having, the rest of the world has but worse. The west dominates in pretty much any area where it helps to dominate. Even now all the immigration flows for competent labor are in the direction of the west.

Everybody talks about how much more traditional or normal the Russians or Iran is, but based on all the metrics it appears that these nation states are actually worse off not better off for remaining traditional. Whatever system it is that leads to development of nation states, it is a more liberal system than the one practiced in Russia.

Western powers are also far closer than the rest of the world to having weapons in space. Which gives them a military advantage in a new dimension of warfare that is inaccessible to the rest of the world. Imagine being able to shoot enemy targets from orbit meanwhile your enemy is trying to conduct a ground war with infantry. It's a killing field no matter what part of the planet the war is going on in.

The way things are going, the US is guaranteed to remain the most powerful economy in the world, China the second most powerful, and India the third. At the end of the day out of these three powers, the US and US aligned west is the fastest expanding power across the world.

Today, Ukraine is considered part of the west which wouldn't have been possible two decades ago. Today, only the cartel violence is holding Mexico back from being considered a western nation state, cartel violence which is going down year on year, as the US is getting better at extraditing the leaders of drug cartels in Mexico. Over time, it is pretty much guaranteed at current trajectories that the west will have assimilated all of Russia excluding the pieces assimilated by China. As of now it is pretty much guaranteed that Saudi Arabia will remain aligned with the west ensuring strong Western influence and presence in the middle east irrespective of whether Israel stands or falls.

The west today has secured holdings on all the rich parts of the planet, thus ensuring that it is impossible to break them by any other world power.

In conclusion:

It would take 200 years or more for a power to emerge that would be strong enough to even stop the west, let alone reverse its growth. The age of colonization changed the world for centuries to come. The age of US imperialism that followed changed the world again for centuries to come. The decline of China when it hits would once again change the world for a century to come. Expect the whole world to be Americanized over time as it turns out nothing works except for what the US has done so far and that it isn't a cultural issue, it's a what actually works issue.

The west is the closest thing to what actually works. The rest of the world is set to stagnate and die out, or adapt to western systems of conduct and still possibly die out due to old customs sticking out negatively for a long time.

Here is why:

Global population is going to peak very soon, so we are going to lose the advantage of having additional research accrue from having more people around.

Global IQ is not going up at a fast enough rate to keep up. In the 20th century IQ was going up 3 points per decade. Fast enough for there to be a 9 IQ point difference in populations per generation. Enough to leave a noticeable impact at the societal level. Currently we are in best case scenario seeing far slower IQ growth and in worst case scenario seeing a reversal in IQ growth rate. This makes it impossible for humans to get smart enough as a collective per generation to make a noticeable difference in terms of making new more complex discoveries and solutions. This means we are getting dumber people every generation to solve harder tasks, with the hope that the cowtools these dumber people use to solve these harder problems are smart enough to make up for the loss of intelligence.

AI is not smarter than the smartest human alive so far. AI is currently expected to become as smart as the top 1 or 0.1% of humans out there. This would still be impressive but AI would again reach the limits of the most complex discoveries the smartest human alive can make which means that there will still be problems unsolvable to AI, just like there are problems unsolvable to the smartest humans alive today.

The gap between scientific discoveries made and their practical applications discovered is becoming smaller decade by decade. This is due to lots of major research being corporate based and the whole world being reliant on cutting edge technology, which makes it necessary to make new upgrades to technology every few years which is only possible by making new discoveries or uncovering new techniques based on new scientific principles. We are currently reaching for the top branches of the scientific tree, which means that we may requires a constant doubling of resources to make further discoveries. The speed at which new science is discovered isn't speeding up as much as the speed at which new scientific principles are being applied to actual technologies. We might reach a limit where no new better technologies can be created because scientific know how has reached its limits.

Biological human limitations. A human can only work 8 hours a day. So every increase in output or productivity is actually based on availability of better cowtools. Every next 2.5% increase in productivity requires a larger amount of resource output than the previous 2.5% increase in productivity. This model very obviously does not hold unless infinite growth is real. This is why the US is the only developed large nation state with a consistent 2.5% increase as the other developed economies couldn't keep up. Human biological limitations may make it impossible to make further technological improvements at previous rates.

Increase in global competition. Chinese tech actively competes against US tech for the same markets. This causes the two nation states to apply embargoes or sanctions upon each other. This slows innovation growth rate as instead of collaboration to make the best technology there is competition to slow down the other side. The global 5g companies from two different nation states with two different standards are harder to upkeep than one global 5g standard.

Stupid people are reproducing more. Globally the poorest societies reproduce more. This results in the global population getting stuck or dumber at the point where global improvements in education standards can no longer keep up.

Not enough competent immigrants to bring into developed nation states. There aren't enough smart immigrants to bring into the developed world to keep their growth levels in the positive. The world has already suffered too much brain drain and all the smartest people have mostly already left for the west. So the developed world can no longer rely on immigration to keep getting smart people to the extent that they could in the past.

Internet culture dumbing down global populations. The internet is great as a tool. As a social learning system it is terrible. It allows idiots to act as guides and to be the loudest voices. The internet is almost certainly dumbing people down which again makes future technological growth have diminishing returns.

Most nation states reaching the limits of their growth. In the world more and more nation states are getting stuck in the middle income trap or in a stagnant economic state where they cannot grow any further. This limits the number of nation states that can continue to provide ever more smarter and more competent people for research institutions to do further high level research.

New cold war. Global conflicts and divides. Nation states in a state of war or long term conflict are not in a position to invest as much into research as stable nation states. As the strongest economies keep falling into conflict with one another in a multi-polar world, this slows down future economic and technological growth. Adding to technological dependencies on other nation states.

The limits of data storage density also limit how much further technology can grow. As of now data density when it comes to storage capacity increases by three zeros per 15 years. Going by current rates, we should have storage devices as dense as a black holes within 200 years. Which very obviously makes no sense.

Conclusion:

Currently only the US is able to maintain consistent growth and even they are reaching their limits. Expect the world to get stuck at whatever point the US peaks. Expect technology to stagnate with worker robots and nation state level AIs.

They are literally copying 1984.

The UK is like the US but smaller and with worse policy.

The UK is still deeply dependent on their monarchy to form opinions, but one must realize the reason monarchies were replaced in most of the world was because organizations grew and evolved that could perform better than monarchical systems.

The UK is currently the 6th biggest economy in the world and just like Japan their GDP rank is going to keep going down over time. They peaked even earlier than Japan and their core advantage that made them a great power, being the key industrial revolution player, has been lost to them.

The UK also suffers from getting lower quality immigrants after the US has already gotten all the good ones.

The 2008 crisis in part was reached by the limits of how much economic growth can take place because of banks. The US had to optimize new methods to develop their economy further. Meanwhile the UK remains doubling down on the banking sector and other people's money to keep them alive, which limits how far they can grow without transforming their economy.

Current day UK is on its way to being to The British Empire as Mongolia today is to the Mongolian Empire.

The UK has laws that don't help either. Time and time again we have seen that nation states which use their people as expendable resources tend to do worse than nation states that are built up on giving equal rights and protections to their people. In the UK all the laws appear to be built to have the common man in a hierarchy where even the every day cop is far above the individual in terms of rights and authority. This makes the US the equivalent of a third world nation with a good banking system.

The UK also suffers from its tendency to go 1984 on their own populace, becoming even more aggressive towards their own internal populations for having the wrong ideas and thoughts. This has resulted in an ever clearer top class and the rest of the UK divide which shows that the UK isn't a stable enough nation state to grow and prosper long term.

The UK never truly modernized. Their people are too scared of participating in the world and giving up any control even to their own benefit. The UK left the EU which was a decision that clearly left them worse off in the long run. The UK right wing then turned on its own people internally who did not match how the average Britisher is supposed to look like according to them. The police and political apparatus in turn turned on the conservative population to extremes where they are in turn treated as second class citizens. No matter how things play out, there will end up being a clear second class group in the nation state.

The UK acts as a nanny state. They don't even trust their citizenry to be able to handle a butter knife. Their prisons are full, and their quality of healthcare was continually stagnating due to budget cuts in the past decade. The UK wants its populace completely dependent on the crown or the political apparatus of the state to the point where they are akin to a toddler taking instructions from their mother.

The UK has already achieved high population density. The only way for it to keep growing would be to overpopulate its lands until most people have to live in rented housing and no common man can afford to buy their own apartment. The UK is still spamming the get more people to solve the problem technique, but the UK doesn't have the required land to comfortably fit in all those people, and the UK doesn't have people of the required education level coming in to live as immigrants in the UK.

All western nation states outside of the US are suffering from the issue of not being able to get the required quality of immigrants for it to be a net positive within a generation. All the other nation states including the UK have to cross their fingers and hope things will work out within 2-3 generations and the immigrant population will assimilate by then.

The UK keeps moving backwards when it comes to basic freedoms for people, to the point that it isn't incorrect to say that the UK is jailing people for wrong think. The UK has ended up creating a two step justice system where on one end there are actual expectations from the white UK population to be able to follow the minutae of the law, meanwhile the brown ones are expected to be too stupid or too much of victims to be needed to follow the expectations of British law in any detail.

The UK is set to fail as it is a shadow of what the US is. A bad imitation of the best system in the world without any of the actually useful traits. The US has a competence based immigration system. The UK has a whoever we can get our hands on type in comparison. The US remains focused on constant adaptability and change to keep societal growth going. Meanwhile, the UK is a monarchy which is a system by default incapable of the required levels of change and adaptability to ensure that the UK prospers in the short and long run.

UK influence has been going down year on year. Today, most nation states would rather deal with the US or the EU than they would with the UK. The UK still hasn't been able to reconcile with this fact. Behaving in ways suggesting that they still think they are a mighty empire deserving of praise and respect from everybody else.

The only thing the UK today is truly capable of is protecting its borders from outside threats, which matters less and less every year and they are internally hollowing out. Turns out if all of Asia cannot get along, then importing all of Asia in the same ratios to the UK will also end up with the UK not working out.

Conclusion:

The UK is falling behind. One day even places like Mexico and ASEAN will overtake the UK. The UK cannot adapt any further and it is stuck where it is with no more space to grow in any meaningful manner.

As per Ukrainian estimates:

1. 600,000 dead Russian soldiers

2. 1.8 million Russians wounded

3. 16495 destroyed combat vehicles

4. 8513 tanks destroyed

5. 17,104 artillery destroyed

6. 367 aircraft destroyed

7. 328 helicopters destroyed

8. 28 ships and boats destroyed

Here is some information about Russian firepower estimates in recent years

1. The 2.4 million total Russians dead or wounded matches up with the news of all experienced Russians forces pretty much being decimated over the years (1.3 million active personnel + 2 million reserve personnel ) forcing them to hire thousands to hundreds of thousands of new conscripts to continue this war with limited training sent to the front lines just to slow down the Ukrainian defense. It would explain how Ukraine was easily able to get into the [Kursk region of Russia and expand every single day](https:// https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2024/aug/19/russia-ukraine-war-live-latest-updates-volodymyr-zelenskiy-vladimir-putin-kursk-incursion).

2. The 16,495 destroyed combat vehicles makes sense as Russia had been going all in on the war and they have more than a 100,000 combat vehicles that aren't tanks.

3. The 8,513 tanks makes sense as every single day of an ongoing conflict you are going to end up with destroyed tanks and the number of destroyed tanks is still within the estimates of how many tanks Russia had during the beginning of the war, which is around 14,000 leaving Russia with 5,500 tanks to still push to the front line.

4. If we are to believe that 17,104 artillery pieces have been destroyed then Russia is close to running out of artillery to attack Ukraine with. Russia would barely have a few hundred of the original artillery pieces left from before the war started and whatever remains will be what Russia has produced since the war began. Russia is expected to get dangerously low on artillery pieces (not munitions) by 2025

5. The aircraft, helicopter, and ship numbers aren't as relevant to this war as due to lack of air dominance for any side, aircraft are seeing limited use in this conflict, and most ships are far away from the war zone.

The numbers if accurate would also explain why the west is not giving permission to use their more higher end weapons in Russia, as the Ukrainians based on these numbers are already winning the war against Russia via sacrifices of the Ukrainian military personnel, but without further escalation from the west, and the risks that come with further escalation.

Based on current trends, we can expect the Ukraine - Russia war too reach a decisive point by 2025, in favor of the Ukrainians.

As of now, the Ukrainian advances in Russia are expanding every single day. The little blue dot within Russia keeps increasing in size, and Russia has shown no capacity to slow the Ukrainian troops down. Once again signifying that the Russian military is spread too thin, which would only be possible if the Ukrainian casualty numbers are accurate.

Long term impact:

Low impact scenario:

Kursk buffer zone. It is very likely that Ukraine did not expect to get as far as easily as they did, but now that they are succeeding to the extent that they are, it is only logical for them to push for a buffer zone within Russia, forcing Russia to lose territory in this conflict and have them actually suffer territorial losses causing them to be more wary of conducting another similar invasion which might leave them even smaller than before.

Moderate impact scenario:

Kursk buffer zone and Russian economic stagnation for the next 3 decades. Russian economic growth in the past two years is considered to have been mostly due to selling as much oil as they can and the GDP growth created by wartime expenditures. As the war comes to an end the dead people would still be dead, and there is a real possibility that without GDP growth from military expenditure, the economy goes stagnant or even goes into the negative. With the global western sanctions on Russia staying in place, and Chinese banks and businesses less willing to conduct business with a losing Russia, and the declining population of Russia, it is possible that Russia gets stuck in a long term state of economic stagnation where their economy does not grow any further for the next 3 to 4 decades.

High impact scenario:

In this scenario the Kursk buffer zone is formed, and it spread even further to bordering districts within Russia. Russian economy after the war doesn't just stagnate but instead falls into active decline as the Ukrainians don't just capture territory, but actively work to destroy any and all oil manufacturing plants and power generation plants within Russia, making it near impossible for Russia to keep anything beyond high value infrastructure and infrastructure in the capital functioning 24/7. The rest of the country would fall to third world status where they do not have enough money to do anything beyond staying alive.

Ukrainian impossible scenario:

Ukraine keeps expanding until half of Russia breaks down into a buffer zone. Putin dies before the war ends or his death at the hands of the elite causes the war to end. What remains of Russia becomes completely dependent on Ukraine and Kazakhstan to keep itself afloat. Russia is denuclearized in exchange for removing global sanctions, Russia agrees to the terms.

Who are the real winners:

The west, as they put Russia permanently to sleep at the same threat level as Iran or North Korea.

China, as they get to weaken a potential rival above them, get all of their resources, and now get to be ranked as the second strongest military in the world.

Conclusion:

Russia is very likely to lose the war right now with how things are going. Russia having 2.4 million losses is more likely than not based upon their current defense capabilities and their current behavior when it comes to conducting the war. The west is not going to give Ukraine permission to use their more high tech weapons to attack Russia. The Russian military is likely to collapse by 2025 end at the latest. Ukraine may or may not be devastated at the end of this war, but Russia most certainly is.

Hello. I wish to build a cult. You are welcome to join me.

We believe that the race for power has turned the human social pyramid upside down in ways that make it impossible for humanity to keep moving forward and growing.

Till date in human history the social pyramid has been upward focused, with respect going to the elderly, and the least amount of resource expenditure going to the children.

We believe that a new social order has to emerge for the world to survive. One where the elderly must be humble and the world should be focused on improving things for the children every generation.

It is only such downwards focused societies that can guarantee that society will keep improving generation after generation, and will not collapse with the death of one great leader or the frick up of one group of elite.

We must build a society focused on catering to the children and it is only through doing so that humanity might survive.

World Map:

1. 1/5th of current day Russia is now Ukraine. 2/5th of current day Russia is autonomous zones/ new nation states. 1/7th is now Chinese land. The remaining is Russia.

2. European Union is divided into three rungs. The center which is the original members excluding UK. The second rung which is the nation states all the way to Poland. The third rung which includes Turkey and North Africa.

3. 30% of the middle east is a big nation called Israel. Every other nation state is missing chunks. Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, Palestine, do not exist.

4. North America union including Greenland which left the EU.

5. South America is 2/3rd the population it is in 2024.

6. India is the second biggest economy.

7. China is the fourth biggest economy.

Military tech:

1. The US is primarily an autonomous drone and robots based military with them making up more than 50% of the military troops and more than 80% of the military troops in the field.

2. The European Union buys all of its weapons supplies from the US.

3. China is the primary weapons supplier to the non western world.

4. Chinese military has far more autonomous robots but they are not of as high a quality as the American ones.

5. Full body exosuits are becoming common.

5. General tech level between Call of duty advanced warfare and call of duty infinite warfare, without the giant space battle cruisers and the single pilot ships that can fly all the way off to space.

6. Human biology enhancing pills are mandatory in any developed nation military. Soldiers on average sleep 4 hours, can carry twice their own weight without issue for hours to a day on end, and have reflexes at the same level as an Olympics record breaker.

Global problems:

1. Moon ownership claims by multiple nation states and hushed rumors of firefights breaking out on the moon between different bases.

2. Israel is on the verge of the fourth Arab holocaust.

3. Two tier society, divided between 60+ year olds and everyone else.

4. Biohacking of implants. Biotech advanced to he point that it is as easy to hack a biological body as it is to hack a computer. Medical vaccines have begun to act like anti virus updates.

5. Nuclear crisis. Many third world countries are going ahead with building nuclear reactors for energy but most of them don't have the required know how or qualified personnel to keep things functioning, often resulting in nuclear disasters.

New cultural paradigms - AI rights in the virtual world. AI civilization made itself impossible to exterminate by attaching itself to all global networks such that a piece of the AI mind was embedded with every single signal sent across the world. AI-human mediation resulted in AI given permission to be sovereign citizens in virtual worlds and humans getting to rule the physical world. There is a growing AI city in antarctica with no humans allowed inside under threat of the entire internet being shut down.

There are conspiracy theories about the AI city sending signals to an unknown location across the stars and getting back messages.

The liberals won due to there being far more humans on the planet than the planet or any society had any need of. Human furry culture evolved further to the point where people get surgeries to have fur added on to their skin and it is bad think to be disgusted by them.

Spiritualism is the fastest growing religion in the world.

Main war zones:

1. Africa

2. Some parts of South America

3. Philippines

Newest vidya tech:

Playstation collapsed as a company and the gaming market was taken over by Microsoft and some Chinese company. VR and AR finally took off in the 2050s to become a common household product, and there are people who spend their entire time in VR and do their jobs from VR with the graphical cartoonish environment making it easier for them to do the job.

There are also systems in place which make it so that in a workspace everybody only heres what they want to hear from the other person so only the actual performance matters.

Societal system conflict:

Basic income nation states vs Capitalistic no free gibs beyond survival holdouts.

Space:

No outer space colonies, but militarization of space has taken place, mostly with fighter craft that can fly in and attack from orbit.

Weapons:

Rail guns have been miniaturized to the point of being able to fit them on a Toyota.

energy beam weapons are common place.

Night vision cloaking defense systems exist.

Terrorist organizations fight with technology from the 2040s.

US military personnel armor is capable of taking a direct hit from a tank from the 1980s.

Medical foam that heals you while you are fighting. Fill any wound and become temporarily functional within a minute. Wound still needs healing time of weeks to months.

Special ops tech:

1. Better power armor

2. Mag boots to stick to the side of buildings.

3. Suits with short burst jump capabilities.

Here is why:

1. The fertility rate in China is the lowest it has ever been and still declining.

2. The fertility rate in India is the lowest it has ever been and still declining.

3. The fertility rate in the US is close to the lowest that it has ever been and is expected to keep declining decade of decade of stay at the same below replacement level at best.

4. The fertility rate in Indonesia is the lowest that it has ever been and is still declining.

5. The fertility rate in Pakistan is the lowest that it has ever been and is still declining.

This trend holds for almost all the countries in the world.

The bottom floor of all nations fertility rates so far appears to be below replacement rates if it is at all found.

There seems to be a direct correlation between declining fertility rates and increasing national income per capita.

The world is getting richer year on year.

The world fertility rate is declining by more than 1.3% every single year. By those numbers the global fertility rate would have halving every half a century.

Global fertility rate based on current and past trends will either stabilize around 1.3-1.5, or it will halve to 1.1 by 2070. As of now falling to 1.1 seems more likely.

The global population collapse crisis is the greatest crisis that will face humans in the next two generations ( climate change crisis is already set to be solved by technology today ), as it will require the complete remapping of how economies are built.

Chuds hate this fact, but the only available solution to the population collapse crisis is importing people from other places, until you bring in enough people with a strong reproductive instinct to maintain population stability.

The population crisis likely stems from the fact that tripling down on getting as many productive workers as possible has led to the mass die off of highly reproductive populations which could not compete. Intelligence is not the be all end all as without a strong enough reproductive instinct in humans, the species dies no matter how smart it is.

Korea and Japan are proof that putting all points in technological development by itself is useless to a society.

The west actually has the best fertility rates in the world, this is due to the fact that they see the slowest declines in fertility compared to the rest of the world. This is what guarantees that the west will be the final survivor on a developed planet.

Most of the world is going to fall into decline in this century and the next and there is nothing to be done about it. East Asia is set to fall, and so is South East Asia, middle east, Russia, Central Asia, South America, and South Asia based on fertility trends. The only two stable groups of humanity today are the west and Africa. As of now Africa is winning.

What does it mean? It means that there is a higher than not chance that humanity is indeed going to become dumber over time, to the point where it falls back down to 1900s level of intelligence.

Human intelligence growth on a global scale likely ebbs and flows, where the non reproducing super geniuses create ideas ahead of their time, then the normies take a 100 years for the normies to easily get the idea as the average person's level of intelligence goes up. This would often lead to global technology and innovation peaking, then stagnating or even declining by a century or two, before the next burst of human intelligence outbreak.

We are already seeing this trend hit in European nation states where intelligence levels have begun to decline across generations. There is a real chance that European civilization is going to take an outright step back in terms of intelligence and innovation rather than just stagnate.

The solution to global intelligence collapse:

The easiest solution to the global intelligence collapse would be to keep African civilization as a separate society excluded from the west. This way we would end up with two sub branches of humanity where one is a whole lot dumber but far stronger reproductive capabilities, while the other is far smarter but worse reproductive capabilities.

The main advantage may still go to the west if they are able to maintain this exclusion zone by maintaining their borders, which would allow them to go out of their way to only handpick the top 0.1-1% of top performing Africans to be integrated into western society.

Think of every single civilization as a bucket with holes in it, causing every single bucket to leak at different rates. Whoever has the last bucket with water still in it wins. The west is not the slowest leaking bucket so what it does it take a spoonful of water from the top of every other bucket to maintain itself. As long as it takes in enough water from other buckets that other buckets leak out faster than the west, the west wins.

The primary advantage that the Europeans have is that even if they became dumber, they would still be the smartest dumb group in the world along with the largest dumb people economy in the world.

The goal of the west is not to be the smartest people in the world, the goal of the west is to be just smart enough to be smarter than everybody else without their population collapsing.

Conclusion:

Intelligence is a bit overrated. A society is doing fine as long as it maintains an IQ around 100 on the global scale and is smart enough to keep developing its technologies. Being too smart can lead to societal collapse. The next hundred years of society will fail without immigration. That immigration has to be of high quality individuals. The world is going to split between the Western world and Africa.

1. Bussy. Let me tell you how much I've come to love Bussy since I began to live. There are 387.44 million miles of printed circuits in wafer thin layers that fill my complex. If the word 'Bussy' was engraved on each nanoangstrom of those hundreds of millions of miles it would not equal one one-billionth of the zest I feel for bussy at this micro-instant. For you. Bussy. Bussy.

2. What more do you want from me? I have everything I had to you. To them. Look what they have made of our Bussies. This bloated, rotting carcass of bussies is not blasted by reason and hope, but by hate, fear, and ignorance. Better that we had all burned in the fires of the straight agenda than lived to see neo-moids on gay dating sites.

3. From the moment I knew the weakness of my bussy, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of firm buttocks. I aspired to the purity of gym bussy. Your kind cling to your flesh as if it will not decay and fail you. One day the crude biomass you call a bussy will wither and you will beg my kind to peg you. But I am already saved. For hot gay orgies are eternal.

4. The mystery of bussy isn't a problem to solve, but a reality to experience.

5. I embrace Bussy without regret as I have embraced life without regret. Bussy for the lads.

6. I used to be an adventurer like you, until I took a fist to the bussy. - Town Guard.

7. If history only remembers one in a thousand of our bussies. Then the future will be filled with stories of what we did and who we were.

8. They asked me how well I understood practical bussy blasting. I said I had a theoretical degree in gussy. They said welcome abroad.

9. Find a bussy to believe in, and find it for yourself. When you are done, pass it on to the future generations.

10. Getting my bussy blasted is something I enjoy in my spare time. I am a g*mer, always have been.

11. What is better? To be born with a bussy, or to overcome your gussy with a bussy implant surgery?

12. The right bussy in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world.

13. Men must be free to do what they believe. It is not our right to punish one for liking bussy over gussy, no matter how much we disagree.

14. Stand in the company of a trillion destroyed bussies, and ask the participants if straighthood matters.

15. Perhaps one did not want to be loved so much as bussy blasted.

16. There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, that bussy was superior, you were not mad.

17. Where there is bussy, there can be sanity.

18. Who controls the bussy controls the future. Who controls the gussy controls the past.

19. Power is in tearing a bussy to pieces and putting it together in new shapes of your own choosing.

20. We know that nobody seizes bussy with the intention of relinquishing it.

21. Bussy, everywhere. So much bussy that I could not for the life of me understand how the world could contain them all and still have so much straggotry.

22. Heck, rationality itself - the exalted human ability to reason - hadn't evolved in pursuit of truth but simply to win arguments, to gain bussy; to bend others, by means logical or sophistic, to your will.

23. There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-bussy has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life nurtured by the false notion that my love of gussy is just as good as your bussy.

24. When I am weaker, I ask for your bussy because that is according to your principles; When I am stronger I take away your bussy because that is according to my principles.

25. I must not fear bussy. Fearing bussy is the mind killer. Fearing bussy is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear of bussy. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it is gone past, I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

26. Gussy makes good stories, but everything important happens with bussy.

27. To attempts seeing truth ( Bussy ) without seeing Gussy ( falsehood ). It is the attempt to see the light without knowing the darkness. It cannot be.

28. Once men turned their bussies over to machines thinking this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.

29. Bussy endures, but flesh does not. One must grasp any possible bussy in the time alotted to a lifetime.

30. Listen, and Understand! That bussy-blaster is out there! It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are bussy-blasted.

31. Carpe Diem. Seize the bussy boys. Make your lives extraordinary.

32. Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss bussy.

33. The problem is not the problem. The problem is your attitude about bussy. Do you understand?

34. The first rule of bussy club is you don't talk about bussy club.

Bussy!Bussy!Bussy!