I just don't get Taylor Swift

CNN — AJ Willingham

Editor's Note: This is the first in an occasional series, “I Just Don't Get It.” Sometimes, no matter how popular something is, it just doesn't click with us. Whether it's a food, a hobby, a pop culture star, or anything else that the masses seem to adore, we all have those “I just don't get it” moments. In this lighthearted series, CNN staffers explore why we just don't get things that other people seem to love.

I just don't get Taylor Swift. There, I said it. (DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT DISLIKE HER. I WISH HER ALL OF THE HAPPINESS AND SUCCESS IN THE WORLD. PLEASE, I HAVE A FAMILY.)

It's freeing to just … not care about something, isn't it? When friends start to wax poetic about the Eras Tour or their favorite Taylor Swift song, I listen politely as if they were talking about professional darts or French cinema, and a feeling of peace washes over me.

I do not need to love things, I think to myself. I do not need to hate them, either. I can simply watch them pass by like a leaf borne along a river's current and say, “Well, that certainly is a thing!”

Granted, it is a lot harder when that thing is, by all indications, specifically made for you to enjoy.

While Taylor Swift can appeal to anyone, there is real data showing what a single peek at an Eras Tour crowd or a simple walk outside can tell you: Swifties are most likely to be White suburban millennial women like me. Minds much more qualified than mine have written about the tension between Swift's position as a “voice of a generation” and how much that voice is or isn't speaking for listeners of color. That's a different conversation worth having, but it's not the one I'm getting at here.

What makes me itchy is the constant framing of Taylor Swift's music among my peers (or at least my census-designated demographic) as an unassailable communion of girl-and-womanhood: A favorable review of “The Tortured Poets Department” in The Spectator calls Swift “the tortured voice of millennials.” On a recent episode of BBC NewsNight, author Kat McKenna said the “uniqueness of Taylor Swift is that she speaks for an audience that is not always spoken for.”

While I don't begrudge people that kind of connection, there's only so many times you can hear lyrics from “Cardigan” or “Cruel Summer” invoked like prayers before you start to feel like there's something wrong with you.

You kept me like a secret, but I kept you like an oath.

You showed me colors you know I can't see with anyone else.

Great lines! Beautiful lines. To many fans, such stanzas are life-affirming poetry or, at the very least, quotable enough to adorn shirts and throw pillows and Stanley cups as crystallizations of their own identity.

But are they truly so unique? I have never gotten something out of a Taylor Swift song about love, loss, heartbreak, revenge, shame or self-actualization that I couldn't have gotten from dozens of other artists. It honestly feels like I missed a day in White woman class when they explained, in detail, all of the ley lines of feminine kinship that are supposed to connect our paths with hers.

Again, I respect the Taylor Swift lovers. I have seen, firsthand, thousands of women at the starting gate of a novelty 10k race belting out “You Belong With Me” at the top of their lungs at 4:15am. From inside the cocoon of my noise-cancelling headphones it looked joyous and fun, and who in the world would find fault with that?

Maybe that's why the whole Not-Caring-About-Taylor-Swift thing stings. It does feel like I'm missing out on something. It does feel like the cogs of my life, and maybe even my identity, would be slightly more lubricated if I could eke out a single independent thought about Taylor Swift that wasn't “She seems like a suitable role model!” or “I really admire her commitment to good bangs!”

(If you think this apathy comes from a place of snobbery, ha, you are wrong! I do not have good taste in music. My most listened-to Spotify tracks are Spanish gospel hymns and stuff with names like “soothing 438 mHz tone therapy for very delicate people.”)

Until recently, admitting to not enjoying Taylor Swift's music was a bizarrely political statement. Said in the wrong circles, even such a mild admission could get you branded a hater, a misogynist, a contrarian bore or one of those adult women who still plays the “I'm not like other girls” card.

That's not an overstatement. The Cut recently published a piece by a woman who ended a relationship with a friend who didn't like Taylor Swift. More alarmingly, Paste Magazine elected not to byline its critical review of “Poets” because, according to an editor's note the publication posted on X, a review of her 2019 album “Lover” resulted in the writer receiving “threats of violence from readers who disagreed with the work.” While these are extremes, there is always some anxiety in admitting you don't care about something you seem expected to care deeply about.

However, the days of Taylor Swift as an ultimate cultural barometer may be waning. While Swift fans were thrilled with the release of her new double-length album (again, good for them!), critical reception was more mixed. Following the feverish media whirlwind of “The Eras Tour” and her impact on the NFL season as she supported her boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs player Travis Kelce, people seem ready to talk about Swift in tones more tempered than slavering ardor or hardened, pointless hatred.

If you don't love Taylor Swift, if you don't hate her; if she is simply not something that affects your life whatsoever, it's probably safe to come out now. Go, take your apathy, and be free.

I still like his music and dudes can be feminine...but I feel like he'd be a train by today's standards...

What the lack of fathers does to a fella

not as good as the other two singles :(

Power tripping small peepee piggy seriously thinks you cannot cross any street at all unless there's a crosswalk, even on a dead end street with no traffic. Lmao

Due to the new law on mobilization and the cessation of issuing passports, Ukrainians abroad began to remove the attributes of their country from their cars. pic.twitter.com/q14EVChWyw

— S p r i n t e r F a c t o r y (@Sprinterfactory) April 25, 2024

Currently one of the primary reasons everyone was okay with pushing all the women's rights stuff no matter how stupid it got at times was that the more feminist societies were at all times successfully more developed as well.

However, we are now beginning to see the deviation between the most successful nations and the most feminist nations of the world, especially on the tail end where the lower income nation states are currently able to keep improving without giving women and western civilization equivalent human rights.

For example, places like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Afghanistan are all seeing good GDP growth in current year.

We can see places like China and South Korea with their disdain of feminism also have strong growth in spite of the lack of pro women policies and cultures.

It is currently only in the western world that we are seeing an almost 1:1 match for rise in income and high levels of feminism.

There too Europe as one of the more feminist parts of the world is going through periods of continual stagnation and it is only in North America where there is a strong presence of feminism while the GDP also keeps climbing.

Today, the strongest GDP growth in the world can be found in countries such as China and India, both of which are clearly not the bastions of women's rights in a vein similar to the western world.

As for highest GDP, the US remains number one, and in the case of the US, radical feminism has failed to successfully take root in the current generation, as multiple interest groups such as the gays, transwomen, and sane people hold American radical feminism back.

America is proof that the world is okay with whores as long as they don't try to marry men or have kids going to the same school.

The US judicial system has also proven to be robust enough as to not put up with women lying their way into getting someone jailed for a false accusation. The primary issue remains that of costs of going through the legal process, rather than biases in the law itself against men.

We can expect this to be the standard of feminism in the current century, where you can only lose to feminism if you are poor or are is a people facing industry where public shaming can cost you your job and well being.

It is also very likely that as LGBTQ+ and various minority interests spread around, that women's rights becomes an ever smaller part of a conglomeration of multiple human rights interests, resulting in stagnation or even steps back in women's social privileges.

One of the signs of this is the disdain held for women not being sent to war in Ukraine even though the country is fighting for its right to exist, and is willing to sacrifice all men to hold off Russia.

As men continue to get weaker through this century and do not think of women as special creatures, it is likely that there will be a strong push for women to also participate at the front line in wars of survival.

In conclusion, if there is another war in Europe like the one Ukraine is going through, it is pretty much guaranteed that women will be forced into front line roles just like the men.

The regression of feminism ideals is imminent in the second half of this century. A scenario we can already see the signs of with how J.K Rowling is reviled in liberal spaces for having the same views about women's rights as everybody did 2 decades ago instead of forever moving left with the times.

As the BMI of the average woman goes up, the halo effect around women also weakens, over time resulting in men not caring about women's issues.

In conclusion, women's rights are going to see a reversal in the decades ahead.

We can expect women's rights to fall back to levels that can be found in Eastern Europe by the end of the century.

Get fricked boomer.