Cranes will see a guy and just say “husband” pic.twitter.com/2yR45pzt0W

— Tom S (@AniOutdoor) March 30, 2025

I have always had problems getting girls. Idk what it is about me but they just dont like anything about who I am. My first impression usually has them running away. If I get through that then they run away after talking to me for 5 minutes. It has been like this since I got out of HS. I'm on the come up now. I'm starting to make decent money and about to take the gym to the next level. I fear that I am going to hate whatever woman meets me at the finish line. How can I respect or love somebody who I know would've hated me before success? What other options do I have celibacy?? Nah. Any of you BIPOCs got some good material I can use to better my game without making me a cuck?

Most Dramatic Comments

What? (+2/-1)

You're a fricking fruit cake bro. That's why you can't get laid. (+3/-2)

What? (+2/-1)

Well and also because you're a filthy subhuman but that's besides the point. (+3/-2)

It's not that deep, porn has ruined your image of women. They only know what they have been shown. It's up to you to show them the light. It's that fricking easy. (+3/-1)

that assumes I could even get a woman in the first place which the way things have gone doesn't seem to be the case Women peak around 15 and decline from there Hmmm..... (+4/-1)

What? (+2/-1)

Well and also because you're a filthy subhuman but that's besides the point. (+3/-2)

I'm genetically superior to most of the men in the shithole that is the modern US (+2/-1)

like autodrama (thanks heymoon) but outside reddit. Ping @GatanKot for bugs or suggestions

Please watch this trailer it's almost as good as Rings of Power

Also Rogue Trader sucks

Yes! It's the Uyghur Mandatory Cultural Reorientation!

OP and shillbot 300 /u/rtmxavi is furiously guzzling that scrumptious Chinese peepee. Aren't they feeding him at home?

holy frick we are not defending china, theyre not even socialist or leftist but state capitalist

You're ignorant and don't know what a dictatorship of the proletariat is

The dictatorship of the proletariat is radically democratic for those proletarians, which party domination doesn't work for. Hope this helps! (But yes, dictatorships of the proletariat aren't meant to be immediately socialist, but they're also not meant to reproduce capitalist relations.)

I don't care what any state says, systematic cultural erasure is genocide.

Yeah so that's not happening. China literally builds more mosques in urumanqi alone than the entirety of the us. They CELEBRATE Uighur culture over there

What an hilarious misunderstanding on our part then

as a chinese person currently in southern china, there is a genocide going on against the uyghurs in xinjiang but it's more of a cultural cleansing than a cut and dry "kill them all". don't get me wrong, lots of uyghurs have been persecuted and many have died at the hands of the chinese state. however, in modern day, it's more about a cultural erasure and effort to "unify china": we can see it happening with cantonese and the southern dialects as well.

Baseless claims

my family is native to the guangzhou region, and the government is actively trying to prevent dialects other than mandarin from being taught in schools, so much so that my guangzhou born relatives (region that historically speaks cantonese) DO NOT KNOW HOW TO SPEAK CANTO. in the CITY WHERE CANTO ORIGINATED FROM. my own family members have been taught to speak mandarin rather than their native dialect simply because the chinese government wants to present a "unified front". they're not killing us but they're killing the diversity that makes the country so beautiful to begin with

Whomst to trust?

I know Uyghers on my area. Their stories are heart breaking. Even if it doesn't fit the legal definition of genocide, it is absolutely a crime against humanity.

Propaganda^

There's lots more slapfighting in the thread but I'm to lazy to read it so it would be hypocritical to quote it here as if I read it

It gives u the fuww reddit experience!

I literawwy can't get any farther even thwough I werifwied my e-mail...

Nyewermind. It onwy twook 30 secwonds two realize I had a werifwied email. It's like minyesweeper but wen u hit a minye u get bannyed and put in different "off-bwand" /r/field subweddits. The arbitwary nyature defwinyitewy encapsulates the reddit experience

That's it. This sure is mwore fun that /r/place

It's apparentwy reawwy fun and redditwors luv it!

BREAKING NEWS: Billy Mitchell has won his defamation lawsuit in a Queensland court against Karl Jobst.

Karl Jobst has been ordered to pay Billy Mitchell $350,000 in damages.

— Goose (@rwhitegoose) March 31, 2025

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/william-james-mitchell-vs-twin-galaxies-llc-jeff-harrist-jeremy-young-donkeykongforum-com-benjamin-q-smith.69506/post-20972084

I don't like the word 'evil.' But I don't know what to call this other than that. I think we're dealing with some pretty evil people who have an immense amount of power.https://t.co/KzRYrROwoj pic.twitter.com/oJkWdgjjzq

— Jesse Singal (@jessesingal) April 1, 2025

Why does anyone like this guy holy shit

Here's the context he's leaving out btw

I just read the court filings to get the full context (which may not satisfy either side):

The man is an illegal migrant from El Salvador. In 2019, ICE presented sufficient evidence that he was a member of the MS-13 gang for an immigration judge to deny him bond and order his… https://t.co/Xb9VY39KG8

— AG (@AGHamilton29) April 1, 2025

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Is that why he has a history of this stuff? (303)

Sweet Christ (140)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Generally a good principle to say nice things to/about your wife. Even more brownie points when you compliment publicly. (2193)

Why doesn't it go both ways? You don't hear "here's my handsome husband…" nearly as often as "here's my 'beautiful' wife" (-127)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Men say it to flatter their wife. You're way overthinking this. (5195)

I realize that's the intent but it feels weird because it's either unnecessary or untrue to say. It also perpetuates the outdated notion that women are primarily valued by how they look. (-87)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘

Noted. I'll introduce my wife as "my ugly big fat b-word butt whale butt wife" (1)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘

Lol okay- So firstly, you get upmarseyd in this sub because people consider your opinion to be UN-popular. Not because they agree with you.Secondly, all the top comments are people, very obviously, disagreeing with you. If you're looking for substance and not finding it, you've got rose-colored glasses you need to take off. Lastly, nobody feels like this meaningless, or a tradition. It's a gesture of appreciation, and love. What you're saying is like instructing people to stop shaking hands when they meet, because it's a "pointless tradition." I could parlay this into a rant about how post-modernism/structuralism is a disease that's rotting all of our brains, but I won't.Additionally, 'four comments repeated a thousand times" that are "personal attacks" is a massive, massive cope. People telling you that you're way off base, aren't personal attacks. Heck, even if everyone is correcting you, but at the same time calling you an idiot- They're still correcting you, and your opinion is st... (1)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘

"THIS IS MY UGLY WIFE" 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥 (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/hxaxw

Score: 🐮🔘🔘🔘🔘

Number of comments: 6

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

See title strag

I don't have any raccoon updates beyond Brenda doing much better. Still on death's door but otherwise no ticks and acting more energetic.

Compared to the original:

Made this after yet another miserable attempt to save the userbase of one of my old alma maters, /r/skeptics which has become a shadow of it's former self and half the mods are thin skinned cute twink astrotufer fake butt skeptics (no true scotsman ya know?) who got cucked by terfs at some point and spend all the time pooping up one of my old favorite centrist communities with non-stop quackery ( shit) as well as wingcuckery to the max.

In this latest episode and forage into fake skepticsville I did find some hope that some are amenable to not wanting to look completely fricking r-slurred and made a post about why the JD Vance video was literally the worlds most obvious fricking fake on the planet earth.

Before I get into it I'll clarify that Redditors fell for this hard:

based on that I figured there was a teachable moment buried in all of this shit that could reach both sides since it helps lefties stop being r-slurred and also by default dispels a hoax about vance

I was wrong, but also unsurprised.

My first post was immediately removed of course and its tradition at this point, because basically all posts on /r/skeptic there now are auto-removed until you spam the jannys for permission which I did.

Their explanation doesn't make any sense but I could be wrong because I don't janny shit since we made love4landlords went red and yellow.

apparently all effortposts on /r/skeptic with any links (as in trying to fricking literally cite your sources of information with more than one shitty trans opinion article ) is now AUTO REMOVED. Curious. My own personal conspiracy is

that they did this out of spite because one of you guys !transphobes made a good effort post one time and linked all of the verboten science showing gender dysphoria isn't real and just a fancy name for an acquired condition that causes a chronic copemine deficiency which in real medicine is called being a pathetic little b-word (who was either coddled by mama or alternatively abused/groomed too much growing up, source: nursing science)

anyway facts aside, I bit the bullet and split the post into a singular link for the r-slurs and posted my write up separately. The post has done well because there's still a few old marbles rolling around there it seems who haven't been banned by the jannies yet, however the astroturfing newcute twink r-slur fake skeptic denizens were likely offended by my facts and only about a dozen people have even read the whole fricking point I made the post which was to try and help the children learn how critical thinking works.

In any event here's the post where I had to split up the link and my write up in a comment because you can't link facts anymore in /r/skeptics lol:

https://old.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/1jizari/info_regarding_a_leaked_audio_ai_hoax_of_jd_vance/

Link to my original write up in attempts to help redditors unfrick themselves with some helpful tips for spotting AI, which even dramatards could apparently use a lesson in :

https://old.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/1jizari/info_regarding_a_leaked_audio_ai_hoax_of_jd_vance/mjj34lc/?context=8

I consider this pretty sound and sage advice but alas basically no one read it and the majority of the hundred or so comments are by a bunch of complete absolute fricking hypoxic snot licking imbeciles. Here are some of the best excerpts:

https://old.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/1jizari/info_regarding_a_leaked_audio_ai_hoax_of_jd_vance/mjj7tcj/?context=8

>translation: you're right but orangeman bad so conspiracy good

I corrected him politely just saying actually maybe justr don't fricking jump to conclusions like a good skeptic, which prompted further autism from some other fricking non-skeptic loser TDS cuck:

Your logic is way of base. I make films for a living and we take recording audio pretty seriously. It's extremely difficult to get good high-quality audio unless you have a mic in someone's face. As you've probably seen when we can't have a Mike on camera we put it as close as the person as possible on a boom. The standard Mike used the situation Costs a couple of thousand dollars and better options cost four and five. This supposedly leaked audio sounds exactly as good as you would expect if you were recording someone a few feet away using a phone on a desk or concealed under a piece of paper or in a pocket.

Everybody can tell when they are "on speaker" because the change in audio quality is so apparent and that's with high-quality processing in a modern phone. The argument that this recording is fake because the quality is poor is back to Front. If it sounded as if someone was speaking directly into a mic, you would know it was fake.

How tf does person pretend to get paid to do this shit that I can do for fun and they cannot even differentiate something made by trolls?

I checked his history and was SHOCKED to find out he's a pathetic old broke butt leaf who spends all his time basically crying about space daddy:

I again searched for the effort to help these developmentally disable posers, but to no avail, they started downpooping me, ungrateful fricks:

Nothing could prepare me for the king of neurodivergent libertarians audiophiles, a peak Oldcute twink Leftist Redditor !atheists who posted the most confidently incorrect Adderall fueled r-slur rants that I've seen in awhile, read at your own peril:

I have run recording studios for 35 years. I have done forensic work for most of the major insurance companies in my my State, more than a dozen lawyers, lots of private investigators, the State ad Local police, EMS, and our local airport. I have the same noise reduction cowtools the FBI and CIA use. I have heard both much better and much worse recordings made since smartphones became a thing.

The greatest determinants (as a user above pointed out regarding location sound on film) to sound quality are the microphone and the proximity of the mic to the subject. People recording surreptitiously often put their phones/ recorders in jacket or pants pockets. Sometimes they start a recorder in a hidden location near where they hope the speaker will be when incriminating himself. Often that's not the case. We have no way of knowing what kind of device this was recorded with, we don't know what the microphone was, or whether it had a directional or omnidriectional pickup pattern. It sounds like a mic halfway across an office. The reverberant quality of the background noises are consistent with the reverberant voice reflections in the room. I certainly wouldn't assume the noise was added after the fact.

I actually would not immediately jump to disbelieving the whole thing without evidence for it being fake. Someone claiming it is fake is not evidence. I have used AI voice generation for a few paid projects, and quite a bit, just out of my own curiosity. The thing that AI still gets wrong most often is inflection, especially if there is no punctuation to push it in a particular direction- things like pauses for a comma, hooking up the pitch of the words at the end of an interrogative sentence, loud, definitive exclamations, etc. Those cues that follow punctuation are easier than those which don't rely on punctuation. Getting an AI voice to inflect something like anger, or sarcasm, or hushed intensity isn't easy. You can't type in those kinds of inflections with normal punctuation marks. I understand that a new AI training tool that changes all of that is coming. Apparently some company is working on a way to scan and learn one person's delivery and then replace their words with an AI voice, but following the cadence, speed, lilt, pauses, etc. of the person training it for that particular job.\

So, yeah, it's conceivable that someone who does a great Vance impersonation was able to further polish the voice with AI to create this. But as important as it is to not leap to conclusions regarding something like this (if the real truth matters to you at all), it's important to look at all the evidence before rendering a hard conclusion. We don't have all the evidence, so the safer thing to do is to not claim someone said something they, perhaps, did not. But it's also good to have a working theory, as long as you're willing to accept new data that can discredit your assumption. That's what I'm doing. Until someone can prove otherwise, I have to imagine it is what it sounds like. Would anyone be surprised to find out he feels that way? It certainly would have made sense for him to have said that. When someone shows me convincing evidence that it is not him, I'll change my mind. But I'd bet my left nut it's genuine.

https://old.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/1jizari/info_regarding_a_leaked_audio_ai_hoax_of_jd_vance/mjlaamj/?context=8

This dumb fricker literally cannot distinguish reality and wrote a novel under his pen name:

L. E. Akshually

Go figure he too has TDS and also he lepardsatemyfacemaxxes as a cope:

Literally he spent like an hour on that shit to try and "1-up" me and failed like a bitcho as I was immediately able to show he was r-slurred as this is what inspired the video I posted which took tens of minutes. Audiophiles have some of the worst r-slurs of all time. By nature of the fact their so braindead they can't even apply anything they've learned about how basic HEARING SHIT AND SOUND WORKS.

Anyway like I said that annoyed me enough to stage a quick video with some AI voice synth which inspired this whole post because I think it came out pretty good.

I'm still waiting to see what he says in response to this video and see if all of his fake wisdom will allow him see reality, I suspect he will not and continue to shit up skeptics spaces like all the other ladygardens, ah well.

Anyway beyond that, here's some additional proof that this whole subreddit needs to get nuked and get rebuilt by actual skeptics since it's been astroturfed by Resetera Megan's Law enthusiasts formerly known as the OG incel G*mergater quacks now masquerading as skeptics.

Lets get into it, first off, it's definitely real if JD vance denies it:

b-b-b-but trump and MAGAs are r-slurred too!!! Yea no fricking shit you dumb mother fricker

This guy waited like two years to start commenting and he's already off to a failed start:

Also I hadn't heard of /r/MAGANAZI before today but it sounds like a bait sub but also rolls off the tongue way better that marchagainstnazis or whatever the frick that old annoying shitsub was.

Ah hey and look who it is, the libertarian and/or roblox kid being groomed by s. The tard gangs all here:

Anyway, if you want more seethe !aichads look at how many fricking r-slurred AI haters there are out there, this should be an important lesson for !masterbaiters, it just takes one good idea and a beefy GPU real or cloud to frick with the literal internet (and by tangent the vice president of the united states.) Get a load of all these fricks:

https://old.reddit.com/r/50501/comments/1jicc6t/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/

https://old.reddit.com/r/millenials/comments/1jihv5k/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/ < --- !millenials we should harass these people in particular

https://old.reddit.com/r/VaushV/comments/1jickxk/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/

https://old.reddit.com/r/MAGANAZI/comments/1jibaah/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/

https://old.reddit.com/r/AccidentalAlly/comments/1jibqmy/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/

https://old.reddit.com/r/EnoughMuskSpam/comments/1jiijv2/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk_is_this_real/

https://old.reddit.com/r/Whistleblowers/comments/1jib9ll/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/

https://old.reddit.com/r/Staiy/comments/1jiml5o/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/

Considering the above, the skeptic's thing is not quite so bad, but whatever. High standards for shit is what used to make it great.

!chuds get a W for this since I couldn't find as many rightoids taking the bait.

!jannies effortpost or rope

!animalposters Check out queeries big ol' peepers as he hides from the Wrath of Baby Face Beardson

Also before I forget, for extra spice I also added a good impression of Elon Musk I found in the background to simulate a lovers quarrel as the basis for JDV's fake rdrama rant trying to get away from that crazy b-word. Listen closely and you can hear it.

it's 99.9% fake but I just wanted to make this thread to ping them to come tell all here

I can't remember if I made this or thought it was so stupid I had to save it.

appropriate for a show I barely remember except The Weekend saying cringe shit while watching Lily Rose-Depp masturbate and I think the train has some connections to Red Scare and C*m Town. I guess it was a musical?

https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/PhotoshopRequest/comments/1jodo9i/please_help_me_look_like_a_woman_again/

It's mostly people pooping on s, not s angry at her betrayal.