None

Imagine voluntarily posting this to the internet.

Of course, Redditors chime in with excellent legal advice for manchild NEETs:

>Assuming you're in the USA, you should know that your father just committed a felony by tampering with your mail. FYI.

None
15
new 'toss

None

The US has been the biggest and strongest economy in the world for over a century now. It's geographic isolation from the rest of the world, it's highly developed industrial base, and its ability to attract the best workers the world has to offer has led to it remaining in that position as the strongest while the rest of the world begins to fail in one way or the other. As all nation states around the world have come to realize that they cannot compete with the US, they have found themselves a solution in the form of coming together whether economically, politically, or militarily, with the goal of being able to remain competitive in a world where the US exists. Following these footsteps is what has led to the formation of organizations such as the EU, ASEAN, OPEC, and MERCOSUR. However, just as putting a bandage on a leg already destroyed by gangrene provides no real remedy, the current unions formed are a too little too late solution, only delaying the inevitable failure of these regions of the world at worst, and a complete subservience to the US at best. Let us now look at the reasons why:

1 ) None of the unions formed so far have been able to economically compete with the US:

The EU is the largest economic union in the world. It's GDP is however is only 67.23% of the US in 2024, leading it to trail so far behind as to be impossible to ever catch up, taking its continually slowing down GDP growth rate into account. The other economic unions are comparatively even smaller than the EU in economic terms, unlikely to even reach the EU any time soon. This pretty much guarantees that all these economies will always remain behind the US in their current form, unless they were to expand and grow even further which only the EU is currently successfully able to do.

2 ) None of the unions formed so far are militarily as powerful as the US:

The EU is again the strongest military in the world out of all the union of nations formed so far across the world. Almost all EU nations are part of NATO, a defense agreement that states that an attack on one NATO ally is an attack on all NATO allies leading to war with all NATO members. The EU in recent years has also officially begun work on an EU level military, which makes their military forces more coherent than any other union of nations having their national armies working in coordination during military exercises. The EU military even so, is not even considered in the top three military in the world. Which again shows that union of nations are still completely outclassed by the US.

3 ) Some of the Unions formed so far do not have a demographic future as good as the US:

The EU, the most powerful union of nations in the world, is currently on a declining population trajectory which it is barely able to hold back in recent years due to mass immigration of Ukrainians leaving a war torn nation behind. Without the Ukrainian war, the EU population would have already been in decline. The EU does not have a naturally growing population and is completely dependent on immigration to grow its population, an issue that gets worse when you factor in that the EU is going to keep growing over time geographically as it adds new member states to itself.

Besides the EU, the other groups of nations formed into a union generally have a good demographic future. For example, ASEAN population is growing at a rate of 1.1% per year. OPEC member nations have a positive population growth rate. MERCOSUR nation states have a growing population. Same for the African Union. Besides the EU, almost all unions of nations are in a position to maintain a positive population growth for decades to come. In this manner they have one advantage over the US. MERCOSUR however is expected to have worse demographics than the US within a decade or two at most, leaving only economically worse off nation states with better demographics than the US.

4 ) None of the Union of nation states have a migration network as good as the US:

The US has the largest immigrant population on the planet. Not only that but this immigrant population is generally also highly skilled and far more competent than the immigration population available to other nation states such as Canada or Germany. The US due to its sheer economic prowess gets access to the cream of the crop every year when it comes to immigrants. Meanwhile, the rest of the world gets access to all the immigrants left after the US has had its fill.

MERCOSUR, OPEC, African Union, ASEAN, EU, none of these entities have access to the quality of immigrants that the US has. This again puts these territories at a disadvantage in comparison to the US as their population quality cannot be improved by bringing in high quality blood from abroad.

These unions also suffer from the disadvantage of not having access to immigrants on the level of the US once their natural populations fall into decline, pretty much guaranteeing that in the long run, the US would always outlast them once every part of the world is below replacement population levels.

5 ) They are not as far up the tech tree as the US:

Currently the US is the most technologically advanced nation state in the world. China comes second with how close behind the US they are in multiple major technological fields. After that at third place might be the EU due to the amount of investment in research and higher level education, even when factoring in their habit of kneecapping themselves with legislation that is anti-innovation in nature. ASEAN comes the closest to being in sixth or seventh place due to having Singapore as one of its member, and after that, the rankings don't really matter.

All in all, none of these current Unions are in a position to defeat the US in any manner. They aren't even in a position to defeat China, the world's second biggest economy in any manner. Thus once again confirming that these entities are all too weak to survive into the future long term unless they were willing to form into ever greater unions until they were big enough to compete on their own merit.

Only the EU has been willing to apply that strategy in practice and we can see that it bears fruit in the form of not leaving the EU too far behind the US so as to become completely disconnected and forgotten. It is in this manner that the only four relevant regions of the world in the end become the US, the EU, India, and China.

Conclusion:

Once every single centimeter of the planet is owned by one government or the other, there is no putting the genie back in the bottle. A weak nation dies to a stronger nation once enough time has passed and its territory taken by the stronger nation state. There is no two ways around this. None of the union of states formed till date are strong enough to defeat the US meaning that the US is going to outlast them all. The only exception lies in the EU taking over the entirety of Russia, taking over the entirety of Europe, taking over the entirety of North Africa, and Taking over Kazakhstan. The likelihood of this happening is low to middling at best over the course of two centuries.

The geopolitical union of states is a solution that only works until the end of the 21st century. It will have to be replaced by another new system of governance by the 22nd century for it to still remain relevant in the future.

What will replace the Union of states in the future:

The most likely answer is sub-continental/ regional federations. Such as India. This is due to the fact that a federation actually has enough cohesion as an entity to function as one in all international relations and maintain stability internally, while still being free enough as to discourage open rebellion from within in the name of being oppressed by a master far away. The EU has already evolved into a quasi-federation and is pretty much guaranteed to evolve into a full federation on its current trajectory. As nation states become entities too small to remain relevant in the world or defend themselves, all regions of the world are likely to follow this path over time. The future thus takes the form of the US, a South American federation, the African Union as a federation, the EU as a federation, the middle east as a federation of Arab states, etc. This would also help to ensure peace as all these entities would become too big for was to be worthwhile as any war would take too long and cost too much in terms of resources and manpower.

The future of the world is regional federations such as India across the world. Generally having a population larger than 400 million.

Writing IQ : 114 ( Above average )

Voice level : 140 Hz ( Voicecel )

Writing Gender : 79% Male

None
11
HE IS REBORN

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17270940882838385.webp

None
6
Daily Bard Digest 2024-09-22

Live feed of the best moderator on the internet, straight into your veins.

Here's todays official post from the BARDCHIVE:

03/21/19 01:41:01 with a score of -2: https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/b3mkgo/man_wearing_maga_hat_kicked_out_of_vigil_for/ej0rrmq/?context=8

"i HaVeN't bEeN fOlLoWiNg rEaL cLoSe"

"Please Mr. President, stop using these shootings as the face of gun control. There were 432 murders in Chicago last year. Tackle that. Make those murderers the face of gun control.

Stop fricking pretending that school shootings make any dent in the murders in this country. They don't. There were over 16,000 homicides in the US last year. This will make less than 0.1% difference this year. That doesn't help the families of the people who died here, but please tackle the real problem Mr. President."

You need to shut. the frick. up

None
6
:marseypearlclutch:
None

The artist was supposeddly really beloved, and this made artist fans who want to be even more insufferable than them come out to shit on her. The comment section is full of seethe.

That's honestly all the context I got, I kinda remember more drama from earlier, but apparently she's being made into a case study on how to ruin your career or something. AI really makes for a great catalyst of drama :marseywholesome:

None
None

This is the gayest soyboy fight that was censored by reddit moderators because they suck up to streamers in the 'cord:

TLDR; some bald neighbor cheated on his wife and she divorced and left him and took his child. Got roasted and sucker punched a hard-working American. These are all huge cute twinks, but it's still amusing.

None
12
Lil Pump gets choked out by Colby Covington

!tmz

!r-slurs

@Awoo

None
15
New 'Side

None
1
:marseylaptopangry2:
None
12
I AM LEARNING TO READ

Intelligence

None
11
@j why does the crosstalk bot fricking suck

whats the point in a bot for cyberbullying if the bot doesnt actually message people who need to be bullied

None
None
None
6
The Oculus Anubis Mystery Solved :marseyilluminati2:
None
15
Cobes and Methica's baby
None
9
holy shit this is the best series I've ever seen

!transphobes

None
2
Kamala harris 4 president

I love kamala harris cuz she supports women's rights and we don't need more old men running the town πŸ’€

None

https://media.tenor.com/Ds9-74tmxBsAAAAx/spiderwoman-spiderverse.webp

None

I know. She's literally drunk at campaign events and has no policies. Anyone pretending she's any better than the Biden puppet are not fooling anyone lol

:chudsmugtalking:

Trump 2024

:marseymagahattalking:

I know right? Who would ever vote for her incompetent butt?

:brainletmagatalking:

Yea I can't see why people would vote for Harris, except for the fact she is a woman and black. Seems stupid af.

:marseydiversity#:

I'm voting Trump for sure, and I'm definitely not a conservative. I don't like the man or think he is a good person, but I don't care about his personality. He was a decent president. His policies weren't bad. People did pretty well under Trump. I care about people doing well. I find it pretty bizarre that people truly support Kamala Harris. She does not have a good track record. Can you really not see that talking about compassion and whatnot doesn't actually mean policies affect people positively?

:gigachad2talking:

None
12
Am. R. R.

sketch

None
None
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.