please give me subreddits to rebuild my tard watching collection with I am blanking on all of them

this is /r/collapse which is good but very entry level

what are some more niche ones

Are you eating Bill Gates FAKE FOOD? pic.twitter.com/jEc4iNSvPZ

— savage daughter (@DonnaPrissyrn1) June 26, 2024

Can't make this shit up lol

Taken from us too soon 😔

Not sure exactly what's going on, but a bunch of the early power users are insane creeps I think? The baddies include people called anonsee and kairi as well as pedos and zoophiles if anyone wants to try find the goss.

examples of spicy stuff:

• https://aegis.blue/Notice+of+Labeler+Termination

• https://bsky.app/profile/bitdizzy.bsky.social/post/3kvmg42btrs27

• https://bsky.app/profile/himboblacksmith.bsky.social/post/3kvmbq2eedc2i

• 

P.S. I object to bard-posting on principle, but penny remains an active user

PBS host saying that the Dem advisors she's talking to are crying right now

— Mystery Grove Movie List Co. (@MysteryGrove) June 28, 2024

keep yourself safe jannies

!nooticers actual headline

was wondering why on earth is this particulour war movie abrasive ?

basically lots of sneed by Bongoloids about "stolen valour"

basically orcs (bongs) assblasted that yank flick shows yank as good guyz, in that typical Hollyweird 1980-2000s fashion

sun setting on the dying bong empire, and they

"Anyone know the release date of that film where 2 British pilots saved pearl harbor?"

"This story about the enigma is more nonsense than even the Great Escape. In the real great escape not a single American was part of the escape but at least they were in the camp until separated by the Germans. But the enigma machine capture is 100% British, and some British sailors blablablabla" nobody likes bongs

threads with dozens to thousands of comments all empty.

https://old.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1dqa0zr/is_it_just_me_or_are_comments_coincidentially_not/

https://old.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/1dq9iw2/deleting_posts_about_censorship/

This supreme court ruling from yesterday was quite timely

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

Congrats Jake! 🤝 pic.twitter.com/TjFmHyZAq9

— Delaware Baseball (@DelawareBASE) June 27, 2024

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court overturned the bribery conviction of a former Indiana mayor on Wednesday, the latest in a series of decisions narrowing the scope of federal public corruption law.

The high court's 6-3 opinion along ideological lines found the law criminalizes bribes given before an official act, not rewards handed out after.

“Some gratuities can be problematic. Others are commonplace and might be innocuous,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote. The lines aren't always clear, especially since many state and local officials have other jobs, he said.

The high court sided with James Snyder, a Republican who was convicted of taking $13,000 from a trucking company after prosecutors said he steered about $1 million worth of city contracts to the company.

In a sharply worded dissent joined by her liberal colleagues, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said the distinction between bribes and gratuities ignores the wording of the law aimed at rooting out public corruption.

“Snyder's absurd and atextual reading of the statute is one that only today's court could love,” she wrote.

The decision continues a pattern in recent years of the court restricting the government's ability to use broad federal laws to prosecute public corruption cases. The justices also overturned the bribery conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell in 2016 and sharply curbed prosecutors' use of an anti-fraud law in the case of ex-Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling in 2010.

The decision also comes as the Supreme Court itself has faced sustained criticism over undisclosed trips and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some justices that led the high court to adopt its first code of ethics, though it lacks an enforcement mechanism.

Snyder was elected mayor of Portage, a small Indiana city near Lake Michigan, in 2011 and was removed from office when he was first convicted in 2019. He has maintained his innocence, saying the money he received was payment for consulting work. His attorneys said that prosecutors hadn't proved there was a “quid pro quo” exchange agreement before the contracts were awarded.

The Justice Department countered that the law was clearly meant to cover gifts “corruptly” given to public officials as rewards for favored treatment.

Kavanaugh, writing for the high court majority, disagreed, finding that interpretation would “create traps for unwary state and local officials” and would “subject 19 million public officials to a new regulatory regime,” though he said a gratuity could be unethical or illegal under other laws.