But it's too dark out now to shoot anything and there's no wildlife in the mornings because it's so darn cold.

Canon 400mm f5.6L. It's one of those lenses that depreciated in the used market because of the lack of image stabilization, but now that modern camera bodies have in-body stabilization it becomes an actually useful lens. Only paid $500 for it.

Women so beautiful, I just wish they were good people https://t.co/RP7xMJhRqr

— LetEmKnow (@223__Ali) February 20, 2025

Today I have decided to return to calling myself English because I am.

Born in England, makes me English.
🙌🏾 pic.twitter.com/cjhDvq8PIr

— Bushra Shaikh (@Bushra1Shaikh) February 17, 2025

!nooticers

You will never be English.

You have no Anglo, you have no Saxon.

You are a Pakistani twisted by ideology and delusion into a crude mockery of nature’s perfection.

All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted.

The Celts are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of… https://t.co/ughNxveCjP

— Callum (@AkkadSecretary) February 17, 2025

Unfortunately, @CommunityNotes is increasingly being gamed by governments & legacy media.

Working to fix this …

It should be utterly obvious that a Zelensky-controlled poll about his OWN approval is not credible!!

If Zelensky was actually loved by the people of Ukraine, he… https://t.co/gy0NjtPwiq

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 20, 2025

So, when "free speech" is not going the way you want it, you decide to "fix it".

— Lady Jaujau (@ladyjaujau) February 20, 2025

are you actually braindead ?

— ʌzυ (@Azulabtw) February 20, 2025

Nope.

— Lady Jaujau (@ladyjaujau) February 20, 2025

Glad they settled that one up

Sorry man, lived in Ukraine for years, your 100% wrong.

Ukrainians love him and he's kicking Russia's butt.

— Jay in Kyiv (@JayinKyiv) February 20, 2025

This guy also canceled elections during war. pic.twitter.com/D670cEvj4y

— Jay in Kyiv (@JayinKyiv) February 20, 2025

jay, just remember all these ‘maga’ here are larpers. Mostly indian, some chinese, some russian. Real americans want elon and trump outta office and that definitely includes maga.

stay strong

— DarwinAwardsCancelled (@AwardsCancelled) February 21, 2025

BLAH BLAH BLAH....ALL AMERICANS voted for Trump. 78,000,000 of us Americans. Jay knows the truth. And he knows Zelensky is DONE! You are a RACIST Demotart!

— Rich Hall (@RJHall69_) February 21, 2025

Tbf I'd be angry too if someone called me indian out of nowhere

CHURCHILL FOUGHT NAZIS, ZELINSKY WORKS FOR THE NAZIS (azov batallion, full of nazi tatoos, declared terrorists by US congress in 2020)
Stop the nazi pupet regime installed in ukraine in 2014 with the coup by USA. We have the invoices now from USAID, it was all orchestrated

— Viva Peron (@Cristinaok) February 21, 2025

Bollocks! You appear to of been guzzling not only Trump's but the Kremlin kool aid aswell.

— Mark Maher (@MarkMaher679390) February 21, 2025

I don't even know what's real and what's just nonsense ramblings any more

People of Ukraine, Musk thinks you are stupid and unable to think for yourself so, as the russians do, he wants to show you the way, choose who you must love or despise because he knows so much better than you !

— Lady Jaujau (@ladyjaujau) February 20, 2025

THEY ARE STUPID AND UNABLE TO THINK BY THEMSELVES. So they did not sing an amazing deal in 2022, and now they lost 500k lives, and 4 regions they will never take back. Thats stupidity! thats zelinsky, Ukraine is done, thanks to biden, boris jonson and zelinsky

— Viva Peron (@Cristinaok) February 21, 2025

Ok, so maybe they are all just the same ten r-slurs screaming at each other over and over

In other words, you had no issue with it until it no longer helped your agenda, so you decided to break and adjust the entire system to fit your needs, ensuring it shows only results you like, just like with everything else, including the U.S. government, right?

— Tatarigami_UA (@Tatarigami_UA) February 20, 2025

https://x.com/DStove14655/status/1892965396363251835

So Russia is working for American industrial complex? Got it, thanks for your wisdom

— Tatarigami_UA (@Tatarigami_UA) February 21, 2025

But Russia has been America's biggest cash cow for decades, so kinda true

It must not feel too great getting tag teamed by Trump, JD and then Elon. LMAO, this little guy doesn't stand a chance. pic.twitter.com/rCckVvMbJE

— Ryan Jacobsen (@Dndbreakfast) February 20, 2025

Political gangbang!

So much truth. We in America had elections during many wars

— Mark Silverman 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@silvermanmarkj) February 20, 2025

We were never invaded dumb butt.

— Tedd Dionne (@Tedd_Dionne) February 21, 2025

We held elections during our civil war, r-slur

— Durden (@durden_actual) February 21, 2025

At least everyone is having fun

This happened most blatantly in Israel. 100% of @CommunityNotes in Hebrew are by the extreme left.

— Dr. Eli David (@DrEliDavid) February 20, 2025

Israel most affected

34 responses... all hidden.

— Atom Jones 💛🌕🌗🌑🖤 (@AtomJones) February 21, 2025

Noticed that too, and there are people replying with multiple tweets to everything, or ?

Correct. It's basically leftists ganging up to push propaganda and lies.

— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) February 20, 2025

Community Notes has become a total farce.

I am regularly Community Noted on posts that are factually correct with unnecessary additional "context". It is such a joke.

— Cillian (@CilComLFC) February 20, 2025

I never saw these horrible community notes frankly, either my side of twitter is clean or rightoids are just sucking Elon's peepee for free again

Info about Bellatrix: Bellatrix is the third-brightest star and a candidate binary star in the constellation of Orion, positioned 5° west of the red supergiant Betelgeuse (Alpha Orionis). It has the Bayer designation γ Orionis, which is Latinized to Gamma Orionis. With a slightly variable magnitude of around 1.6, it is typically the 25th-brightest star in the night sky. According to parallax measurements by the Hipparcos spacecraft, Bellatrix is located at a distance of 250±10 light-years. And this pic is low quality but magnificent

Wikipedia's "talk" page on the Gulf of Mexico/America/Cuba/Florida has been in an uproar the past few weeks because of 's EO to change its name. Some highlights:

If the international groups such as the United Nations group of experts on geographical names (meeting in April), the International Maritime Organisation and the International Hydrographic Organization opt-in to recognising the U.S. owned portion of the gulf as the Gulf of America, then I agree that we should concede to the name. Somejeff (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

To both sides of this "question", this entire discussion is moot, since the moment Donald Trump leaves office the next President of the United States will immediately reverse the name-change order. The Gulf of Mexico will remain The Gulf of Mexico so long as modern human society endures. Looneybunny (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

We should call it the Gulf of the Olmecs since they were there first

Google just announced there changing it on their maps Bamaboi445 (talk) 23:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Google is not Wikipedia. Accuratelibrarian (talk) 02:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

You had no problem with President Obama changing the name from Mount McKinley to Denali it's over if that's what president Trump wants that's what he gets you can still go on to Google maps and this nonsense on here Wikipedia and I still got to hear the same bullshit if it's good for the goose it's good for the gander it changes and it needs to be changed now today not yesterday because you don't like trump it don't matter I voted for Obama I voted for that change I didn't like that Mount McKinley got changed him out Denali but because I voted for it happened it going to happen fight it love it leave it it does not matter it's changing and we're not going to stop until it does 65.102.184.179 (talk) 10:07, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

In case editors don't realize, usage of this name has already begun: "an area of low pressure moving across the Gulf of America, interacting with Arctic air, will bring widespread impactful winter weather to North Florida, etc." StAnselm (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

That "source" is from the POLICTICAL OFFICE of a well-known extremist right-wing supporter of Donald Trump. It is not a reliable, nor independent source, and therefore should be discounted Looneybunny (talk) 22:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

I don't see why a mention would be a problem considering the fact that American schools (and media) will soon be teaching it as the Gulf of America. Jstewart2007 (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Also, the moment Donald Trump leaves office the next President of the United States, (who will, considering recent events, most assuredly be a Democrat), will reverse the order, and the "Gulf of America" will vanish as quickly as it appeared, just another example of exactly why Donald Trump was the worst pick for President in American history. Looneybunny (talk) 22:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

This Looneybunny person has posted similar comments on multiple reply chains even if it is questionably relevant

Seriously, how long are the admins going to drag their feet on an official government change? Regardless of whether people like it or not the Government of the U.S. as well as major state and private institutions will refer to it as the Gulf of America going forward unless the change is reversed. The title of the article doesn't have to change but the intro to the page should at the very least include "also known as the Gulf of America in the United States" and there should be a new page on the dispute itself like the pages for the disputes around names of the Persian Gulf and Sea of Japan respectively, instead of relegating it to two clearly tacked paragraphs at the end of the etymology section. No one else outside of the Koreas calls the Sea of Japan the "East Sea" but the article intro still recognizes the dispute's existence, why isn't this any different? Syracuse58 (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Because it's Drumpf silliness and not something that has to be indulged here. Among all the other reasons given. Acalamari 02:54, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

I think we're going to be stuck fielding whatabouts from the people who erroneously believe that the United States should be allowed to rewrite reality like O'Brien from 1984 for a very long time if we don't start aggressively clerking this page. An RfC generally has a shelf-life of minimum six months. Can we please have a moratorium on discussions of American nicknames for the Gulf of Mexico for the next six months so that we have the clarity of consensus necessary to clerk these repetitive arguments promptly? Simonm223 (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

The nonsense is from those fighting so hard to pretend like the American government doesn't have the authority to name things. It's hilarious to see how quickly Wikipedians tripped over themselves to change Mount McKinley to Denali, and how hard they're ignoring the same arguments to change it back, same with this page. Ortizesp (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Funnily enough, although both the Gulf of Mexico and Denali name change were part of the same EO, Denali's wikipedia page intro has already been changed to include the tagline "Denali, federally designated as Mount McKinley"

Oppose, see the example of Clingmans Dome, which was changed by Wikipedia the very same day Biden changed it. Funnily, all these scruples about COMMONNAME and all those "voices of concern" were nowhere to be seen. XavierItzm (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

This is a comment for the RFC that isn't open right now. Comparing a relatively obscure mountain in Tennessee to an internationally important body of water isn't doing this argument any favors, politically motivated or otherwise. Departure– (talk) 01:57, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

We should rename the Atlantic Ocean to the American Ocean so that people stop worrying about the gulf name change since then it wouldn't be as big of a deal.

Strong Support It is important to address the elephant in the room here: There is a strong liberal bias on Wikipedia. By comparison, the Obama administration changed the name of Mount McKinley to Denali in 2015, and the Wikipedia editors were almost tripping over themselves trying to make the name change from Mount McKinley to Denali. I understand that the Gulf of Mexico is a different case in that the Gulf of Mexico is not entirely within the borders of the United States, as Denali/Mount McKinley is, but I think that at the very least the president's executive order must warrant changing the title to: "Gulf of Mexico, officially the Gulf of America in the United States." To me, any opposition to simply noting that it is officially called the Gulf of America in the U.S. is bald-faced activism protesting the name change more than it is actually rooted in reason, evidence, and consistency across articles. U.S. Federal Agencies will henceforth be referring to it as the Gulf of America. If someone sees the name Gulf of America on a U.S. Federal map and enters it into Wikipedia, they'll need to scroll down to the middle of the page and read a paragraph buried in the article containing irrelevant information such as a comedian Stephen Colbert's comments on the name to try to make sense of why they're seeing Gulf of America on a map. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia designed to transmit information; activism and bias should be discouraged. (For evidence of such activism and bias, just look at the opposing comments above describing this as a "stunt"; yet no one ever described Obama's name change from McKinley to Denali as a "stunt." Such opposing positions are not rooted in reason, only bias and activism.) Ambrosiaster (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

This really is the essence of false balance. "We shouldn't call something Trump does a stunt, unless we can also describe something unrelated that Obama did as a stunt." (We can unpack the facts if you like, but this isn't the Denali page; it's the Gulf of Mexico page.) Things can be qualitatively different from each other. Describing different things with different terms isn't bias, it's analysis. And sometimes the analysis can quite validly (if informally) be 'yeah, that's a stunt'. Biden claiming to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment was also a stunt. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

NB: The above user is currently blocked from editing in the main space, as a sanction for having edit warred on the Gulf of Mexico article. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Correct. And the editors who were warring to include comments from comedian Stephen Colbert and to revert the changes with even more frequency than me were not temporarily blocked from editing. Further evidence of bias and activism. Thanks for pointing that out. Ambrosiaster (talk) 19:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

That's an interesting linguistic tic you've got there, always pairing "bias and activism". GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Still waiting on that analysis you alluded to in your prior post. Ambrosiaster (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Nope. I mentioned that it's possible, which it is. I'm not here to perform for you; your own biases are showing. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:37, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Figured that would be your response. Ambrosiaster (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Support in a way its very similar to Deadnaming if the federal government wants it to be Gulf of America then that is what it should be called. Did we have this type of vote when Ellen Page changed her bame to Elliot? I know its not a human but it still applies here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fruitloop11 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

You mean his name'. And no it's not, because Eliot Page is the leading authority on what his own name is - it's within his power to choose it, and he did. He is, in fact, the individual affected. Neither the President of the USA, nor the US government generally, are the Gulf of Mexico, nor do they own or control it. It's international waters, and it is beyond the power of any arm of the US government to change its name unilaterally - even in common usage within the USA, never mind globally. GenevieveDEon (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

You are so terrified, I can tell your hands start shaking every time you type. The fact is it WILL be changed you need to stop harassing all support voters. Imagine if someone was allowed to harass you while you voted Harris, which you 100% did. Even another user has warned you to stop Fruitloop11 (talk) 15:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from personal attacks. You are wrong about my voting, for a reason that should be apparent upon reflection. GenevieveDEon (talk) 16:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm literally about to report you for harassment. the admins will see user:Wildfireupdateman giving you a warning and the harassment you made against User:Ambrosiaster user:AnotherWeatherEditor and many others. and no, I will not call Ellen Page Elliot Page until you stop bothering people. Fruitloop11 (talk) 16:19, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

You are welcome to try. GenevieveDEon (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia Jannies hid this one in spoilered text simply titled "Enough."

Thank you. This user's engagement certainly veers more on mud-slinging than it does on civil discourse in my opinion as well: (1) She told me I have a linguistic tic and (2) She tried to undermine my position by claiming that I had a very temporary ban for an edit war. She is free to reason through it, but she is mostly engaging in name-calling and attempting to shame the support voters. Ambrosiaster (talk) 16:37, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

I knew before I posted she was going to reply to me, so I was on the defense. I think anyone will see this person isn't using the discussion board the way it is intended. It's all about bullying someone who doesn't have the views as you. Fruitloop11 (talk) 16:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

This strikes me as in line with Facebook's actions of lightening censorship and Twitter's actions of existing past 2022 of trying to be in line with the new Trump government because if I'm not mistaken they're facing a pretty serious federal anti-trust lawsuit. What shows up in Google maps does not necessarily reflect what is in common usage. Departure– (talk) 01:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

You do understand that this is merely a question of entering in the lead ", officially Gulf of America in the United States," not to change the title wholesale. As pointed out earlier, the moment that the Obama admin changed the name Mt McKinley to Denali, liberal Wikipedia editors changed it forthwith and added the hashtag #ThanksObama! Common usage was moot at that time because everyone knows that the common used term was Mount McKinley, not Denali. But now all of a sudden common usage returns to the forefront. Ambrosiaster (talk) 04:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

In sum, stop treating common usage as a dispositive factor. It was not dispositive for Mount McKinley, and in that case, the entire article name was changed—a much more drastic measure than is being proposed here. Ambrosiaster (talk) 04:20, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:No personal attacks: "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Better read up the policy. Also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Gotitbro (talk) 04:58, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

I hope that is not directed at me. Defining someone who posted #ThanksObama in the edit line of the Denali article as a liberal is a personal attack? Read the link I shared above: While redirecting the Mt McKinley article to Denali, an editor inserted the political line into the edit #ThanksObama. That to me is far less neutral and inappropriate than me defining such an individual as a liberal. Certainly a conservative didn't write #ThanksObama. No one was attacked personally here. Ambrosiaster (talk) 06:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Is Ambrosiaster Wikipedia's biggest ?

Bonus: The Denali Wikipedia talk page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Denali

Opppose (changing the name back to McKinley on the website) per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CRYSTAL. This move request is premature and entirely based on a political maneuver that likely is not going to affect the common nomenclature of the mountain. Its status among governmental figures is not relevant to the article's name. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 15:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

In the above discussions, it's been made clear that both are common names. If "McKinley" is the name that the government and Associated Press are going to use, it should be given precedence as the title. Derpytoucan (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Are the majority of reliable sources going to follow the federal government and the Associated Press? Is every publication that adopts the AP stylebook going to discard Denali completely? It's too soon to tell, and we shouldn't react on the spur of the moment. XOR'easter (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

How many times is the goalpost of "well not ALL RS call it McKinley" going to be moved over the next four years? There's already a precedent that's been set when the article was renamed in 2015. If McKinley is a common name, and its the name that the federal government and Associated Press are going to be using, it should be the article's title. I'm fine with waiting until the Secretary of the Interior has actually made the name change official, and perhaps seeing how other RS call the mountain when reporting on that event, but implying that we need to wait any longer to rename the article is absurd, especially given the aforementioned instant renaming in 2015.Derpytoucan (talk) 21:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Stop WP:BLUDGEONing the discussion. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 23:53, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

I don't see this as bludgeoning. @Derpytoucan makes a good point. anikom15 (talk) 03:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Repeatedly replying to multiple commenters is textbook BLUDGEON. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 13:22, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Talk about projection because that's exactly what you're doing. Esotericmadman (talk) 13:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Bonus bonus: The edit page for the Gulf of Mexico webpage:

106 edits in the last 24 hours alone

I've always believed that Wikipedia is a goldmine for drama and petty squabbles between self-centered know-it-alls, but I usually can't care to look into it because I find the layout of their website atrocious.

!ifuckinglovescience what is the scientific consensus?

Who were you most surprised was on the list?

I need to feed my wife and three kids a balanced meal while also preparing it all in under 1.5 hours. and I cook SLOOOOOOW. What should I make?

Please list many ACTUAL OPTIONS YOU MAKE AND KNOW ARE GOOD. I can look up recipes elsewhere. I come here for nuance.

katie hill rules

I got around by posting vid directly

This woman made a post a week ago stating that Trump will make the great reveal today. I guess he still has a few hours left to do that.

This guy says Trump will soon reveal technology that will revolutionize transportation, but all of the replies are just concerned with when he is going to bring out the medbeds.

A poll is posted asking people if they believe medbeds are real. 63% say yes.

This guy replies saying the town where Trump got shot actually already has a medbed center open.

What the heck is Tesla BioHealing? Any connection to Musk, or are they just piggybacking off the name?

https://www.teslabiohealing.com/

This is their website. What the heck is with that tab in Japanese? Clicking it downloads a PDF in Japanese that talks about how they provide minerals that can fix your "chi." Seems like a legit medical company.

The FAQ section on their website talks incessantly about some pseudo-health shit involving "biophotons" whatever the frick that means.

This section of the FAQ is what holds any real information. The "cover our butt legally" part buried in the FAQ.

Actually, Elon Musk already disclosed that medbeds exist in a video I saw but can't remember the name of and basically you're fricking stupid if you still think they aren't real.

Is this person a fricking bot?

Trump is going to usher in a communist utopia according to these people.

Military bases have been filled up with medbeds and very soon you will be able to go to one and get all of your physical ailments solved FOR FREE!

Very soon all hospitals will be shut down and completely replaced by medbeds. I, for one, can't wait. Thank you, Mr. President!

@Aevann

!friendsofspiderman !attentionmaxxers

This community is growing more ungrateful by the day. Vermin. Filth. Start banning them for the smallest slight.

Contact pic.twitter.com/3JZfzcmcYI

— Frasier Payne (@MeinGottNiles) February 21, 2025

Dozens of Alaskans – potentially over 100 in total – are being fired as part of the Trump administration’s reduction-in-force order for the federal government.
 
Many of these abrupt terminations will do more harm than good, stunting opportunities in Alaska and leaving holes in…

— Sen. Lisa Murkowski (@lisamurkowski) February 15, 2025

You are one of the all time champs. pic.twitter.com/51TzBoVon7

— The Homocracy (@ReasonPete) February 15, 2025

I tried to help

Murkowski is very anti Trump and has talked about leaving the GOP even before he won again lol

— rDrama.net (@rdramanet) February 15, 2025

I got sure janned

> Murkowski is very anti Trump pic.twitter.com/DCHSq4JjVv

— The Homocracy (@ReasonPete) February 15, 2025

I cited leftist friendly sources

2017https://t.co/feY29LAvum

2020https://t.co/mJaPAJp42O

2021https://t.co/TX4IXfjqRX

2024https://t.co/6ULdG3KFRB

Fortunately he’s now won 3 times but only gotten two terms, so legally he’s entitled to stay in office until 2032 and I think he will. Sorry Lisa!

— rDrama.net (@rdramanet) February 15, 2025

It was for naught

And yet she still votes for his nominations.

— The Homocracy (@ReasonPete) February 15, 2025

Meanwhile on the other end of the spectrum, I left a reply to reddit_lies about how Trump clearly stole the election because he has no support on Reddit

Every comment I see on r/politics, r/political humor and r/news regarding Trump is negative. Every single one without exception. You can claim Reddit has a liberal bias all you want, but there are limits.

He probably got around 80 votes nationwide and there WILL be a reckoning.

— rDrama.net (@rdramanet) February 14, 2025

It's still causing anger 14 hours later and I'm still getting notifications from accounts like "Rage Against ZOG" who believes he has milquetoast conservative beliefs

I've got banned on reddit multiple times for lukewarm conservative takes. That hellhole is a liberal echo chamber. Get fricked.

— Rage Against ZOG ✞ (@IFAMERlCANSKNEW) February 15, 2025

Good morning I hate everyone.

/u/RosewaterST

This dude thinks you combat fascism with rainbows and unicorn.

Real cute, buddy.

https://old.reddit.com/r/anime_titties/comments/1iiahle/reddit_community_banned_as_user_spat_with_musk/mb3uprb/?context=8

/u/poop-scroller Canada

This dude thinks you combat fascism with Reddit posts.

Real cute, buddy.

https://old.reddit.com/r/anime_titties/comments/1iiahle/reddit_community_banned_as_user_spat_with_musk/mb3v1oz/?context=8

/u/SlightlySublimated

How do you think movements start or are coordinated? Via messenger pigeons?

https://old.reddit.com/r/anime_titties/comments/1iiahle/reddit_community_banned_as_user_spat_with_musk/mb3w2kk/?context=8

THIS NEIGHBOR THINKS THAT HIS REVOLUTIONARY INSURGENT ARMY WILL BE ORGANIZED ON TRANNIT

/u/Link9454 and /u/GPT3-5_AI go full-Kiwi Farms and use the "its public info chud, its not doxxing!

https://old.reddit.com/r/anime_titties/comments/1iiahle/reddit_community_banned_as_user_spat_with_musk/mb4brkd/?context=8

!chuds !reportmaxxers

REPORTMAXXERS, ASSEMBLE!

!nonchuds !lgbt !cuteandinvalid Based based based

Feet tax

Fascism may be defined as a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation, or victim-hood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion.

— Robert O Paxton, _The Anatomy of Fascism (2004)_