None
58
:marseynull: continues to grave dance on his enemies as Path is evicted from multiple datacenters

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1738275009OZQfmDCrGP6r1w.webp

I just wanted to post about :marseycwc#:

None
12
NASA :marseyastronaut2: predicts incoming asteroid now has 3.1% chance :marseygangster: of striking Earth :marseyxdorbit:

https://media.tenor.com/1XCp_Z-hGf4AAAAx/it-just-keeps-going-up-sam-johnson.webp

30
unique interview setup
None
32
Official pokemon full size gardevoir
13
remember when people thought veganism was the future

feel like that moment has well and truly passed, everyone I know has increased their meat consumption and takes collagen peptides now

None
23
Cute twink spills tea; proven right after 5 months

And naturally Elon stays winning :#marseyelonmusk:

None
13
me trying to do the weekly !crossword
None
Reported by:
53
Frick the police-marsey

!coomers !2dgooners

I am also once again out of dramacoins to pin things :marseypoor:

None
22
Anyone else think that ai is going to kill everything in 3 years?

I kinda hate rationalists but I haven't heard a convincing counter argument on AI doom.

None

					
					
					
	

				
None
27
Shoulda taken the buyout fedbros

					
					

"HOLD THE LINE HE CANT FIRE ALL OF US"

:#marsey57:

None
14
Make mutt politicians sperg out with this ONE trick

:marseyxd:

None
22
:marseyfoidretard: + :marseyredhat: = :marseykernelpanic: || :marseyemojilaugh:

!winchads !wincels !winners

:marseylinuxsweater#genocide:

None

A new campaign group for gay and bisexual rights but not transgender rights has been formed in the Labour Party.

Labour LGB aims to "defend and enhance the rights of LGB people" whilst also calling for protections for single-s*x spaces and "supporting the principles that same-s*x attraction is real and that biology matters".

It comes as another rival group to LGBT+ Labour, Pride in Labour, held its first annual general meeting last weekend and called on the party to deliver on its manifesto commitment to implement meaningful reform to the Gender Recognition Act.

Dee McCullough, a spokesperson for Labour LGB, said: "We are a coalition of proud Labour Party LGB members.

"The last Labour government delivered a raft of landmark reforms that we celebrate. Civil partnerships, equal age of consent, equal employment rights, adoption law reform and abolishing Section 28 to name a few. In the years ahead, we need to be vigilant in maintaining these rights. We must defend the Equality Act which spelled out that sexual orientation is a protected characteristic.

"We want to ensure that the Labour government continues to accept that same-s*x attraction is real and that biology matters. These principles must be embedded in legislative proposals and in government policy.

"We would encourage Labour Party LGB members to join Labour LGB. In the ongoing debate about LGB rights within the party, the voices of LGB people must be heard in branches, CLPs, at party conference and in Parliament. The campaign for equality never ends."

The move comes amid claims that the government is shelving a manifesto commitment to make it easier for people to legally change their gender, with a party source telling The Guardian that changes may not be brought forward before the next general election.

The Prime Minister's spokesperson told reporters the government "stands by our commitment to modernise gender recognition rules as set out in the manifesto and we'll set out our next steps on this work in due course."

'No LGB without the T', says rival LGBT+ group

Some LGBTQ+ groups within the party have spoken out over the formation of Labour LGB, claiming it aims to "divide the LGBT+ community" within the party.

Alex Charilaou, co-chair of Labour for Trans Rights, said: "The values of the labour movement are those of equality, social justice and solidarity. This new group's plans to divide the LGBT+ community in Labour will not work.

"Trans people are at the frontline of a wider reactionary culture war. Gay, lesbian, bi and other LGBT+ people recognise that their rights are just as under threat from growing far-right attacks as the trans community.

"We hope LGBT+ Labour will disavow this group as antithetical to the aims of the LGBT+ rights movement and the Labour Party."

Co-chair of the Pride for Labour group Jamie Strudwick called on the Labour leadership to "act immediately to protect trans people before we go past the point of no return".

"Pride in Labour exists to champion LGBTQIA+ rights within the Labour Party. We are utterly appalled that a new splinter group, Labour LGB, is seeking to capitalise on the vile transphobia which is so deeply embedded within our society.

"We will always be extremely clear on this โ€’ there is no LGB without the T.

"We are at an extremely dangerous crossroads where trans people and their right to exist is being brought into question, and we cannot allow this sickening cycle to continue.

"Be under no illusion โ€’ the vast majority of gay, lesbian and bisexual people stand firmly with trans people, because they have always been, and always will be part of our family."

In response, McCullough said: "We are proud to be Labour and proud to be LGB. Our aim is to represent people who are same-s*x attracted."

LGBT+ Labour gave no comment when approached by LabourList.

None

First, it is simply false to say that treasury payments do not have a "payment categorization code". It is notable, by the way, that he uses this completely invented phrase rather than the actual phrase "Treasury Account Symbol" (TAS). Indeed, it's impossible to find another use of this phrase using an internet search engine in any context, let alone the Treasury context. The far more limited "deficiency" pointed out by the Government Accountability Office report Krause referenced is that information about individual government transactions were recorded in multiple different account entries separately by some government agencies and thus individual transactions could not be readily traced through to all the accounting ledgers they effected.

No chud, the government doesn't need to note where it's spending your money and it was definitely working on a system to fix that by 2028 possibly :marseysmirk2:

On to Musk's next claim: the need for "rationales". The idea of putting a "rationale" for each and every individual payment (or payment file) makes little sense in the context of how the system works. Think of this in your own life: do you fill out a little form that provides your "rationale" for purchasing an item every time you swipe your credit card? If you were required to do so, you would react very negatively for the same reason you should react very negatively here: if you had to put a rationale then someone could reject your spending requests on the basis of providing the "wrong" rationale.

Imagine the right wing uproar when the possibility emerged of restricting purchases of meat through such a "rationale for transaction" system. This should be seen as no different. The "Treasury Account Symbol" (TAS) provides the only rationale that should matter which is that congress appropriated the spending. Of course, if you want to abrogate congressional spending then that is obviously not sufficient and, in fact, counterproductive.

No chud, the government doesn't need to note why it's spending your money :marseysurejan:

Imagine if the government were buying some groceries and the government's credit card was rejected at the checkout, chud, that would be terrible. What if the government imposed fascist restrictions on you, chud, how would you feel? :marseysmughips:

This all goes back to Musk's tendency to think that there is, can be or should be a "button" that determines all of this and its corrupt, inefficient bureaucrats preventing this from happening. He simply doesn't understand how complex these systems are or why they are the way they are. Take the Treasury Offset Program (TOP) for instance. It is a Bureau of the Fiscal Service system for collecting delinquent federal or state debts. One former Bureau of the Fiscal Service employee explained to me that there are rules that determine:

Actually, chud, the bureaucratic tumour is a good thing and hasn't metastasized enough :marseysmug:

To include my own editorial comment for a moment, this is why it's so alarming to see him talk about updating this list "weekly, or even daily". This strongly suggests to me that he is talking about arbitrarily and rapidly expanding the list of people and entities on lists such as the Office of Foreign Assets Controls (OFAC) list without any due process to block them from government payments. As I discussed the Wednesday before last, the apparatuses for capriciously destroying the financial life of disfavored entities and people has been constructed over multiple decades with active Democratic participation and support. Now they are in the hands of Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Thus, again, Musk's comments hide a desire for unchecked power over others under a false narrative about governmental "inefficiency".

:chudsm#ug:

My sources are also very skeptical that any career Treasury employee told Elon Musk that half of the expenditures that constituted "entitlements payments to individuals with no SSN" were "unequivocal and obvious fraud". It's hard to say more without knowing the context. This is the difficult thing with government by the pronouncement of Elon Musk. He can say stuff without any corroboration much faster than anyone else can check facts or correct falsehoods.

There's no fraud chud, my sources are 'skeptical' :marseyantiwork:

In the meantime, it is exhausting how much effort is required to deconstruct one Elon Musk tweet. He can lie about very complex and technical systems much faster than he can be answered, but nevertheless it's important to periodically critically assess what the richest man in the world is saying as he continually tries to justify chopping the government up and selling it for parts like this is a private equity takeover.

Actually Musk is just lying, chud :marseyexcited:

None
23
New toss
None
18
:marseyserioushatfact:
None
20
[๐Ÿค“๐Ÿค“๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜] How much does beef cost in your state?

					
					

Most Based Comments

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜

Fir bolte hn log that Indians are racist towards NE Indians. (-51)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜

Post some nice beef dishes from you states. And recipe if you can. Best way to shoo away the mainlanders lol (22)

Like the Meitei are shooing you away?! (-30)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜

Bheju kya BJP aur RSS ko? Poora north east lynch kar denge. (-38)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

First, lets talk about science, you know, that thing you dismiss when it doesn't support your beef obsession. Yes, science is about possibilities, but its also about probabilities and overwhelming evidence. The link between excessive red meat consumption and health risks isn't some vague claim ,its backed by decades of research from harvard, WHO, and the american heart association, none of which were funded by the humble pea or chana lobby.Now, onto your 'beef is a perfect food' fairytale. Sure, beef is nutrient dense, but calling it a complete meal is like saying soda is perfect because it has water in it. A diet based solely on beef is not balanced, you are missing fiber, antioxidants, and a variety of phytonutrients essential for gut health. But hey, who needs a functioning microbiome, right?As for the B12 injections, you conveniently ignore the fact that NRIs have deficiencies due to processed diets, not just the absence of beef. Eggs, dairy, and fortified foods provide plenty o... (-4)

Still u can't process the facts that i just said! Beef is a complete meal for our body & with 1-2sides like vitamin c rich food etc... an avg indian gets more nutrition than they get from their normal so called balanced meal. WHO&American heart asso.has also published research papers abt veggies & other meats too... so look into it to get a full view & also u really missed the essence of that report. R u even a doctor cuz u have a narrow mind pov in viewing the research papers.Over consumption of any food is bad but who here said we need to overconsume beef? What is the % of Indians consuming processed beef/meat? Totally irrelevant points tbh! U still got my whole argument wrong cuz no research study has proven without doubt that red meat is bad! But what's a irrefutable fact is that channa, peas etc.. can't be fully digested by humans cuz we lack the enzymes to do so. I assume that u r basing ur arguments based on ur beliefs which itself refutes ur arguments. Also beef=meat of cow,... (1)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

Cows are as native as we slaughter them and their meat. It is natural as we eat pork, chicken and dog meat. Cows are as natural food for us. If you have issues, go consult your tanatani. (1)

Again with tanatani , ricebag hurts you then why call others name . I am agnostic ,vegan btw . I don't give a fk u eat but stop with the insults narcissist. This sub isn't food culture sub make one , if u hate disagreements. (2)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”˜

Mere yaha beef nahi pork bahut tasty milta hai yum yum 200kg (25)

๐Ÿ˜ญfunny you think it would offend the muslims. We literally think of pigs as the ugliest unhygienic shit covered animal. We are glad it's forbidden to eat. (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/AlargerPotato

Score: ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Number of comments: 4

Average angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Maximum angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Minimum angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining! :marseyminer:

:marppy: autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. :marseycapitalistmanlet: Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion :marseyjamming:

None
8
FYI - The Great MAGA Depression is Coming Soon : centrist

					
					
					
	

				
None
14
New Stonetoss

None
15
RAPPER OF THE MONTH - BLACK HISTORY MONTH EDITION

While every month is black history month, this month is special due to the fact all chuds have to legally abide by the government's set status. This month is dedicated to... DRAKE! Aubrey "Drizzy" Drake Graham (born October 24, 1986) is a Canadian rapper, singer, and actor. As a figure in popular music, he has been credited with popularizing R&B sensibilities in hip-hop artists.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_(musician)


Now... why is this month dedicated to Drake?

  • Super Bowl

Kendrick Lamar performed at the Super Bowl. Now you might be asking why he's included as a reason. Drake basically put this guy on the spot, prior to this Kendrick was famous in rap spaces while Drake was a name everyone knew. When Kendrick Lamar initially dissed Drake, it led to a whole snowball effect that eventually led to hit song "Not Like Us" dropping. Full timeline if you're wondering about the history of this beef: https://www.vulture.com/article/drake-kendrick-lamar-feud-explained.html Not Like Us is a diss dedicated directly at Drake, and it's his most famous song. It revolves back around to the same debate about if Kanye put Taytay on the map. Kendrick got awarded a multitude of grammies for this false mediocre song all because of Drake, Kendrick was appointed to play at the Super Bowl because of Drake, and while performing at the grammies AND the Super Bowl he still sang the song about Drake. Everything about this guy revolves around Drake.

Related lyric/song:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1739498766sR1exlsGpzKuzg.webp

  • Grammies

Mostly explained in the previous paragraph.

  • New Album

Drake is about to drop a collab album with famous rapper Partynextdoor. I'm guessing most of the tracks are gonna be love songs and maybe two will be rapping. The linked tweet gives a full rundown on how to celebrate black history month with Drake.

  • Beautiful Music

Drake has a very nice discography, with hits ranging from Passionfruit to Jimmy Cooks he's very diverse in the areas that a black person can properly sing in. You could probably find a Drake song for any occasion. Some of my personal favorites (it should be very easy to see his diverse discography with these picks):

  • Pioneer in black culture

Kendrick reversed hundreds of years worth of black activism in one 30 minute show. If Drake was on that stage, we would've somehow gotten Obama a 3rd term. Since Drake also has some jewish heritage, he's loved by many in jewish communities. Around my very southern part of town, the stores usually play only white songs and the occasional Drake song. I've heard Drake referred to as "one of the good ones" before. All in all, the people love this guy.


I have themed my profile accordingly. Have a nice night and remember to support real black artists (not fakers like Kendrick LAMEar).

None
12
Now it's Texas Fried Chicken, TFC
None
22
Kremlin "Insider" Says Trump Has Given The Go To Expand The War - Redditors :soysnooseethe: :soysnooseethe: :soysnooseethe:

					
					

It's from the Daily Beast and I don't see it mention anywhere about an insider at the Kremlin.

Either way...let's see how Redditors are taking the "news"...

None

					
					

My gf, my dog and I are living in our car, this is gonna fing suck.

Thanks to lots of nice clevelanders we have blankets and coats but man, Im stressed

So stressed I can make this post on Reddit tee-hee!

:#marseybeggar:

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.