- 51
- 73
Pro-Palestine protestors gathered outside the Hollywood premiere of “Captain America: Brave New World” and called for a boycott of the film over its inclusion of the Israeli superhero Ruth Bat-Seraph, aka Sabra.https://t.co/TRNhD7Lkhb
— Variety (@Variety) February 12, 2025
Look up “Sabra and Shatila Incident”
— JohnKhalidi (@JohnKhalidi) February 12, 2025
There's a hundred versions of this attack in the replies as per usual every time this subject comes up. Let's unpack.
What the name actually refers to:
The Sabra character predates the Lebanese Christian militia chimpout:
So much for that nonsense
I can't believe I just defended Disney, kill me now
- Grue : Daily reminder to bully spergs that use degenerate as an insult
- 22
- 30
🚨#BREAKING: The Truth
— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) February 19, 2025
The past few days have been an unrelenting nightmare, marked by an overwhelming barrage of stress, frustration, and exhaustion that has taken a significant toll on my part. A severe and unjust breach of my personal life has occurred, and private… pic.twitter.com/bUa1OGxcnA
"Furthermore, let me state this as clearly as possible as I have no interest in minors. Period." https://t.co/p3frIhg4uw pic.twitter.com/ydimrHv8ce
— MavLostHisIQ (@MavLostHisIQ) February 19, 2025
Respectfully, if you’re a proud gay man, why did you pretend to have a wife? https://t.co/Cv4uokZGI2 pic.twitter.com/bEKdDMepbm
— TheDoog (@doogle990) February 19, 2025
Who had this on their 2025 bingo card? https://t.co/CoONU1LOEE pic.twitter.com/J84ptCNbGq
— Garbage Human (@GarbageHuman24) February 19, 2025
So... turns out this degenerate is into pup play...
— Joshua Ek (@JoshuaEkOnX) February 19, 2025
... dude... you can get off this dimension!
🫤 https://t.co/fOLLZe6u2m pic.twitter.com/B8MwnrnGQI
Rawsalerts is ALSO into nappies and shit like that!
— Joshua Ek (@JoshuaEkOnX) February 19, 2025
In an advanced and respectful society, you'd be put down like the sick dog you identify as!
What a degenerate!
🫤 pic.twitter.com/ArrEtlydqu
"Imporntant" bro gooning as he wrote this whole statement https://t.co/ng4L3A6GUt
— Cynic (@FreeRoamMode) February 19, 2025
Now THATS how you conservatism in 2025. Uwu
- 25
- 69
Why is Sweden so r-slurred?
What makes afghan refugees so important that they won't get deported no matter what crimes they commit, but a Ukrainian
nursing student
who's been in Sweden
for a decade and is perfectly integrated has to go back home in the middle
of a war lmao
- 7
- 26
The boys love being under the sheets where it's warm
- 72
- 94
https://screenrant.com/matrix-sequels-tank-marcus-chong-not-return-reason/
After playing such an integral role in The Matrix, Tank (Marcus Chong, adopted son of Tommy Chong) didn't appear in either of the sequels, The Matrix Reloaded or The Matrix Revolutions, with many viewers wondering why. As the operator of the Nebuchadnezzar, Tank plays a pretty crucial role on the team in the first movie, making his disappearance surprising. That's especially true due to the fact Tank was one of the few Nebuchadnezzar crew members to even survive Cypher's betrayal of his comrades. In 2003's The Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions, Tank is instead replaced by his brother-in-law, Link (Harold Perrineau Jr).
It's explained in-universe that Tank died sometime after the first Matrix movie, though no cause is given. It's a simple explanation hiding a complicated behind-the-scenes story. The real reason Tank didn't come back for the admittedly quite divisive Matrix sequels was a conflict between actor Marcus Chong and the producers. Said conflict got incredibly heated, leading to legal battles, and Chong making shocking allegations against his former colleagues and bosses. Needless to say, Chong's career has never truly recovered.
TLDR for the original matrix he got paid $75k (in 1999 is worth approx. $142k today) and for the sequel demanded the same pay as the other 3 or 4 main characters who
While Tank died in the canon The Matrix timeline, there was a behind-the-scenes reason for this creative decision. In 2003, Chong filed a lawsuit against Warner Bros/AOL Time Warner, claiming that there was a verbal agreement from 1998 and a contract signed in 2000 that guaranteed him a place in the sequel movies. Warner offered him $400,000 for The Matrix Reloaded and The Matrix Revolutions, and he wanted to get $1 million, and Chong wouldn't budge (via entertainment.ie).
The lawsuit included claims of defamation, stating that the producers tried to paint him as a terrorist. In October 2000, Chong was arrested for making threatening phone calls to Warner Bros and writer-directors the Wachowskis over his being written out of the movie. He even went as far as claiming he was being blackballed in the industry by the producers. Chong hasn't been in many movies since The Matrix — which may hint that he is difficult to work with.
Beyond all of this was a website I never heard of probably made by Chong and is a goldmine of sneed lmao
https://web.archive.org/web/20020608185811/http://www.boycottthematrix.com/index.htm
As a result of all this drama, Chong's last real feature film was in "The Crow: Wicked Prayer" starring washed up actors Edward Furlong (John Conner T2), Tara Reid (American Pie), and David Boreanaz (Buffy TV show)
(Despite being a fan of the original "The Crow" Brandon Lee movie, I have never even heard of this crow movie until now but I will give every dramatard 1 gold award who has suffered through it and educates me on how terrible it is)
Anyway I have no idea wtf this r-slur has been doing for 15 years after sperging out, but I found his youtube account were he paints a crazy picture and if you skip to the last few seconds claims The Whack-out-ski Sister threatened to transition him, to the grave.
Now that you have seen all the evidence
Please judge, who was right here:
- 16
- 15
- 4
- 15
Brock is so cute! Triana is the sleepiest babe!
- 14
- 43
WARNING THIS POST CONCERNS LEFTISTS SO EVERYTHING IS
Honestly I (f19) feel like I messed up very badly here, despite having been the "more educated" one on the topic. I blame it on my impulsivity, bad debating skills and lack of empathy, and now I regret having cut someone off too quickly. (posting from a throwaway acc. Might delete this post later). Ok, very long wall of text incoming, only read if you have time to care to hear about the troubles of a dumb leftist teen...
We got along greatly, shared a lot of hobbies and interest in the same media, she (f20) seemed to like me a lot, and I might've even developed a crush on her. But then the issue appeared when I once compared the depiction of an oppressive system from "Arcane" to what's going on in Palestine. Turns out she's "neutral", is only focused on the current war (without any regards to the broader historical context) and refuses to support a liberated Palestine bc then Hamas would rule and enforce sharia law (she's specifically concerned about the women. In her own words, she "can't support a country that treats women worse than animals") (also she spoke of Hamas as if they're the only Palestinian semi-governing power, it seems she has never heard of the PA (although I'm aware that they're collaborators of the occupation)). (Also she wrongfully regurgitated the claim that Israel is more tolerant towards other religions.) I told her, among other things, about how Israel forces all of its citizens into military training in order to maintain the occupation, but her only response to that was "yeah, I too wish they would leave the women out of the conscription", completely missing the point. I also mentioned the Nakba, but eh, to no avail. And to be fair, it was probably a mistake on my part to not provide sources right away the first time it came up. I wish I had just sent her the purplewashing-article from decolonizepalestine.com right away instead of wrestling with my weak words. And I feel like in general I didn't address her points and concerns well and precise enough, such as failing to make it clear enough that supporting Palestinian liberation has nothing to do with inherently supporting Hamas' ideology, and the reason most people (including those who'd be marginalized under them) are not condemning them right now is because they (alongside other armed groups of different ideologies) are currently the only effective resistance against Israel in Gaza. And I realize I might've made a crappy transition to that topic in the first place too, it started with me disecting the in-show argument "you're one of the good [members of an oppressed group]" and arguing that a people under occupation can't/shouldn't be separated into "good/harmless civilians" and "armed/evil terrorists", if the root cause of "terroristic actions" is oppression from an outer force and said "terrorists" are sometimes the sole glimmer of hope of their societies. And when I meant to say something in the sense of "Gaza is an example of that, where you can't separate the people based on their reactions to their own oppression, the 'peaceful' ones may disagree with the 'radical's ideology and methods but in the end they still share a common struggle and goal, the true big bad here being the colonial oppressor (for now) who created the conditions for violent resistance and religious fundamentalism to spread in the first place", it ended up coming across to her as "all of Gaza supports Hamas".
Eventually I just gave up arguing, on the basis that "hey, at least she supports a ceasefire too", and we continued our friendship and communication like normal. Though that underlying feeling of frustration and disappointment kept lingering within me...
Some time later, over the course of a few months, we watched some movies together... and some of these movies (e.g. "Wicked") also contained themes of oppression and discrimination, presenting fictionalized depictions of them in fantasy settings, and another one was about colonialism and it's effects on nature. Obviously, when watching these, my brain also inevitably made the connection with Palestine (among other things), but was frustrated knowing that I couldn't tell her that without having to argue again.
Over time, I opted to sprinkle in some political articles (not even just about Palestine specifically, but also White Feminism and other instances of colonialism and imperialism, including an analysis on zionist antisemitism) in my stories inbetween pics of my mundane activities, hoping she'd read them, without me having to shove it in her face directly. But it proves to have been for nothing...
Fast forward, and I share with her a leftist commentary&analysis video about Arcane ("Arcane has always been centrist", great watch btw). We discuss some stuff we agree and disagree on in a civil manner. Eventually I somehow couldn't help but mention Zionism and Palestine in a small side comment again (my bigger argument was not centered around it). She noticed, and got upset again, disagreeing and stating "uhm I disagree, Palestinians aren't oppressed, they are the ones who started it and are being racist towards Israelis". I got annoyed and replied something along the lines of "Bruh, Israelis are the indeed occupiers and oppressors here, how you still so ignorant?" and announced that I'll share some sources for once. She took great offense to being called "ignorant", and claimed she'll also share some from her side.
I took some time for research and sent her several long lists with sources covering several aspects (the beginnings and proof that this is indeed colonialism, casualties comparison, Hamas & PA and other factions, women (including female journ*lists and resistance fighters), greenwashing, ressource distribution...) with some of my own commentary in between (which for once was actually quite calm, objective (Edit: ok the first few messages were emotionally charged too), and non-accusatory). Though it didn't take too long either, because I have already semi-prepared myself for such confrontation. Then I waited. 1 week of silence. Then, her reply finally arrived. It was not as bad as I thought it'd be, but still disappointing. She essentially just wanted to retreat from the argument, refused to share her sources bc "it would only stoke the flames", once more insisted she was already well-informed long before receiving my links since she "has been keeping up with this war for a long time", and suggested we should just shift our focus away from this topic because she otherwise enjoys hanging out and talking with me. I took offense to that, since she essentially admitted to not even have bothered looking at anything I sent. And her offer just... rubbed me wrong. Having to avoid this one topic when it's reflected so often around us, in reality and fiction. And in general, how could she deny the plight of one people, but then preach how "all oppression is wrong"? If she's on a completely different page than I am? So I took only 24hrs to draft different responses, and sent some replies that could be dumbed down to this: "Sorry mate, but if I can't discuss stuff like this with you, we're not compatible" "Also, you mean you can't support guys who commit mass-r*pes, but yet you are fine with me 'supporting them'? (since according to your own logic, pro-Palestine and pro-Hamas are the same thing)" "I really don't want to do this, but I think it'd be better for both of us if we go seperate ways. Goodbye" and one pic with a cartoon saying "We can disagree and still be friends - yeah, on pizza toppings, not genocide". And before she had the chance to respond, I blocked her.
And now I wish I had taken more time to think, before doing any of this. Because now she definitly resents me for good. And it would've not ended like this, had I done things differently from the start. We had plans together, and I ruined them. I wish i could've either kept it alive but simply at arms length (like make it clear if she insists on these views, I merely can't consider her my closest of friends and that our relationship evolving into anything beyond platonic will be off the table), or just break it off much gentler, without blocking... The subtle contempt I felt before that point has abruptly transformed into much more debilitating shame, guilt and regret since.
To wrap this all up, I guess the main questions I derive from this experience and would like you to give your thoughts on are:
Was I justified in feeling the way I did (even if I might've overreacted?
What would you have done in my place?
Do you think we could've continued being friends like that, that it would've been ok?
And any advice on coping with the consequences of my actions and my grief overall? Surely I'm not the first to have been in this sort of situation, right?
General advice and sources on how to be more compassionate and come off as less zealous when engaging in debates like these?
Bc in left circles, we always argue about how friends can agree-to-disagree, except when it comes to human rights and genocide. Would this have also fallen into that? Since otherwise we're both very pro- any human right you could think of (except she isn't really pro-Palestinian rights, I guess... or technically she is worried about Palestinian women, but only in regards to the violence they suffer at the hands of domestic patriarchy, not recognizing the additional suffering caused by colonialism and that either source of gender-based violence does not justify the other). And isn't there at the same time a common complaint about how the left is so weak because we are so divisive over too many things?? (or does it apply here at all?)
Like do not get it twisted, she is not evil, she is not a zio herself (though one of her fave celebrities is one), she probably has her heart in the right place, she's just very stubborn and was unlucky to have received a half-assed and probably patronizing attempt at education from me, an equally stubborn plus impulsive and hot-headed individual. And now she's surely heartbroken too, maybe even more than I am. She is a very forgiving person, but I doubt we could ever get reconcile this time... or if we should even get reconcile at all. Bc now I know I won't convince her to consider a different perspective ever. And if her stance made my uncomfortable, mine probably made her uncomfortable too.
Ok thank you for reading my entire stupid yappery, I'm interested to hear you all.
You were a massive, ginormous peepee. You shouldn't apologize. She's better off without your endless diatribes, purity tests and holier-than-thou "learn or burn" link dumps. Poor girl was like, here's a dweeb who literally supports fundamentalists Islamist terror groups and think raping, mutilating and murdering girls at a music festival is "resistance", but I'm still gonna give his shmuck butt a chance. And you just kept blowing it over and over again. Leave her alone and go be miserable by yourself or with someone who does some useless Palestine virtue signaling street theater.
She didn't "engage" with your nonsense link dumps because she's a mature, emotionally developed human being who prioritized a relationship with you over political disagreements that neither of you have any actual influence over. She didn't need the validation of defeating your viewpoints or convincing you. She gave you the most precious thing she has, herself, her time, her attention, even as you kept insinuating that she was lacking because she didn't submit to your arguments.
I know you're a kid. Do whatever you want. She's better not being around a toxic person, and if you're not one yet, you're well on your way. As for her, don't you worry, she'll put a finger out and guys will line up around the block to give her attention and care and support and love which she deserves.
You didn't expect this on a leftist sub, but here we are. I hope one day you can look back and really see what an ugly person you were to a nice girl who went out of her to overlook areas of disagreement, try to make peace and be with you, something which is very rare in this world.
Neutral is complicit, frick her
- 29
- 68
There's a lot here, but a summary and some key takeaways:
Lady is a feminist and a dominatrix. Decides she wants to fight for social justice in a small South African kingdom. Applies to the Peacecorps; is told that up to half of all Peacecorps volunteers ragequit, and is she absolutely certain she wants to continue fighting for social justice? Says yes, gets in the program, is informed on arrival that there will be no fighting for social justice, since Africans are racist and sexist and the local King will absolutely FAFO the Peacecorps if it fricks around.
Whole country is full of AIDS. 25% of all people have HIV, including 40% (yes) of all pregnant women.
Lots of little details come to light, such as:
A man killed his wife for asking him to wear a condom. Whether this is a reasonable thing to do or not is, evidently, a matter of national debate in their society.
Peacecorps volunteers can't wear anything too slutty, like mom jeans, else they might get r*ped. Having to wear a dress and not being allowed to wear jeans causes her fellow volunteers so much distress that at least one of her coworkers quits.
Libertarianism is rampant. To the point where they have billboards everywhere warning adults that fricking kids will give them AIDS.
It's not just normies, either. Apparently the King himself spotted a middleschooler he wanted to bang; her family tried to flee to England, so he had the Secret Service track her down and abduct her.
Because Africans hate hookers, Peacecorps volunteers find themselves needing to do HIV outreach work while simultaneously avoiding groups with HIV, lest they anger the locals too much.
The Peacecorps offers months of training and ideological reinforcement, but after that, has no idea what the frick it's doing. Every individual volunteer is, evidently, expected to think of something useful to do on their own, if and when they get assigned to a village; there's no "plan". Just liberal 20-somethings, abandoned amongst AIDS-riddled libertarian male feminists, with truckfulls of cash and rapidly souring views on the nobility of underprivileged Africa.
Eventually Our Heroine finds a village where hookers have formed a union, of a sorts, and is like OOO GOODY as a hooker myself, that's for me.
Unfortunately, it turns out most of the hookers aren't actually hookers. They're fake hookers, only telling the NGOs that they work as hookers because they expect government gibs earmarked for s*x workers. There is, apparently, no way of screening any of them, so everyone loots the hooker aid money and nobody cares.
But whatever, some of them are probably hookers right?
The local NGOees hit on a brilliant plan to convert the "hookers" into car wash attendants - even though there's almost no cars, and the only "road" in the community is a mud track that makes cleaning an effort in futility.
But the car wash is abandoned halfway through the building process, after the money is handed out but before anything concrete and workable is in place. Instead of waiting to finish the wash (which would have been an economic failure anyways, given the aforementioned lack of roads), the Peacecorp Kids organize a press event and take a bunch of photos to go on their resumes, before every single one of them leaves.
The half-finished car wash is abandoned and the Africans go back to hooking. Only lasting legacy are the news reports touting the success of those bright-eyed white liberals helping African hookers get on their feet.
The fact that she, also, fricked off out of Africa and cynically hates her Peacecorps work, same as the rest of the buttholes she worked with, goes unremarked.
OH, and frick Trump and Elon, they're the real problem, even though aid doesn't work it's important we support it anyway. Maybe she'll explain this in a subsequent article...?
- 5
- 15
- kaamrev : Death to vatziggers and magatards
- 8
- 18
3 buses exploded in Israel tonight and undetonated bombs were found on another 2 buses.
— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) February 20, 2025
According to initial reports, they were supposed to explode tomorrow at 9am but instead exploded tonight at 9pm when the buses were empty and not in use pic.twitter.com/iX9h0WLfXB
- 19
- 31
SNL had Tom Hanks play a racist Trump supporter who wouldn’t shake a Black man’s hand. This propaganda is dumb and isn’t funny.
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 17, 2025
When will they learn?? pic.twitter.com/b5s5culphF
For those of you not in the know, Black Jeopardy is a recurring SNL sketch in which the trivia categories are replaced with Black slang,. Naturally, many of the jokes use Black stereotypes as the punchline, so you'd think rightoids would love this. Sadly, the chuds of the moment are too thin-skinned to appreciate this.
8 years ago, Tom Hanks joined Black Jeopardy as Doug, a Trump supporter (hick) who fits into the show perfectly due to a shared distrust of elites, but is reluctant to shake the host's hand.
Recently, as part of the 50th Anniversary, SNL did another Black Jeopardy. It was the least funny one so far, but that's not important. At the end, Doug appears and does the same thing as before (getting a question right, is reluctant to shake the host's hand).
Rightoids were not having this, proclaiming and
finding common ground to be instead to mockery of all rightoids, and an expression of the liberal elite's pure contempt for them.
You can see some here: https://x.com/search?q=libs+of+tiktok+tom+hanks, but here's a few others:
Add another chapter to the book “Why We May Never Lose Again.” Unbelievably offensive. They’ve learned nothing. https://t.co/7Geqszjafc
— Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) February 17, 2025
POS snob who thinks he's better than us. https://t.co/ECY4dXgDjQ
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) February 17, 2025
And here's Elon retweeting the time-honored tradition of "all my enemies are libertarians":
- 8
- 17
Was on hinge (mistake #1) talking to a guy who was a massive Ariana Grande stan (mistake #2). He mentioned her and how much he loved her music, and I mentioned something about liking her music (lie) but I'm worried about how she looks right now. Immediately this man went off about (exact words) how "problematic" it is for me, "as a man", to "gossip about women's bodies". I'm not trying to gossip, I'm genuinely concerned. She's bone. It's horrifying to see, especially in the face of younger girls/gay men [lets be real] who may end up thinking there isn't a thing wrong with being that skinny, and any comment of genuine concern is "gossip". Even worse, this didn't seem like the opinion of some one off arianapilled r-slur, but a pretty popular opinion online to just ...not mention how she looks in any context. I'm genuinely worried. She looks incredibly sick.
https://old.reddit.com/r/redscarepod/comments/1itnjqz/ariana_grande_looks_like_absolute_shit_and/
- 2
- 13
Top Drama
Score | Post | Subreddit | Ratio | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔘 | The current state of this country has me panicking. I'm having pani... | /r/confession (11M) | 60% | 13453 |
🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘 | AITAH for refusing to split rent evenly with my girlfriend after sh... | /r/AITAH (3M) | 54% | 1190 |
🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘 | I'm that one who decided to stay with my cheating wife... with cond... | /r/TrueOffMyChest (3M) | 59% | 1257 |
🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘 | New rule. No more post about USA, Trump, or reaction to their bulls... | /r/EhBuddyHoser (67K) | 53% | 878 |
🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘 | What if instead of "Gulf of America" we settled on "Gulf of the Ame... | /r/whatif (31K) | 56% | 597 |
🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘 | President's day protest | /r/idahofalls (10K) | 49% | 355 |
🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘 | Anyone else think AI is overrated, and public fear is overblown? | /r/ArtificialInteligence (2M) | 52% | 317 |
🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘 | Lift malfunction | /r/Unexpected (12M) | 64% | 417 |
🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘 | Can we all agree MILEZPERPROWER just made the best Ragatha design e... | /r/Amazingdigitalcircus (34K) | 51% | 300 |
🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘 | Trudeau is finally talking about the "crushing U.S. tariffs." But e... | /r/XGramatikInsights (129K) | 47% | 264 |
Relative Drama (takes into account the size of the subreddit)
Score | Post | Subreddit | Ratio | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
🤓🤓🔘🔘🔘 | President's day protest | /r/idahofalls (10K) | 49% | 355 |
🤓🔘🔘🔘🔘 | Ilhan Omar DID marry her brother and said she would 'do what she ha... | /r/altmpls (9K) | 47% | 218 |
🤓🔘🔘🔘🔘 | Elizabeth Warren just ASSAULTED me on camera for asking her WHY she... | /r/UsaNewsLive (3K) | 48% | 57 |
🤓🔘🔘🔘🔘 | What if instead of "Gulf of America" we settled on "Gulf of the Ame... | /r/whatif (31K) | 56% | 597 |
🤓🔘🔘🔘🔘 | Hot take: a lot of y'all are overreacting to the so-called PDF alle... | /r/AMBERLYNN_Snark (13K) | 59% | 205 |
🤓🔘🔘🔘🔘 | New rule. No more post about USA, Trump, or reaction to their bulls... | /r/EhBuddyHoser (67K) | 53% | 878 |
🤓🔘🔘🔘🔘 | Mal/Kendrick | /r/RoryAndMalPodcast (12K) | 50% | 124 |
🤓🔘🔘🔘🔘 | This is why Sonic 3 was so good, took inspiration from the best mov... | /r/SnyderCut (21K) | 52% | 196 |
🤓🔘🔘🔘🔘 | Can we all agree MILEZPERPROWER just made the best Ragatha design e... | /r/Amazingdigitalcircus (34K) | 51% | 300 |
🤓🔘🔘🔘🔘 | I really hate when socialists do the "markets need infinite growth!... | /r/economicsmemes (33K) | 47% | 185 |
autodrama: returning jobs to dramneurodivergents.
Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion
- 17
- 49
The dude who tried to crash Kendrick Lamar‘s Super Bowl set by running out on the field with the Palestinian and Sudan flag, was a Sudanese tether
— Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸 (@tariqnasheed) February 10, 2025
😐#NonFBAnonsense pic.twitter.com/x4iIin13pj
People know they hate to see a real FBA win
Imagine being 43 years old and being this cringe
He's from the Congo but cares more about Palestine... curious
True American FBA patriots are lighting up ICE's phones over this
- 44
- 100
-
Y
: Ngl she a baddie fr fr ♡
- 5
- 33
Clips from an abandoned video on /r/dating_advice, the editing was a huge b-word. Might be worth finishing though.
What should I do? !poll_voters
- 2
- 7
- 17
- 66
And by 'destroy' I mean 'cause a nationwide blackout' and by 'monkey' I mean 'monkey'.