None
13
is lauriewired trans

shes cute but in kind of a gay way, so i think she may be trans

also woman into low level shit = trans :marseyagree:

None

!applechads iOS 18 is somehow even more soulless than previous recent iOS versions.

None

I have $11k to play with - most of which will end up going towards car expenses. I have to spend like $3000 of it before the end of the year for reasons I won't elaborate on. So it's this, or putting money into the Porsche, and I can't use the Porsche during the winter so it would lack the gratification I'm seeking to do so.

I used to be a professional photographer (www.bradgillette.net) and during the process became really good at Photoshop.

Then I stopped working, my computer got old (2013 i7 iMac), and I couldn't edit in Photoshop anymore because my computer was too slow. I don't know if I'm going to be able to become a professional photographer again, or if it's just going to be a hobby, but I'm worried I've lost a lot of my skills from lack of use. I feel like having a new, more powerful computer will inspire me to get back into it. In the meantime I've gotten really good at nailing shots in-camera and doing very minor editing, basically limited to what I could do in a physical color darkroom. That said, my images could always be improved with Photoshop.

I bought my current computer, a 2020 M1 MacBook Air, a couple years ago to do normal computer things and minor editing with my old camera (Canon 5D mkII) but now I have a new camera (Canon 5R) that produces much larger file sizes and it's too slow to run Photoshop to any useful extent and using Lightroom is painful.

I also want to get back into video production.

Should I dump $3500 into a laptop that could do everything I could ask of it, even though I don't have the income stream to support it at the time, and use it for practice? Or should I look at cheaper options like around $2500. I feel like if I don't spend the extra $1000 it'll come to bite me in the butt in the future.

This post is brought to you by weed, adderall, and lack of sleep thinking about this darn computer.

None
None

					
					
					
	

				
None
Reported by:
  • DickButtKiss : Thee smallest amount of hydration u can survive on is the healthiest, anything more is excess
  • XD : The human body wasn't meant to survive on anything but Pepsi Max
  • anonymousm : i have drank nothing but bloxy cola for the past 999999999 years
86
:taychristmas: MAJOR SCIENTIFIC BREAKTHROUGH. LK-99 EAT MY BUTT. :marseyspit:

					
					

Are there actual health benefits of drinking more water?

Publicly released: Tue 26 Nov 2024 at 0300 AEDT | 0500 NZDT

We often get told we should drink more water, but US experts say the actual benefits of increasing water consumption are not well established, so they set out to review the evidence that drinking more water is good for you. They found that while there is a limited number of clinical trials, a small number of studies did suggest increasing your water intake has benefits for weight loss and kidney stones. There were also individual studies which they say raise the possibility of benefits for migraine prevention, UTIs, diabetes control, and low blood pressure. They say that given how cheap and safe water is, we should have more well-designed studies to assess the benefits of drinking more water for these conditions.

paper

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17325817041963813.webp

:marseysmug2#:


If you drank water before today, in any amount at all, you are nothing more than a pseudoscience peddling witch doctor twink.

Thank you Neil.

https://media.tenor.com/YWTX8DTKDT4AAAAx/neil-degrasse-tyson-whatever.webp

Thank you Bill.

https://media.tenor.com/55OsKB_b6k4AAAAx/tongue-out-crazy.webp

Thank you the other Bill.

https://media.tenor.com/InPMVrf6ZhwAAAAx/bill-gates-dab.webp

Thank you Asian Dude.

https://media.tenor.com/y_XkaG5TF7QAAAAx/technology-michio-kaku.webp

Thank you Newton.

https://media.tenor.com/vrzcjLCDmOsAAAAx/the-man-on-whom-the-apple-fell-smrtkoslav.webp

WATER IS GOOD FOR YOU TO DRINK

https://media.tenor.com/qWV_4rXrGywAAAAx/drink-water.webp

LK-99ers would be on suicide watch, but they're all dead. From suicide. :marseysmug:

None
90
:marseyaware:
None
68
[stragged] Bluesky is breaking the rules in the EU :pepejannie:

why is every thread on orange reddit flagged?

None

!burgers - imagine being an EUcel lmao.

None
53
WINDOWS CHADS STAY WINNING :marseydance:

@WindowsShill

None

:#marseytime: :#marseyclock:

None
Reported by:
  • HailVictory1776 : Imagine this jannie saying he can't come in because he's tired. Do your job, what are you paid for?
89
C++ committee member fired due to antisemitic canard in title of Technical Paper ("The Undefined Behavior Question")

Reddit discusses

https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/s/ft8JblfE0a

But it gets jannied

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17324557146029155.webp

And people conplain

https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/s/mhL0P1Jx57

edit: link to paper https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3403r0.pdf

None
46
UNIX == Eunuchs?

https://media.tenor.com/PeHzqp0JccIAAAAx/mind-blown-boom.webp

None
30
Mozilla: DOJ's Plan for Chrome Risks Hurting Smaller Browsers | PCMag :marseyfirefoxgenocide:

Mozilla points to a key but less eye-catching proposal from the DOJ to regulate Google's search business, which a judge ruled as a monopoly in August. In their recommendations, federal prosecutors urged the court to ban Google from offering "something of value" to third-party companies to make Google the default search engine over their software or devices.

"The proposed remedies are designed to end Google's unlawful practices and open up the market for rivals and new entrants to emerge," the DOJ told the court. The problem is that Mozilla earns most of its revenue from royalty deals—nearly 86% in 2022—making Google the default Firefox browser search engine.

As a result, Mozilla says the DOJ's proposal could "unnecessarily impact browser competition,"

"If implemented, the prohibition on search agreements with all browsers regardless of size and business model will negatively impact independent browsers like Firefox and have knock-on effects for an open and accessible internet," Mozilla says. "As written, the remedies will harm independent browsers without material benefit to search competition."

:#marseyemojilaugh: :#marseyfirefoxgenocide:

Kill Chome, kill Furryfox.

https://news.slashdot.org/story/24/11/22/1112255/mozilla-warns-dojs-google-breakup-plan-may-hurt-small-browser-makers

None
None

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1gy285f/t%CF%89itters_heir_apparent_isnt_x_or_threads_its/lylf75h/

None
None
None
95
Oops we made a little fcky wucky

https://9to5mac.com/2024/11/21/openai-accidentally-erased-chatgpt-training-findings-as-lawyers-seek-copyright-violations/

None

					
					

Our post starts off with OP sharing their hypothesis on why very few games are developed for GNU/Linux - not because of low market share, but because of 'backroom licensing and exclusivity deals'.

The post is relatively well received and generates some interesting discussion, but the slapfights begin when OP starts replying to every comment that disagrees with their assertion.

Some comments trimmed for brevity, click the links for the full text. I've linked a few nuggets but OP is all over the comments.


Is Game Pass the same thing as Windows exclusivity?

game pass isn't windows.

OP:

It's money from Microsoft which often implies exclusivity. [...]

Commenter:

Another Linux gaming thread where the poster has revealed how much they don't know. And how much they hate the thing they know nothing about.

OP:

Making vague and accusatory statements does not prove anything.

You're only trying to discredit my idea by insulting me. It's a last ditch effort of someone that lacks arguments of his own.


Do game developers have the facts? Or are their bosses lying to them?

Game developer here. It's not a conspiracy—it really does come down to the number of potential users. [...]

OP:

Indie game devs never get exclusivity deals because of how small their potential sales are.

And if you're working for a big game dev company as a developer then you sure as heck aren't privileged to the reasoning behind your boss's decisions.

All you get is pretenses and platitudes just like any other employee.

Another commenter jumps in and the thread eventually ends with:

You are not providing constructive criticism. Instead, you have insulted me on multiple occasions and you are now personally attacking me with your every reply.

I don't usually block people here but you've crossed a line I cannot tolerate.

I really hope you seek professional help. You are a deeply disturbed individual.


Another game developer adds their take

As a professional game dev I disagree 100%.

I've tried to ask for Linux and macOS support at some of the places I've worked at (because using a different compiler helps flush out bugs) but it is very hard to argue against the data to management AND publishers. [...]

OP:

You disagree because your boss told you something else and you believe him?

Dude...

Commenter:

On one game that we supported Windows and macOS on I looked at the telemetry data first hand on what Operating Systems people were using. macOS was a rounding error. Talking with other game devs the story is ALWAYS the same whether it is it is Linux or macOS.

The Steam Hardware Survey shows the same ~1% data.

You are in complete denial over the facts.


The book club joins the fray

TLDR big word budget, rambling confused conspiratorial nonsense

OP:

If that's a "big word budget" that you didn't read then I'm not going to ask you what was the last book you've read.

Commenter:

It's really just the ratio of words to value that's off here. The last book I read was Ocean at the End of the Lane. I recommend it in general, but I don't think you'd connect with it.


Some commenters just go for the jugular

It's absolutely low market share. It's not that deep and you're not that smart.

OP:

Insulting me does not prove your point. Quite the contrary.

and

why is this theard still up? why isnt this absolute low iq moron banned yet?

OP:

Insulting me only proves your own incompetence.


All this and more in the full comments, sorted by Q&A for your viewing pleasure. You'll have to expand to view most of OP's comments since they've been downmarseyd.


https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/linux_gaming/comments/1guv49z/why_game_devs_do_not_support_linux_and_why_valve/

https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/1gvppkx/do_game_developers_skip_linux_because_of_the_low/

None
None

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Bcachefs-Uncertain-Kernel-Issue

https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1gw75r7/the_future_of_bcachefs_in_the_kernel_is_uncertain/

None
17
Computer vision as a career

How hard would it be to break into the computer vision industry? It seems like if you can combine the hardware and the software it makes you look more valuable to a company, and that's what computer vision engineers do, right? Can you be somewhere between a basic opencv user and the mathematicians making tensorflow and still make decent money doing this stuff?

Anybody that does cv at work, is it a full time thing or just a part of your job?

!codecels

Thanks

None

/r/cpp thread- https://old.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/1guzvuu/on_safe_c/

None

applestrags btfo etc

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.