I ask this because I'm considering the actions of women like Lori Vallow who kill their children before they reach the age of reason so that they can be guaranteed an eternity in paradise. If all children go to heaven, then what's the flaw in the logic? Shouldn't all mothers have as many children as possible and just murder them as infants so she can send as many souls as possible to heaven?

>God doesn't want that!

Sure, I agree. The woman will be darned for murder, but she has guaranteed the salvation of many souls.

>She could have parented her children to be good and saved their souls that way!

No amount of parenting can guarantee a child will turn out a certain way. I was raised Christian and attended a Christian school and here I am, an atheistic adult with no regard for any gods. It seems the only way to guarantee your children will go to heaven is to kill them.

Chuds gonna learn that once you get on that fat c*nt Chtorrr's radar, your subs are dooomed. They made this sub to bypass all the drama from chud posts on /r/GamingMemes. It got banned, so now the chuds are getting bans for repurposing content. Sound familiar? lol

https://old.reddit.com/r/Asmongold/comments/1hmuedc/so_apparently_rfreegamingmemes_got_banned_too/

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/whatifalthist-rudyard-lynch.174154/reply?quote=20166966 - live kiwifarms reaction

- this is the first time ive seen his own comment section turn against him

- his own fan groomercord

millions must celebrate new years

Somebody do the effort for me and find the Juicy slap fighting, I'm on farm a d can't really link on phone

Whole thread 🧵🧵🧵 is soys Vs Coomers Vs chuds Vs Feminazis

That pretty much sums it up.

This was eye-opening.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 27, 2024

How will things shake out for our African friend? He's nervous posting like crazy

Post he is responding to

So basically the right split into two factions, tech right and right right, and the tech right is like "hey we need h-1b visa people to do the jobs," and the right right was like "no you need to hire americans," and the tech right is like "but you guys are r-slurred," and the… pic.twitter.com/KatlmN6BuX

— Autism Capital 🧩 (@AutismCapital) December 26, 2024

These job listings on @Tesla are incredibly ridiculous. @elonmusk, are you to tell me entry level engineers get compensated this low?

$70K / year is ridiculously low for STEM, but somehow they claim the pay is just fine.

They want more profit, simple!

Get it? pic.twitter.com/0PGhnh1UCA

— Chief Trumpster (@ChiefTrumpster) December 26, 2024

Uh it's uhhh about the talent uhhhhh

🚨 China launches world’s largest amphibious assault warship

The first Type 076 landing helicopter dock (LHD), CNS Sichuan (51), made its debut in Shanghai on Friday and features “significant technological upgrades that place it in a class above its peers.”

Here’s what we know: pic.twitter.com/wNf4OC0C9b

— Ian Ellis (@ianellisjones) December 27, 2024

cost: $ Free

cost: $250

Your artist gave her high poly face low poly thighs

I prefer the left, but because of the lighting, not the art.

If I was scrolling through a list of titles on Steam, that would pop out to me more.

Given, it gives off horror survival vibes, so if your game isn't that, then carry on haha.

The human-made art here is clearly just a bunch of copy/paste, or a screenshot of a game with a filter on it. Look at the columns on the walls. They're all completely identical. Same exact texture on all of them. That doesn't happen when a human actually draws 10 columns. But it does happen when a mediocre artist draws one column and copy/pastes it. Or when they use an asset pack to create a 3D scene and then apply some kind of art filter to it.

So, maybe we can postpone the deep dive into AI vs Human, and just acknowledge that the human artist here did an extremely cheap/sloppy job? Is that what we're supposed to be "supporting" and "protecting" by not using AI art?

The left is AI or the Right? The left looks better to me. Plus some platforms don't like promos where the gun is pointing out. As lame as that sounds. Apple, for example. Ideally, they don't want the gun at all but otherwise pointed away.

Left is ai, it's a PC game and so I wanted it to be similar to other of the genre

I mean... as someone who draws for fun I will say artist did a really fricking bad job with imagine on the right, like super lazy work: left wall is copy-paste city, ceiling is AI generated xd, character looks flat and not even properly cutted from somewhere xd and goddarn this unrealistic shine of light coming straight out of her butt just to achieve any sort of contrast... And AI did much better job at composition because it copied the most and easy common one, your artist had not idea what composition is.

I hope you didn't pay much

Merry Christmas !aichads !g*mers

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Full disclosure: I am a leftist in the USA and while I don't have an issue with the rich or ultra-rich existing, I do have an issue with people existing in abject poverty in the richest country on the planet. (41)

Can you give an example of someone in America living in abject poverty?Medicaid, food stamps, section 8 housing, free k-12 education. Plus local and state programs for internet and phone subsidies. Unless you are mentally unwell and not able to manage these programs, you should never be in abject poverty. (-11)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

No. Inequality is the killer of Capitalism. People forget the real value of money is not living a more comfortable life; it's power. When a small group of people are able to hoard all the money, it means they hoard all the power. When that happens their immediate next step is to close the door behind themselves to prevent other people from getting power, followed by disenfranchising all of the people who could threaten them. This naturally creates an authoritarian state (Socialism, Fascism, Feudalism, etc. are all different flavours of authoritarianism) where a small crowd that thins to a single person who is given control over the destiny and freedom of every person in the state.It's not about giving everyone a decent standard of living; that's a consequence of them having power. It's about keeping the different levels and layers of society functioning and competing to keep things in balance. (134)

This… makes no sense. You get richer by trading/leveraging others' strong qualities while lending them yours - in good faith (do it in bad faith and people will stop trading with you - and you will fall behind no matter the initial edge). This is the opposite of "closing door behind yourself once you get rich". If your theory made slightest sense people would never get rid of slavery, for example. Nor would developed countries invest in underdeveloped ones (that themselves become developed as a result, mind you). (-17)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Tax them properly. Solved. (7)

But then who will we blame for all our problems if not the rich? (0)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

I am wondering where all this poverty is. Not only do I not see it, ever, but we have vast welfare programs that provide all the necessities and more. Our welfare state provides food, clothing, spending money, housing, healthcare, and probably a bunch of other stuff I am completely unaware of. So how is it we have poverty and where is all this poverty?I think the left has mental problems. They suffer from a sick sense of envy, hatred, and greed. Those problems are focused on anyone they currently deem to have too much regardless of how much the individual worked for what they have. They are authoritarian and want to decide how much money an individual can accumulate. They also want to decide how much everyone is afforded regardless of how little they work. They would literally give able bodied people free everything even if those able bodied people sat on their asses all day long and did nothing. (-6)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

I am wondering where all this poverty is. Not only do I not see it, ever, but we have vast welfare programs that provide all the necessities and more. Our welfare state provides food, clothing, spending money, housing, healthcare, and probably a bunch of other stuff I am completely unaware of. So how is it we have poverty and where is all this poverty?I think the left has mental problems. They suffer from a sick sense of envy, hatred, and greed. Those problems are focused on anyone they currently deem to have too much regardless of how much the individual worked for what they have. They are authoritarian and want to decide how much money an individual can accumulate. They also want to decide how much everyone is afforded regardless of how little they work. They would literally give able bodied people free everything even if those able bodied people sat on their asses all day long and did nothing. (-6)

It's the lower income working class where the poverty is at. Due to rising costs in housing and health insurance, middle income earners are slipping into poverty as well. Car insurance and home insurance rising costs are going to bring even more workers into poverty. I would say the high number of adults who don't have kids or are not into marriage/dating are often victims of working class poverty because often they realize they cannot afford family/children, so why bother dating in the first place. (2)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘

I think there's two problems here:2 - All the measures I've seen to lower income inequality ultimately just harm potential business owners and house owners the most.3 - Anecdotal but it feels ridiculous how Leftists get mad at people having money. Like an athlete offers a service and gets paid [X] amount of money for it. How's he at fault for someone else being poor? (3)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/ColorMonochrome

Score: 🐮🐮🔘🔘🔘

Number of comments: 3

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Minimum angriness: 😡😡😡🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

I cannot take them seriously pic.twitter.com/crrm8afoe9

— Lord Miles Official (@real_lord_miles) December 26, 2024

Just a reminder that the algorithm is trying to maximize unregretted user-seconds.

If far more credible, verified subscriber accounts (not bots) mute/block your account compared to those who like your posts, your reach will decline significantly.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 27, 2024

Can't believe this cute twink actually made a good point

Elon the free speech guy is now censoring right wing accounts even though his anger over right wing accounts being censored is what caused him to buy Twitter pic.twitter.com/klwvE7d9SB

— evan loves worf (@esjesjesj) December 27, 2024

I just lost my verification...was told my account is "under review".

Anyone know what's going on?

— Owen Shroyer (@OwenShroyer1776) December 27, 2024

Thank you Aevann and Carp, I love nu rDrama and can't wait to see what latest hijinks @S, @ARNOLD_FRIEND, @Gruestletoe, @DeathToAllChuds, @King-Krazy and @BooMetropolis are up to now!

!anticommunists

!jannies we need a toggle to turn that shit off like yesterday