@Vegeta , @Aevann , can you ban this neighbor @Liquid_Bridge and @laguerna. It's obviously ghost. I know you probably don't care tbh, but the first one is pretending to be me and obviously failing, and the second is larping as a groomercord BIPOC.

Yesso scallop #gijinka #cute

— The Careful Buggy girl❤️🧜‍♀️ (@carefulbug.bsky.social) 2025-02-14T15:17:38.942Z

In the last couple hours, any posts calling for or even just asking about a ban are removed by mods, despite all the comments on said posts before deletion being in support of banning links.

This is especially ironic considering Wicked's entire message is anti-fascist

https://old.reddit.com/r/musicals/comments/1i7sovv/rwicked/

Edit: thanks to user /u/p_rantTA for this link

https://i.imgur.com/a/posts-removed-by-r-wicked-EiSOy5x

https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/1i7vzu2/rwicked_has_removed_a_dozen_or_so_posts_calling/

balancing like 3 books right now. finished a muriel spark in the middle of the night last night while eating salami out of the fridge.

Redditards love tiktok

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1i3xifb/tiktok_says_it_will_go_dark_in_the_us_if/

The typical tiktoker

https://old.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1i3ptft/tiktok_ban_rant/

Tiktokers deserve to be r*ped by ccp officials

https://old.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1i3ybh8/this_is_why_youre_seeing_so_much_chinese/

Social media influencers are dead dead dead!

https://old.reddit.com/r/memes/comments/1i3wpuz/tldr_get_a_real_job_you_lazy_leaches/

Yes yes give me your tears losers!

https://old.reddit.com/r/TikTok/comments/1i40ifk/americans_are_yall_ready_for_tomorrow/

The astounding absurdity of @ThierryBreton 🤡 as tyrant of Europe 😂 https://t.co/fdLp8rbF0M

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 11, 2025

Some former EU something old fart casually admitted that EU was behind the cancelled elections And that they plan to do this to other european countries too. Other countries pre-emptively announced that they discovered russian bot networks influencing their political landscape, and whether is true or not doesn't matter, guess what will happen anyway? ...or maybe he simply meant that european countries have a way to protect themselves from Russia and gave us as an example. Depends on who you ask I guess

No one really reacted here since people choose the interpretation that fits with their worldview and most people are already exhausted and done with the whole mess, regardless of who is actually to blame. But new elections will happen in may, still a long way to go, so maybe some giant scandal will eventually happen. Musk is definitely determined to create one Still, this is a warning. Elections are approaching for other countries too and the question on whether EU or Russia or both is influencing them will be a reoccurring theme. And frankly there are some good chances that this is the last nail in the coffin and that EU won't survive this controversy

So, if the Grand European Union will collapse because of this please remember that we started the whole shit and that we're partially to blame for the upcoming disaster. Frick yeah!

Supposed report

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25486132-report-of-special-counsel-smith-volume-1-january-2025/

https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1i0zbai/is_this_it_jack_smith_release/

https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1i0zl9x/sleep_well_everyone/

https://old.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/1i0zdn9/special_counsel_report_says_trump_would_have_been/

VI. CONCLUSION

On remand from the Supreme Court's decision in Trump, the district court set a litigation schedule whereby the parties would submit briefs regarding whether any material in the superseding indictment was subject to presidential immunity. ECF No. 233. The parties were in the middle of that process when the results of the presidential election made clear that Mr. Trump would be inaugurated as President of the United States on January 20, 2025. As described above, it has long been the Department's interpretation that the Constitution forbids the federal indictment and prosecution of a sitting President, but the election results raised for the first time the question of the lawful course when a private citizen who has already been indicted is then elected President. The Department determined that the case must be dismissed without prejudice before Mr. Trump takes office, and the Office therefore moved to dismiss the indictment on November 25, 2024. See ECF No. 281. The district court granted the motion the same day. ECF No. 283.

The Department's view that the Constitution prohibits the continued indictment and prosecution of a President is categorical and does not tum on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government's proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Office stands fully behind. Indeed, but for Mr. Trump's election and imminent return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

There's no real connection made to any of the contestants. Very few backstories presented, no hometown B-roll or family shown. This is understandable, because there are just so many people it would've been impossible. Tracking contestants at that personalized level would've been a spoiler for future episodes because you'd figure out that person must make it to the next stage to be featured. But the result is that the audience doesn't get as invested in individual stories, and don't want to follow their journey outside the game. Maybe it reflects ratings/views, maybe not. I think it's more likely people just don't follow the contestants because the audience wasn't given the chance to know or care about them as people. (19)

Who cares about the backstory, youre watching the show to see hella people get eliminated in fun games, although the games could be better (2)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

My kids like it but it is terrible, the contestants are awful. I don't know if they are scripted actors or just weird people but seem to over do it. (9)

not scripted actors lol. (1)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

Yea no one is taking a million dollars c'mon you don't think they were paid off to do that. (4)

i don't find it hard to believe no one would take the million lol. it's blood money. you're being very pessimistic. and my brother was in the games, it's not scripted (-1)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡🔘🔘

The biggest problem with these games was most of them in the beginning made it so that people could be eliminated through no fault of their own. It was a dumb way to get rid of a lot of contestants fast. Viewers would see this as not entirely fair. If they only want 60 contestants to fight for the prize, then they should choose 60 people, not 500 or whatever they started out with. I had a chance to get on this show and I refused for this reason, because knowing my luck I would have been in one of those rows where someone takes the money and eliminates me, or get stuck in a group of 50+ who loses because one guy dropped a ball...think about it, a former wide receiver dropped a red playground ball? I wouldn't be surprised if he was a studio plant. It's ridiculous. I'm a former athlete and would have asked for a 10ft circle of space to catch any ball myself. These dumb eliminations don't typically happen in a mr. beast contest, at least not so often. (2)

Angriness: 😡😡😡🔘🔘

There's no real connection made to any of the contestants. Very few backstories presented, no hometown B-roll or family shown. This is understandable, because there are just so many people it would've been impossible. Tracking contestants at that personalized level would've been a spoiler for future episodes because you'd figure out that person must make it to the next stage to be featured. But the result is that the audience doesn't get as invested in individual stories, and don't want to follow their journey outside the game. Maybe it reflects ratings/views, maybe not. I think it's more likely people just don't follow the contestants because the audience wasn't given the chance to know or care about them as people. (19)

the thing that's kills these type of reality tv show games is inauthenticity, everyone has a sob story ("i lost my home, i've struggled very much in life, my family needs this, i have a sick family member", etc.) even tho it is unfortunate everyone in multiple reality game shows have the same rehearsed story atp as much as it sounds mean or insensitive but who knows if they're just making stuff up. at the end of the day they just want money so all these sob stories to move further in the game really doesn't make you root for anyone cause the more people eliminated the more the remaining players will say or do anything to stay. what the show needs is to be cutthroat and really have games where everyone try using their actual skills (7)

Angriness: 😡😡😡🔘🔘

My kids like it but it is terrible, the contestants are awful. I don't know if they are scripted actors or just weird people but seem to over do it. (9)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/Sea-Affect8379

Score: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Number of comments: 1

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡🔘🔘

Minimum angriness: 😡😡😡🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

Transparent

Zoomed

!anime !art !monke

!coons

I have a nespresso machine and usually make a cappuccino at home. If I'm out I'll get a drip or a matcha.

MY MOM MADE ME SPAGHETTI.

Redditors scramble to the defence

Murthy argues in his advisory, noting alcohol consumption is to blame for nearly one million preventable cancer cases in the U.S. over the last decade. About 20,000 people die every year from those alcohol-related cancer cases

They expect people who are drinking enough to get cancer from it to be so into the health food craze to be scared of that? You could eat like 2 fewer hot pockets per year and it would do as much good. Most of these people probably smoke, which is where you've actively made a decision that you're okay with getting cancer.

The hypocrisy of this is just astounding. We put warning labels on alcohol products about stuff that everyone knows (you might actually be worse at driving! ) but for some reason reason out of all food and drink, booze has an exception for nutritional information. Why? When did this start? What possible justification is there for this? Why in the frick would you print any kind of warning on it if you won't even just tell women it's going to make them fat? Why do we go through this charade of pretending the government in Elliot Ness when there's tax incentives for the wine industry, the beer industry, the weed industry, the mushroom industry. Extreme taxes on the tobacco industry because I guess they were actually the ones really hurting people.

The Surgeon General's office has not replied to MNN's request for comments.

Also BTW am I literally the first fricking person in America who ever noticed this? I have never in my entire life ever heard anyone notice that alcohol makes your product less regulated.

!boozers !noalcohol

Happy bday peanut