- 67
- 74
In the dead of winter, on a day with -27°C wind chill, in FiveFinger shoes (my toes are still cold), on icy trails, in a state that hates anything other than cars, on a dead ebike (25kg), and with no additional planning than "I should bring a rope today," I was able to transport a full 4'x8' sheet of plywood from the hardware store to my home for model railroading without any issues at all. If I could do it under these conditions, then anybody could do it under nearly any conditions.
AstroG4 had a problem: He loves trains, but he just doesn't have quite enough wood. Now a normal person would look at the weather, then hop in their GMC Yukon XL Denali and run over fifty children on their way to pick up plywood.
AstroG4's too eco-conscience for that. Instead, he strapped on his goddarn FiveFingers shoes with the individual toes, mounted his glorified Huffy, and braved the subzero temperatures on a non-functioning eBike to prove to the rest of us that you CAN, in fact, transport one full sheet of plywood on a walmart-tier Trek bicycle.
You may be asking yourself "how is that a full 4x8 sheet when it's clearly cut into 4x2 sections?"
Three splices, actually, but perfectly sound logic. I could grind a piece of plywood into sawdust, dump it into a backpack, carry it onto a plane, then reglue it back into a 4x8 sheet and claim I was able to carry-on a sheet of plywood.
But honestly, that's not the reason I'm posting this. Much like the /r/malelivingspaces threads that Carp would post (please do more, they're fun), I want everyone to look at his model trainery.
The more you look, the more you see.
Pieces extending beyond necessary length
Jigsawed paths for curved tracks
Everything is made of scrap remnants you'd normally toss or burn
Drywall screws everywhere
Scrap pieces used as spliceblocks, seemingly using tie-wire to hold them to the main track curve
Thin tinmetal braces held on by a single screw, no washer, in no way actually bracing the legs
The table-thing in the foreground (lower right corner) has a short leg, being extended with a single carriage bolt
Handwriting looks like a fat neurodivergent, using the cheapest tan masking tape he could find.
A single laser-cut cupholder, clearly not his own work
I'm still baffled by how he can be so terrible at woodworking on the right half of the picture, but appears to have functional drawer slides and flush-mounted buttons on the left half.
And since this is Reddit, you guessed it:
thanks and godbless !friendsofxirabolt
- 10
- 66
'Some sources suggested that the reluctance to push ahead with broader [gender change] reform was down to a desire to protect relations with the United States.' So Trump succeeded where a multitude of British women, including lifelong leftists, failed. 1/4https://t.co/V4oUQbCvhg
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) February 9, 2025
However, in spite of the puberty blockers ban, 'separate moves for a transgender-inclusive ban on “conversion therapy” are understood to be going ahead.' This means therapists will be banned from fully exploring why a child wants to transition. 2/4https://t.co/V4oUQbD36O
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) February 9, 2025
We know that children who are neurodivergent, same-s*x attracted and those who've experienced sexual abuse are overrepresented at gender clinics. We also know, from multiple studies, that the vast majority of children grow out of gender dysphoria if allowed to go through puberty. 3/4
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) February 10, 2025
Therapists and gay activists have begged Labour to realise that the affirmation-only model could cause serious, irreparable harm to minors, to no effect. I suppose we have to hope Trump says it soon. Then, maybe, they'll listen. 4/X
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) February 10, 2025
- 4
- 14
Fascism may be defined as a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation, or victim-hood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion.
— Robert O Paxton, _The Anatomy of Fascism (2004)_
- 6
- 48
- 65
- 72
In case you're like me, and had no idea what an "ego death" involves other than a vague awareness of it being some kind of Freudian nonsense:
Oh, he went nuts. Why not just say so?
So Bardfinn was a normal well adjusted functioning adult 20-30 years ago?
Not exactly.
That's right. Our neighbor walked away from the best job he ever had because the boys wanted to go to Hooters.
Now he collects welfare payments and creates AI horrors he can post on BlueSky for 27 likes.
- 21
- 46
Here's the text of one of the resignations, from a former clerk for Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts (conservative judges for the s reading)
I expect you will find someone who is enough of a fool, or enough of a coward, to file your motion. But it was never going to be me.
You can see another here: https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/13/politics/read-acting-us-attorney-resignation-letter-doj-response/index.html
which is from a Federalist society member and Scalia clerk:
And to top it all off, 's Border Czar threatens to renew the charges if he doesn't cooperate with ICE (totally not corruption though):
- nopassword : turkic hands wrote this post
-
FourthAlt
: So tanned greek hands?
- ElverGalarga : You mean Confused Greek hands
-
Y
: Turkeys have wings
- alphabet_machinery : Netflix shilling
- 123
- 120
Netflix made a new documentary about Alexander The Great. Within the first 8 minutes, they turned him gay. pic.twitter.com/y56b4eDkjb
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) February 5, 2024
It’s still unproven speculation and should definitely not be shoved into the first 8 minutes
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) February 6, 2024
Noo it's not proven that Alexander was bussy blasting hot twinks nooo
Hmm..... next thing they will say, he conquered nothing 🙄
— Jeff G. (@jlgusa) February 5, 2024
You can only conquer shit when you're a super straight alpha male like me
they're playing the long game pic.twitter.com/riSWBZEbSb
— Bruce Wayne (Batman) (@IBetmang) February 5, 2024
It was a very long game, the gayreeks have won, gen Z is gay
First step pic.twitter.com/FCN8sqz8Cf
— HENRY 🇳🇬🇷🇺 (@hadean_holocene) February 16, 2024
Chuds (black) are suddenly upset when a euro country embraces it's traditions
2,347 years after his death and they want him to be a "Gay Hero" lol
— AF America (@MagaTalkDaily) February 5, 2024
No one can escape the liberal gayinization
https://x.com/Twitermytweet/status/1754623627377447164
I don't think a guy who conquered whole countries cared too much to keep his enemies' kids alive
Who had Alexander the great is gay on Their bingo card?
— Michelle LA🇨🇦 (@MichelleLA1981) February 6, 2024
Everyone with half a brain cell you r-slur
Thank you!!! Couldnt watch after that.
— Crypto Peepee (@tal_farlow) February 6, 2024
Nobody argues that there was no sodomy but why do they have to film romantic sunlit moments of hair stroking and talking about feelings?
Because gayreeks were sappy kid of strags
Yeah, I'm glad they didn't race swap this one. 🤣🤣🤣
— BrandNewDay (@MakeThoseAngry) February 7, 2024
I know, they could have made him monkeydonian
Turned it off at that moment. It's basically unfounded speculation by leftist academics that he was homosexual or even bisexual. They might as well have cast a black or Asian actor in the role as that would've had as much historical basis.
— Vin Tanner (@VinTanner417682) February 10, 2024
Alexander was the only greek in Greece who didn't frick other men, that's why he was the Great
Make it gay and lame!
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) February 5, 2024
Who else will Netflix turn gay next? Achilles? Is no one safe?
!jannies chud post
- 14
- 43
WARNING THIS POST CONCERNS LEFTISTS SO EVERYTHING IS
Honestly I (f19) feel like I messed up very badly here, despite having been the "more educated" one on the topic. I blame it on my impulsivity, bad debating skills and lack of empathy, and now I regret having cut someone off too quickly. (posting from a throwaway acc. Might delete this post later). Ok, very long wall of text incoming, only read if you have time to care to hear about the troubles of a dumb leftist teen...
We got along greatly, shared a lot of hobbies and interest in the same media, she (f20) seemed to like me a lot, and I might've even developed a crush on her. But then the issue appeared when I once compared the depiction of an oppressive system from "Arcane" to what's going on in Palestine. Turns out she's "neutral", is only focused on the current war (without any regards to the broader historical context) and refuses to support a liberated Palestine bc then Hamas would rule and enforce sharia law (she's specifically concerned about the women. In her own words, she "can't support a country that treats women worse than animals") (also she spoke of Hamas as if they're the only Palestinian semi-governing power, it seems she has never heard of the PA (although I'm aware that they're collaborators of the occupation)). (Also she wrongfully regurgitated the claim that Israel is more tolerant towards other religions.) I told her, among other things, about how Israel forces all of its citizens into military training in order to maintain the occupation, but her only response to that was "yeah, I too wish they would leave the women out of the conscription", completely missing the point. I also mentioned the Nakba, but eh, to no avail. And to be fair, it was probably a mistake on my part to not provide sources right away the first time it came up. I wish I had just sent her the purplewashing-article from decolonizepalestine.com right away instead of wrestling with my weak words. And I feel like in general I didn't address her points and concerns well and precise enough, such as failing to make it clear enough that supporting Palestinian liberation has nothing to do with inherently supporting Hamas' ideology, and the reason most people (including those who'd be marginalized under them) are not condemning them right now is because they (alongside other armed groups of different ideologies) are currently the only effective resistance against Israel in Gaza. And I realize I might've made a crappy transition to that topic in the first place too, it started with me disecting the in-show argument "you're one of the good [members of an oppressed group]" and arguing that a people under occupation can't/shouldn't be separated into "good/harmless civilians" and "armed/evil terrorists", if the root cause of "terroristic actions" is oppression from an outer force and said "terrorists" are sometimes the sole glimmer of hope of their societies. And when I meant to say something in the sense of "Gaza is an example of that, where you can't separate the people based on their reactions to their own oppression, the 'peaceful' ones may disagree with the 'radical's ideology and methods but in the end they still share a common struggle and goal, the true big bad here being the colonial oppressor (for now) who created the conditions for violent resistance and religious fundamentalism to spread in the first place", it ended up coming across to her as "all of Gaza supports Hamas".
Eventually I just gave up arguing, on the basis that "hey, at least she supports a ceasefire too", and we continued our friendship and communication like normal. Though that underlying feeling of frustration and disappointment kept lingering within me...
Some time later, over the course of a few months, we watched some movies together... and some of these movies (e.g. "Wicked") also contained themes of oppression and discrimination, presenting fictionalized depictions of them in fantasy settings, and another one was about colonialism and it's effects on nature. Obviously, when watching these, my brain also inevitably made the connection with Palestine (among other things), but was frustrated knowing that I couldn't tell her that without having to argue again.
Over time, I opted to sprinkle in some political articles (not even just about Palestine specifically, but also White Feminism and other instances of colonialism and imperialism, including an analysis on zionist antisemitism) in my stories inbetween pics of my mundane activities, hoping she'd read them, without me having to shove it in her face directly. But it proves to have been for nothing...
Fast forward, and I share with her a leftist commentary&analysis video about Arcane ("Arcane has always been centrist", great watch btw). We discuss some stuff we agree and disagree on in a civil manner. Eventually I somehow couldn't help but mention Zionism and Palestine in a small side comment again (my bigger argument was not centered around it). She noticed, and got upset again, disagreeing and stating "uhm I disagree, Palestinians aren't oppressed, they are the ones who started it and are being racist towards Israelis". I got annoyed and replied something along the lines of "Bruh, Israelis are the indeed occupiers and oppressors here, how you still so ignorant?" and announced that I'll share some sources for once. She took great offense to being called "ignorant", and claimed she'll also share some from her side.
I took some time for research and sent her several long lists with sources covering several aspects (the beginnings and proof that this is indeed colonialism, casualties comparison, Hamas & PA and other factions, women (including female journ*lists and resistance fighters), greenwashing, ressource distribution...) with some of my own commentary in between (which for once was actually quite calm, objective (Edit: ok the first few messages were emotionally charged too), and non-accusatory). Though it didn't take too long either, because I have already semi-prepared myself for such confrontation. Then I waited. 1 week of silence. Then, her reply finally arrived. It was not as bad as I thought it'd be, but still disappointing. She essentially just wanted to retreat from the argument, refused to share her sources bc "it would only stoke the flames", once more insisted she was already well-informed long before receiving my links since she "has been keeping up with this war for a long time", and suggested we should just shift our focus away from this topic because she otherwise enjoys hanging out and talking with me. I took offense to that, since she essentially admitted to not even have bothered looking at anything I sent. And her offer just... rubbed me wrong. Having to avoid this one topic when it's reflected so often around us, in reality and fiction. And in general, how could she deny the plight of one people, but then preach how "all oppression is wrong"? If she's on a completely different page than I am? So I took only 24hrs to draft different responses, and sent some replies that could be dumbed down to this: "Sorry mate, but if I can't discuss stuff like this with you, we're not compatible" "Also, you mean you can't support guys who commit mass-r*pes, but yet you are fine with me 'supporting them'? (since according to your own logic, pro-Palestine and pro-Hamas are the same thing)" "I really don't want to do this, but I think it'd be better for both of us if we go seperate ways. Goodbye" and one pic with a cartoon saying "We can disagree and still be friends - yeah, on pizza toppings, not genocide". And before she had the chance to respond, I blocked her.
And now I wish I had taken more time to think, before doing any of this. Because now she definitly resents me for good. And it would've not ended like this, had I done things differently from the start. We had plans together, and I ruined them. I wish i could've either kept it alive but simply at arms length (like make it clear if she insists on these views, I merely can't consider her my closest of friends and that our relationship evolving into anything beyond platonic will be off the table), or just break it off much gentler, without blocking... The subtle contempt I felt before that point has abruptly transformed into much more debilitating shame, guilt and regret since.
To wrap this all up, I guess the main questions I derive from this experience and would like you to give your thoughts on are:
Was I justified in feeling the way I did (even if I might've overreacted?
What would you have done in my place?
Do you think we could've continued being friends like that, that it would've been ok?
And any advice on coping with the consequences of my actions and my grief overall? Surely I'm not the first to have been in this sort of situation, right?
General advice and sources on how to be more compassionate and come off as less zealous when engaging in debates like these?
Bc in left circles, we always argue about how friends can agree-to-disagree, except when it comes to human rights and genocide. Would this have also fallen into that? Since otherwise we're both very pro- any human right you could think of (except she isn't really pro-Palestinian rights, I guess... or technically she is worried about Palestinian women, but only in regards to the violence they suffer at the hands of domestic patriarchy, not recognizing the additional suffering caused by colonialism and that either source of gender-based violence does not justify the other). And isn't there at the same time a common complaint about how the left is so weak because we are so divisive over too many things?? (or does it apply here at all?)
Like do not get it twisted, she is not evil, she is not a zio herself (though one of her fave celebrities is one), she probably has her heart in the right place, she's just very stubborn and was unlucky to have received a half-assed and probably patronizing attempt at education from me, an equally stubborn plus impulsive and hot-headed individual. And now she's surely heartbroken too, maybe even more than I am. She is a very forgiving person, but I doubt we could ever get reconcile this time... or if we should even get reconcile at all. Bc now I know I won't convince her to consider a different perspective ever. And if her stance made my uncomfortable, mine probably made her uncomfortable too.
Ok thank you for reading my entire stupid yappery, I'm interested to hear you all.
You were a massive, ginormous peepee. You shouldn't apologize. She's better off without your endless diatribes, purity tests and holier-than-thou "learn or burn" link dumps. Poor girl was like, here's a dweeb who literally supports fundamentalists Islamist terror groups and think raping, mutilating and murdering girls at a music festival is "resistance", but I'm still gonna give his shmuck butt a chance. And you just kept blowing it over and over again. Leave her alone and go be miserable by yourself or with someone who does some useless Palestine virtue signaling street theater.
She didn't "engage" with your nonsense link dumps because she's a mature, emotionally developed human being who prioritized a relationship with you over political disagreements that neither of you have any actual influence over. She didn't need the validation of defeating your viewpoints or convincing you. She gave you the most precious thing she has, herself, her time, her attention, even as you kept insinuating that she was lacking because she didn't submit to your arguments.
I know you're a kid. Do whatever you want. She's better not being around a toxic person, and if you're not one yet, you're well on your way. As for her, don't you worry, she'll put a finger out and guys will line up around the block to give her attention and care and support and love which she deserves.
You didn't expect this on a leftist sub, but here we are. I hope one day you can look back and really see what an ugly person you were to a nice girl who went out of her to overlook areas of disagreement, try to make peace and be with you, something which is very rare in this world.
Neutral is complicit, frick her
- 187
- 166
Congrats to Mexico voters! 🇲🇽
— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) February 3, 2025
*MEXICAN PRESIDENT SHEINBAUM SAYS HAD A GOOD CONVERSATION WITH TRUMP
*WILL DEPLOY 10,000 NATIONAL GUARD IMMEIDATLEY TO BORDER TO AVOID TRAFFICKING OF DRUGS TO U.S.
*TARIFFS DELAYED FOR A MONTH https://t.co/qJ4oI08guG
Blackface trusted the bean yenta to team up on Donald and he got fricked
She's kinda based for it tbh
- JimieWhales : >dailymail >considers KEEP YOURSELF SAFE for being British, OP
- 75
- 127
OI GUVNAH YEW GO' A LOICENSE F'DAT DEYUH POIN'Y KNOIFE COR BLOIMEY INNIT?
A Hollywood actor who glamorizes psychotic murderers on death row as the good guys told England to ban pointy knives
!burgers point and laugh at the !britbongs
- 5
- 6
/u/Gn0slis, ex-Gn0sis, is a Satan worshiping r-slur who both supports Trump and yet is a self proclaimed anarchist. Has returned to Reddit. I originally hit him with reportmaxxing because he was an insufferable twat with no sympathy for Palestinians (imagine that)
He supports Gnostic fascism, a death cult that wants to return the world to chaos and destroy the cosmos. His AMA is horrific.
On a side note, sorry for being inactive. Building a house chews through your time.
- 96
- 128
Hi! It's now February, and you know what that means - it's time for our annual Donkey Kong December celebration!!!!
Unlike last year (but like the year before!), this time around there are
NEW BADGES
and as you know I am extremely sleep deprived, so I will mostly be just copypasting from this thread here https://rdrama.net/post/156812/diddykongdancediddykongscaredkongmaxxing-event-badges-galore-diddykongscareddiddykongdance
NOTE: Badges appear on profiles in the order they were granted, so I will be paying out in order so as to spell K-O-N-G. So if you're just doing the G (name and stuff), that will be paid out after the event.
SUBMIT A DONKEY-KONG THEMED BANNER TO EARN YOUR K. No low effort, quality control will be exercised. You know the drill by now with how banners work.
Protip: Here is a fantastic Donkey Kong font - https://fontmeme.com/donkey-kong-font/. There are a huge number of Donkey Kong assets out there if you don't feel like creating your own.
Submit here: https://rdrama.net/submit/banners
SUBMIT A DONKEY KONG-THEMED SIDEBAR PIECE TO EARN YOUR O. Requirements: Must incorporate Marsey or another mascot (bardfinn counts if you want). No low effort, quality control will be exercised.
Submit here: https://rdrama.net/submit/sidebar
N
SUBMIT A DONKEY-KONG THEMED MARSEY or DONKEY KONG EMOJI TO EARN YOUR N. Requirements: None for Marseys, you know the drill with those by now. For straight up DK emojis, these need to be transparent background animated assets from the games. No low effort Marseys, quality control will be exercised.
Submit here: https://rdrama.net/submit/emojis
NOTE: Game assets should be submit under the new "Donkey Kong" category. Marseys still go under Marsey.
ROCK A KONG-THEMED NAME (USE "KONG" SOMEWHERE), PFP AND PRONOUNS TO EARN YOUR G. It really is that simple. The G symbolizes that you are a real and true G. Anthems, profile backgrounds, and banners aren't required because I don't have time to check all of that, but it is strongly encouraged. If you're found to have de-konged yourself before the end of the event (TBD at this time), you will LOSE YOUR G.
If you've kongmaxxed your name, leave a comment in this thread - https://rdrama.net/post/338843 - and I will review at end of event and badge those who stayed true to the faith.
BUT WAIT THERE IS MORE
ALL COINS FROM VOTES ARE DOUBLED
THAT'S EIGHT COINS PER THREAD VOTE AND TWO COINS PER COMMENT VOTE
AND ALSO
LOOTBOXES ARE BACK IN THE SHOP
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3114/f3114c6dbb22b25b198320fa1648463f7b6f043b" alt=":#kiddykongdru!ms: :#kiddykongdru!ms:"
- 7
- 17
- 13
- 60
- 36
- 64
Halftime show sucked
https://old.reddit.com/r/insanepeoplefacebook/comments/1ilvnzl/here_comes_the_racism/
s ruin magic
https://old.reddit.com/r/magicTCG/comments/1iln7lb/maros_final_word_on_dei_in_magic/
New hampshire chud victory
Trump derangement syndrome can be cured
https://old.reddit.com/r/Omaha/comments/1ilscfa/its_been_getting_increasingly_worrisome_out_here/
Asians don't need the democrats
Magic the gathering again
https://old.reddit.com/r/freemagic/comments/1ilorsr/since_it_is_already_locked_in_the_main_sub_here/
- 41
- 77
It’s ironic that the only NATO member to ever have invoked Article 5 (mutual defence) is America, after 9/11, yet it’s the first to say it won’t honour it for others.
— Grindell Matthews Fella🇺🇦🇬🇧 #NAFO (@MyDeathRay) February 13, 2025
I hope you Americans don’t ever need help again pic.twitter.com/KFPtxke7EU
- 13
- 13
So I'm at work and I'm about to start working a different schedule than the one I've been on for the past few months. This is all well and good, and I've known about it for several months at this point. As the day of the change approaches I'm talking to my manager about some other stuff and he says "By the way what was your new schedule again? Because what you told me the last time we talked about it doesn't match what's in the system."
Turns out someone fricked up the paperwork and my new schedule in the system is slightly off from what was in the announcement months back. While slightly less convenient, it's barely different from what I was already expecting so I'm thinking okay whatever. I just really really REALLY need my time off requests that I put in forever ago adjusted to match the new schedule.
Apparently this is not a simple ask. I got pulled into chief HR's office at the end of the day and was informed that the issue had been passed all the way up to corporate legal and they were going to offer to honor the schedule I was originally presented with in the announcement "as a gesture of goodwill (please don't sue us)". I declined and made it clear that I reeeeeaaaaallly don't give a shit about the minor schedule adjustment, I just need my PTO moved. Response was "we technically still can't force that through, you'll have to get $other_department to override it for you if you decide to keep the adjusted schedule."
So now the shitty part is that I know exactly who fricked up the paperwork and I'm worried that I've made enemies out of her entire chain of command. And all for nothing, because I still don't have a guarantee that I'll get my time off. I just wanted my fricking PTO fixed.
This is at a fortune 100 megacorp (doebeit at a very low level because I am an unambitious lazy r-slur).
- 23
- 41