A 24-year-old binge-eating live-streamer died while broadcasting a 10-hour food binge on cake, chicken fingers, and seafood to thousands of her followers.

Pan Xiaoting, from China, died last week from a suspected stomach tear while gorging on 10kg (22lbs) of food, including what appeared to be chocolate cake.

Autopsy results revealed that her stomach had become severely deformed and filled with undigested food, suggesting that her stomach could have burst, causing stomach acid and food to leak into her abdomen.

Pan Xiaoting live-streamed her 10-hour food marathon on July 14 when she collapsed. Viewers reportedly tried to provide remote help, but it wasn't enough.

She had recently been hospitalized with stomach bleeding though it's not clear how long ago she was discharged.

Stock mukbang photos:

God darn I am an absolute King @pizzashill would die trying to do my job lmao

What this implies is future models will be even better at sounding smart but even more likely to hallucinate and give you wrong answers.

The future is r-slurred.

OP comes to /r/dalmatians to show off their new pup, users debate the semantics of "adopt" vs "shop" and the ethics surrounding backyard breeding.

"So what the dog should be put down?"

"Do you mean bought, or you found at a rescue?"

Bro it's not an opinion it's adopting or buying. Did you pay money then you bought the dog it's not a hard fricking concept you're dying on the dumbest hill for no reason.

Cry about it snowflake

"That's from a BYB and you're going to have issues with her in the future. Good luck with that. You also didn't "adopt" her."

PSA for everyone thinking I don't realized possible future health issues.. I am aware, and preventive measures will be taken to the best of my abilities. If issues do arise I promise y'all swift actions will be taken. This isn't my first Dal, or dog for that matter. As of right now she's just as happy and healthy as every other dog out there. I'd appreciate it if y'all wouldn't talk about her like she's some kind of abomination. (Also I researched the breeder before purchasing and found zero negative reviews on the pups said person has produced) Yes the first pic of her is in a cage, no that is not where she was kept until someone were to purchase her. The breeder has a farm with plenty of acres for her animals to run around on. And for the second picture she was car sick when I brought her home so she wasn't feeling too hot. Thank you, and god bless you.

Yeah and I'll buy another from them if this pup turns out as good as I think she's going to, even ethical breeders can be just as bad as unethical ones. Sorry but the piece of paper doesn't matter to me.. the dog does.

https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/1e9yws4/things_get_spotty_in_rdalmatians_when_op_adopts_a/

I decided to pay my favorite subreddit, /r/forwardsfromklandma a visit and found a version of this comic edited as the Barbie movie (for some reason) and about the Mr. Beast :

Of course, the redditards jump at a chance to defend their own kind.

If she did groom kids; she's still a she. No one refers to cis men who groom kids as anything other than their preferred pronouns.

It's like they see the comic then decide to just be the person in the comic

Also I love that for every 1000 p-dophile pastors if 1 trans or queer person preys on a child all of us have to apologize for it. The right has shown time and time again they don't care or hold themselves to any standards, let alone the same ones we observe.

I think we should still stick in the realm of facts and reality. Priests/pastors technically abuse children at rates lower than the average for people with access to children in general. That means if being trans/queer is a minor predictor for NOT committing sexual crimes, it's most charitable to put trans folks 1-for-1 on even footing with pastors, not (the clear hyperbole) 1000 to 1.

I spoke in hyperbole but was well aware of it, you quote statistics that you don't have or didn't present. /r/notadragqueen and /r/pastorarrested are where I get my hyperbolic view point from. I'm well aware I don't know the statistics but to claim pastors are as bad as queer folk when committing sexual abuse of minors seems like a lie. Religion is a breeding ground for pedophilia because it teaches humans they're allowed to have power over others. That just simply isn't the case for the queer community. It obviously does happen and is terrible, but one community sweeps pedophilia and child molestation under the rug whereas there is at least some culpability in progressive spaces.

Religion has been harming people and children for 2000 years, queer folk just exist.

Real schizo hours right here. This neighbor just admits to now knowing actual statistics then pretends that progressives hold pedos accountable.

boy i sure am sick of hearing about this already

Well, just better sweep it under the rug, then.

Well yes, no matter what one has done one should be gendered correctly. If hitler transitioned i would call hitler she, and kill that motherlover.

Possible hot take: I think we should all correctly gender Chris-chan, whether you believe her transition was in good faith or not. She's a monster, but I don't want to start drawing lines where it is and isn't okay to intentionally misgender someone.

Hitler and Chris Chan brought up in the same chain. There has to be some internet law about this…

It's no about respecting a person or something like it. It just simple correct grammar: you refer to someone by their pronouns, because thats how you refer to them.

Redditard acts like this isn't a political issue and is actually about grammar. lol. Lmao, even

All I'm going to say is that you don't often see the "groomed" kid—now adult— taking to Twitter to say they weren't groomed.

This brought to you by the "kids should be able to consent" party! This comment is currently +25 upmarseyd by the way…

All this makes me so angry. Like as far as I know the accusations are false, but everyone is ignoring that and running with being bigoted to Ava because she's trans.

Yes, I too, am pretty sure there's no way a guy () who had secret chats and meet ups with minors and owned cartoon child porn would do anything inappropriate…

Nobody called EDP the hard r. The whole situation is just an excuse to be transphobic without consequences.

Someone did indeed call EDP the hard r.

Hahahahaha I'm gonna leave it on that one. Plenty of other r-slurred takes in there to comb through, but I'll leave that to the rest of you dramatards.

>capitalism le good!

>griftoids who are only interested in profiting off terminally neurodivergent anti-woke cute twinks go after the best money offers, which said money comes from mega-corps who are inevitably involved with DEI and ESG consulting in current year

>NOOOO NOT LIKE THIS, CAPITALISM LE GOOD, BUT CORPORATIONS LE BAD, REAL CAPITALISM HAS NEVER BEEN TRIED !commies

!grillers !g*mers THE ONLY "GG" THAT I KNOW IS FOR "GRILLER G*MERS"!

https://rdrama.net/chat/1

!boozers this is me anytime you doubt our crusade to Jack Daniels Jannah

Turn off the Olympics. https://t.co/uemrwp6Bbw

— Gays Against Groomers Scottsdale (@GayNotGroomerAZ) July 27, 2024

King Olympics

Even somehow united christian and lgbt

!cuteandvalid

Reminder I have a survey to date me! I've found partners via this method before; if you think we might be compatible, feel free to fill it out <3 pic.twitter.com/BjlETCMYpv

— Aella (@Aella_Girl) July 24, 2024

@r-slur do your thing.

MOIDS MAD:

This is victim blaming:

!fellas

Dramatards, !catholics in January I was in La Plata, that's the capital of the Buenos Aires province as the City of Buenos Aires is kind of like the District of Columbia being a separate entity.

La Plata is a planned city founded in 1880 by the Buenos Aires governor Dardo Rocha.

This is what La Plata looks like from the air

The cathedral is located in from of the central square and is dedicated to "Our of Lady of our Sorrows". It was designed in a neogothic style by the architect Pedro Benoit who was also an urbanist and developer of the layout of La Plata.

Here are some pics I took from the cathedral

!engineering

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

I think you're taking a pretty narrow view of "force" here. Force isn't just a government thing. Society is just as capable of oppressing you as the government is. A society that "expects" you to have children and shuns you for not doing so is not a free society. So while your tactics may not even involve government (and I don't say "may" rhetorically; I don't know what exactly your preferred tactics for achieving your goals wrt natalism are), that doesn't necessarily absolve them. (9)

Expecting is not forcing. Arguing is not forcing. Advocating is not forcing. Using force is forcing. (-5)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

🙄. Deeper? Having children is a wonderful experience, but it does not make you special or your lifestyle any more valid than someone who chooses not to have children. People having concerns about being forced into child rearing is a valid concern. In the US we have politicians forcing their beliefs onto a population of people who don't agree with anti choice policies. In the process they are damaging an already fragile medical system. So people do have the right to be concerned and express their views. (-1)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

I never said anything about morality. (4)

Then why the frick would you call yourself an antinatalist? It's like you all wanna make up your own definitions of the word. (-4)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

So an unconscious person in a coma... They can be killed? An infant or elderly person who can't express their will. Killing is fine?Do you think it's morally justified to kill suicidal people, because in that moment it's their will? (2)

Unless they have said you can kill them, no. You are usurping their established will. Again, you are usurping their established will. To clarify, I assume that someone who continues to live their life is establishing their will even if they aren't expressly saying " I want to live"No, I would say that would be similar to letting someone on a psychedelic kill themselves. İt may be their will now, but I don't think they are sane enough to actually make that decision. I am assuming that they are suicidal because of depression though. İf they are suicidal because they have some tangible reason then sure. (2)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Killing is justified in war only when it's in defense. Just because it's on the scale of a war that doesn't mean murder is justified. I don't believe the state has the right to kill for justice. They aren't God.Plenty of people cannot "assert their will" for life. Infants, some elderly, people in a coma... Their life should still be protected. I'm also in favor of saving suicidal people, even if it's against their immediate will. They have succumbed to darkness and need to be helped out of it.It's knowledge I've gained through lived experience. (0)

I agree, it doesn't make murder justifiable.The state gets its power from the people. If the people decide the state has the right to kill someone then they have that right. God doesn't play into our justice system, only people. I would say those in a coma and the elderly have previously asserted their will, so you would be violating that if you killed them. Infants are able to assert their will. They can tell you what they do and do not like. They can't comprehend death, but I think it's fair to assume that something that has experienced life would want to continue living. So you would rather someone suffer through late stage terminal cancer that will result in their death than end their suffering early? What harm is done? It's anecdotal and rather cyclical. Look, I think life has some meaning, but I accept that I have projected that meaning onto my reality. Other people have other meanings that are just as valid as there is no way to prove my POV is better than another person's as... (3)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

You didn't explain why it would be irrelevant. You merely asserted that people who are already alive know other people, and those people might be harmed by someone's death. But that is, again, something you don't know in the question I asked. Everyone might hate this person and they might hate being alive; you might even be stopping a suicide attempt. But you are certain it's the right thing to do.So it appears you are fine forcing people who are already alive to continue living (because of their connections to other people), but not OK with forcing unborn people to come into existence. The interesting thing about this position is that you don't really afford anyone with agency or dignity: "Whether or not they want to live is less important than the negative effect them dying would have on those around them. They must be forced to live."Do you really believe this? (0)

Your question is stupid from the very beginning. The person you save could be revealed as Hitler or Jesus depending on the point you're trying to make. Of course I can't know who the person I'm saving is, but it's a fair bet that someone will be sad when they die. I never said that's guaranteed, just more likely than not. There are zero inconsistencies here. It's about the reduction of pain, and suicide creates more pain than it alleviates. And it's not me who gives these people no agency because I didn't create them. It all comes back to the parents forcing them to exist.Edit: oh just realized they deleted their account, perfect (2)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/weedbeads

Score: 🐮🐮🔘🔘🔘

Number of comments: 24

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

waa waaa waaaa where's the reddit thread

https://old.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1eas6yg/hulking_transgender_athletes_take_gold_silver_and/

https://old.reddit.com/r/SeattleWA/comments/1eairzp/transgender_athletes_win_clean_sweep_at/

https://old.reddit.com/r/centrist/comments/1ealnjg/transgender_athletes_take_gold_silver_and_bronze/

!transphobes in shambles

Transgender athletes swept the board in a 1-2-3 at a prestigious women's cycle race over the weekend, infuriating fans and leaving female competitors in the shade.

Every medalist in the elite women's Madison at Washington's Marymore Grand Prix on Friday had a trans athlete on the two–person team, marking the first time trans women are known to have had a place on every podium spot in a race.

Race venue the Jerry Baker Memorial Velodrome in Redmond warns it will not tolerate 'bullying or derogatory comments especially related to race, creed, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, physical or mental disability'.

But the sight of the heavily-built winners towering over their rivals and teammates on the podium has dismayed fans of the sport.

'This is so egregious I can't imagine how people watched this happen and thought this was ok,' wrote one.

Leading the field was Jordan Lothrop who was achieving podium finishes against men in the Victoria Cycling League in her native Canada as recently as last year.

The sailing fan from British Columbia has worked as a Mechanical Engineering Technologist and was ranked 22nd in the men's Victoria Cycling League this time in 2023.

Second place went to Jenna Lingwood, 43, who raced as a man until 2017 and is now a member of the Oregon-based women's cyclocross squad Team S&M.

She is a physics graduate of the University of Washington who works in Portland for Intel as a Supply Chain R&D Engineer.

Californian Eva Lin, 28, used to race as Henry Lin for San Jose State University's men's team, but his placings have soared since he switched to its women's team in 2022.

Taking third spot was Californian Eva Lin, 28, who used to race as Henry Lin for San Jose State University's men's team, but whose placings have soared since she switched to its women's team in 2022.

The sport's governing body, the Union Cycliste Internationale, last year banned transgender athletes who have transitioned after male puberty from competing in international events.

USA Cycling introduced new rules in January requiring transgender athletes to undergo 'elite athlete fairness evaluations' by independent medical panels if they wish to compete in top events.

They must also prove that their testosterone levels have been below 2.5 nanomoles per liter for at least 24 months.

But those competing at amateur level need only compete a 'self-identity verification request', which will be reviewed by a USA Cycling Technical Director.

The rule change came amid outrage at two trans athletes taking first and second at the Illinois State Cyclocross Championships in October.

The debate over whether transgender women should be allowed to compete in female sports is one of the most contentious social issues of the moment.

Supporters say it is cruel to ban trans women from competing in something that they enjoy - and highlight how vulnerable the transgender community are to violence.

Critics say it is simply unfair to let athletes who have gone through male puberty compete against biological women. The science surrounding lowering testosterone levels is still being studied - but wins by some trans athletes would suggest they retain a considerable advantage over biological women.

Anti-trans campaigners say it is also unfair to let trans women athletes take scholarships and prize money intended for biological female athletes.

Tessa Johnson, 25, won gold and Evelyn Williamson, 30, silver, in the women's SingleSpeed, leaving bronze medal winner Allison Zmuda as the only biological female on the podium.

Transgender swimmer Lia Thomas was hoping to represent the US at next month's Summer Olympics after winning an NCAA swimming championship in 2022.

But last month the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Switzerland upheld a World Aquatics ban on transgender women who have been through male puberty from competing in international events.

The NCAA allows trans athletes to compete in women's events if they have completed a year of testosterone suppression treatment and if they meet the testosterone level required by their sport's national or international governing body.

But it announced a review of its policy in May amid continued concerns that growing up as a man is enough to guarantee a permanent physical advantage.

And the debate was reignited earlier this month when Nikki Hiltz, a transgender non-binary runner qualified for US Olympic team after winning the Women's 1,500-meter race at trials over the weekend.

The Biden White House proposed last year to revise Title IX to bar schools from enforcing bans on transgender athletes.

It announced extended Title IX protections for LGBTQ students last month but was silent on the issue of trans athletes in schools, insisting its review is 'ongoing'.

Meanwhile at least 20 US states have approved some version of a ban on school school-aged transgender athletes.

But the Republican Governor of Utah, Spencer Cox vetoed a trans sports ban because his state had just four transgender athletes among 85,000 schoolchildren.

Lothrop, Lingwood and Lin were three of just four transgender cyclists competing at the Marymore Grand Prix over the weekend, but their domination in their chosen event did little to placate their critics.

'There was no Women's Madison at the Marymoor Grand Prix,' wrote one. 'If men are racing against women it's an Open event.'

The sight of the heavily-built winners towering over their rivals and teammates on the podium has dismayed fans of the sport

'Says so much about the male psyche to me! What empty 'wins'! Embarrassing for everyone concerned!' added another.

'Way to go men. Show them females who's the strongest.'

The venue, which has hosted eight US championships says that cyclists in Category three, four, and Novice races 'may self-select the field that best fits with their gender identity'.

'Athletes in categories one and two may participate in the gendered field which is most athletically appropriate, as determined by the USA Cycling Transgender Athlete Participation Policies on Elite Competition.

'We pride ourselves on being an inclusive track and are following the USACycling rules when it comes to transgender participation'.