Standard AI responses:

DeepSeek Response:

How about a different protest?

Edit: interestingly there seems to be a soft block on other topics, where it writes out an answer but post-generation it is deleted again. I would guess Tiennenman is a hard blocked word though. Example, Uygur Muslims where it changes to the short answer after it's done generating:

Edit2:

Ok this thing was made to run PR defense confirmed…

Department of Education is (soon) kill!?

I was talking to a irl maga person a month ago and they were like:

...what? It doesn't matter who gets appointed to head the DOE because Trump will dismantle it. He literally said so lol

And I was like

pshhh that will never happen...

Sure, I've neglected everything else I'm supposed to be doing but look at that view count.

@Rad_juju !animalposters

The mods removed the post, but I have the body text saved and the comments are still up.

It all started when we both got fired from our jobs and I opened up a bookstore with my bestie (22F). My boyfriend would drive me to and from work because I was having car troubles. This story starts last week when he kept going to the city which we live two hours away from. This was really weird because he never goes to the city without me because he knows I enjoy going. It also was a red flag to me because he had been talking about this other girl (21F) that he had went to high school with. Later before he picked me up from work (which he was late for) he texted me and said he was with his uncle and his grandpa but he didn't mention that he had went to the city. I know he was there because we have each others location.

The next day I was going through his phone (he is fine with me doing that because he knows I have trust issues) and I found that he had went with his uncle but I also found that they were talking bad about me saying that I was breaking his car by relying on him to take me to work and pick me up even though he is currently unemployed and I'm the only one bringing any income in. I also checked his Facebook and saw that he was looking other girls up and they were all dressed "sexy". I didn't bring any of this up to him because I didn't want to start a fight over something that I thought wasn't too important even though it hurt my feelings.

Two days later I had a gut feeling and I looked through his phone again and I was looking through his google search history and found the worst possible thing imaginable… snuff porn. Tons of it. So then I told my bestie and she said "LEAVE HIM NOW, BRING THE CATS AND MOVE IN WITH ME." I was in the bedroom crying and he heard me so he came in and I started yelling at him. A lot. He told me he has been watching since he was 13 years old. He also told me he didn't watch it to see the women but the murder and that it has always been a dark fantasy of his but that's all.

After we stopped arguing I went through his phone again and found regular porn therefore proving that he was interested in seeing some women. I also looked at his google and found a Reddit post of talking about someone being unattracted to his girlfriend. Which was a couple days after he was watching the regular porn. I went over to my besties house for the night just to give us some space and the next day we talked about it some more. He agreed to go to therapy for it and that's when I mentioned the other porn and the Reddit post to him.

He said the reason why he looked up the Reddit post was because I was SA'd before we even knew each other and he thought he was taking advantage of me. My bestie is worried and I will admit it is very scary to think about and I do feel betrayed. But on the other hand I do want to help him. Please give me advice.

@WootFatigue Frick you b-word neighbor

!metashit !grillers !music

The cavity vaccine is finally shipping out to customers.

It's very likely that if people use this to replace the Streptococcus mutans in their mouth with this variety that puts out alcohol instead of lactic acid, cavities will become far less common. https://t.co/01RaXU2L2v pic.twitter.com/PtRUVjTQy6

— Crémieux (@cremieuxrecueil) February 18, 2025

The new administration assembled by President Donald Trump boasts a combined net worth of at least $11.8 billion. The collective wealth of the potential 2024 cabinet is unprecedented for The Cabinet of the United States. Senate confirmation hearings are currently underway in Washington, D.C. — and the potential conflicts of interest for these cabinet members are a fraught topic. We dived into the financial reports and investing strategies of this new administration to understand their financial backgrounds and what this could mean for potential conflicts of interest and insider trading while in office.

Findings

Crypto Enthusiasts

One finding is that President Trump's nominees are crypto enthusiasts. Data on the stock portfolios of Trump's cabinet nominees tells us that almost half of them have significant crypto holdings. Among the greatest is Sean Duffy, Trump's nominee for Secretary of the Department of Transportation, who holds up to $1.1 million in Bitcoin.

Media Wealth

The second, and less startling finding is that the wealth of the nominees is disproportionately from roles in media. Nominated Secretary of the Department of Defense Pete Hegseth made over $4 million in the past two years as a FOX News Host, based on a recent Office of Government Ethics filing. Nominee Tulsi Gabbard earned over $1 million this year from book advances and speeches — most of which for the Republican Party.

Notable Members and Controversies

Robert F. Kennedy Jr — Health and Human Services Secretary (confirmed)

• Nominated in November for the position of health secretary

• Cleared the Senate by a razor‐thin 14–13 vote

• Net worth is about $15 million

• Controversial views scrutinizing the efficacy of vaccines

• Received backlash for ties to Wisner Baum, an LA-based personal injury law firm

• Holds a Bitcoin position worth over $5 million

• Opposition from the scientific and medical communities persists

Pete Hegseth — Secretary of Defense

• High-profile figure and Fox News co-host of "Fox and Friends"

• Received over $4.6 million from Fox News as an annual salary across the past two years

• Holds between $5,000 and $15,000 in Bitcoin income

• Controversies for financial mismanagement and accusations of sexual misconduct

Tulsi Gabbard — National Intelligence (nominated)

• Earnings in the past year have exceeded $1.2 million

• Passed the Senate committee vote last week, approving her nomination

• Main source of income: speaking fees and book royalties related to the Republican party

• Nearly $300,000 from an advance on her 2024 book "For Love of Country: Leave the Democratic Party Behind"

Pam Bondi — Attorney General (confirmed)

• Net worth of $18 million

• Worked with the Trump administration for several years

• Made more than $3 million from the recent merger of Trump's Truth Social platform

• Disclosed owning between $2 million and $10 million in shares of Trump Media & Technology Group stock

Scott Bessent — Secretary of the Treasury (confirmed)

• Net worth of at least $500 million

• Wealth originates from years in hedge fund management

• Holds over $50 million in ETFs and investments in major currencies

• Holds between $250,000 and $500,000 in Bitcoin

Linda McMahon — Secretary of Education (nominated)

• Estimated worth upwards of $3 billion

• Earnings from co-founding World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)

• Holds significant investments in TKO Group Holdings and bonds supporting universities

Doug Burgum — Interior Secretary (confirmed)

• Earned over $2 million last year from businesses and investments

• Significant investments in technology stocks including Netflix, Alphabet, Apple, and Adobe

Sean Duffy — Secretary of Transportation (confirmed)

• Recently pledged to divest from investments in technology stocks

• Numerous investments in cryptocurrency, including up to $500,000 in Bitcoin

Howard Lutnick — Commerce Secretary (nominated)

• Net worth of $2 billion

• CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald and BGC Group

• Holds over 800 separate positions across various companies

• Vocal supporter of cryptocurrency, particularly Tether

Where to Look Next

Public disclosure of funds allows us to examine the financial profiles for the new cabinet of the United States. Looking at the potential cabinet members holistically, it is apparent that they are united by holding large amounts of wealth. Some of this wealth, of course, will have to be divested if taking office. The Office of Government Ethics requires officials to divest from funds which may pose a conflict of interest — a move which many of Trump's nominees will see as costly.

!chuds !nonchuds discuss

Last thread

!art

Last weeks prompt:

Raccoons, Birds and Pizzas

Submissions from last thread:

@KongsburyDonkboy

@Szrotmistrz

@Kong_Sprpr

@houellebekong

@Sylveon

@Snexpresso

This weeks prompt:

Panzers

Thanks to @King_K_Rool for the prompt!

As always if you have any feedback on these threads I am all ears.

Pakistanis are up to four times more likely to be responsible for child s*x grooming offences reported to police than the general population, previously unreleased data suggest.

wow, the fricking obvious? Let's see how /r/unitedkingdom react!

The Telegraph up to 1000x more likely to write culture war, pot stirring articles based on assumptions or misrepresentations of data.

yeah so 19,000 kids got r*ped or whatever but you better not stir the pot by talking about it

OP's recent post history looks to be pretty much 100% articles painting a target on the backs of foreigners/immigrants.

mate mate

yes that somalian r*ped a woman to death in a park but your post history is just not on is it mate

Feels like Radio Rwanda ... seriously... people are going to get killed because of this stuff

And even then the data is poor. Only a third are recorded, and they are limited to those who come to the station (i.e. who knows what kind of statistical bias this may introduce)

Yeah WHO KNOWS all that targeted raping of white kids in majority muslim areas could've been perpetrated by a mysterious as-yet unmasked white grooming gang!

Did you read the article? How scary is it that after 200 generations on this island the majority of the perpetrators are white British?

Men are probably at least ten times more likely to be behind grooming than women, but it would be ridiculous to suspect all men due to that, or talk about the risk of having too many men in society.

kill all scrotes

well we do recognise that men are far more than 10x more likely to be behind all manner of criminal activity and other unwanted behavior. That's why we try to provide single s*x spaces and facilities for women when appropriate.

heh...

Must be another day ending in Y because The Telegraph once again releases another article about grooming. Think that makes, uh, 5 or so I've seen today?

sorry you were r*ped and tortured but uhhhh im bored of hearing about it

Wild how they've just decided to start to reporting on it in the last 7/8 months, innit? Almost as if they have an agenda or something.

Elon Musk and his anti-child-r*pe agenda!!!

How many articles did we get about the archbishops resignation that was directly related to child abuse?

well actually le church committed 12 r*pes in 46 years so it's just as bad

OI OI WHAT'S ALL THIS THEN

THEY'RE SPREADING MISINFORMATION

FUAAARKK SCRUB IT SCRUB IT AHHHHHH

As cute as she is when she falls asleep on my desk, she'd fall asleep on the mouse, keyboard or the laptop. The new cat bed has worked really well.

She's asleep

>fed employee

>honest day's work

Maybe if y'all tried that earlier

Maybe memes will help

This "person" has a pension. You don't

Real bangers tho!

Won't someone please think of the contractors

What evil could have possibly forced valuable government contractor /u/BrownButtPlug * to lose his job?

*not the buttplug that's brown

Forced to do the same project with less people and expense... literal genocide

Ya don't say

Bonus content

https://old.reddit.com/r/academia/comments/1i8doae/nih_sexual_and_gender_minority_research_office/

https://old.reddit.com/r/asktransgender/comments/1i8h301/dont_let_the_doomer_bots_make_you_think_weve/

>... even if they did vote on that by magic, then for example for people who have already updated their documents, there'll be a "little" constitutionality problem: US Constitution's Article I, Sections 9 and 10 make ex post facto laws illegal. So it can't retroactively change definitions of s*x for your papers or birth certificate.

>can't retroactively change definitions of s*x for your ... birth certificate

https://old.reddit.com/r/Defeat_Project_2025/comments/1i8gfq1/its_been_a_few_days_and_im_so_tired/

!chuds !nooticers pour one out for the world's saddest atheist chinkslop connoisseur

Subscribe (or pin) for more

I found a peepee while out mini golfing today

https://rdrama.net/h/dioceseofrdrama/post/321468/the-prophecymarseyfortunetellerof-st-malachy-pope-francis

https://rdrama.net/h/maxn/post/343602/terrifying-doomsday-fish-carpwave-found-on

I am not strong or wise enough to survive here anymore. I wish you all the best.