Refreshers

Emília Pérez actor ousted as a chudette called out fentanyl Floyd and Muzzies

I will genuinely never understand what these people see in Emilia Perez, it's shocking how many awards it's winning

Hollywood wants to pat itself on the back for making a movie about a transgender character.

I can't even find anyone who likes it. With Green Book or Crash, I get it. I knew lots of people who liked those movies even if they didn't think they were awards contenders. Only 3 movies have ever had more noms than Emelia Perez. Genuinely wild.

I can find 100s of comments on reddit alone praising the movie before the CHUD reveal

Voting closed prior to the recent drama surrounding Emilia Pérez, so that's something to consider. However, the movie is a piece of trash to begin with and the director is a turd bag to boot

It's a dogshit movie made by a director who's almost as much of a shit person as the lead actress herself, and I kinda hate that going forward, the only reason it won't be awarded as much as it is now is bc of KSG's antics—bc it deserves zero awards for its quality alone.

It's so bad. I had unfortunately heard the complaints before I went to watch it, but went in with an open mind. The thing that makes me the angriest is that by all surface metrics I should like a film like this. I have a number of close friends who are trans and who I've been close to during their various transitions. Been a person who was there for them as they dealt with their families falling apart. I'm straight and cis but this is near and dear to me.

But the film is just terrible. I couldn't find any empathy for the characters. Maybe it's the flat acting by some normally amazing people. There's no character building. The songs are also flat, both in expressiveness and tonality. I speak pretty decent Spanish so it wasn't a language barrier. I knew what they were saying for 90% of it and had subtitles for the rest. The melodies, if you can call them that, seem low effort. The lyrics in a few of the songs had me laughing at how inane they were, and I'm not talking about the Thai s*x clinic song that everyone rightfully ridicules. Musicals are known for silly songs but that's on purpose. This is trying to take itself seriously. The cinematography is questionable. I was amazed to see it was nominated for that. It's just uncreative and again, flat. Boring. Not groundbreaking. Not even mildly interesting.

And even with all of that, it could still be salvageable. But you have an old French cis dude writing in Spanish about Mexican trans people?! And then directing it? What is this insanity? I could go on but it's a kick in the face that I (and many others including many in the LGBT+ community) now get to be the buttholes who are saying this apparent masterpiece doesn't deserve any of these nominations. So yeah frick the Academy for their gratuitous self congratulatory bullshit. These are some of the same people who think Roman Polanski did nothing wrong. Frick em.

Emilia still won a lot is interesting. Either votes have been locked for months now or the Hollywood inner circle dont care for the discourse. Wonder how Oscar will do though

Voting closed prior to the drama

I guess the Oscar Jannies LOCKED the thread

Whatever this guy is smoking I will NOT have it

I'm not a fan of the film either, but we just can't ignore that apparently a lot of people see quality in this film and it extends outside the Academy. It's a polarizing movie, with great disparity in the Rotten tomatoes score (72% vs 17% lol) and even though I feel like it's a weird mess, a lot of people find something greatly enjoyable about the film.

For instance, at the Toronto International Film Festival. It has around 480.000 attendees. Regular movie goers. They're not millionaires or Academy members. Of all the films on the program they can vote for the ones they love the most, the People's Choice Award, they voted for Emilia Perez. And it got the runner-up prize there.

The Cannes jury (listed below) awarded it as well, even consisting of J.A. Bayona who speaks Spanish.

• Greta Gerwig, American actress and filmmaker – Jury President

• J. A. Bayona, Spanish filmmaker

• Ebru Ceylan, Turkish actress and screenwriter

• Pierfrancesco Favino, Italian actor and producer

• Lily Gladstone, American actress

• Eva Green, French actress

• Hirokazu Kore-eda, Japanese filmmaker and producer

• Nadine Labaki, Lebanese actress and filmmaker

• Omar Sy, French actor

People keep mentioning the 13 Oscar nominations. Well, it got 15(!) BAFTA nominations. The British Academy consists of over 13000 people.

Denis Villeneuve called it one of the best movies of the year.

"I really loved Jacques Audiard's Emilia Perez. I thought that it was very original and inspiring. Jacques Audiard's movies always give me a boost of energy, he's one of our best filmmakers."

Dune 2 director Denis Villeneuve reveals his favorite films of 2024, from a divisive Netflix musical to Daniel Craig's latest feature

James Cameron loved it.

"What I saw that blew me away was Emilia Pérez. I have seen it three times now. It's just not like any other film that's ever been made, you know? I mean, I think it's bold, it's daring, it's a vision. It's beautifully executed. It's a beautiful piece of filmmaking."

'I Have Seen It 3 Times': James Cameron Gives High Praise to Controversial Netflix Hit

I am equally baffled by it. I can understand some of the praise of it. I gave it a 5/10, but it's nowhere near my top spots in any categories, but we can't just stick to the Reddit sphere and ignore that there is incredible passion for the film.

If Emilia Pérez wins any Oscars, the Academy is a farce.

really neighbor, only now you say this? because of the CHUDening ?

Emilia Perez won Best Foreign Language Film here, it's sending me. "'Emilia Pérez,' its beleaguered star Karla Sofia Gascon not present (as she is not expected to be for the rest of awards season), won Best Foreign Language Film, Best Song (for 'El Mal'), and Best Supporting Actress for Zoe Saldaña." So the "most prizes" isn't too egregious for Emilia Perez considering it's those, only three, awards.

Its winning of Best Foreign Language Film is such an irony when the film has been widely panned for stereotyping Mexico, its actors' poor accents, the inaccurate contexts of its dialogues, and made by a director who doesnt speak the language and apparently said Spanish is a language of poor countries (paraphrased) in an interview.

!kino !chuds if anything Hollywood should start casting redditors because they are so good at acting as if this is was their opinion all along

he's not a Kiwi Farmer per se, he tried to shake down KF, and then cussed them out when they wouldn't pay out and/or when they doxxed him. bsky.app/profile/lizt...

— Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) (@lizthegrey.com) 2025-02-08T03:47:58.452Z

A leaked draft of the list of plans by the European Commission shows that the Commission wants to follow a new approach to introduce "hate crime" as a felony in the entire EU. There have been several attempts since 2021.

Already during her first term as Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen wanted to declare "hate crime" a EU felony.

The magazine Euractiv recently published a draft of the list of all initiatives that the European Commission wants to implement this year. On Tuesday, February 11th, the final list is to be presented by Ursula von der Leyen to the members of the European Parliament. The European Commission president wants to tackle another initiative so that "hate speech" is recognized as a felony in all of the European Union.

Already in 2021, during her first term as Commission president, the Commission presented a corresponding legal initiative. The parliament agreed to the initiative, but there was no agreement in the Council of the European Union. Because "hate crime" can only be introduced as a EU-wide felony if all member states agree. In November 2023, members of the European Parliament demanded again that the initiative shall be followed on.

Crimes need to meet certain requirements in order to be considered "EU crimes". These requirements are stipulated in Article 83 Paragraph 1 on the work of the European Union. The crimes must be cross-border, the acts must be categorized as "particularly severe crime", and there must not be an alternative to the expansion of EU crime status to get the crime under control. So far, among EU felonies are human trafficking, terrorism, and money laundering. "Hate speech" allegedly is cross-border not only because of the Internet, but also because media such as newspapers are able to distribute content far and wide.

So far, at the level of the European Union, discrimination on the basis of skin color, religion, or s*x is punishable. The European Commission argues that the introduction of a felony "hate crime" is necessary because hate not only harms the individual victim, but "also society at large", as the legal initiative from 2021 says. "Hate undermines the very foundations of our society. It weakens mutual understanding and respect for diversity on which pluralistic and democratic societies are built", it continues.

When "hate crime" is fundamentally recognized as a felony in the European Union, then, in a second step, the Commission together with the Parliament and the Council of the European Union, in the scope of the regular legislative procedure, can set concrete characteristics of the felony "hate crime". Also, the three institutions can then decree minimum regulations that are then valid in all member states.

Currently, in EU law, there is no definition of hate speech and hate crime. On the definition of the term "hate speech", the Commission refers to a recommendation by the European Council from 1997, in which it states that hate speech is the incitement of hate because of certain protected characteristics like religion or s*x. The term "hate crime" is being defined in a recommendation by the European Commission in 2015 as "advocacy, promotion or incitement, in any form, of the denigration, hatred or vilification of a person or group of persons." A "negative stereotyping" is also seen as "hate crime". In that, it is about characteristics like an alleged social gender identity, age, origin, s*x, or religion.

Based on these two documents, the Commission speaks of "hate crime" being any crime with a motive based on prejudices. Specifically, the initiative from 2021 says: "For both hate speech and hate crime, it is the bias motivation that triggers the perpetrator's action." Furthermore: "These are 'identity' or 'message' acts, as the messages conveyed - notably that the targeted victims do not belong to that society - are addressed not only to the victim, but also to their community or group."

Accordingly, the motivation of the perpetrator is crucial for the felony. In addition, the text says that "hate crime" and hate speech "undermine the foundations of the EU". The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) decided in 2006 that it could be necessary for "democratic societies to sanction or even prevent all forms of expression which spread, incite, promote or justify hatred based on intolerance".

The right to freedom of speech does not protect against law enforcement reactions to hate speech, the ECtHR says. The legal initiative from 2021 also refers to the concept of a "ladder of harm" or "pyramid of hate", according to which hate not only leads to discrimination or insults, but also "bias motivated violence" like r*pe, murder, or genocide. As an example, they refer to a study according to which hate-filled tweets lead to an increase of hate crime in a city.

!nooticers

https://x.com/dailysnoopys/

https://archive.ph/GnorX

Make a killing in these polymarket bets, AfD sweep is going at 19% (16+3) and 7% respectively

https://polymarket.com/event/afd-of-vote-in-german-election?tid=1739022455327

https://polymarket.com/event/germany-parliamentary-election

This post proudly sponsored by

!chuds !hawktuah !dramatards

I used to go on college humor when I was a kid but fell off when I was a teen like most of the people here. I just tried to find the website and couldnt. Apparently theyve rebranded based on their youtube page.

So i went to the new website and what do you know? Its like every other media slop around now. Lets get into their original programing

Dungeons and drag queens which looks like understudies for ru pauls

Make some noise which is described as "A game show where talented contestants compete to bring to life silly prompts." Chat GPT 2 could have come up with a more passionate show description

um actually which is "Introducing a game show of fandom minutiae one-upmanship, where nerds do what nerds do best: flaunt encyclopedic nerd knowledge at Millennium Falcon nerd-speed." again the description makes me viscerally cringe

and

Adventuring party which appears to be just the view but with the same D list drag queens

Just another example of shit I used to like ing out for an ever shrinking audience and straddling bankruptcy.

Seven authors have pulled out of the competition, citing free speech concerns.

Cancel culture—the practice of ruining someone's career for not sufficiently adhering to Leftist principles—appears to be dying after decades of victimizing innocent people. In what seems to be the first attempted cancelation of the new Trump administration, Self-Published Science Fiction Competition (SPSFC) announced on Wednesday that it was removing author Devon Eriksen's book from consideration for an award. The SPSFC said that it made the decision because Eriksen violated the competition's code of conduct—which had been published to X the day before this announcement.

SPSFC Twitter "We apologize for the extended delay and radio silence. Devon Eriksen has been removed from the SPSFC effective immediately for violation of our code of conduct," the SPSFC posted on X.

We apologize for the extended delay and radio silence. Devon Eriksen has been removed from the SPSFC effective immediately for violation of our code of conduct.

— The Self-Published Science Fiction Competition (@theSPSFC) February 4, 2025

Eriksen is the author of "Theft of Fire: Orbital Space #1," a popular self-published book that has received glowing reviews, including one from the creator of Doom. He didn't even enter the book into the competition; his wife did, thinking she might surprise him if he won. After seeing that he had been booted from the competition, he published a fictional account of learning that he had been entered into a competition without his knowledge and had somehow violated that competition's code of conduct, which he never agreed to.

I was walking down the sidewalk the other day, relishing how warm weather comes early in Tennessee, when a weird little goblin with big eyes and floppy green ears jumped out of the bushes in front of me.

"You're banned from the competition!" he proclaimed, with a self-satisfied… https://t.co/lRyhWclpXh pic.twitter.com/sgya1ote7I

— Devon Eriksen (@Devon_Eriksen_) February 4, 2025

That code of conduct stated that contestants could not harass judges or other authors, which Devon didn't do—and couldn't do—since he didn't even know he was entered. But one of the judges posted on Bluesky, in a message provided to The Daily Wire, that even though Eriksen "didn't directly contact judges or other authors," his posts were "driving away judges, authors, and prospective contestants/members in huge numbers."

The SPSFC competition has been around for a few years and is currently in its fourth iteration. Nearly 200 books from independent authors are submitted and divided among various reviewers, each reviewing around 30 books. Each group then selects around four books as quarterfinalists, reads those four books, and selects two semi-finalists. Eventually, the list is narrowed down, and a winner is selected. There is no cash prize, but it allows the authors to collect reviews and publicity.

According to Christine, Eriksen's book had been selected as a quarterfinalist and was the only author to receive a "strong yes" in his batch. After dozens of authors had been cut, at least one began complaining about Eriksen's inclusion in the competition based on his numerous blog posts and tweets, which contain comments about immigration and transgenderism that frequently offend the Left. Dozens of people on Bluesky and the SPSFC groomercord started calling Eriksen a "nazi" for his posts and published some screenshots of them on Reddit along with a summary of the situation at the SPSFC. Following the prolonged outcry, the SPSFC put together a code of conduct and then used it to boot Eriksen from the competition.

But the code of conduct claims that its "goal is not to eradicate these 'bad' opinions" and that they are "not here to police people's opinions," they do just that after claiming Eriksen's posts amount to "hate speech" and "backwards attitudes."

Eriksen was not the only author targeted. E.J. Fisch, author of "Dakiti: Ziva Payvan Book 1," who wasn't even part of the SPSFC competition, spoke out against the handling of Eriksen and quickly saw her book dropped out of a promotion that is reportedly being run by one of the authors involved in the mob against Eriksen.

lol welp pic.twitter.com/2FBwiZgQFP

— EJ Fisch (@EJFisch) February 6, 2025

The announcement that Eriksen was booted from the competition was met with immediate backlash, with many other authors pulling their books from the competition. Moe Lane, whose book "Ghosts of an Alien Wind" was in the competition, asked the organizers to remove his book from consideration, though his reasoning is unclear. His announcement was posted on the Groomercord for the competition and was shared with The Daily Wire.

Other authors were more explicit about why they asked for their books to be removed from the competition. Gregory Michael, author of "Chloe's Kingdom," asked for his book to be removed because "free speech is crucial."

Removal of @Devon_Eriksen_ over politics is upsetting. Theft of Fire was likely the best book in the competition … I don’t agree with everything Devon tweets, but free speech is crucial. Please remove Chloe’s Kingdom @theSPSFC

Heist novels need to stick together 🚀💰 https://t.co/kVnKpMeJ6R

— Gregory Michael (@_GregoryMichael) February 4, 2025

G.S. Jennsen, author of "The Thief," posted a lengthy letter on X outlining why she wanted her book removed from the competition as well.

In light of recent events, I am withdrawing THE THIEF, which is currently a Quarterfinalist in @theSPSFC , from further consideration in the competition. More below.#SPSFC https://t.co/Hm1NEXTwPl pic.twitter.com/qMtYUjgHwq

— G. S. Jennsen (@GSJennsen) February 5, 2025

C.R. Walton, author of "Wilderness Five," also noted that Eriksen's removal had nothing to do with his actions relating to the competition, writing that the decision to drop him was "very clearly just caving to a hateful mob that hates the guy."

As some other authors, I'm distancing myself from @theSPSFC for its aggressive termination of @Devon_Eriksen_ for thoughts expressed on his own media channels completely unrelated to the competition.

No specifics of the violation are even given. It is very clearly just caving… https://t.co/XZkeHlzzup

— C. R. Walton (Scientist & Author) (@lithologuy) February 5, 2025

Zachary Forbes requested his book, "Slipspace: Terra Nullius" be removed from the competition as well, also writing a lengthy X post about how the SPSFC's recently introduced code of conduct "was done hastily and sloppily, left intentionally vague, for the sole purpose of banning one particular contestant."

Personal announcement in regards to SPSFC

The left image below is an objective analysis of the their new ‘code of conduct’, written 2 (two) days ago…

It’s clear from any lens that this was done hastily and sloppily, left intentionally vague, for the sole purpose of banning one… https://t.co/pF7NVucixb pic.twitter.com/vnnbY3hDfV

— Zach Forbes (@ZachForbesBro) February 5, 2025

Steve Gavin also requested his book "Cosmic Strife Assault" be removed from competition, writing a short post on X calling the situation involving Eriksen a "mess."

Thank you to the @theSPSFC judges and reviewers. I have watched the mess from afar and the disqual of @Devon_Eriksen_ and the CoC. This is not a political statement. Please remove my book from consideration in this contest. I wish everyone else the best of luck. pic.twitter.com/Bcf6zj8T6j

— Steve Gavin (@stevegavin09) February 5, 2025

Grace Walker publicly distanced herself from the SPSFC, seeking to have her book, "ASH (Rogues: Legends Book 1)," removed from the competition as well.

https://x.com/gwalkerauthor/status/1622877587983173632

Danielle Ste. Just also cut ties with the SPSFC, although her book, "The Disk Mirror Solution (Galaxia Mortem Book 1)," had already been cut from the competition.

Watching the #SPSFC controversy over the past couple days has been disheartening.

As a science fiction author, I want to concentrate on writing science fiction people will fall in love with, not on passing a purity test whose requirements are only known to the gatekeepers.
1/4

— Danielle Ste. Just (@DanielleSteJust) February 6, 2025

Haldane B. Doyle, author of "Our Vitreous Womb," announced he was also withdrawing from the competition, thanking the volunteer judges but saying he only wants "to participate in indie sci fi competitions that judge the books and not the authors, regardless of the criteria applied."

I am officially withdrawing "Our Vitreous Womb" from the #SPSFC competition. I'm deeply appreciative of the volunteer judges @theSPSFC , but I only want to participate in indie sci fi competitions that judge the books and not the authors, regardless of the criteria applied.

— zeroinputagriculture (@zeroinputag) February 6, 2025

Even one of the competition's judging teams decided to pull out of the competition—not because they agreed with what Eriksen had said—but because of how SPSFC handled the situation. The eight authors—other than Ste. Just—who have so far withdrawn from the competition were quarterfinalists, meaning they had already advanced over about 30 other competitors in each of their respective judging groups.

Eric Kay, author of "Above Dark Waters," wrote on X that his book had already been cut, but questioned why the people behind the competition couldn't just cut Eriksen and write a nice review for his book, as they had done for Kay's book.

I was in the competition and was already cut. Why couldn't they simply cut Devon at the Quarterfinals and write a nice review like below?

Because they wanted to make an example and keep purity and 'do something' above sense. pic.twitter.com/Nl1XjTathb

— Eric Kay (Hard Sci-Fi) (@Eric_K_PNW) February 7, 2025

The idea that fellow competitors would drop out of a competition in solidarity with one of their own is almost unheard of when it comes to these types of cancelations and shows the ideology of "cancel culture" may no longer be tolerated. Christine Eriksen wrote on X that "cancelations are canceled" and pointed out that her husband's book has had one of its best sales days to date.

Cancelations are ✨C A N C E L E D✨

A big thank you to everyone who's shown support for @Devon_Eriksen_'s unfair treatment in this. I was excited to submit Theft of Fire to a fun little competition, but when they created a CoC explicity to appease a mob and kick him out? 😭 https://t.co/jp57ZK5lMw pic.twitter.com/QIg4uANEXD

— Christine Eriksen (@AnEriksenWife) February 5, 2025

Other authors who dropped out of the competition said they had seen an increase in sales. Michael, who was the first to withdraw from the competition, noted that "Chloe's Kingdom" was now #1 on Amazon, "not from winning a competition – but for standing up for free speech. Doing the right thing feels good."

CHLOE'S KINGDOM is #1 on Amazon! 🚀 Not from winning a competition—but for standing up for free speech. Doing the right thing feels good.

To my new readers, I can't wait for your thoughts & reviews! Oh, and did I mention there’s a raccoon? 🦝 pic.twitter.com/SPS0YGhdjw

— Gregory Michael (@_GregoryMichael) February 6, 2025

In a post shared with The Daily Wire, John A. Douglas, author of "The Black Crown," commented that the SPSFC doesn't "fully understand the schism kicking Devon out has caused in the indie author spaces." "DevonGate is a seismic shift in the indie landscape," Douglas added. "And he didn't even DO anything!"

If you’re thinking of running for office, I’d love to chat with you.

Check out three months of data—@AntiWuCoalition delivers real engagement, not just impressions. Unlike traditional digital ads that get ignored, my audience actively engages.

Spend your political ad budget… pic.twitter.com/6MAixhUzex

— Bostonians Against Mayor Wu (@AntiWuCoalition) February 8, 2025

!metashit

If you're thinking of running for office, I'd love to chat with you.

Check out three months of data—@AntiWuCoalition delivers real engagement, not just impressions. Unlike traditional digital ads that get ignored, my audience actively engages.

Spend your political ad budget wisely—reach out with what you need, and let's get your message seen, shared, and talked about.

This is how Kamala can still win!

4 pm EST is so far away

hi everyone! We @electiontruth.bsky.social have final video, smoking gun that proves it was a coup d'etat not an election in November 2024. We will give 3 or 4 news outlets scoop to help us get this video at 4pm EDT today. @bloomberg.com @newsweek.com @rolandsmartin.bsky.social are our 1st choices

— Kirstin Elaine Martin (@kirstinelaine.bsky.social) 2025-02-08T10:11:46.666Z

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/496871376

Hunter Biden reportedly 'commandeered' the White House after Biden's disastrous debate with Trump:
Lindy Li: "After the debate, Hunter basically commandeered the White House. He sat in on all of the White House top level meetings. We had a former cocaine addict sitting in on the… pic.twitter.com/yO2GBRVZyk

— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) February 7, 2025

Hunter Biden reportedly 'commandeered' the White House after Biden's disastrous debate with Trump:

Lindy Li: "After the debate, Hunter basically commandeered the White House. He sat in on all of the White House top level meetings. We had a former cocaine addict sitting in on the most sensitive meetings of the most consequential and most important government in world history. Does that sit right with you?"

Shawn Ryan: "No."

Li: "Without security clearance mind you. That's basically who was running the show.

Hunter basically batten down the hatches after the debate to make sure his father would only receive intel he pre-approved."

The Biden administration makes a lot more sense if you view it through the prism of 'The brains of the operation was on crack'

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbgwibh/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbhna45/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbgubic/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbguo0l/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbgz1rz/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbgxdkt/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbhswa6/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbgve6g/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbgxrvt/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbh4g6a/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbk585v/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbh8j70/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbgtmvn/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ijtoul/gen_z_at_the_antitrump_protest_in_la/mbgup6u/?context=8

Top Drama

Relative Drama (takes into account the size of the subreddit)

autodrama: returning jobs to dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ikgrjw/this_happened_2_months_ago_did_anything_change/mbmhylp/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ikgrjw/this_happened_2_months_ago_did_anything_change/mbmasbi/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ikgrjw/this_happened_2_months_ago_did_anything_change/mbmf0pb/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ikgrjw/this_happened_2_months_ago_did_anything_change/mbma55h/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ikgrjw/this_happened_2_months_ago_did_anything_change/mbmbiud/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ikgrjw/this_happened_2_months_ago_did_anything_change/mbmg38m/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1ikgrjw/this_happened_2_months_ago_did_anything_change/mbmdb6m/?context=8

What color will the gatorade shower be?

Enter BetGreen/Yellow - 13 bets

Enter BetPurple - 5 bets

Enter BetOrange - 6 bets

Enter BetRed/Pink - 9 bets

Enter BetBlue - 20 bets

Enter BetClear/Water - 3 bets

Enter BetNo Gatorade Shower - 5 bets

!bets !goomble !goomblers !goombling !goyslopenjoyers

https://polymarket.com/event/gatorade-shower-color-super-box-lix

bottom text

Thоsе соmраníеs аřе STАTЕ соmраníеs sо tо gеt роsítíоn thеřе уоu nееd tо bе еnļístеd bу gоv híghеř uрs

Sоmе mоřе řесеnt nеws аbоut thеm

Аnd thаt соmраnу hаs nо mоnеу tо рау suсh sаļаříеs sínсе thеу dереnd оn Řussíа sо nоw thеу bеíng fuļļу sроnsоřеd bу wеstеřd buxx аnd аřе ín řеd sínсе thеу dоnt gеt Řussíаn сhеареř řеsоuřсеs

Thеу аřе buуíng nоn еxístеn gаs thеn sауíng оh nо Řussíаn dеstřоуеd ít

Í wоnt bе suřрřísеd íf thеу рау Řussíаn tо bļоw uр sоmе gаs řеfínеřу tо соvеř thе еvídеnсе

Thаts whу zеļеnskуу dеsрítе Třumр аskеd tо fосus оn реасе tаļk, zеļеnskуу dоеs еvеřуthíng tо břеаk ít

pic.twitter.com/d4NBVY7LMa

— Pirat_Nation 🔴 (@Pirat_Nation) February 7, 2025

GOOD MORNING R-SLURS

— ye (@kanyewest) February 7, 2025

Ιf wе dоnt соunt sub 50B аíd ít shоuļd bе 440B mínímum

But wíkí stореd uрdаtíng ít

Awesome 😎 pic.twitter.com/DkoZXRROuq

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 8, 2025

Age when they started these companies:

Michael Dell, Dell: 19
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook: 19
Bill Gates, Microsoft: 19
Steve Jobs, Apple: 21
Thomas Burberry, Burberry: 21
Walt Disney, Disney: 22
Paul Allen, Microsoft: 22
Whitney Wolfe, Bumble: 25
Larry Page, Google: 25
Sergey…

— World of Statistics (@stats_feed) February 8, 2025